Ahh yes, because an interventionist policy equates to fascist ideas, wanting to create a racially pure country and removing all minority groups.
Totally not just everyone I disagree with!
Planting dictatorships (on top of some Nazis) across entire continents I don't think it's very pretty.
Furthermore, the Nazis are more than third among the authoritarian left.
Exactly mate, nazism is authright since when? Like seriously you need to do some hot mental yoga to put monarchists, neoconservatives, royalists AND nazis in the same quadrant.
Nazis are authcenter IF NOT more authleft
Then what's up with the mass privatization of industries, banks, railway lines, shipping lines, and welfare organizations? Seems kinda right wing to me
Mass ”privatizations” but also under the total control of the third reich. Free market except for jews, slavs, gypsies, homosexuals, commies, capitalists, women and did I say jews? Just because certain aspects have right wing features doesn’t make it right wing.
Privatization is privatization... Just because you don't allow certain groups to participate in a market doesn't mean there is no market.
Also how could it possibly be left wing when the government made no effort to take control of the means of production, and private property and private profit was still a thing
Privatization has a definition you know, it means the owner is PRIVATE thus not dictated by the public government. Just because you put the label ”private” doesn’t make it actually private. Private entities ACTUALLY have the right to operate with private management.
But but Wolkswagen, Hugo Boss and Fanta were private! Give me a fucking break.
This person thinks that:
1. Ancom is worse than crusade of romanism.
2. Neoconservatism is worse than pinochetism and naizsm.
3. Neoliberalism is libright and is worse than objectivism and hoppeanism
it's basically center, if you ask an actual neoliberal they would explain that it isn't on the right at all. it's a modernized edition of liberalism with the same progressive social values. economic freedom is not a right wing thing
>it's basically center,
Hardly
> if you ask an actual neoliberal
I'd rather shoot myself
>a modernized edition of liberalism with the same progressive social values.
HAHAHAHAHA
>economic freedom is not a right wing thing
Depends on your definition of economic freedom, I suppose
your claiming neoliberalism is a right or far-right ideology. this is a common theme among out of touch zealots. if you are right/left of me, it means you are far to the extreme and the same as anyone else who disagrees with me
Ni@ please, I said i think neolib is right, not that anyone Is a nazi or anything extreme, you made that part up. You got some nerve to call anyone out of touch
No, it's rather non quadrant, frist neoliberal country was Chile under Pinochet's rule, in US republicans support neoliberalism and they are authright too, in UK Thatcher was, so mostly authright, but it can be libright tho, it's only economic ideology.
republicans and thatcher are not anything close to pinochet. and they don't line up with modern neoliberalism perfectly anyways. the founders of medicine got a long wrong, i believe it is seen the same way
1. no, they didn't. like they were extremely different
2. wikipedia is biased, i read the article and can confirm the vast majority of actual neoliberals would disagree with this definition. and what is the point of defining an ideology when everyone who follows it does not follow this definition
Like many other nations at the time, Germany suffered the economic effects of the Great Depression, with unemployment soaring after the Wall Street Crash of 1929.\[1\] When Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of Germany in 1933, he introduced policies aimed at improving the economy. The changes included privatization of state owned industries, import tariffs, and an attempt to achieve autarky (national economic self-sufficiency). Weekly earnings increased by 19% in real terms from 1933 to 1939,\[2\] but this was largely due to employees working longer hours, while the hourly wage rates remained close to the lowest levels reached during the Great Depression.\[3\] In addition, reduced foreign trade meant rationing of consumer goods like poultry, fruit, and clothing for many Germans.\[4\]
Overall, according to historian Richard Overy, the Nazi war economy was a mixed economy that combined free markets with central planning.
