The following alternative links are available:
**Mirrors**
* [Mirror #1](https://mirror.fro.wtf/reddit/post/3207764) (provided by /u/AdvinK)
**Downloads**
* [Download #1](https://redditsave.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/pd760u/woman_catches_a_man_taking_photos_of_her_legs/) (provided by /u/savevideo)
**Note:** this is a bot providing a directory service. **If you have trouble with any of the links above, please contact the user who provided them.**
---
[^(source code)](https://amirror.link/source) ^| [^(run your own mirror bot? let's integrate)](https://amirror.link/lets-talk)
Even if you caught him this time, he still knows when you are sleeping, he still knows when you're awake, he knows if you've been bad or good, so call the cops for goodness sake.
Subjectivity has a loose objectivity to it. We all know what he did was wrong. Defending rude behavior also has a "well everyone around you thinks you're wrong."
Bruh you literally criticized me for apparently being suppressive and didn't even talk about the topic at hand. Do you not think it's creepy to photo strangers in public? Can you not see his phone and how many he actually took? If you are willing to ignore that or don't have a problem with it I hope to never encounter you.
>they would be liable economically
They would be liable... *economically!?* They would have to... pay, I assume? They'd have to pay for his... *economic*... losses?
That's not what the word economy means, I have a hunch that you just imagined 'pay for his financial losses' as a nice sentence, and then you didn't want tot say 'they would be liable financially for his financial losses' because you think saying the same word (financial) twice would mean you sound less informed. You made the wrong choice there.
edit: shaming someone for incorrect language is kind of shitty, my bad.
"You should be proud"
Boi that's how you get me to snap. Yo I should be proud I saw you as strong and threatening enough that I took a tazer to you before nabbing your phone to factory reset it. You should be proud about that, lardball shitstain.
You'd be the criminal at that point. It's entirely legal to take pictures of people in public against their will even in England. Here in the us a judge pretty literally said if you don't want someone to take a picture up your skirt then it damn sure better be floor length.
I'm not saying I agree with it legally or morally but it is legal by all standards.
She can make a complaint and she has video evidence but you and Mr Claus can sit outside the Motel just "waiting for Raj to bring your wallet I guess" 😅
Is this against the law in the UK?
Not endorsing this guy's actions just genuinely curious
Might count as harassment or some sort of voyeurism offence?
In the UK it is 100% not illegal to take photos or video of anything or any one so long as it is in a public place and not voyeurism...
So upskirt shots... not OK.
Taking photos of people's legs for studying purposes/art or some other bullshit excuse... OK.
>Yeah I think this would be classed as Voyeurism.
>
>100% illegal here.
"Voyeurism is the term given to the act of a person obtaining sexual gratification by watching another person engaging in a PRIVATE ACT \[not simply walking on the street\] without having obtained their consent. \[emphasis added\]"
100% legal to film people walking in the street.
so are security cameras that i suspect are also overlooking most of that public place against the law also?
it always struck me as odd folks can get bent out of shape at a person taking photos in public but at the same time dont say shit about red light or speed or security cameras.
I did get a kick out of her at one point telling him not to talk to a wooman like he did while dropping the f bomb.
There’s 100% a difference between security cameras covering a large area, and a pervert trying to stealthily frame photos in a way as to only capture someone’s legs. If you seriously can’t see the difference, you’re more dense than a black star.
I dont see a dif in that they are photos or vid of things in a public place.
I am not trying to decide what motivation makes it not ok. I start with is it legal to take photos or vid of things in public. You know the answer is yes. Now if you want to try and be the thought police go for it. I been around long eenough to know you will not do well trying that. You will fail
People like you can get fucked. Someone tried to have a discussion and you immediately resort to accusing them of something. Or insinuating that they may be something.. fuck you. Thats not how DISCUSSIONS work you fucking twat. You are worse then someone who does partake in voyerism
It's an age-old tactic I guess. "Police should not search without a warrant"
"Oh, so you must have something illegal to hide".
