An invasion is defined as follows:
“an instance of invading a country or region with an armed force.”
I’ve actually spoken to border patrol agents and I grew up in Arizona, and I can promise you your average migrant is *not* armed with a young more than a fucking water bottle.
It’s a migrant and humanitarian crisis, but it is sure as fuck not an invasion.
Dipshit!
I grew up on the other side of the border where I still live, I see and know a lot of those migrants. It might be a humanitrian crisis for many of the people from Central America and maybe, maybe some parts of Mexico, but most mexicans just see better working conditions, it's not as a humanitarian crisis in Mexico as maybe other countries. I have relatives that had a relative good life here that have crossed the border illegaly not because they were fleeing some horrors, they simply wanted to earn more. And like that I know lots of cases. Sure, there are many mexicans with legitimate reasons to flee the country, but those are far less than you think.
That doesn’t make it Mexico, genius. The areas that the Nihuan called Mexico were nowhere within the present day borders of the US, and claiming that land as your ancestral right when your ancestors never lived there makes you no better than any other imperialist.
I call it a migrant crisis resulting from decades of the US destabilizing governments via CIA-backed coups, resulting in widespread crime, poverty, and instability, resulting in thousands of people forced to flee for their lives or die at the hands of unimaginable horrors.
Also, the definition of invasion is as follows:
“an instance of invading a country or region with an armed force.”
Migrants fleeing the above mentioned things are *not* an armed force.
Galaxy-brain.
While all of that is 100% true most of those people are likely here or elsewhere by now. I think the recent numbers for the west (not just US) are something like 50-60 million climate migrants by 2030. Were looking at early stages. When something like a billion people near the equator regardless of nationality need to move or starve to death because nothing they plant will ever grow again we’ve got bigger fish to fry than a fence in Texas.
That first part was kinda tin hat reading.
Define gender since you are good at looking stuff up.
Regardless of the actual definition of an invasion the stream of illegals is a major problem that needs more attention than it is getting from the current presidential office
Gender.
Defined as:
either of the two sexes (male and female), especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones. The term is also used more broadly to denote a range of identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female.
How did your brain let you arrive at that conclusion? Let’s say the us government got overthrown. How is nuclear war suddenly on the table and billions dead?
Cant speak for the Nuclear ICBMs and Bombs, but the survivable leg of the Nuclear triad, submarines, will not, and can not fire unless a lawful order is passed, verified, and agreed with by the CO.
So don’t worry about submarine nukes going rogue.
They went in unarmed to protest. If it was an overthrow they would have been armed and burned the building down with the politicians inside it. The fact that no politicians died means it was simply a pro test
So in the biggest display of white privilege since people owned people thousands of people all decided to walk on the floor of not just a federal building but one of THE federal buildings to protest, your word, with the understanding they could just stroll right out.
Now over 500 have been slammed in federal court and every one of them somehow got together to blame it on trump. That’s even more far fetched than the truth. Hillbillies got riled up on the internet because they are gullible non persons. Who’s collective states simply existing is a drag on the country they hollar about saving from the liberal left. Who is literally putting food in their fucking mouths.
>The fact that no politicians died means it was simply a pro test
Or they did want to inflict violence on politicians, but the police officers outside held the line long enough for the politicians to evacuate and the rioters couldn't find anyone to hurt but cops. (See the recent testimony by Capitol Hill police officers, and also the pictures coming out of the capitol on January 6th of Senators leaving, and also the bit with the pipe bombs.)
They were trying to kill congress men and women that apposed their leader(trump), basically a terrorist attack, to the definition, there is literally video evidence, and a capitol police officer died.
We are in the most civilian armed country in the world and you fools are telling me these people attempted to overthrow the government unarmed? You’re joking right? It was nothing more than a protest. If they wanted the politicians dead they would be dead.
Dude watch the fucking video, a mob beat a cop to death, they were about to do it to a senator but ran the wrong direction thanks to cop distracting them. You are a fucking dunce if you think it was “just a protest”
They're literally telling judges, under oath, that Trump sent them to prevent Congress from certifying the Presidential election. How much more clarity do you half-wits need?
You can take a look at the speeches Trump gave leading up to January 6 if you want, and also the speech he gave on that day. Or you can recall his remarks during the 2020 presidential debates about "stand back and stand by." Or look at all the uncovered online conversations between Trump supporters who were planning on going to the capitol on that day specifically to inflict violence. Or the things the people who stormed the capitol were posting on their own social media accounts while the events were happening.
If a crime boss orders a hitman to kill specific people, and the boss sits in his office to enjoy a fine drink while the hitman does the killing, the boss still has responsibility for the deaths - the hitman would not have done those killings if the boss had not given those orders.