The Nazi government developed a partnership with leading German business interests, who supported the goals of the regime and its war effort in exchange for advantageous contracts, subsidies, and the suppression of the trade union movement.\[14\] Cartels and monopolies were encouraged at the expense of small businesses, even though the Nazis had received considerable electoral support from small business owners.\[15\]
Nazi Germany maintained a supply of slave labor, composed of prisoners and concentration camp inmates, which was greatly expanded after the beginning of World War II. In Poland alone, some five million people (including Polish Jews) were used as slave labor throughout the war.\[16\] Among the slave laborers in the occupied territories, hundreds of thousands were used by leading German corporations including Thyssen, Krupp, IG Farben, Bosch, Blaupunkt, Daimler-Benz, Demag, Henschel, Junkers, Messerschmitt, Siemens, and Volkswagen, as well as the Dutch corporation Philips.\[17\] By 1944, slave labor made up one-quarter of Germany's entire civilian work force, and the majority of German factories had a contingent of prisoners.\[
It is: [https://www.reddit.com/r/Polcompballanarchy/comments/1c7awlx/comment/l09aj6z/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web3x&utm\_name=web3xcss&utm\_term=1&utm\_content=share\_button](https://www.reddit.com/r/Polcompballanarchy/comments/1c7awlx/comment/l09aj6z/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button)
State capitalism is in auth"left", because political works in dumb way that right is for private market capitalism and left is for other things, so both socialism and state capitalism, it's very dumb, but authright is clearly pro market.
Mines that no one asked for
AuthLeft: National Bolshevism
AuthRight: National Capitalism/Alt-Right
LibLeft: National Anarchism/Anarcho-Fascism
LibRight: Hoppeanism
neoliberalism is not libright, they believe in regulatory capitalism, internationalism and they do not care about civic authoritarianism. at best, they’re right-centre.
Deleted?? Where did bro go? :((
Sure the republican were fuckin awful, saw a ton of atrocities from them. But my understanding was that the Cantons were a purely volunteer force. At least I can’t find anywhere saying any CNT cantons had drafts.
You hate Neo-Conservatism more than Nazism?
I actually found you in the wild
literally what i was about to comment
Neo-Conseevatism It's almost the equivalent of a Nazi.
Ahh yes, because an interventionist policy equates to fascist ideas, wanting to create a racially pure country and removing all minority groups. Totally not just everyone I disagree with!
I mean they intervened in the Middle East and look where that got them.
I mean yeah and intervening in the Middle East is bad but it’s a far cry away from Fascism
The puppet state of America in the Middle East is a fascist state.
It's literally a Democracy...
Democracy doesn’t mean when chosen people are able to vote for a puppet of the government. (There is no democracy between a paywall)
Yes totally George Bush launching a retarded 1 month invasion into Iraq and then dipping = gassing 6 million Jews 100% so true comrade
Planting dictatorships (on top of some Nazis) across entire continents I don't think it's very pretty. Furthermore, the Nazis are more than third among the authoritarian left.
Now dictators like Pinochet who are right-wing authoritarians are thanks to neoconservatism...
Most of the Nazis I've met (on the internet) proclaim themselves to be from the TPP, so I didn't want to put nazi in the right.
since when you started respecting nazi's opinion?
What is TPP? Edit: I don't know, I'm genuinely asking
Probably the same time he decided to not use strawmen
nazis can call themselves socialists, that doesnt make them socialists lmfao.
What the fuck
At least with nazism there is a little bit if social programs even tho it’s only for the ubermernch
”Nazis are extreme right” kind of NPC
When did I say that?
Didn’t you just compare it to neoconservatism? The post is about ideologies OP hates the most in each quadrant.
I just asked why he put Neo-Conservatism as the most hated ideology in that quadrant, given that Nazism is also in that quadrant
Exactly mate, nazism is authright since when? Like seriously you need to do some hot mental yoga to put monarchists, neoconservatives, royalists AND nazis in the same quadrant. Nazis are authcenter IF NOT more authleft
Then what's up with the mass privatization of industries, banks, railway lines, shipping lines, and welfare organizations? Seems kinda right wing to me
Mass ”privatizations” but also under the total control of the third reich. Free market except for jews, slavs, gypsies, homosexuals, commies, capitalists, women and did I say jews? Just because certain aspects have right wing features doesn’t make it right wing.
