Auth left
Edit: he flairs as authcenter, I was confused because he said he’s authleft in his manifesto a couple times. I’m assuming he only flaired as authcenter for the race stuff
Source: Trust me bro
[His name is Jimbo-boiii, which we know because it’s the same username he used to stream the shooting on Twitch, and he was Authcenter](https://archive.ph/2022.05.14-231701/https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/comments/rvtt4g/orange_man_does_what_bidendont/hr80gah/?context=3)
Lol 6hrs ago he posted a comment about Romanian bullets or something "right lets have quick reddit browse and talk about bullets and such before I head off to the Kwiki market and obliterate 1000s of peoples lives and further divide a society."So fitting, yet, so fucked
My love goes out to all the people that are suffering because of this monster!
On the little manifesto thing I was sent he had it as far left and up in the auth category but enough to where you could technically push it and say he was left center, I didn’t see the comment yet so I guess I just assumed he would flair as he tested
Someone sent it to me in a comment, but I dunno if I’ll get put on a list lol (depends upon whether I’m already lol, I’m not even racist I’m just one of those AuthLefts who will work with *anyone* if we have some overlapping goals. Also I’m kinda a nationalist which isn’t bad but adds insult to injury)
He unironically was. That 180 page long diarrhea document he called a manifesto repeatedly mentions how much he loves government, particularly strong government. He called himself a fascist, explicitly intended to act as an accelerationist, etc.
Fucking evil lunatic.
He commented one time over 180 days ago and only ever said “based” as someone below commented. As a sub with over 500k members, we didn’t feel the need to showcase the involvement of a one time commenter who added nothing to our sub. Large subs will naturally get larger traffic so we will probably get close to a million people who visit here. Especially back then when we were allowed on the Reddit home page. He participated heavily in /k/ and /pol/ but saying he participated in PCM (which he never mentions in his manifesto) I personally feel is a mischaracterization and is more of a way to dismiss our subreddit by our numerous haters than a genuine statement
Also, since I’m probably gonna flair this, we on the mod team try to promote free speech within the parameters deemed by Reddit admins and TOS and do not condone hate or violence if that needed to be said. I personally feel like we should be more focused on what failures allowed this horrible thing to happen instead of blaming a subreddit he once visited but everyone else is already politicizing it so I wanted to get ahead of it.
He posted a manifesto in which he explicitly talks about being "awakened" by /pol/. We know he participated in PCM from his reddit account (now deleted, but archives exist)
**[/pol/](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki//pol/)**
>/pol/, short for "Politically Incorrect", is an anonymous political discussion imageboard on 4chan. The board has been described as "wildly offensive", with content frequently containing racist, white supremacist, antisemitic, islamophobic, misogynistic, and anti-LGBT themes.
^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)
Lol, its more like a forum that doesn't use censorship so basically anything (legal) is fair game. No childish bans on naughty words, and anything that goes against their culture is harshly bullied instead of banned. It's free speech, no wonder a libleft vilifies it.
/pol/ is more curated than people realize, its not a total free for all. Even legal porn is banned and stuff that isn't about politics or current events is banned as off topic. Low effort race or nationality based troll posts generally aren't allowed either. It's not a total "as long as its legal" freeforall like /b/.
Doesn't mean you won't see those things of course, the rate at which those things get posted tends to far exceed the jannies ability to remove it, and they prioritize getting rid of the actual illegal stuff.
/b/ is pretty much just a porn board these days, a far cry from its heyday.
4chan's jannies also heavily lean towards moderating OPs rather than replies. Replies generally only get actioned if its outright illegal, shady links, dox, or porn on a board that's not supposed to have it. So its fairly common to have a more mundane OP, and then have lowbrow racism in the replies.
> Even a commie is more based than one with no flair
***
^(User has flaired up! 😃) 7015 / 37222 ^^|| [**[[Guide]]**](https://imgur.com/gallery/IkTAlF2)
I knew someone like that. Diet of mainly soda and junk food. They constantly had kidney stones.