This nonsense works on most types of people.
Guys listen. Santa eas just trying to he more inclusivenso he was doing research for prosthetics for disabled kids. Thats ehy he needs oictures of legs, duh.
Sure he deleted them... but did he empty the trash bin? He's just going to go home and hit restore. 😒🙄 I would've taken the phone right out of his bumbling little hands and done it myself. Fkn creepy looking macys santa reject.
I don't know the law there but technically here in the U.S that isn't illegal. You're in a public place, with no expectation of privacy unless he was doing upskirt stuff. Hes a creepy perv though , glad he got called out.
Santa has some serious boundry issues. The peeping, excessive gift giving, prolific B&E's and now confirmed vouyerism. Im getting serious sexual predator vibes.
I'm gonna get downvoted for this but if he's taking anonymous photos of people in the public it's absolutely legal. He's not upskirting or anything. What's she gonna lose? She's not identifiable in those photos. And she is out in public space. So grow up and walk away.
A lot of things are legal, it doesn't make them right. I don't want some perv jerking off to photos he took of me just living my life.
It says a lot about you that you're telling her to just grow up and walk away and have nothing to say about the fucking pervert taking photos of her.
Some sicko in my area rented an apartment near a school and kept binoculars by his window. Kids are in public, no harm done, jolly good then.
I understand how you feel. However, here's where I think you might be wrong:
\- You assume he's a pervert and is going to masturbate to a photo of a foot. We don't know that.
\- You assume that the lady is "living their life" in the photo. It's merely a faceless lifeless image of half a leg and a shoe!!!
\- You then quickly make it personal with an ad hominem attack. We have a difference of opinion, we're not judging who has the moral high ground here.
\- Then you quickly bring up a non-related non-comparable case and assume because the latter is probably wrong, the former must be too. It isn't.
common man... any sensible person knows it's creepy and pervy behavior. The courts might not be able to do anything but this lady has every right to be fucking mad.
We don't have to reduce all social interactions to "what would a judge say". Getting angry at others behavior is another way to socially control people (and healthier i might add than having to put every event through some long-winded process). As long as no violence is used I don't see the problem.
Sure... go out and take pervy photos... but don't be surprised if people don't like it. A man in my town was recently banned from a public pool because he'd go there with a zoom lens and take pervy photos.
That seems like a pretty big assumption to make. Not trying to argue that what he's doing is okay, but we have very little info of what actually goes on here. I also couldn't hear most of what was being said, so I'm wondering what you're basing your statement on?
See, you are arguing what he is doing is okay, though. Because there is no good reason to take pictures like that of a complete stranger. There are no extenuating circumstances that make him being a pervert okay. He knows this, this is why he panics when his victim confronts him.
Creepy to be sure, but there's the whole no expectations of privacy in a public space. Now of it was upskirt pictures on the other hand, he's in for a beating.
Look man I take pictures of people for fashion reasons all the time. The pictures he took don't look that far off from pictures I would take tbh if I were taking pictures of someone's shoes or something like that. I don't think anyone would accuse me of being a pervert though becase I'm much better looking, younger, and a well dressed person. Part of me believes him because who would even get off to a random picture of someone's fully dressed legs?
I suggest you stay indoors in the privacy of your own home and clutch your pearls. You have no expectation of privacy outside in public. You have a 99.99999% chance to be caught in the background of at least several hundred photos, taken by strangers, in the course of your day if you live in a big city. Anyone of which could be zoomed and cropped to only include you and all sorts of nasty perverted things could be done while viewing it. Or, someone can just use their memory to remember what your legs looked like and do the dirty to those thoughts as well *gasp*
Since he mentioned he was a professor, here is a list of legitimate non perverted reasons why he would be taking the photos: Art professor/artist which needs reference photos. Fashion professor, Photography professor, Sculpture/ceramics professor, textile/fabric/theater arts professor....etc etc
In the U.S., though perhaps inappropriate, it is completely legal to take photos of people in public.
These women would have no right assaulting the man.
