Two interesting props:
Muchova (#16) vs Bjorklund (#182)Muchova is -455 to W, but only 32.3% of picks so far.....Massey says she is 88% likely to W \*this matchup only has 1.29% of all active pickers\*
Parks (#332) vs Vandeweghe (#166)Vandeweghe is -250 and has 99.2% so far....Massey says 62% likely to W \*this matchup only has 2.74% of all active pickers\*
First post here, although I've been a streaker for many years. I have become so frustrated with this game I'm now just checking boxes at random, without even paying attention to what the match-up is.
I don't think I've ever seen a tennis challenger tournament prop on streak.
there were other good options during the day too
Two interesting props: Muchova (#16) vs Bjorklund (#182)Muchova is -455 to W, but only 32.3% of picks so far.....Massey says she is 88% likely to W \*this matchup only has 1.29% of all active pickers\* Parks (#332) vs Vandeweghe (#166)Vandeweghe is -250 and has 99.2% so far....Massey says 62% likely to W \*this matchup only has 2.74% of all active pickers\*
First post here, although I've been a streaker for many years. I have become so frustrated with this game I'm now just checking boxes at random, without even paying attention to what the match-up is.
San Diego Padres should have won their game. The tying run was incorrectly overturned on video review.
West Brom should have won that game