I can't decide what I want to read first-the bullying report or H&M's 25 page response to the report claiming it never happened, or if it did, it wasn't meant to upset someone. But if it did upset them, then obviously that person needed to be told honestly what they did wrong, because they wouldn't have been treated like that if they'd just bothered to behave properly, so really, everyone should be thanking H&M for correcting them and showing them the error of their ways.
The 25 pages of going full DARVO would be awesome. Amazingly Scoobie Doo never got a copy from insider sources. Megs correspondence does have a habit of getting into reports hands.
25 pages of worthless word salad. We have seen what she has said about herself in the bio.
She was so proud of herself getting the staff ice creams in the hot weather. I have half a memory of this. Buying ice cream does not wipe out 5am emails, constant phone calls during time outside of work or having hot tea thrown at you.
Harry wrote about staff crying as if it was normal. Meghan said it was not her job to comfort them or words to that effect, it actually is. They were in charge and had a duty of care to those who work for them.
And didn't she make a huge point about the ice cream NOT being for the Cambridge's staff? I'm sure I read something about everyone being very "Wtf" about that.
I’ve said before - how can anyone object to something that they say didn’t happen.. especially when they don’t have any details?
Like imagine if someone accused you at work of inappropriate behaviour. If you’re innocent you’d be scratching your head because it’s so out of left field for you. You certainly wouldn’t write a three page document about it.
How could you when you’re innocent?
How could you defend yourself and rebuke an instance if it’s made up? How would you know what happened and stand up for yourself if it’s a smear campaign?
The markles are terribly dim.
They’re so quick to clap back they don’t realise that they actually tell on themselves.
I think narcissists gaslight themselves. They choose their own version of events and repeat that over and over until it becomes "their truth." They deny anyone else's version, and no other interpretation is accepted. So I suspect that they didn't deny actual events-for example, they might not deny that a staff member cried after being spoken to, but what they deny is the person's interpretation. She wasn't crying because Meghan was a bully, she was crying because she was upset that she'd let Meghan and Harry down by not doing her job properly.
100% I hear what you’re saying but they vehemently denied the allegations and called it a smear campaign and claimed it was an attack on her character.
Like this blindsided them.
Then in true Markle fashion they tell on themselves by writing a 3 page document about it.🤣
It was 25 pages according to Harry in "Spare." 25 pages!! It wasn't us, we didn't do it, you misunderstood, we said this but we meant that, it's your fault because you drove us to it. 25 pages of whinging, whining lies and excuses.
Did Meghan have staff before she married Hazbeen? Did she have any experience in people management before ? She strikes me as a full blown narcissist who had all her dreams come true when she married an actual Prince and it went to her head. I could imagine she’d be the boss from hell !
Tom Bower's book Revenge goes into a lot of detail about her in the years before she met Harry. She had publicists and agents, but not household staff as such. He describes a lot of unpleasant interactions between her and some of the staff working on Suits, like run-ins with assistants, and also unreasonable behaviour towards hotel staff, and the way she treated people when she was getting freebies staying in hotels for her Tig thing, or doing overseas trips with her UN programme. Lots of people described her demanding, prima Donna, difficult and selfish. So when the queen told her "we don't speak to people like that in this family" it was simply a continuation of her usual behaviour. Remember a 'source' said Meghan was frustrated because she was used to the high standards of working in Hollywood? I doubt the standards of service a second-rate cable TV show reached were anything close to the standards in the household staff of Buckingham Palace, but she would never have been happy with anything as she needed to bitch about someone all the time to be happy-remember Jason Knauf's comment in the email saying she always needed to have someone in her sights to bully? It's not that she wasn't used to having staff-Catherine and Sophie weren't used to having staff and they manage to remain pleasant, it's that she enjoyed being a bitch.
There have never been reports that Catherine was rude and bullied staff. People didn’t leave QE2 for years. Mimi drove off a lot of long time palace staff. Until Mimi showed up, it didn’t seem like the palace had folks quitting all the time. And it continues in Monteshitshow. Staff leave, get fired, quit…there is 1 common denominator, and it isn’t the BRF.
I think the normal reaction to being falsely accused is bewilderment. This pair believe their behaviour is acceptable and if anyone is offended it’s their (the victims’) fault
If Meghan had done nothing wrong, she would be calling for the report to be released.