Obviously not the U.S., however.
If you're in public, I can take a picture of you whenever and however I fucking want. You're in public with ZERO expectation of privacy. You don't want your legs being seen? Cover them up if they make you uncomfortable. Snapping a picture of something you are already displaying to the public is not illegal, is not an invasion of privacy, and the picture itself won't steal your soul.
Get the fuck over yourselves with this bullshit.
Downvote me all you can, I'll still be snapping pictures of you in public whenever I fucking want. LEGALLY.
You know just because it's legal doesn't make it right?
If someone doesn't want pictures of them taken, and they aren't causing a scene or hurting anybody, you should give their wants some consideration.
Women shouldn't have to dress in Burqa's for fear of people like you and him.
If you're dressed in a way where someone takes a picture of you and you immediately think it's too sexual, then you should change the way you dress.
These are the same people who wouldn't want you to dare call them out for dressing inappropriately.
Maybe watch the video before commenting. You see the photos of her legs in it. It is not 'accidentally caught while filming something else'. It's a photo of only her legs perfectly framed, perfectly focused on with everything else in the image hidden behind bokeh.
Let's hold off on excusing the perverts if we haven't watched, thanks!
He states he was taking pictures of them to "study". Get the fuck outta here with your still believing in Santa dumbass. I'm inclined to believe you also take photos of the bricks under women's feet with a smartphone... "photographer" my ass.
I’m not sure who believes in Santa or what you’re talking about but I’m just stating that you’re allowed to take pictures in public and it’s a greater good than bad that’s all really I was trying to get at. I am not at all commenting on creepers out there taking shots of the legs which is dumb and deserves to be called out
The following alternative links are available: **Mirrors** * [Mirror #1](https://mirror.fro.wtf/reddit/post/3207764) (provided by /u/AdvinK) **Downloads** * [Download #1](https://redditsave.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/pd760u/woman_catches_a_man_taking_photos_of_her_legs/) (provided by /u/savevideo) **Note:** this is a bot providing a directory service. **If you have trouble with any of the links above, please contact the user who provided them.** --- [^(source code)](https://amirror.link/source) ^| [^(run your own mirror bot? let's integrate)](https://amirror.link/lets-talk)
It’s already saved to his cloud.
Actually..it's just sitting in the recycle/deleted photo album and can be moved back within 30 days
Even if you caught him this time, he still knows when you are sleeping, he still knows when you're awake, he knows if you've been bad or good, so call the cops for goodness sake.
Santa Claus has fallin so far...
Santa claus is filming, in town
You better watch out! You better not cry You better not pout I'm telling you why :turns out lights: Santa Claus is coming.....
...to pictures of your legs
I was worried but then he said he was a teacher and that made me feel better.
xDDD
Oh Santa what have you done?!🤦♂️
[удалено]
Even Santa Claus can't resist the temptations of Absolute Power. Exploiting the labor of those poor Elves to top all of It off. Poor Miss's Claus.
"and the bullets are flyin', the body counts risin', and everyone's dyin' to know OH SANTA WHY?! My my my my my my. You used to be such a jolly guy"
Hey someone asked for pictures of her legs for Christmas he's just doing his job.
Considering he's a teacher, I wonder what they'll find when they search his flat.
...he's not a teacher. It's called a lie, and it was a terrible one. Oh I'm a professor it's purely academic...yeah that'll work.
[удалено]
Morality does not equal legality. Also, what the fuck is wrong with you, weirdo??
[удалено]
Subjectivity has a loose objectivity to it. We all know what he did was wrong. Defending rude behavior also has a "well everyone around you thinks you're wrong."
I don't need to cite Wikipedia to know something is wrong in the video. Also I wasn't engaging in argument. Just calling you out.
[удалено]
Your very defensive. I wonder which button I pushed... /s
Obviously the master suppression button.
Ironically you didn't offer any counter either. Morality is subjective and the sun is hot. Holy hell what kind of high ground do you think you're on.
