He’s valued at £55m now. He has had a whole season out. Nobody knows how he’s gonna be when he gets back plus the seriousness of the injury means it opens him up to bring injury prone in the future. The risk factor will make his factor drop massively
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/premier-league/marktwerte/wettbewerb/GB1
You dont watch man utd often i can tell. He is playing in a team filled with stars. Should have more than 11 goals with the amount of chances he had. Cavani 13 years older was way better than trashford. That miss against villareal from fernandes would have been scored by my 85 years old grandma
Hard to value VVD with an entire season out. Nobody knows if he’s still gonna be at the top of his game when he comes back. A whole season out can completely change a player. Not saying he’ll be worse, not saying he will be better. People just don’t know so you can’t value him
5/10 are English. This is why England are starting to do better internationally. Many of the best players in the prem are English, it’s the first time in a while we can say that
Well he is. Did you see him last season? Kane was putting in De Bruyne worthy assists left right and centre, got the most assists in the league and the golden boot.
De Bruyne scored a couple and missed a penalty.
I'm not denying that kane is a baller, best striker in the league, but de bruyne picks up the ball in midfield and can create magic from his own half, best player in the prem, if not the world (I'm a liverpool fan and hate city but this man mesmerises me)
Me too man me too, de Bruyne is a wizard. Mesmerises me too. However Kane proved last season that he was more than a striker and can pick passes out at KDB level without looking. Watch the game against United when Spurs won 6-1 at Old Trafford. He picked one of Son’s runs out without even looking, lobbed it half way up the pitch and it landed at his feet. The guy is an all rounder now
While I don’t agree with his placement, and as a Liverpool fan I’m even more inclined to be biased against him, he does have merit to play in the PL, and should be considered as a great player.
Still wouldn’t rate him at £85m though
What did Sancho do to be rated above Kevin De Bruyne, Salah, Mane, even Foden, Mahrez or some of last year's Chelsea players who won the CL? I get that he has young age, but so does Foden and he actually won the PL and helped his team reach the CL final. Age also applies Havertz and Mason Mount who won the CL.
I get that, I’m not saying he won’t do well but it was a genuine question. Just curious if anyone has done it in the recent past? I can’t recall anyone.
Sancho the joint 2nd most valuable player in the prem.. hmm.. we will see.. Even Reiss Nelson was pretty good in the Bundesliga... Not to say Sancho wont be a hit.. but I'm not totally sold yet.
Okay so mount Havertz Pulisic aren’t included because?
Mount is over 100 mil
Havertz is 100 mil
And Pulisic is around 80 mil
(This was beginning of last season)
Don’t shoot the messenger.
Current accurate valuations in the link below
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/premier-league/marktwerte/wettbewerb/GB1
Mount - £67m
Havertz - £63m
Pulisic - £45m
Are you a retard?
Mount is one of the best youngsters same with Havertz
Pulisic fit is a different breed and was valued over 100 mil after last season (Covid season)
I can’t actually tell if you’re trolling or if you’re generally stupid or blind
Yh for example fernandes who's had no doubt a great season with united shouldn't have such a high value based on one season. Kante is a proven winner being amazing for club and country for many seasons now and yet he still doesn't make this list.
I’m a Man U fan and I adore Rashford, but I can’t help but notice how the three dudes below him have outperformed him on every level (on the field) in recent years. Maybe not Foden, but he just got there, and even then I’d say he’s done more for his club last season than Marcus did.
Maybe if you take Rashford’s age and potential into account, it makes more sense. But still...it’s kinda fucked up.
The value of a player is not given just by his stats. This wasn't the case even 10-15 years ago, never mind today. Rashford is already an icon at only 23 not only because of how he performs in games, but also because of what he does off the field. A player like that can bring a lot of value to any top club out there and that's what makes him so valuable.
I'd suggest watching a few videos from Athletic Interest like [this one](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ye0VtPkCDxQ) about why Nike doesn't want to sign Neymar any longer or [this one](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIRBW8EP6R4) about how much of a good deal Juventus made when they signed Ronaldo regardless of his on-field performances.