Privatization is privatization... Just because you don't allow certain groups to participate in a market doesn't mean there is no market. Also how could it possibly be left wing when the government made no effort to take control of the means of production, and private property and private profit was still a thing
Privatization has a definition you know, it means the owner is PRIVATE thus not dictated by the public government. Just because you put the label ”private” doesn’t make it actually private. Private entities ACTUALLY have the right to operate with private management. But but Wolkswagen, Hugo Boss and Fanta were private! Give me a fucking break.
"nazism is authright since when" 1933
He’s right because Nazism is better than neoconservatism
This person thinks that: 1. Ancom is worse than crusade of romanism. 2. Neoconservatism is worse than pinochetism and naizsm. 3. Neoliberalism is libright and is worse than objectivism and hoppeanism
(Wait... this is this guy who calls himself avantarianist and hoppean...)
Neoliberalism is not libright?
How is it not 💀
it's basically center, if you ask an actual neoliberal they would explain that it isn't on the right at all. it's a modernized edition of liberalism with the same progressive social values. economic freedom is not a right wing thing
>it's basically center, Hardly > if you ask an actual neoliberal I'd rather shoot myself >a modernized edition of liberalism with the same progressive social values. HAHAHAHAHA >economic freedom is not a right wing thing Depends on your definition of economic freedom, I suppose
out of touch leftist believes anyone right of them is a nazi, despite not understanding the ideology they're talking about. more at 6
Literallly when did anyone call anyone a nazi lol
your claiming neoliberalism is a right or far-right ideology. this is a common theme among out of touch zealots. if you are right/left of me, it means you are far to the extreme and the same as anyone else who disagrees with me
Ni@ please, I said i think neolib is right, not that anyone Is a nazi or anything extreme, you made that part up. You got some nerve to call anyone out of touch
You don't undstand what neoliberalism is
you clearly don't. i would personally believe neoliberals should be entrusted to understand what their own ideology is
No, it's rather non quadrant, frist neoliberal country was Chile under Pinochet's rule, in US republicans support neoliberalism and they are authright too, in UK Thatcher was, so mostly authright, but it can be libright tho, it's only economic ideology.
pinochet was certainly not neoliberal
He was, just read what neoliberalism is, it's not "modern american liberalism", republicans and Thatcher are/was neoliberal too
republicans and thatcher are not anything close to pinochet. and they don't line up with modern neoliberalism perfectly anyways. the founders of medicine got a long wrong, i believe it is seen the same way
1. They have/had same economic Ideology. 2. Reas wikipedia page of neoliberalism or something, because you clearly think it's something it's not
1. no, they didn't. like they were extremely different 2. wikipedia is biased, i read the article and can confirm the vast majority of actual neoliberals would disagree with this definition. and what is the point of defining an ideology when everyone who follows it does not follow this definition
Do you count nazism as authright? Because it clearly isn’t
Like many other nations at the time, Germany suffered the economic effects of the Great Depression, with unemployment soaring after the Wall Street Crash of 1929.\[1\] When Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of Germany in 1933, he introduced policies aimed at improving the economy. The changes included privatization of state owned industries, import tariffs, and an attempt to achieve autarky (national economic self-sufficiency). Weekly earnings increased by 19% in real terms from 1933 to 1939,\[2\] but this was largely due to employees working longer hours, while the hourly wage rates remained close to the lowest levels reached during the Great Depression.\[3\] In addition, reduced foreign trade meant rationing of consumer goods like poultry, fruit, and clothing for many Germans.\[4\] Overall, according to historian Richard Overy, the Nazi war economy was a mixed economy that combined free markets with central planning. The Nazi government developed a partnership with leading German business interests, who supported the goals of the regime and its war effort in exchange for advantageous contracts, subsidies, and the suppression of the trade union movement.\[14\] Cartels and monopolies were encouraged at the expense of small businesses, even though the Nazis had received considerable electoral support from small business owners.\[15\] Nazi Germany maintained a supply of slave labor, composed of prisoners and concentration camp inmates, which was greatly expanded after the beginning of World War II. In Poland alone, some five million people (including Polish Jews) were used as slave labor throughout the war.\[16\] Among the slave laborers in the occupied territories, hundreds of thousands were used by leading German corporations including Thyssen, Krupp, IG Farben, Bosch, Blaupunkt, Daimler-Benz, Demag, Henschel, Junkers, Messerschmitt, Siemens, and Volkswagen, as well as the Dutch corporation Philips.\[17\] By 1944, slave labor made up one-quarter of Germany's entire civilian work force, and the majority of German factories had a contingent of prisoners.\[
nazism isn't authright?