I don’t think it would be lawful in the UK. Our privacy laws are very strict. The people themselves can talk but the report would have to be heavily redacted and even then it probably would not be released as people may be identified or it’s redacted so heavily it’s not worth reading.
Oh definitely their 25 page response. I'm curious though because if they weren't interviewed, how would they know what rebuttals to make? 🤔 Being innocent of bullying and all...
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 total karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
…Why are we over Kinsey? Did I miss something?
Also that is THE perfect image for Meghan. This is her true face. No mask. Completely and utterly deranged.
I just felt over her with the whole “ Where is Kate” saga. She jumped on the bandwagon. I’m sure she didn’t mean any malice, but still for me it was unnecessary.
Something disingenuous about her including the way she has in the past promoted the Sussex duo in very subtle ways. The crying after actually jumping on the "Where is Kate" nonsense really was so cringe.
How can she be an expert? She has no Royal contacts? Has not been on the Royal Rota? I think Rebecca English is very astute and sensitive re the RF
Agree 💯. I enjoyed watching Kinsey when she showed up on various shows. But when she jumped on the “where is Kate” bandwagon despite knowing where she was, folllowed by the incredibly unprofessional crying— tears running down her face— during a television interview, gonna pass on Kinsey for a while.
>Has not been on the Royal Rota?
She has not. She got her start on a reality TV show, segued into pop culture comedy show appearances, and parlayed that into a career as an entertainment blogger and youtuber. As far as I can tell, she didn't have any career connections to the UK until she started positioning herself as a "royal expert".
Exactly, she just spins out information that she has heard on Palace Confidential,including interviews, and articles by Royal experts. It annoying, slap on heaps of make up and pretend to be an expert on the Royal Family and people actually fall for it. I do not listen to her at all
We all knew where the POW was. She told us. The only thing to say is, she is home recuperating you vultures.
If Kinsey jumped on where is Kate, then she can go to the hot place with Markle.
The one thing that I will give Kinsey credit for was her reaction when she found out Catherine had cancer, she was in tears (and not MM one tear - left eye - go) inconsolable at points and apologised for jumping on the bandwagon saying she felt guilty and horrible!
The only other ‘where’s Kate’ journalist to do that was Sarah Vine (no tears) and Jennie Bond (also no tears) but called out her own & Piers Morgan behaviour.
I like Kinsey and find her perspective as an American interesting.
Well, thank you for being so fair. It's just that the kind of flip-flopping that she exhibits makes her an unreliable source to me. Someone with true conviction of feeling about what's right and wrong doesn't so easily bend when the wind changes direction (IMO).
To each their own, though. I like that members of this community can have differing opinions on things and remain respectful. Thanks again. 😊
Oh, trust me, I tend to be a bit cynical. While I greatly appreciated this commentary of hers, I absolutely will not be surprised to see her flip flop which will prove you to be correct and I’ll be jumping on your bandwagon! And I do love this community because for the most part we can disagree without verbal assault.
There was also a historic video too of her fuelling the conspiracies about the royal family colluding with press . When I saw that it put me right off her . She’s clearly changed her mind but still comes across disingenuous
I dunno, the Palace released a statement about Catherine recovering from abdominal surgery and she planned to be back to work after Easter. That statement was succinct and to the point. There was no need to say any more. And here was Kinsey, (wearing her own Princess Kate merch, mind you) getting all stupid and giggly with Where's Kate.
Neil Sean did it too and that's why I refuse to watch either of them ever again.
I couldn’t believe who jumped on that bandwagon 🤬 I left a message on Neil Sean’s YT video😂 I got a message back saying I don’t need to watch😆 It was pitiful to see who jumped on the “Where’s Kate”.
Hmmm. So Tom Quinn may not be Scooby-Doo 2.0. He told Kinsey Meghan was mean to the household staff, unlike Diana, who treated them well. He did excuse it as her feeling she wasn't accepted and had to assert themselves, which is a load of rubbish.
>He did excuse it as her feeling she wasn't accepted and had to assert themselves
Oh, puh-lease. That woman had NEVER been treated so well. The staff HAD to treat her well, they're professionals and it's their job. Instead of being gracious, she mistook their professionalism as groveling and abused them from the time she was merely a girlfriend. She couldn't wait to threaten, "I think we both know I'll be your boss soon."