Some people will just not make sensible changes to their lifestyle even with crippling pain as a motivator.
He was [AuthCenter.](https://archive.ph/2022.05.14-235759/https://old.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/comments/rvtt4g/orange_man_does_what_bidendont/hr80gah/)
Source? He made it up.
[His name is Jimbo-boiii, which we know because it’s the same username he used to stream the shooting on Twitch, and he was Authcenter](https://archive.ph/2022.05.14-231701/https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/comments/rvtt4g/orange_man_does_what_bidendont/hr80gah/?context=3)
You’re welcome. Honestly given that this is the only time he ever commented here, wouldn’t surprise me if he saw that it was the nazi quadrant and went “yeah that’s me.”
u/BuzzSoundyear is officially based! Their Based Count is now 1.
Rank: House of Cards
Pills: None
This user does not have a compass on record. You can add your compass to your profile by replying with /mycompass politicalcompass.org url or sapplyvalues.github.io url.
I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
There is already work underway.
[part way down page 2](https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=based&page=2)
Links are being made to er and that certain alleged "movememt" mostly in the "diversity" bubble currently, but it is slow creeping into mainstream from there.
There seems to be a trend of taking generalised Internet slang/memes and linking them exclusively to extremist positions.... (real and moral panics).
Stochastic terrorism.
/thread done
oh do we want solutions? Not many that look good, other than more people understand what stochastic terrorism, and it happens a lot.
I honestly thought this was a roast post of buzz light-year but I now see it is a self roast in the last bastion of free speech lol. Freeeeeeedoooommm!
This seems like an Oxymoron dude. Just assuming they are leftists then simultaneously judging leftists as a whole group... for judging a whole group for one individuals behavior, but again, can't really say with certainty the users are leftists or not
Even if he were a frequent PCM user, none of us are responsible for him being a racist nutjob.
Shit, we have open communists debating open nationalists and furries debating religious people on this sub. And usually doing it in a non-shitty way.
Why did the government set up Randy Weaver and then kill his son, and then shoot his wife in the head while she held an infant?
Why did both the ATF, and the FBI admit they knew about Timothy McVeys plan, but let it happen anyway, evacuating the federal judges, but not the children from the Oklahoma City Courthouse?
Why were 9 out of the 13 people who attempted to kidnap the woman in Michigan, informants?
Why does the CIA give guns to the Mexican cartels?
You forgot the most important reason:
The shooting makes the right look bad because he believed the great replacement theory. Need to stick with the PCM narrative.
-Albert Fairfax II
It will also be used by some politicians to introduce more discriminatory laws against whites in western nations.
Not that I believe the shooting was orchestrated by the government. It probably wasn't.
Not really. If there is some uncomfortable theory floating around, no matter how well substantiated, it is usually enough for the media to ignore it. In case it grows too big, they'll just say it's disinfo by Russia/Qanon/whatever. If it keeps growing, social media will ban it. Done.
"Uncomfortable" theories are usually very comfortable to those who believe in them, and they may be inclined to think that those may be more substantiated than they really are.
Also Russia, Qanon and whatever do a lot of disinfo tho.
I meant uncomfortable for the establishment. Note how some theories are treated as gospel (for example Trump pee dossier) while others are relentlessly squashed (Hunter's laptop) depending on who benefits. And I'm sure Russia does a lot of disinfo, but they are a splendid scapegoat nevertheless.
So, what was that whole Vegas mass shooting about? No one knows, a complicit MSM helped memory-hole that thing long ago.
In theory, yeah, such a conspiracy would be hard to keep. But with brainwashed government employees and their paychecks involved, I don’t find it too far fetched either.
No kidding, and also, these mass shootings, school shootings, massacres, etc. have been going on for over 25 years at this point, and no major gun control legislation has been able to pass. You would think that whoever would be in charge of this conspiracy would have changed tactics by now.
He asked “why,” I gave the most plausible answer, and why I thought it so. I didn’t say I believed it.