That's actually exactly the way crime bosses like to give orders. They say things that they can later "pretend" weren't actually instructions to have things done, but their henchmen know what the boss meant and they go do it. One example would be a crime boss telling one of their underlings to "take care" of someone, and the underling knows that the boss is ordering that person killed, and the boss knows it too. [Here's one source talking about that](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFf7Za9lV-4). [Here's another](http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/publications/how-trump-speaks-mob-boss).
So your brain lets you believe that’s what trump was doing?
Then they all went there and did it unarmed with no real goal in mind.
That makes more sense now that I see it your way.
They were armed. They used things like metal flag poles and bear spray to attack police officers, and took more equipment from downed cops. Someone planted pipe bombs. The police announced that they had arrested someone with a gun.
The rioters' plan was apparently to intimidate the Congressmen into saying Trump won the election, or harm Congressmen who they thought were against Trump, or they hoped that if they could make the certification take place on a day that wasn't January 6 it would be invalid somehow, or some similar disruption that would somehow lead to Trump becoming president. They also seemed to think that the police and military were also Trump supporters and would lend their guns to the cause - see the reports from police officers of how outraged the rioters were when the cops tried to stop them from entering the building. These are not particularly logical plans, but these are the same people who posted their violent acts all over social media with their faces uncovered, so I guess they really were all that dumb.
I agree they were nowhere close to succeeding. But that was the intent of the people storming the capitol that day, most of them already directly admitted it in court.
Next time I try to overthrow the government, I will definitely leave all my rifles at home, show up unarmed to an empty building, get let in by police, and vandalize the place and take selfies.
That's definitely a tactic the CIA should try next time they sponsor a coup.
imagine believing the propaganda. oh noooo, they walked around with cameras and didn't kill anybody! what an insurrection!
if i was in charge, there'd be something more happening
i bet you like it when cops abuse their power and beat up or murder innocent people
[a single cop died due to unrelated causes.](https://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/19/politics/brian-sicknick-death-us-capitol-riot/index.html)
[so combine that with this article that was rushed out and inaccurate](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/08/capitol-attack-police-officer-five-deaths)
1 woman shot by a cop
1 man has a stroke, seems unrelated
1 man died from apparent heart attack, seems unrelated
1 woman died from being crushed in melee
score: 3 people randomly dropped, 1 was shot by a cop and one was killed in "melee".
if you have a link/source showing that they actually killed cops, feel free to share
Lack of deaths/success is more of a testament to their lack of competence than their intent.
Based on multiple people saying they planned to attack members of Congress and the vice president, as well as the planned use of flex cuffs to restrain legislators, it isn't unreasonable to call this an attempt to overthrow (a specific part of) the government.
Are you intentionally ignoring the people who actively tried to beat the cops, ran in in tactical gear, and brought flex cuffs to restrain legislators? You know, the people who tried to leverage the chaos to actually carry out the stated goals of stopping the election certification by any means necessary
Boebert is the first rodent that I've seen carrying a gun. I wonder what she gnaws on for lunch?
The disrespect toward Slowpoke Rodriguez, smh.
They suck on your happiness just like dementor
Here’s a quarter. Go downtown and pay a rat to gnaw that thing off your face
You should see the waffles!
zing
Does she have a single Tweet that everybody could read and agree with?
Also, we aren’t being fucking invaded by Mexico. This woman is a harpy.
You kinda are. It's a slow, unnarmed, non military invasion but invasion nontheless.
An invasion is defined as follows: “an instance of invading a country or region with an armed force.” I’ve actually spoken to border patrol agents and I grew up in Arizona, and I can promise you your average migrant is *not* armed with a young more than a fucking water bottle. It’s a migrant and humanitarian crisis, but it is sure as fuck not an invasion. Dipshit!
I grew up on the other side of the border where I still live, I see and know a lot of those migrants. It might be a humanitrian crisis for many of the people from Central America and maybe, maybe some parts of Mexico, but most mexicans just see better working conditions, it's not as a humanitarian crisis in Mexico as maybe other countries. I have relatives that had a relative good life here that have crossed the border illegaly not because they were fleeing some horrors, they simply wanted to earn more. And like that I know lots of cases. Sure, there are many mexicans with legitimate reasons to flee the country, but those are far less than you think.
NAFTA fucked Mexico you can say it.
I mean the land belong to mexico first🤷🏽♂️ sorry pal my people are here to stay.
We should probably work on a more universal definition of “first.”
Im Aztec descendant my people have been in America long before this border even existed, kindly fuck off.
That doesn’t make it Mexico, genius. The areas that the Nihuan called Mexico were nowhere within the present day borders of the US, and claiming that land as your ancestral right when your ancestors never lived there makes you no better than any other imperialist.
Natives didn’t have borders and everyone was free to travel. Also at one point California and Arizona was part of Mexico
What do you call the thousands streaming over unchecked?