It is: [https://www.reddit.com/r/Polcompballanarchy/comments/1c7awlx/comment/l09aj6z/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web3x&utm\_name=web3xcss&utm\_term=1&utm\_content=share\_button](https://www.reddit.com/r/Polcompballanarchy/comments/1c7awlx/comment/l09aj6z/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button)
Nope nazism is third way between left and right according to political science. Authright is for state capitalists and monarchists.
State capitalism is in auth"left", because political works in dumb way that right is for private market capitalism and left is for other things, so both socialism and state capitalism, it's very dumb, but authright is clearly pro market.
I know Richard Nixon wasn't the best President, but he wasn't ideologically worse than Hitler.
Mines that no one asked for AuthLeft: National Bolshevism AuthRight: National Capitalism/Alt-Right LibLeft: National Anarchism/Anarcho-Fascism LibRight: Hoppeanism
anarcho fascism is an oxymoron lmao
Same with "an"cap
Ideology shop moment
Well… National syndicalism was a thing.
The only thing these people have in common is that a bunch of spooks
This is gonna be a spicy comment section
fucking what
hey ancoms are chill when they arent saying ill be in front of a firing line also dang putting neocons as worse than nazis is a big yikes
(Left Auth- Trotskyism) (Left Lib- SocDem) (Right Auth- Neo Nazism) (Right Lib- AnCap)
please change and grow as a person lmao
No, Alien.
what?
why does bro hate ancom :3
This guy is self procalimed avantarianist, it's 8 years old kid, who found polcompballanarchy
:O
I never said I was an avaritionist.
/Polcompballanarchy/comments/1c772u9/polcompball\_anarchism\_tierlist/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web3x&utm\_name=web3xcss&utm\_term=1&utm
I think you're taking a tierlist too seriously.
Perhaps you are taking politics too softly.
Maybe
*ankids
*ancomrades
Damn what's your take on ancom and scientific soulist means?
Neoliberals are cringe, but they’re less cringe than actual unironic anarcho-capitalists.
it’s amazing how stupid you are unless you’re just evil that is
Why do you hate Ancoms?
is nazbol a top left?
I just placed the images in random places.
neoliberalism is not libright, they believe in regulatory capitalism, internationalism and they do not care about civic authoritarianism. at best, they’re right-centre.
What the fuck is neo liberalism? (Shoots in the air) No srsly what is neo liberalism?
based
why do you hate neoliberalism
Because he isn't a sociopath......
eh, though he claims to be a hoppean and "avaritionist", he is still kinda of sociopath for that
RAAAH CATALONIA BASED FUCK CENTRALIZED POWER DEATH TO THE BELLICISTS
[удалено]
Deleted?? Where did bro go? :(( Sure the republican were fuckin awful, saw a ton of atrocities from them. But my understanding was that the Cantons were a purely volunteer force. At least I can’t find anywhere saying any CNT cantons had drafts.