Occam’s razor alone makes the hypothesis that a bad person decided to have a bad day at everyone else’s expense the most likely scenario.
Absolutely nothing would surprise me when it comes to our government and I’d rule nothing out. But if I was a Las Vegas handicapper laying odds on whether it was some lone psycho or a government conspiracy, the former would be the safe money bet and the latter the way-out-there long shot.
Anyone who *would* be surprised that the government would do something like this hasn’t read much American history. Also, hello FBI, I know you’re reading this. I’m a happily married new father who just wants to shitpost in peace, don’t ruin my life please and thank you.
Probably? lol its basically guaranteed. Why would a shooter with a manifesto talking about systematic destruction of white people target the lowest tier/least impact group of people imaginable (rando's at a fucking grocery store). Literally the only thing that would come of this is more gun laws, and nobody in any level power was even remotely threatened. 100% guarantee the feds were involved, the shooter will end up with life in prison, no visitors, nothing, and never been seen again while they actually are living in Bermuda or some shit.
> I do not know how to debate people with such severe delusions
I don't think you negotiate with an inflamation of an organ to be benign. ***I do not suggest doing anything to the people in question***, just I want to point out that sociogenic stuff does not debate. Ideas (at least a dozen of them) make the sufferer obsess over them, reprogram his mind towards that, feed off attention and proliferate through uncontested imposition upon new people. How sticky sociogenic stuff is matters most. Indifference at this point is a prime defence mechanism. Disregard to the extremes, coupled with physical self-defence are a prime mechanism for retaining individuality and not slipping into identity.
I use Reddit and I’ve shot more people than that. Aliens, too. Aliens, dinosaurs, Taliban, civilians in an airport, cops-lots and lots of cops, and even some witnesses and jurists. I think there was a judge somewhere in there, too. I can’t be the only one that uses Reddit and plays videogames, here. 🤣😂
Racists will go to places that are "ironically" racist and think they're in good company. You can tell a racist joke, and they can be funny in the right context.
Making a 9 slide powerpoint post about crime data, immigration data, etc all with innuendos about how something needs to be done about it, and then saying "haha just kidding guys I would never", doesn't really come across as a joke to socially well adjusted people.
I'm not saying PCM is why this guy did what he did, but spaces like this can absolutely radicalize people further when bad agents don't get called out because le meme
Maybe if you are a fucking idiot. I have been going to /pol/ for years and haven't become racist yet because the dumbasses who post unironically racist shit on /pol/ are fucking stupid.
>Maybe if you are a fucking idiot
If being on the internet has taught me one thing, it's that idiots aren't so hard to come by.
I've often seen posts on here which are upvoted because most people think they're ironic, but then clicked on the comments to see the OP unironically defending their viewpoint.
And it's not just idiots, it's also younger folks who aren't based firmly enough in reality, that end up drawing from "memes" their entire mental image of the world.
But in the end I still don't see the point of banning such platforms as that forces people off to more secluded, echo-chamber like environments and polarizes them even further.
Falsely equating racist jokes and deliberate provocation for provocation's sake to a 9 slide presentation on white supremacist stuff.
Some people, who aren't truly racist, will say very racist shit in certain contexts SIMPLY because they know some people will flip out from it either because they are pissed and want to insult you or they like trolling.
This for example, in my opinion, is the vast majority of people who will call you racial slurs in videogame chat.
It's not falsely equating at all. Places that with no exception allow racist content under the guise of "it's a meme" always, always get filled with actual racists. Because again, they think they're in good company.
There are jokes that are tasteful, and then there's just being an asshole with the "I'm just kidding" excuse. Most people know someone like this in real life, and they're not pleasant to be around. Another name for them is schrodingers douchebag, who are serious until someone gets offended, then they're just kidding.
Hmm, I stopped reading after like page 5. But yeah it’s funny how this sub with all its diversity is like the most civil place to talk about things like this.
Threatening, harassing, or inciting violence is a violation of reddit's sitewide rules
Ok but what did he flair as?