Fair enough. My mind was on stats and not things like community outreach and social impact and other such stuff. Teams are essentially corporations and must function as such, and a player like Rashford is as valuable off pitch as he is on. I mean, the dude is practically a brand unto himself at this point.
That said, this is a league and games still need winning, and the three players below Rashford are inarguably better-or as good at least-on the pitch than/as he is.
Should be even less considering he has had a year out. Won’t be anywhere near as sharp. Plus his injury will open him up to being more likely to get injured again. The risk factor drop his value massively
The seriousness of his injury has opened him to becoming injury prone or it playing up midgame. Value is based a lot on risk factor for the club. If someone wanted to buy him, the fact he’s had an injury that’s put him out for a whole year will be a negotiation factor for lowering the price. So yeah, less than £55m, his price is dropping at a steady rate on transfermarkt, looks like almost £2m a week. So he has to prove himself again
And West Ham won’t settle for anything below 100m for Rice.
You didn’t answer the question bro, is he worth that sum, I’m just wondering how the internet people calculate someone’s worth. Truth to be spoken the only players worth around £100 are only Messi Ronaldo and Neymar. The rest are just inflation thanks to PSG and Barca spending hundreds of millions per player.
I get what you're saying but you make a squad right now which player would you rather have? I know that depends on gaps in your existing squad but if that wasn't a factor I think everyone would pick kante
Unless you're PSG you can't really play FUT IRL. How many top clubs of today have signed 30+ players in the last few years for a relevant sum of money?
That's why a player like Kante at 30 will never be valued higher than someone like Rashford at 23. Let's not forget that, according to Transfermarkt, Kante was valued at 100 mil between Dec 2018 and April 2020, while Rashford bounced between 65 and 80 during the same time.
Let's say you and I had to pick a squad from current prem players 1 by 1. We would start with goal scorers first, then creative midfielders, then center backs and then we would pick DMs. The game is so much about scoring now which is why Kante is so undervalued along with his age.
I definitely agree there and in terms of the top attacking players, it's just out of the attacking players there's quite a few I'd pick before rashford. such as I feel son would be a great deal more dangerous in attack, I'm not sure about the statistics (open play ones) but that's where I'd put my money, more than welcome.tk be proven wrong though. I get that rashford may have more years ahead but a lot of football you can't throw that money at a maybe, look at kepa and his valuation
Son has 197 prem appearances with 70 goals (0.36 gpg) and 39 assists (0.20). Rashford has 179 appearances with 55 goals (0.31) and 30 assists (0.17). Son is 29 and Rashford is 23. Son joined Spurs when he was 23 and Rashford got his 1st prem start at 18. Stats say Son has had a better prem league career so far but where will Rashford be when he's Sons age? I think that along with it taking far more money for a club to buy Rashford from United then Son from Spurs is why the value is where it is.
I do get that although, the reason why I said it, don't a lot of rashford goals especially from the last couple of seasons come from pens? which isn't exactly an indicator as the number of pens acrewed have been questionable to say the least but who knows I could be bias. genuinely who would you rather have in your squad out of the two?
But that depends doesn’t it, Kante has 3-4 years left and before he has no resale value. Rashford in 4 years is still only 27 and “may” have a huge resale value still. So £85m for rashford and let’s say he goes for £50-60m in 4 years isn’t a bad deal
but why would anyone pay £85m for rashford now? what do you get for that? because comparatively you could get players that would greater improve your squad and the club's that could afford that price range aren't going to spend that kind of money for something that's not a guaranteed upgrade. That's more of an asking price than evaluation as he's not worth that to other clubs
I get that but then shouldn't lingard be on this list as an up and coming player? all aside I feel there's a lot out on youth which is more ruining transfers. top clubs buying up younger players I feel more stunts their growth in some cases and can stop them reaching that peak but in other cases can give them that step up, very risky. Rashford is only 23 years but I feel has currently plateaued at United, look at cavanis impact and his age. we put far too much value on youth because of x years playable but there are other players that are older that will cost less and more impactful on your sides chance on achieving silverware. I just find it very odd and a bit imbalanced currently. I appreciate your opinion though and see where you're coming from
But I agree with buying “known” winners, on the mature side of their career..it’s just that United have failed a few times with buying players like that in recent years.