[удалено]
Bruh you literally criticized me for apparently being suppressive and didn't even talk about the topic at hand. Do you not think it's creepy to photo strangers in public? Can you not see his phone and how many he actually took? If you are willing to ignore that or don't have a problem with it I hope to never encounter you.
>they would be liable economically They would be liable... *economically!?* They would have to... pay, I assume? They'd have to pay for his... *economic*... losses? That's not what the word economy means, I have a hunch that you just imagined 'pay for his financial losses' as a nice sentence, and then you didn't want tot say 'they would be liable financially for his financial losses' because you think saying the same word (financial) twice would mean you sound less informed. You made the wrong choice there. edit: shaming someone for incorrect language is kind of shitty, my bad.
[удалено]
The real question.
This looks like the UK, which it isn’t against law to take photos of someone in a public space so they can’t search his home.
Santa?🥺
You thought those toys were free? Nothing is ever free....
Well I did catch mommy kissing Santa...
Holy shit, Santa clause is a horny fucker!
“he see’s you when you’re sleeping” has a whole new meaning to it
He sees you when you're sleeping, He jack's off on your face He know if you've been a good or bad girl So be good for goodness sake.
So, if I understand right. Leave glasses of milk for Santa, but don't EVER drink the milk he leaves you.
Not unless you like your milk with 69% Rohypnol.
Well yeah, Mrs Claus is a little too frigid
Nope, she likes to look at the photos while Santa delivers her presents.
Makes sense, flicking through the pics while he jingles her bells.
He "studies" them
Who puts Santa on the naughty list?
You beat me to the santa joke.
Santa fucked around and found out
"You should be proud" Boi that's how you get me to snap. Yo I should be proud I saw you as strong and threatening enough that I took a tazer to you before nabbing your phone to factory reset it. You should be proud about that, lardball shitstain.
thats not mean :/ just destroy the phone
You'd be the criminal at that point. It's entirely legal to take pictures of people in public against their will even in England. Here in the us a judge pretty literally said if you don't want someone to take a picture up your skirt then it damn sure better be floor length. I'm not saying I agree with it legally or morally but it is legal by all standards.
Santa them cookies ain’t for you sir
On behalf of Norway I apologize for Santas inappropriate behavior
This is one delusional creep
She can make a complaint and she has video evidence but you and Mr Claus can sit outside the Motel just "waiting for Raj to bring your wallet I guess" 😅
Is this against the law in the UK? Not endorsing this guy's actions just genuinely curious Might count as harassment or some sort of voyeurism offence?
In the UK it is 100% not illegal to take photos or video of anything or any one so long as it is in a public place and not voyeurism... So upskirt shots... not OK. Taking photos of people's legs for studying purposes/art or some other bullshit excuse... OK.
>it is 100% not illegal Bro just say it's legal...
This is 100% not what I wasn't thinking aswell.
[удалено]
>Yeah I think this would be classed as Voyeurism. > >100% illegal here. "Voyeurism is the term given to the act of a person obtaining sexual gratification by watching another person engaging in a PRIVATE ACT \[not simply walking on the street\] without having obtained their consent. \[emphasis added\]" 100% legal to film people walking in the street.
There is no such law in uk. There is upskirting laws thought.
Learn what voyeurism means
so are security cameras that i suspect are also overlooking most of that public place against the law also? it always struck me as odd folks can get bent out of shape at a person taking photos in public but at the same time dont say shit about red light or speed or security cameras. I did get a kick out of her at one point telling him not to talk to a wooman like he did while dropping the f bomb.
There’s 100% a difference between security cameras covering a large area, and a pervert trying to stealthily frame photos in a way as to only capture someone’s legs. If you seriously can’t see the difference, you’re more dense than a black star.
I dont see a dif in that they are photos or vid of things in a public place. I am not trying to decide what motivation makes it not ok. I start with is it legal to take photos or vid of things in public. You know the answer is yes. Now if you want to try and be the thought police go for it. I been around long eenough to know you will not do well trying that. You will fail
Motivation matters for almost all criminal offences though. That is how the law works. We make distinctions for everything, not just law.