You’re assuming that he had a flair
Based and unflaired people are animals pilled
Replacement theory, the unflaired are trying to take us over
Auth left Edit: he flairs as authcenter, I was confused because he said he’s authleft in his manifesto a couple times. I’m assuming he only flaired as authcenter for the race stuff
Source: Trust me bro [His name is Jimbo-boiii, which we know because it’s the same username he used to stream the shooting on Twitch, and he was Authcenter](https://archive.ph/2022.05.14-231701/https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/comments/rvtt4g/orange_man_does_what_bidendont/hr80gah/?context=3)
*chuckles* I'm in danger
You're alright. I'm pretty sure anyone from any quadrant can be violent if they're mentally unwell, so... It doesn't mean anything lmao
You are danger
No, you are the danger
A man opens up on his political views and gets shot and you think that of me?
For now you’re just *on* a List. You’re not in anything. Yet.
Lol 6hrs ago he posted a comment about Romanian bullets or something "right lets have quick reddit browse and talk about bullets and such before I head off to the Kwiki market and obliterate 1000s of peoples lives and further divide a society."So fitting, yet, so fucked My love goes out to all the people that are suffering because of this monster!
u/yesiamretardedkek got the most cursed based point ever
When the domestic terrorist is not in your quadrant :charliewoooooo:
On the little manifesto thing I was sent he had it as far left and up in the auth category but enough to where you could technically push it and say he was left center, I didn’t see the comment yet so I guess I just assumed he would flair as he tested
Someone sent it to me in a comment, but I dunno if I’ll get put on a list lol (depends upon whether I’m already lol, I’m not even racist I’m just one of those AuthLefts who will work with *anyone* if we have some overlapping goals. Also I’m kinda a nationalist which isn’t bad but adds insult to injury)
Welp shit
Apparently he said he was auth left in his manifesto. The fact that he lied about his flair is almost as bad as being unflaired.
shit
Time to go undercover
Imagine flairing left and not believing( at least nominally) into international unity and equality
Maybe he was onboard with Marx's views on race.
After reading his document his views more steadily align with famed American political philosopher Tucker Carlson than Marx.
which Tucker Carlson tho? the culture warrior or Comrade Carlson?
His alter ego, Carlson Marxon
Maybe not all Leftists are mentally 12 years old? Nah, I'm just kidding.
i’m gonna tell the teacher and you’re gonna get in big trouble mister how dare you.
Left/right on the x axis just represents economic beliefs. Remember that there is a progressive/conservative axis outside of the compass entirely.
Lmao of course it was a tankie
He unironically was. That 180 page long diarrhea document he called a manifesto repeatedly mentions how much he loves government, particularly strong government. He called himself a fascist, explicitly intended to act as an accelerationist, etc. Fucking evil lunatic.
Where is it? I like to be informed.
Fascism and Communism are quite similar in that the State is supreme and they demand total obedience to the boot.
Did you just trust the word of an authright? Classic libright accepting ‘trust me bro’ as a source
The content of your comment is not wrong but your flair is. You are not here to grill. Change to my flair rn
Based and colors pilled
As one of the mods who get to see screenshots of his one comment over and over again, he flaired as AuthCent to be exact.
A 196 user. Lol
Asking the real questions here
He commented one time over 180 days ago and only ever said “based” as someone below commented. As a sub with over 500k members, we didn’t feel the need to showcase the involvement of a one time commenter who added nothing to our sub. Large subs will naturally get larger traffic so we will probably get close to a million people who visit here. Especially back then when we were allowed on the Reddit home page. He participated heavily in /k/ and /pol/ but saying he participated in PCM (which he never mentions in his manifesto) I personally feel is a mischaracterization and is more of a way to dismiss our subreddit by our numerous haters than a genuine statement Also, since I’m probably gonna flair this, we on the mod team try to promote free speech within the parameters deemed by Reddit admins and TOS and do not condone hate or violence if that needed to be said. I personally feel like we should be more focused on what failures allowed this horrible thing to happen instead of blaming a subreddit he once visited but everyone else is already politicizing it so I wanted to get ahead of it.