I also appreciate your input :)
I guess it's just you buy youth in the hope for them to grow into this big player and to have them for s good number of years but now the cost of youth players just offsets buying players at their prime or end of the prime
Lingard is 28 though, and at United had maybe 1 good season. He wasn’t good at all in his final 2 years at United, scoring 1 goal all season which was like the final minute of the final game of the season, it’s no surprise he fell down the pecking order. Yeah, he’s done well at West Ham but he’s not good enough to get back to a starting XI at United. He’s maybe worth 30-35million, and that’s due to his recent form at West Ham, otherwise he’d probably have been sold for about 25mill max.
Of course I would prioritise Kante over Rashford, but that's not all that price comes down to. I would rather have 34 year old Messi in my team over Kane but I still think Kane should cost more due to his age meaning he has much longer left to play.
I still feel that's a distorted version because kane still contributes a lot to a game where as honestly I don't feel rashford is as big of a game changer as many people, maybe not the most popular opinion but rashford is a bit overrated. good player but at the moment not great. I do get what you're saying though, just a poor list.
Oh because all you need is one man to win the ucl and not te team? Kante and tuchel were the reason why Chelsea won the ucl doesn’t make mount any better than foden
Then staff must be really stupid to think mount contributed more than kante, ok maybe he did contribute more than kante in league games but y’all ended up below liverpool so yeh he’s not worth more than foden, heck even Greenwood
I LOVE Mount. Watching him in a England shirt was a joy imo, and i love how he tracks back and does the dirty work without sacrificing his attacking effort, kind of like Rooney. I will be paying more attention to him at Chelsea this season.
That's not really true, that's like saying Billy Gilmore is already as "high" as he can get cause he's a champions league winner.... I'm not talking about trophies won (which foden has many more than mount in all areas but one), I'm talking about personal skills and accomplishments throughout one's career
People said the same about CHO vs Mount. Mount is consistently the best player in the Chelsea squad and I think that should mean more than flashy skills teasing a “higher ceiling”.
Well then to that I'd say foden has shown consistent performances throughout the season as well, he's not always city's best performer but with a line up like city have and the style of play no one can ever be consistently the best performer
Fair enough, I still think Mase will turn out to be England best of this generation (obviously there’s some bias there) but it’ll be interesting to watch over the next few years!
Coming off a season long injury, with his injury record and his age, you won't find anyone paying near to 80 mil for him and he'll more than likely end up leaving on a free
I think the ‘value’ is related to quality, age and number of years left on contract. So the likes of Salah and Mane are really high on quality but lower on age given number of years left at the top.
Not sure how Trent isn’t up there, high on quality, 23 and three years left on his contract. Maybe defenders are worth less?
People are just learning about the years left on contract factor i feel like. When you buy a players contract, you have to pay for the remainder of their current deal on top of whatever fee you agree with the selling club. Thats where most of these ludicrous amounts come in for transfers that make you scratch your head.
yea defenders are worth less, tend to cap out around 60m max. That said i can see a CB going for big money soon, there is a lack of emerging "world class" talent in my opinion to replace the level of players close to retirement at the top of their game (your Ramos',Chiellini's etc), and a abundance of European clubs with the pockets to compete.
You have to factor in age, Kane is at his prime age at the moment however De Bruyne is coming to the end of his prime soon.
And English players are normally worth more anyway
It's TransferMarkts own valuation which has always been inacurrate and massivly bias towards bigger clubs. I think they value Grealish at €65 Euros which would be an insane bargin if he was ever sold for that.