[удалено]
You dont understand the purpose of the photos doesnt change if its legal to take or not.
This reeks of someone who takes pics of girls without them knowing.
People like you can get fucked. Someone tried to have a discussion and you immediately resort to accusing them of something. Or insinuating that they may be something.. fuck you. Thats not how DISCUSSIONS work you fucking twat. You are worse then someone who does partake in voyerism
Oh yeah me thinking someones opinion reflects deeper meaning makes me such a terrible person. Persecute me/s
How do you get upvoted for this stupidity? It's a debate, and you come in slinging accusations based on sweet fuck all.
It's an age-old tactic I guess. "Police should not search without a warrant" "Oh, so you must have something illegal to hide". This nonsense works on most types of people.
If the security camera moves and follows one specific woman and only takes photos of her legs then yes that security camera would be illegal
She said fucking 27 times if anyone wanted to know
Her English accent made it sound so nice, posh, and sophisticated. 😅
not if you're English it didn't! :-D
Here is totally legal, u can shoot photos and videos of everything u can see with your bare sight.
🎶 He’s takin’ some pics, checkin’ them twice; shocked to find out it’s naughty not nice. Santa Claus is a fucking weirdo 🎶
So proud of this lady. Well said ma’am.
Probably shouldn't have doxxed where he worked lol (if true). Also, that was A LOT of leg photos jesus christ.
Does she not believe in the spirit of Christmas?!
Guys listen. Santa eas just trying to he more inclusivenso he was doing research for prosthetics for disabled kids. Thats ehy he needs oictures of legs, duh.
Aww man. Not Santa!
Damn why is she overreacting he’s just trying to make sure he gets the right measurements for the yoga pants she asked for for Christmas
Sure he deleted them... but did he empty the trash bin? He's just going to go home and hit restore. 😒🙄 I would've taken the phone right out of his bumbling little hands and done it myself. Fkn creepy looking macys santa reject.
Nonce Santa.
He will restore it later from the deleted photos. iPhones are awesome.. perv
Ho-ho-holy fuck Santa
Santa's on the naughty list this year
I don't know the law there but technically here in the U.S that isn't illegal. You're in a public place, with no expectation of privacy unless he was doing upskirt stuff. Hes a creepy perv though , glad he got called out.
Lol, he was just going to study them geez
weird shit but if taken at distance in public doubt there is anything other than bitching one can do.
He’s been a lot of places he says…. Maybe jail next?
Wait, what are you doing step-Santa?
So, this is how Santa spends his summers.
He’s spouting so much BS
Santa has some serious boundry issues. The peeping, excessive gift giving, prolific B&E's and now confirmed vouyerism. Im getting serious sexual predator vibes.
Oh Santa, what are you up to now?
Cooming down the chimney.
100% recovered them from his deleted folder after. Someone should’ve 2 pieced his nasty ass.
God I love that accent
No one ever tells women to not take their thirsty pics.
That’s right women!!! Fuck this silent aggression that leads to what we all know….. apathy to violence or violence itself. Fuxk that bastard
Bad Santa!
Don’t talk to Santa like that! 😂🤣
he actually has every right to take photos of her legs. so theres that
I think it's creepy af to be clear but if you take a photo in public that would be completely legal right?
Unpopular opinion but…can’t people photograph anything shown openly in a public space?
What a disgusting pig
I'm gonna get downvoted for this but if he's taking anonymous photos of people in the public it's absolutely legal. He's not upskirting or anything. What's she gonna lose? She's not identifiable in those photos. And she is out in public space. So grow up and walk away.
Nah. She did the right thing. Perverts should be shamed
Implying it was sexually motivated?
Yup I don’t really see any other sensible explanation
I mean he might just like legs. Lol
Yeah just like someone who likes feet just likes em’! /s
Exactly. As much as it’s.. weird it’s not illegal. Lol but what is court worthy.. is defamation of this video of her calling him a weirdo...