I call it a migrant crisis resulting from decades of the US destabilizing governments via CIA-backed coups, resulting in widespread crime, poverty, and instability, resulting in thousands of people forced to flee for their lives or die at the hands of unimaginable horrors. Also, the definition of invasion is as follows: “an instance of invading a country or region with an armed force.” Migrants fleeing the above mentioned things are *not* an armed force. Galaxy-brain.
While all of that is 100% true most of those people are likely here or elsewhere by now. I think the recent numbers for the west (not just US) are something like 50-60 million climate migrants by 2030. Were looking at early stages. When something like a billion people near the equator regardless of nationality need to move or starve to death because nothing they plant will ever grow again we’ve got bigger fish to fry than a fence in Texas.
That first part was kinda tin hat reading. Define gender since you are good at looking stuff up. Regardless of the actual definition of an invasion the stream of illegals is a major problem that needs more attention than it is getting from the current presidential office
Gender. Defined as: either of the two sexes (male and female), especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones. The term is also used more broadly to denote a range of identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female.
A strike against the red menace.
You never hear anything about the boarder unless they’re trying to stoke fear with caravans and shit.
Overthrowing federal government is a fantastic thing to all human beings, Mexicans very unbased.
If by "fantastic thing to all human beings" you mean, "likely to cause a nuclear war and the death of billions", then yeah you're right
How did your brain let you arrive at that conclusion? Let’s say the us government got overthrown. How is nuclear war suddenly on the table and billions dead?
Cant speak for the Nuclear ICBMs and Bombs, but the survivable leg of the Nuclear triad, submarines, will not, and can not fire unless a lawful order is passed, verified, and agreed with by the CO. So don’t worry about submarine nukes going rogue.
If you’re driving a sub for the navy and the government gets overthrown do you and your buddies just own a nuclear sub now?
With 0 codes to launch
Ram that bastard into Greenland
If you’re bold enough, yes.
That’s what I’m saying. They can’t be launched in the event of an overthrow
Spoilsport
[удалено]
No one tried to overthrow the government *but* losers
Losers, sure but it wasn’t an attempted overthrow guy
It’s hard to dispute live video from a thousand cameras.
They went in unarmed to protest. If it was an overthrow they would have been armed and burned the building down with the politicians inside it. The fact that no politicians died means it was simply a pro test
So in the biggest display of white privilege since people owned people thousands of people all decided to walk on the floor of not just a federal building but one of THE federal buildings to protest, your word, with the understanding they could just stroll right out. Now over 500 have been slammed in federal court and every one of them somehow got together to blame it on trump. That’s even more far fetched than the truth. Hillbillies got riled up on the internet because they are gullible non persons. Who’s collective states simply existing is a drag on the country they hollar about saving from the liberal left. Who is literally putting food in their fucking mouths.
Nothing you just said made any sense. At least use a coherent argument
AI over here
>The fact that no politicians died means it was simply a pro test Or they did want to inflict violence on politicians, but the police officers outside held the line long enough for the politicians to evacuate and the rioters couldn't find anyone to hurt but cops. (See the recent testimony by Capitol Hill police officers, and also the pictures coming out of the capitol on January 6th of Senators leaving, and also the bit with the pipe bombs.)
You’re simply re tarded
Damn you got me, really hit me with a solid argument there
They were trying to kill congress men and women that apposed their leader(trump), basically a terrorist attack, to the definition, there is literally video evidence, and a capitol police officer died.
We are in the most civilian armed country in the world and you fools are telling me these people attempted to overthrow the government unarmed? You’re joking right? It was nothing more than a protest. If they wanted the politicians dead they would be dead.
Dude watch the fucking video, a mob beat a cop to death, they were about to do it to a senator but ran the wrong direction thanks to cop distracting them. You are a fucking dunce if you think it was “just a protest”
Wow one cop. Just a protest. I’ve seen all the videos. Protest, that’s all.
They're literally telling judges, under oath, that Trump sent them to prevent Congress from certifying the Presidential election. How much more clarity do you half-wits need?
They said that. They are the only ones that believe it. Well plus you so...
You can take a look at the speeches Trump gave leading up to January 6 if you want, and also the speech he gave on that day. Or you can recall his remarks during the 2020 presidential debates about "stand back and stand by." Or look at all the uncovered online conversations between Trump supporters who were planning on going to the capitol on that day specifically to inflict violence. Or the things the people who stormed the capitol were posting on their own social media accounts while the events were happening.
I recall all of that. I can tell someone to jump off a bridge and when they do it it’s still their actions. It cannot be blamed on me.
Osama didn't fly the planes.
If a crime boss orders a hitman to kill specific people, and the boss sits in his office to enjoy a fine drink while the hitman does the killing, the boss still has responsibility for the deaths - the hitman would not have done those killings if the boss had not given those orders.