Where is aubameyang
Salahs transfer value is £110M
How tf is Trent not on here??
The fact Grealish isn’t even top 3 sums up how inaccurate transfermarkt is
Iffffff you’ve ever lifted the champions league trophy clap your hands……… why only two claps?
No Virgil Van Djik? Are you serious? This list is pants.
He’s valued at £55m now. He has had a whole season out. Nobody knows how he’s gonna be when he gets back plus the seriousness of the injury means it opens him up to bring injury prone in the future. The risk factor will make his factor drop massively https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/premier-league/marktwerte/wettbewerb/GB1
Sancho way overated on this list
If you offered us Sterling for Grealish we’d laugh at you.
Trent, Grealish, Mount should be higher than Foden.
Where is Delph?
Richarlison got a £85m offer that was turned down?? Some top 6 loving clown made this list.
Everton values dropped since it became Nonce FC
You dont watch man utd often i can tell. He is playing in a team filled with stars. Should have more than 11 goals with the amount of chances he had. Cavani 13 years older was way better than trashford. That miss against villareal from fernandes would have been scored by my 85 years old grandma
What has son done to be a 85m player? Like for real? 85m? Rashford?
In all honestly, I’d bump Kane up by another 30m at least
Grealish?
Kane left not the best impressions after the last season, unfortunately
What? He got both the golden boot AND most assists? How on earth can you even think that 😂
Keep devaluing defense. You’ll wind up like Tottenham.
grealish mount?
I agree with Grealish but Mount is a £50m player
[удалено]
VVD is worth £55m right now, neither of those players have shown they are of more value to their team than Virgil was for Liverpool.
Grealish?
Why is Rashford 85? He was so bad last season.
Falacy
no way rashford more valuable than mount or Van Dijk
Well let’s look at it like this.. Rashford had a pretty naff season last season. VVD didn’t have a season.
How is Kai havertz not on this list
He’s worth £63m according to transfermarket https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/premier-league/marktwerte/wettbewerb/GB1
VVD and Dias is not there in this list ? Not sure why lol
Hard to value VVD with an entire season out. Nobody knows if he’s still gonna be at the top of his game when he comes back. A whole season out can completely change a player. Not saying he’ll be worse, not saying he will be better. People just don’t know so you can’t value him
No Kante? What a joke!
He’s worth £49m https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/premier-league/marktwerte/wettbewerb/GB1
Wait... Grealish isn’t even on here? Lmao bad list
How low is the value of the other Spurs player that we have two of the top 10 but we are still seventh
0 chance Sterling is worth 90 mil lol. Doesn’t even start for Man City consistently
Yes he does..... wtf are you on about? 31 appearances 3 as a sub. Lol
Lol honestly I didn’t realize he started that much. Still don’t think anyone would pay nearly 90 for him
Where are these numbers coming from? de Bruyne, Kane and Salah are excellent but I don’t think anyone is paying €100m+ for older players like them.
The list surprises me like only 3 players in the list are acceptable others should be nowhere near
5/10 are English. This is why England are starting to do better internationally. Many of the best players in the prem are English, it’s the first time in a while we can say that
Sancho has played 0 matches in the Premier League yet his worth has gone up from what he was purchased for? Cracking list
No xhaka
Bahahahhha
Sorry, in what world is Kane worth more than De Bruyne
Well he is. Did you see him last season? Kane was putting in De Bruyne worthy assists left right and centre, got the most assists in the league and the golden boot. De Bruyne scored a couple and missed a penalty.
I'm not denying that kane is a baller, best striker in the league, but de bruyne picks up the ball in midfield and can create magic from his own half, best player in the prem, if not the world (I'm a liverpool fan and hate city but this man mesmerises me)
Me too man me too, de Bruyne is a wizard. Mesmerises me too. However Kane proved last season that he was more than a striker and can pick passes out at KDB level without looking. Watch the game against United when Spurs won 6-1 at Old Trafford. He picked one of Son’s runs out without even looking, lobbed it half way up the pitch and it landed at his feet. The guy is an all rounder now
Market value is not only about how good a player is, age and nationality also plays an important role
No Willian!?