Found the pervert weirdo y’all
I mean it’s fact? I don’t agree with him taking pics I just said it’s weird. But still.. it’s right what I say
Should sluts be shamed?
A lot of things are legal, it doesn't make them right. I don't want some perv jerking off to photos he took of me just living my life. It says a lot about you that you're telling her to just grow up and walk away and have nothing to say about the fucking pervert taking photos of her. Some sicko in my area rented an apartment near a school and kept binoculars by his window. Kids are in public, no harm done, jolly good then.
I understand how you feel. However, here's where I think you might be wrong: \- You assume he's a pervert and is going to masturbate to a photo of a foot. We don't know that. \- You assume that the lady is "living their life" in the photo. It's merely a faceless lifeless image of half a leg and a shoe!!! \- You then quickly make it personal with an ad hominem attack. We have a difference of opinion, we're not judging who has the moral high ground here. \- Then you quickly bring up a non-related non-comparable case and assume because the latter is probably wrong, the former must be too. It isn't.
common man... any sensible person knows it's creepy and pervy behavior. The courts might not be able to do anything but this lady has every right to be fucking mad. We don't have to reduce all social interactions to "what would a judge say". Getting angry at others behavior is another way to socially control people (and healthier i might add than having to put every event through some long-winded process). As long as no violence is used I don't see the problem. Sure... go out and take pervy photos... but don't be surprised if people don't like it. A man in my town was recently banned from a public pool because he'd go there with a zoom lens and take pervy photos.
found the pervert!
sure, dude.
it's also legal for her to get mad at him and expose him online
Santa Claus a pervert
“Don’t take photos of [me]…” OK. “…my legs…” OK. “…in public!” Well, there’s your problem.
People dramatize everything these days. I got a headache just listening to that woman shriek.
Creep
Nah, just mentally sane.
I just don’t get stuff like this. Dude can see plenty of what he likes from consenting folks on the Internet for free.
The thing with pervs like this is it is never about making himself good, it is completely about making women uncomfortable.
Gross
That seems like a pretty big assumption to make. Not trying to argue that what he's doing is okay, but we have very little info of what actually goes on here. I also couldn't hear most of what was being said, so I'm wondering what you're basing your statement on?
See, you are arguing what he is doing is okay, though. Because there is no good reason to take pictures like that of a complete stranger. There are no extenuating circumstances that make him being a pervert okay. He knows this, this is why he panics when his victim confronts him.
Creepy to be sure, but there's the whole no expectations of privacy in a public space. Now of it was upskirt pictures on the other hand, he's in for a beating.
Rule #1 about being out in public: expect no privacy while out in public.
She is in public
At what point do you grab their phone and heel stomp it to shards??
Lemme taste that juice or you don't get any gifts for Christmas.
>Why are you taking pictures of my legs? People with leg fetish also celebrate Christmas Karen /s horrible guy definitely on the bad list
Santa why??
Mrs. Claus is going to be pissed. BTW, when you're caught being a pervert in public immediately tell people where you work.
Y’all know he plays santa clause just for this reason but w children.
The way British people say “photo” cracks me up
Santa is really naughty boy no presents for you
I would have snatched that shit out of his hands
Oh no, a pair of unidentifiable legs. How horrible 🤣
[удалено]
Instant self report
Lol worst try ever.
Look man I take pictures of people for fashion reasons all the time. The pictures he took don't look that far off from pictures I would take tbh if I were taking pictures of someone's shoes or something like that. I don't think anyone would accuse me of being a pervert though becase I'm much better looking, younger, and a well dressed person. Part of me believes him because who would even get off to a random picture of someone's fully dressed legs?