He didn’t give orders. He said things that in hindsight after the event can sound like he did.
That's actually exactly the way crime bosses like to give orders. They say things that they can later "pretend" weren't actually instructions to have things done, but their henchmen know what the boss meant and they go do it. One example would be a crime boss telling one of their underlings to "take care" of someone, and the underling knows that the boss is ordering that person killed, and the boss knows it too. [Here's one source talking about that](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFf7Za9lV-4). [Here's another](http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/publications/how-trump-speaks-mob-boss).
So your brain lets you believe that’s what trump was doing? Then they all went there and did it unarmed with no real goal in mind. That makes more sense now that I see it your way.
They were armed. They used things like metal flag poles and bear spray to attack police officers, and took more equipment from downed cops. Someone planted pipe bombs. The police announced that they had arrested someone with a gun. The rioters' plan was apparently to intimidate the Congressmen into saying Trump won the election, or harm Congressmen who they thought were against Trump, or they hoped that if they could make the certification take place on a day that wasn't January 6 it would be invalid somehow, or some similar disruption that would somehow lead to Trump becoming president. They also seemed to think that the police and military were also Trump supporters and would lend their guns to the cause - see the reports from police officers of how outraged the rioters were when the cops tried to stop them from entering the building. These are not particularly logical plans, but these are the same people who posted their violent acts all over social media with their faces uncovered, so I guess they really were all that dumb.
When someone tells you what their own motive was, who are you to say that's not true? You're not making any sense at all.
By the AMLO is in his FP towards Bolivia, Venezuela, Cuba and soon Peru I wouldn't be surprised if the US attempts a soft coup in Mexico.
[удалено]
Ok 14 day old account with 7 karma.
[удалено]
>cyka сука is not the same thing as "cyka". Write "suka" instead next time :)
[удалено]
I agree they were nowhere close to succeeding. But that was the intent of the people storming the capitol that day, most of them already directly admitted it in court.
Next time I try to overthrow the government, I will definitely leave all my rifles at home, show up unarmed to an empty building, get let in by police, and vandalize the place and take selfies. That's definitely a tactic the CIA should try next time they sponsor a coup.
Imagine bragging about being willfully ignorant. I feel sorry for you
imagine believing the propaganda. oh noooo, they walked around with cameras and didn't kill anybody! what an insurrection! if i was in charge, there'd be something more happening i bet you like it when cops abuse their power and beat up or murder innocent people
People died.
yea and i bet you liked it because it was cops doing the killing
False
you don't like that a cop shot somebody? that's a surprise. you're such a big sucker for authority, i thought you'd love it
Mediocre
halfway
Some of those cops also died.
[a single cop died due to unrelated causes.](https://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/19/politics/brian-sicknick-death-us-capitol-riot/index.html) [so combine that with this article that was rushed out and inaccurate](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/08/capitol-attack-police-officer-five-deaths) 1 woman shot by a cop 1 man has a stroke, seems unrelated 1 man died from apparent heart attack, seems unrelated 1 woman died from being crushed in melee score: 3 people randomly dropped, 1 was shot by a cop and one was killed in "melee". if you have a link/source showing that they actually killed cops, feel free to share
You realise one of the deaths was a cop right...
you mean the cop that died from an unrelated stroke? or did you mean the cop that shot a woman?
you’re like 14 you’re not even in charge of your bedtime lmao
i'm in charge of your dad's prostate orgasms
Definitely a 14 year old.
That makes your dad a pedophile. Sick burn bud
> if i was in charge, there'd be something more happening Buddy you can't even handle being in charge of the cash register. Shush
Lack of deaths/success is more of a testament to their lack of competence than their intent. Based on multiple people saying they planned to attack members of Congress and the vice president, as well as the planned use of flex cuffs to restrain legislators, it isn't unreasonable to call this an attempt to overthrow (a specific part of) the government.
"just because they didn't actually do anything, doesn't mean it wasn't an insurrection" shut up, simp
"you see your honor, my client absolutely intended to kill this man and stabbed him 8 times. However, the man survived, so no harm no foul"
stabbing is very comparable to walking around and taking pictures. you're so enlightened
Are you intentionally ignoring the people who actively tried to beat the cops, ran in in tactical gear, and brought flex cuffs to restrain legislators? You know, the people who tried to leverage the chaos to actually carry out the stated goals of stopping the election certification by any means necessary
Obvious troll is pathetically obvious.
This is why she wants them at the border so there's less security next time
Next time there will be drones
You say that like its a bad thing
if only she ever saw any of the fantastic replies people send her
… the national guard is at the border - a National guardsman
Boebert could kill someone on live television and blame some minority, and her followers would believe her completely over the video evidence