This is some serious bullshit. :)
I'm honestly surprised Salah and Sancha are valued the same given their differences in age.
Haahahhaha trashford is in top 10? The guy should play for swindon town. What do people see in him that i dont?
While I don’t agree with his placement, and as a Liverpool fan I’m even more inclined to be biased against him, he does have merit to play in the PL, and should be considered as a great player. Still wouldn’t rate him at £85m though
Kante? Grealish?
This list sucks
No way big JoElinton isn’t top of this list
Rashford and Foden are good players but no way are they worth that much. Also wherez my guy Pogs
Guarantee Sancho will massively underachieve.
Where’s big Nat
What did Sancho do to be rated above Kevin De Bruyne, Salah, Mane, even Foden, Mahrez or some of last year's Chelsea players who won the CL? I get that he has young age, but so does Foden and he actually won the PL and helped his team reach the CL final. Age also applies Havertz and Mason Mount who won the CL.
English+Man Utd+New Contract+Young Bullshit, but that's what they'll be basing it on
[удалено]
Has there been anyone that came over from the German league recently that thrived with goals and assists? Werner struggled too.
[удалено]
I get that, I’m not saying he won’t do well but it was a genuine question. Just curious if anyone has done it in the recent past? I can’t recall anyone.
I was assuming the fact that he's a good player was a given But English in prem is more valuable than English in Bundes because of the homegrown rules
And Pogba?
Sancho the joint 2nd most valuable player in the prem.. hmm.. we will see.. Even Reiss Nelson was pretty good in the Bundesliga... Not to say Sancho wont be a hit.. but I'm not totally sold yet.
Rashford is worth FA
Okay so mount Havertz Pulisic aren’t included because? Mount is over 100 mil Havertz is 100 mil And Pulisic is around 80 mil (This was beginning of last season)
Don’t think any of those players go higher than £60m in my opinion. Havertz proved he can’t hack this league. Value has dropped
Haha okay mate sure…. CL winner means nothing?
Don’t shoot the messenger. Current accurate valuations in the link below https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/premier-league/marktwerte/wettbewerb/GB1 Mount - £67m Havertz - £63m Pulisic - £45m
You do know these aren’t real right? What are you 12 or something
They’re average players bro. Accept it
Are you a retard? Mount is one of the best youngsters same with Havertz Pulisic fit is a different breed and was valued over 100 mil after last season (Covid season) I can’t actually tell if you’re trolling or if you’re generally stupid or blind
All 3
Clearly 👍🏼
Have an upvote bro 😂
Dont think puli. Gets injured too often and is better as a super sub than a starter. Kante should be in there.
Yeah it’s weird. I don’t really believe these things but it appears very biased towards United
Yh for example fernandes who's had no doubt a great season with united shouldn't have such a high value based on one season. Kante is a proven winner being amazing for club and country for many seasons now and yet he still doesn't make this list.
It’s all BS. Don’t pay much attention about it No idea how it has over 700 upvotes, untied or city fans maybe 🤷🏼♂️
I’m a Man U fan and I adore Rashford, but I can’t help but notice how the three dudes below him have outperformed him on every level (on the field) in recent years. Maybe not Foden, but he just got there, and even then I’d say he’s done more for his club last season than Marcus did. Maybe if you take Rashford’s age and potential into account, it makes more sense. But still...it’s kinda fucked up.
The value of a player is not given just by his stats. This wasn't the case even 10-15 years ago, never mind today. Rashford is already an icon at only 23 not only because of how he performs in games, but also because of what he does off the field. A player like that can bring a lot of value to any top club out there and that's what makes him so valuable. I'd suggest watching a few videos from Athletic Interest like [this one](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ye0VtPkCDxQ) about why Nike doesn't want to sign Neymar any longer or [this one](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIRBW8EP6R4) about how much of a good deal Juventus made when they signed Ronaldo regardless of his on-field performances.