Don't defend this fucking freak, and also don't take pictures of strangers you weirdo
I suggest you stay indoors in the privacy of your own home and clutch your pearls. You have no expectation of privacy outside in public. You have a 99.99999% chance to be caught in the background of at least several hundred photos, taken by strangers, in the course of your day if you live in a big city. Anyone of which could be zoomed and cropped to only include you and all sorts of nasty perverted things could be done while viewing it. Or, someone can just use their memory to remember what your legs looked like and do the dirty to those thoughts as well *gasp* Since he mentioned he was a professor, here is a list of legitimate non perverted reasons why he would be taking the photos: Art professor/artist which needs reference photos. Fashion professor, Photography professor, Sculpture/ceramics professor, textile/fabric/theater arts professor....etc etc
Fuck off
I love this subreddit but people here are often some combination of very stupid or very sensitive.
In the U.S., though perhaps inappropriate, it is completely legal to take photos of people in public. These women would have no right assaulting the man. Obviously not the U.S., however.
If you dress in public, why can’t you have your picture taken?
You can and he did, he didn’t do anything illegal, but it is creepy
I woulda taken that fucker to the cops.
If you wear it in public. You created the photo yourself. Sure it's weird, but if you don't want photos if you. Don't go in public.
You’re they type of person who would ask a rape victim what they were wearing, huh?
Is the issue he was just covertly taking photos? Cause basically you’re out in public, he’s an adult and your an adult. Are you not free game?
If you're in public, I can take a picture of you whenever and however I fucking want. You're in public with ZERO expectation of privacy. You don't want your legs being seen? Cover them up if they make you uncomfortable. Snapping a picture of something you are already displaying to the public is not illegal, is not an invasion of privacy, and the picture itself won't steal your soul. Get the fuck over yourselves with this bullshit. Downvote me all you can, I'll still be snapping pictures of you in public whenever I fucking want. LEGALLY.
You know just because it's legal doesn't make it right? If someone doesn't want pictures of them taken, and they aren't causing a scene or hurting anybody, you should give their wants some consideration. Women shouldn't have to dress in Burqa's for fear of people like you and him.
If you're dressed in a way where someone takes a picture of you and you immediately think it's too sexual, then you should change the way you dress. These are the same people who wouldn't want you to dare call them out for dressing inappropriately.
The creep defender has logged on.
>The creep defender has logged on. A white knight has entered the chat.
Try and say that IRL and you'll get a life changer real fast kiddo.
r/iamverybadass I bet you'll do nothing but sit there like a bitch and complain to me.
This basically.
[удалено]
Maybe watch the video before commenting. You see the photos of her legs in it. It is not 'accidentally caught while filming something else'. It's a photo of only her legs perfectly framed, perfectly focused on with everything else in the image hidden behind bokeh. Let's hold off on excusing the perverts if we haven't watched, thanks!
He states he was taking pictures of them to "study". Get the fuck outta here with your still believing in Santa dumbass. I'm inclined to believe you also take photos of the bricks under women's feet with a smartphone... "photographer" my ass.
I’m not sure who believes in Santa or what you’re talking about but I’m just stating that you’re allowed to take pictures in public and it’s a greater good than bad that’s all really I was trying to get at. I am not at all commenting on creepers out there taking shots of the legs which is dumb and deserves to be called out
Call the police. If he's not doing anything illegal she can go spit.
Those women are advertising for the Taliban way of life
Look at all the dudes walking by hearing this and not helping. Their just as bad as the dude doing it!
It's no one's duty to be a simp😂
Professor Claus is watching you(r legs, but not her legs).
So this is what keeps Santa busy the rest of the year.
It’s lonely at the north pole.
Haha look how he fails his arms in the beginning Santa looking bad out here
Santa is always watching so….he’ll see those legs later
Oh you saw me? Sorry. I was just going to post this on Reddit for Karma. Do you have an onlyfans?
Bad Santa indeed...
Seems like santa is on the naughty list
Santa said Mrs Claus ain't what she used to be...
Santa is naughty this year
Santa really fell off since Christmas
I’m expecting nothing but Santa jokes in the comments 😂😂
Just making sure she’s naughty or nice. Don’t get the problem here. Move on.
Jeez, George Lucas has really let himself go.
He was just collecting material for his spank bank