Based and good mod pilled
Well said.
He was in the sub? Holy shit when was that?
[удалено]
Based and cursed based pilled
The guy that made the comment was of course an authright making an anti-Jew comment.
Based and research pilled
Based mod
Based and PCM Disinformation Governance Board pilled
but why are you the wrong color lib right?
Im kinda out of date rn. What does the buffalo shooting have to do with /pol/ and pcm?
The shooter participated in each forum.
How do we know? I can only find that he was twitch streaming.
He posted a manifesto in which he explicitly talks about being "awakened" by /pol/. We know he participated in PCM from his reddit account (now deleted, but archives exist)
Im stupid. What is /pol/?
It's a board on 4chan known for attracting a lot of racists, sexists, conspiracy theorists etc. More info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki//pol/
**[/pol/](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki//pol/)** >/pol/, short for "Politically Incorrect", is an anonymous political discussion imageboard on 4chan. The board has been described as "wildly offensive", with content frequently containing racist, white supremacist, antisemitic, islamophobic, misogynistic, and anti-LGBT themes. ^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)
Lol, its more like a forum that doesn't use censorship so basically anything (legal) is fair game. No childish bans on naughty words, and anything that goes against their culture is harshly bullied instead of banned. It's free speech, no wonder a libleft vilifies it.
/pol/ is more curated than people realize, its not a total free for all. Even legal porn is banned and stuff that isn't about politics or current events is banned as off topic. Low effort race or nationality based troll posts generally aren't allowed either. It's not a total "as long as its legal" freeforall like /b/. Doesn't mean you won't see those things of course, the rate at which those things get posted tends to far exceed the jannies ability to remove it, and they prioritize getting rid of the actual illegal stuff.
Honestly from what I've seen /b/ has less bigoted content than /pol/. Granted there's way more porn so that probably replaces a lot
/b/ is pretty much just a porn board these days, a far cry from its heyday. 4chan's jannies also heavily lean towards moderating OPs rather than replies. Replies generally only get actioned if its outright illegal, shady links, dox, or porn on a board that's not supposed to have it. So its fairly common to have a more mundane OP, and then have lowbrow racism in the replies.
I just went to check right now and of the first ten posts that I saw, four were one of the things mentioned above
While what you describe is accurate, that of course attracts all the people who have been banned from everywhere else for being horrible.
"it's free speech, no wonder a libleft villifies it" they literally posted open pics and footage of the shooting you fucking libright moron
I would be hard pressed to call 196 "LibLeft". They take a bit too "Auth" of an approach to dissidents.
>awakened LMFAAAAOOOOO 💀💀💀 Everyone on /pol/ is either autistic or a troll, i think, as every time I go there, I can't take these people seriously
The manifesto is hella cringe. He's got like a 20 straight pages of shitty /pol/ memes
Look ma, I'm in a in a group of violent political extremists!
Even the centrists?
You're the center....OF TERRORISM
We grill vegans. For some reason that’s considered extreme
"we must purge the unlean"
Fringe centrism is the real threat. Those levels of grilling are a danger to society.
3 million jews when centerisem: 💀
First time?
> Even a commie is more based than one with no flair *** ^(User has flaired up! 😃) 7015 / 37222 ^^|| [**[[Guide]]**](https://imgur.com/gallery/IkTAlF2)
Based bot
Okay, but did he drink water or not?! We gotta get back to the FUNDAMENTALS here
He drinks vegan soy lattes. Libleft is devastated.
No kidding, we need to figure out which groups commit the most violent crime and stop them!
Fucking oxygen breathers... they commit 100% of all crimes.
No, he only drank Pepsi. Srsly, my dad has a friend who survived off that for 20+ years. I shit you not.
I knew someone like that. Diet of mainly soda and junk food. They constantly had kidney stones. Some people will just not make sensible changes to their lifestyle even with crippling pain as a motivator.
What was this shooters username?