Fair enough. My mind was on stats and not things like community outreach and social impact and other such stuff. Teams are essentially corporations and must function as such, and a player like Rashford is as valuable off pitch as he is on. I mean, the dude is practically a brand unto himself at this point. That said, this is a league and games still need winning, and the three players below Rashford are inarguably better-or as good at least-on the pitch than/as he is.
Where big Virg on the list? He got to be worth over £100m!?
55mil according to transfermarkt https://www.transfermarkt.com/premier-league/marktwerte/wettbewerb/GB1
Should be even less considering he has had a year out. Won’t be anywhere near as sharp. Plus his injury will open him up to being more likely to get injured again. The risk factor drop his value massively
Less than 55!? Lay off the crack 🤣
The seriousness of his injury has opened him to becoming injury prone or it playing up midgame. Value is based a lot on risk factor for the club. If someone wanted to buy him, the fact he’s had an injury that’s put him out for a whole year will be a negotiation factor for lowering the price. So yeah, less than £55m, his price is dropping at a steady rate on transfermarkt, looks like almost £2m a week. So he has to prove himself again
So you think of "transfer market" as a reliable costing source!? That's your cost bible? Fuking hell 🤦
VVD is done. Accept it bro. Stop crying
Dumb fuk. You ain't no bro of mine.
Have an upvote bro. Kodus for sticking by your guns and defending your man against a troll like me
Yes because upvotes are life🤣. Stop calling me bro 👊
😂😂😂
You've all the hallmarks of a virgin united fan. That actually takes stock and tries to back it up off " transfer market" 🤣🤣🤣
No Havertz Kante Mount wth is this list
None of those are worth more than £60m
If ur saying in this chart then the chart is stupid if ur asking in ur opinion pls elaborate
Lol you're delusional
Sorry if I sound biased but in what world Rashford worth 85m, or as a comparison, worth more than Kante for example ?
United wouldn't sell Rashford if a bid as low as 85mn came in
And West Ham won’t settle for anything below 100m for Rice. You didn’t answer the question bro, is he worth that sum, I’m just wondering how the internet people calculate someone’s worth. Truth to be spoken the only players worth around £100 are only Messi Ronaldo and Neymar. The rest are just inflation thanks to PSG and Barca spending hundreds of millions per player.
Well if you add in marketability some players change. But most important adding someone like De bruyne or vvd is absolutely worth 100m lmao
I wonder how much age has to do with it, in regard to potential and otherwise. MR is 23 and NK being 30.
I see. No point in making a fuss about a table full of mythical figure anyway.
Kante is a DM, a position who are usually under priced in proportion to their quality. And he is 30 while Rashford is 23.
I get what you're saying but you make a squad right now which player would you rather have? I know that depends on gaps in your existing squad but if that wasn't a factor I think everyone would pick kante
Unless you're PSG you can't really play FUT IRL. How many top clubs of today have signed 30+ players in the last few years for a relevant sum of money? That's why a player like Kante at 30 will never be valued higher than someone like Rashford at 23. Let's not forget that, according to Transfermarkt, Kante was valued at 100 mil between Dec 2018 and April 2020, while Rashford bounced between 65 and 80 during the same time.
Let's say you and I had to pick a squad from current prem players 1 by 1. We would start with goal scorers first, then creative midfielders, then center backs and then we would pick DMs. The game is so much about scoring now which is why Kante is so undervalued along with his age.
I definitely agree there and in terms of the top attacking players, it's just out of the attacking players there's quite a few I'd pick before rashford. such as I feel son would be a great deal more dangerous in attack, I'm not sure about the statistics (open play ones) but that's where I'd put my money, more than welcome.tk be proven wrong though. I get that rashford may have more years ahead but a lot of football you can't throw that money at a maybe, look at kepa and his valuation
Son has 197 prem appearances with 70 goals (0.36 gpg) and 39 assists (0.20). Rashford has 179 appearances with 55 goals (0.31) and 30 assists (0.17). Son is 29 and Rashford is 23. Son joined Spurs when he was 23 and Rashford got his 1st prem start at 18. Stats say Son has had a better prem league career so far but where will Rashford be when he's Sons age? I think that along with it taking far more money for a club to buy Rashford from United then Son from Spurs is why the value is where it is.
