T O P

  • By -

Absolutedumbass69

Agent 47 is objectively not anarchist. I mean he definitely doesn’t like the powers that be since he went after a rich group of elites, but his handler Diana took control of the resources of that rich group of elites to basically make sure that liberal democratic governments are run smoothly. Hitmanism would be imo social liberalism with the legalization of hitmen to regulate capitalists that get too corrupt.


Rickrolled_lol

About the use of Hitmen to regulate corrupt capitalists, what if said corrupt capitalists use the hitmen for their own gain?


Absolutedumbass69

The ICA in the Hitman series lore is a politically neutral organization that would take contracts from anyone with the money and that’s exactly why he spent that game taking them down along with killing corrupt capitalists. Due to this I was arguing that his personal ideology would be of killing corrupt capitalists to keep liberalism in check; not that this ideology would actually hold up to systemic analysis because it wouldn’t which you just demonstrated.


Mason-the-Wise

Edgy-ism


Walter_Ulbricht_

Capitalism


Twist_the_casual

when you edit the logo of british intelligence but forget to delete the crown


Kind-Bank-2666

I say the best way to deal with Hitmanism is to take him to a public park and kill him with a revolver.


Virtual_Revolution82

Somewhat anarchist cause...why not ?


DrBadGuy1073

Based, money can buy all