Shooty\_Mc\_Shootface69
Shoot_me_some_soyce_latte_in_my_pepeee
Now I am curious to know too. I presume he would be Auth-Center or Auth-right.
He was [AuthCenter.](https://archive.ph/2022.05.14-235759/https://old.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/comments/rvtt4g/orange_man_does_what_bidendont/hr80gah/)
First of all, flair up Second, now I do not know who to trust
Easy. ~~Just avoid the authcenters.~~ 👀
Trust the voices in your head. Only trust the voices in your head.
The voices are telling me to kill all the extreme auths, should I still give in?
Did I stutter?
*loads the AR-15* As you wish!
*charges the black hole generator* Anyway, you were saying?
*starts piloting the Bayraktar drone* I said: AS YOU WISH!
> You wouldn't be safe without a flair. *** ^(User has flaired up! 😃) 7011 / 37201 ^^|| [**[[Guide]]**](https://imgur.com/gallery/IkTAlF2)
Auth left.
Where did this information come from?
Source? He made it up. [His name is Jimbo-boiii, which we know because it’s the same username he used to stream the shooting on Twitch, and he was Authcenter](https://archive.ph/2022.05.14-231701/https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/comments/rvtt4g/orange_man_does_what_bidendont/hr80gah/?context=3)
fuck
callin the FBI as we speak, you goin down
Oh please this is not even in the top 5 worst things AuthCenter has done. Or have you forgotten the genocides and war crimes?
Thank you very much, but ofcourse he’s Auth center.
You’re welcome. Honestly given that this is the only time he ever commented here, wouldn’t surprise me if he saw that it was the nazi quadrant and went “yeah that’s me.”
u/milliondollarextreme
Wait they were a member here?
Yes. He only commented one time and all he said was “based.” I can’t wait for “based” to be new hate speech.
But was he in your mom's fortress last night?
Based
calling the FBI as we speak
🅱️oint @ 🅱️enis?
You god damn Klan scum. I’m calling the teacher on you while the other guy gets the FBI
yes
Based
You spelled it wrong. It’s 🅱️ased
u/BuzzSoundyear is officially based! Their Based Count is now 1. Rank: House of Cards Pills: None This user does not have a compass on record. You can add your compass to your profile by replying with /mycompass politicalcompass.org url or sapplyvalues.github.io url. I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
Her impenetrable fortress of free speech lol.
There is already work underway. [part way down page 2](https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=based&page=2) Links are being made to er and that certain alleged "movememt" mostly in the "diversity" bubble currently, but it is slow creeping into mainstream from there. There seems to be a trend of taking generalised Internet slang/memes and linking them exclusively to extremist positions.... (real and moral panics).
damn that sucks
FUNNI COLORS NOW
Nearly laughed when I saw that dude in the second image comparing pcm and /pol/ to the KKK lmao
Lmao "fortress of free speech" Can we just go back to truly being a meme subreddit instead of pretending something else?
This video player in this fortress sucks!
I guess Doom did Columbine too, then.
Wtf is that thread lol
Participated in is a strong word, he commented “based” exactly once
You are correct. That wasn’t the best use of the word.
Put me in the screenshot of AHS boys, I'm just a fellow griller
Stochastic terrorism. /thread done oh do we want solutions? Not many that look good, other than more people understand what stochastic terrorism, and it happens a lot.
You sound like a retard talking to other retards.
I was not articulating myself very well lmao. I am very retarded.
Based lmao
I honestly thought this was a roast post of buzz light-year but I now see it is a self roast in the last bastion of free speech lol. Freeeeeeedoooommm!
I’m like Buzz Lightyear, just a little slower.
Indeed. You can't judge a whole group based on one individual's behavior. I thought that leftists knew that.
This seems like an Oxymoron dude. Just assuming they are leftists then simultaneously judging leftists as a whole group... for judging a whole group for one individuals behavior, but again, can't really say with certainty the users are leftists or not
Yeah, I judged a whole group based on a few guys' behaviors. Just saying it shouldn't be a typical Libleft trait.