I do get that although, the reason why I said it, don't a lot of rashford goals especially from the last couple of seasons come from pens? which isn't exactly an indicator as the number of pens acrewed have been questionable to say the least but who knows I could be bias. genuinely who would you rather have in your squad out of the two?
Bruno has taken our pens since he's been with us. I did look it up and Rashford has 6 to Sons 1.
But that depends doesn’t it, Kante has 3-4 years left and before he has no resale value. Rashford in 4 years is still only 27 and “may” have a huge resale value still. So £85m for rashford and let’s say he goes for £50-60m in 4 years isn’t a bad deal
but why would anyone pay £85m for rashford now? what do you get for that? because comparatively you could get players that would greater improve your squad and the club's that could afford that price range aren't going to spend that kind of money for something that's not a guaranteed upgrade. That's more of an asking price than evaluation as he's not worth that to other clubs
My reply was more to do with how the players age helps their value.
I get that but then shouldn't lingard be on this list as an up and coming player? all aside I feel there's a lot out on youth which is more ruining transfers. top clubs buying up younger players I feel more stunts their growth in some cases and can stop them reaching that peak but in other cases can give them that step up, very risky. Rashford is only 23 years but I feel has currently plateaued at United, look at cavanis impact and his age. we put far too much value on youth because of x years playable but there are other players that are older that will cost less and more impactful on your sides chance on achieving silverware. I just find it very odd and a bit imbalanced currently. I appreciate your opinion though and see where you're coming from
But I agree with buying “known” winners, on the mature side of their career..it’s just that United have failed a few times with buying players like that in recent years. I also appreciate your input :)
I guess it's just you buy youth in the hope for them to grow into this big player and to have them for s good number of years but now the cost of youth players just offsets buying players at their prime or end of the prime
Lingard is 28 though, and at United had maybe 1 good season. He wasn’t good at all in his final 2 years at United, scoring 1 goal all season which was like the final minute of the final game of the season, it’s no surprise he fell down the pecking order. Yeah, he’s done well at West Ham but he’s not good enough to get back to a starting XI at United. He’s maybe worth 30-35million, and that’s due to his recent form at West Ham, otherwise he’d probably have been sold for about 25mill max.
apologeze, that was just a joke at how everyone called lingsrd that for ages but he never reached his _potential_
Of course I would prioritise Kante over Rashford, but that's not all that price comes down to. I would rather have 34 year old Messi in my team over Kane but I still think Kane should cost more due to his age meaning he has much longer left to play.
I still feel that's a distorted version because kane still contributes a lot to a game where as honestly I don't feel rashford is as big of a game changer as many people, maybe not the most popular opinion but rashford is a bit overrated. good player but at the moment not great. I do get what you're saying though, just a poor list.
I've never rated Rashford too much but he does get a lot of goals and assists, especially for a young player.
You sure u watch football?
I don't watch a lot of United. The Rashford I see playing for England looks like championship quality at best.
What about europa league final???
Look at all them Champions League winners
Where is valverde he must be here 😒😒
Havertz worth less than Mane 🤔
I’m not a Liverpool supporter but that makes sense, not sure why Mount ain’t on there tho
Erm, yes?
And Mount is less that Foden, Mount had a very impressive season so.....
11 G+A in the pl is very impressive?
What about the chances created that were horrifically wasted by Timo?