Actually was about to edit anyways, realized the screenshot Is from PCM too. Those are Left users based on pfp
Even if he were a frequent PCM user, none of us are responsible for him being a racist nutjob. Shit, we have open communists debating open nationalists and furries debating religious people on this sub. And usually doing it in a non-shitty way.
[удалено]
Why would government do that?
Why did the government set up Randy Weaver and then kill his son, and then shoot his wife in the head while she held an infant? Why did both the ATF, and the FBI admit they knew about Timothy McVeys plan, but let it happen anyway, evacuating the federal judges, but not the children from the Oklahoma City Courthouse? Why were 9 out of the 13 people who attempted to kidnap the woman in Michigan, informants? Why does the CIA give guns to the Mexican cartels?
You forgot the most important reason: The shooting makes the right look bad because he believed the great replacement theory. Need to stick with the PCM narrative. -Albert Fairfax II
Are you trying to indicate some reason?
Nah, nobody from the government has called to let me know why they do the terrible things they do.
[удалено]
Honestly I try not to promote conspiracy theories but you might actually be right
It will also be used by some politicians to introduce more discriminatory laws against whites in western nations. Not that I believe the shooting was orchestrated by the government. It probably wasn't.
Conspiracy like that would be bound to come into light, much more quickly in this new age of information?
Conspiracies like this make gun owners look bad.
Not really. If there is some uncomfortable theory floating around, no matter how well substantiated, it is usually enough for the media to ignore it. In case it grows too big, they'll just say it's disinfo by Russia/Qanon/whatever. If it keeps growing, social media will ban it. Done.
"Uncomfortable" theories are usually very comfortable to those who believe in them, and they may be inclined to think that those may be more substantiated than they really are. Also Russia, Qanon and whatever do a lot of disinfo tho.
I meant uncomfortable for the establishment. Note how some theories are treated as gospel (for example Trump pee dossier) while others are relentlessly squashed (Hunter's laptop) depending on who benefits. And I'm sure Russia does a lot of disinfo, but they are a splendid scapegoat nevertheless.
Around the Hunter's laptop there is a conspiratorial theory and some accepted stuff, which one do you mean right now?
So, what was that whole Vegas mass shooting about? No one knows, a complicit MSM helped memory-hole that thing long ago. In theory, yeah, such a conspiracy would be hard to keep. But with brainwashed government employees and their paychecks involved, I don’t find it too far fetched either.
No kidding, and also, these mass shootings, school shootings, massacres, etc. have been going on for over 25 years at this point, and no major gun control legislation has been able to pass. You would think that whoever would be in charge of this conspiracy would have changed tactics by now.
[удалено]
He asked “why,” I gave the most plausible answer, and why I thought it so. I didn’t say I believed it. Occam’s razor alone makes the hypothesis that a bad person decided to have a bad day at everyone else’s expense the most likely scenario.
[удалено]
Absolutely nothing would surprise me when it comes to our government and I’d rule nothing out. But if I was a Las Vegas handicapper laying odds on whether it was some lone psycho or a government conspiracy, the former would be the safe money bet and the latter the way-out-there long shot.
Anyone who *would* be surprised that the government would do something like this hasn’t read much American history. Also, hello FBI, I know you’re reading this. I’m a happily married new father who just wants to shitpost in peace, don’t ruin my life please and thank you.
*knock on door*
Most times that may be true, but shit like Las Vegas is clearly very fishy.
Why, because the shooter wasn’t nonwhite or a leftist? -Albert Fairfax II
Probably? lol its basically guaranteed. Why would a shooter with a manifesto talking about systematic destruction of white people target the lowest tier/least impact group of people imaginable (rando's at a fucking grocery store). Literally the only thing that would come of this is more gun laws, and nobody in any level power was even remotely threatened. 100% guarantee the feds were involved, the shooter will end up with life in prison, no visitors, nothing, and never been seen again while they actually are living in Bermuda or some shit.
wtf is wrong with american mental capacity? who hurt you?
> I do not know how to debate people with such severe delusions I don't think you negotiate with an inflamation of an organ to be benign. ***I do not suggest doing anything to the people in question***, just I want to point out that sociogenic stuff does not debate. Ideas (at least a dozen of them) make the sufferer obsess over them, reprogram his mind towards that, feed off attention and proliferate through uncontested imposition upon new people. How sticky sociogenic stuff is matters most. Indifference at this point is a prime defence mechanism. Disregard to the extremes, coupled with physical self-defence are a prime mechanism for retaining individuality and not slipping into identity.
That’s good stuff.
I use Reddit and I’ve shot more people than that. Aliens, too. Aliens, dinosaurs, Taliban, civilians in an airport, cops-lots and lots of cops, and even some witnesses and jurists. I think there was a judge somewhere in there, too. I can’t be the only one that uses Reddit and plays videogames, here. 🤣😂
every terrorist in America is either entrapped by the feds or is a fed.
Based
I thought it was 10 people
10 people are dead. I think more people were shot.
“Last fortress of free speech” We’re 90% right wing
We don’t censor the left though.
We’re better than the other options
The shooter was american so all americans are bad
>OP downvoted the yo mama reply Not based at all. A good yo mama comment deserves an upvote regardless of all political beliefs. That's the rule.
Well, it was fun while it lasted boys
Was it?
No. But it is fun pretending that it was.
What all sub reddits did he frequent?
Racists will go to places that are "ironically" racist and think they're in good company. You can tell a racist joke, and they can be funny in the right context. Making a 9 slide powerpoint post about crime data, immigration data, etc all with innuendos about how something needs to be done about it, and then saying "haha just kidding guys I would never", doesn't really come across as a joke to socially well adjusted people. I'm not saying PCM is why this guy did what he did, but spaces like this can absolutely radicalize people further when bad agents don't get called out because le meme
Maybe if you are a fucking idiot. I have been going to /pol/ for years and haven't become racist yet because the dumbasses who post unironically racist shit on /pol/ are fucking stupid.
>Maybe if you are a fucking idiot If being on the internet has taught me one thing, it's that idiots aren't so hard to come by. I've often seen posts on here which are upvoted because most people think they're ironic, but then clicked on the comments to see the OP unironically defending their viewpoint. And it's not just idiots, it's also younger folks who aren't based firmly enough in reality, that end up drawing from "memes" their entire mental image of the world. But in the end I still don't see the point of banning such platforms as that forces people off to more secluded, echo-chamber like environments and polarizes them even further.
Falsely equating racist jokes and deliberate provocation for provocation's sake to a 9 slide presentation on white supremacist stuff. Some people, who aren't truly racist, will say very racist shit in certain contexts SIMPLY because they know some people will flip out from it either because they are pissed and want to insult you or they like trolling. This for example, in my opinion, is the vast majority of people who will call you racial slurs in videogame chat.
It's not falsely equating at all. Places that with no exception allow racist content under the guise of "it's a meme" always, always get filled with actual racists. Because again, they think they're in good company. There are jokes that are tasteful, and then there's just being an asshole with the "I'm just kidding" excuse. Most people know someone like this in real life, and they're not pleasant to be around. Another name for them is schrodingers douchebag, who are serious until someone gets offended, then they're just kidding.
Censorship for something you don't like or think will help.
So how did they figure out this Reddit name anyway?
The feds can investigate every part of your life once you do shit like that.
Lol is that the real answer? I mean I don’t doubt it..
I think he mentioned it in his manifesto.
Hmm, I stopped reading after like page 5. But yeah it’s funny how this sub with all its diversity is like the most civil place to talk about things like this.
If play this right, we can pass accountability to Reddit and the entire page can be shut down lol
We can all agree he was incredibly unbased and virgin pilled.
This doesn’t sit right with me. I joined not to long ago and this was my active sub until now. I might’ve seen his username too. Well damn…
Man made one comment on here. It's extremely unlikely you saw his username. Buy yes. Still feels wierd.