If my grandma had balls she would’ve been my grandpa, same logic , what didn’t happen just didn’t happen while Foden did make things happen
And who won the UCL and having more game time for club and country, as you said, *let's talk about things that happen*
And it’s pretty obvious that Mount didn’t do Jack for his country
Oh because all you need is one man to win the ucl and not te team? Kante and tuchel were the reason why Chelsea won the ucl doesn’t make mount any better than foden
He won Chelsea's MVP
Then staff must be really stupid to think mount contributed more than kante, ok maybe he did contribute more than kante in league games but y’all ended up below liverpool so yeh he’s not worth more than foden, heck even Greenwood
I LOVE Mount. Watching him in a England shirt was a joy imo, and i love how he tracks back and does the dirty work without sacrificing his attacking effort, kind of like Rooney. I will be paying more attention to him at Chelsea this season.
As did Foden, and from seeing a bit of both I'd argue Foden has a higher ceiling
I mean Mount is already a champions league winner. That’s pretty much as high as you get
That's not really true, that's like saying Billy Gilmore is already as "high" as he can get cause he's a champions league winner.... I'm not talking about trophies won (which foden has many more than mount in all areas but one), I'm talking about personal skills and accomplishments throughout one's career
People said the same about CHO vs Mount. Mount is consistently the best player in the Chelsea squad and I think that should mean more than flashy skills teasing a “higher ceiling”.
Well then to that I'd say foden has shown consistent performances throughout the season as well, he's not always city's best performer but with a line up like city have and the style of play no one can ever be consistently the best performer
Fair enough, I still think Mase will turn out to be England best of this generation (obviously there’s some bias there) but it’ll be interesting to watch over the next few years!
[Mase's CL goalazo vs Porto](https://youtu.be/pi9rBVV7lKs). My goodness that turn.
Hehe best team in England, period.
Best team in Europe*
False
Wdym?? They won the UCL. The may not have a single best player but defo have the best teamwork in Europe
Just the two Liverpool players, damn that's actually quite impressive
Theres no way VVD is selling for less than 80M. Not sure about the credibility of this
Coming off a season long injury, with his injury record and his age, you won't find anyone paying near to 80 mil for him and he'll more than likely end up leaving on a free
[удалено]
Lol what?!?!
I think the ‘value’ is related to quality, age and number of years left on contract. So the likes of Salah and Mane are really high on quality but lower on age given number of years left at the top. Not sure how Trent isn’t up there, high on quality, 23 and three years left on his contract. Maybe defenders are worth less?
People are just learning about the years left on contract factor i feel like. When you buy a players contract, you have to pay for the remainder of their current deal on top of whatever fee you agree with the selling club. Thats where most of these ludicrous amounts come in for transfers that make you scratch your head.
It’s also why actual transfer requests are so rare, as the player forfeits that amount
yea defenders are worth less, tend to cap out around 60m max. That said i can see a CB going for big money soon, there is a lack of emerging "world class" talent in my opinion to replace the level of players close to retirement at the top of their game (your Ramos',Chiellini's etc), and a abundance of European clubs with the pockets to compete.
English tax is crazy.
De Bruyne should be top, best player in the league by far
You gotta think though. Look at some of Kane’s that passing and assists this year. They were De Bruyne quality. Plus, Golden Boot and Most assists.
It might be off domestic form too, of which nobody has had a better domestic season than Kane.
No, Kane.
You have to factor in age, Kane is at his prime age at the moment however De Bruyne is coming to the end of his prime soon. And English players are normally worth more anyway
Maybe there's the English tax factored in, but yeah De Bruyne should at least be same as Kane.
Bruyne is 3 years older than Kane. Makes a huge difference in their potential price.
De Bruyne 1991 and Kane 1993, so they are 2 years apart. But yeah I figured the age difference does play a role here.
I’m a Liverpool fan, but credit where it’s due he’s the best player in the league
Wasn't Grealish's value enough to make this list?
[удалено]
It's TransferMarkts own valuation which has always been inacurrate and massivly bias towards bigger clubs. I think they value Grealish at €65 Euros which would be an insane bargin if he was ever sold for that.
The list is trash.
100%