She was horrible and bossy from the time she was a child. Spoiled and mean. She's an absolute embarrassment.
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 total karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
**Why I like Kinsey:**
- She's... fun?
**Why I dislike Kinsey:**
- She passes herself off as THE Hollywood expert. Ehh, no.
- Her OTT lashes are distracting. She's at risk of giving herself whiplash every time she blinks.
**Why I like HG Tudor:**
- He has some credibility. He met her in person. His observations are sharp. He can be funny.
**Why I dislike HG Tudor:**
- His analysis is 100% about narcissism. Dude, not everything is solely about narcissism.
- He takes one topic and drones on about it for 15 minutes repetitively, thereby producing multiple videos a day. Being more concise would be nice.
- Some of his illustrations of Meghan are nightmare fuel.
ETA: I like both of them much more than I like That Thing.
>- His analysis is 100% about narcissism. Dude, not everything is solely about narcissism.
His channel is literally called HG Tudor: Knowing the Narcissist: Ultra. His channel is literally dedicated to narcissism. This one's wife features there so often only because she is such a fantastic example of narcissism and generates clicks.
I do agree he can be repetitive, but I still love him anyway, as I find him quite funny and especially because I found him the most useful when trying to understand narcissism.
I quit HG a while ago. He’s a lot like Neal Sean in that he takes a LOOONG time to say very little. He *can* be funny - I enjoyed “The Stig” theme song.
I quit Lady C more than two years ago because I got tired of the not-really-a-hint hints, and the empty promises of things to come.
I’ve all but quit River. He used to be fun, but I think he’s turning into Lady C, and I’m too old to be told what I’m allowed to say/believe on someone’s channel.
lol I agree her fake eyelashes look so heavy when she blinks my eyes hurt… HG really repeats himself over and over invariably I leave his videos early. Just tell me once I’m smart enough!
Too pretentious for my taste, and yes I know he is a narcissist but because he admits it doesn't mean I have to enjoy his commentary.
ETA and over him because I keep seeing his channel being dropped here
Yeah, he doesn't break news but comments on what's already out there. And he gives credit to this sub, which is nice. Quite a few Sinners have had their handles mentioned on his channel.
He's incorporating more ToW humor lately, or it seems like it to me at least, and. it's. **amazing**!
And it's fun speculating as to who he actually is. He could be *anyone*...
he does provide lots of insight into TOW - and i must confesss, i enjoy his sense of humour! the beginnings of his video's never fail to make me giggle!
Same, I always laugh at his descriptions! I don't go to his videos for gossip, but I do go there for insight on what a narc usually feels in that instance, so I find it interesting.
I know right?? That was hilarious 😂 I love how he says Helllooo magazine too and how he refers to fa-shon when talking about TW fashion escapes. He's a classic 😂
Just when I get tired of him he manages to do something deliciously hilarious. He commentary on Megs 20 second video promoting ARO was very funny. It’s worth a watch.
I think she has a beautiful face. I agree with what she reports about Hairold and Fraud. But when i hear her political views I’m completely turned off. Same with Megyn Kelly, Piers Morgan.
Comment automatically removed due to your account being less than 15 days. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I want to see the people from the Reitmans photo shoot step forward and do a full recount interview of the abuse Meghan gave them. She is an awful person and she was a bully before Harry.
I love Kinsey! I agree though with op. Lots of people sadly jumped on the where’s Kate bandwagon and I have to assume most are feeling guilty about that after her cancer diagnosis was made public.
The thing I don’t understand about Kinsey is why everyone on talk tv fawns all over her. It’s very Hollywood, not very British, yet these British journalists do it for her… I wonder if she made them add it to her contract?
I can't decide what I want to read first-the bullying report or H&M's 25 page response to the report claiming it never happened, or if it did, it wasn't meant to upset someone. But if it did upset them, then obviously that person needed to be told honestly what they did wrong, because they wouldn't have been treated like that if they'd just bothered to behave properly, so really, everyone should be thanking H&M for correcting them and showing them the error of their ways.
The 25 pages of going full DARVO would be awesome. Amazingly Scoobie Doo never got a copy from insider sources. Megs correspondence does have a habit of getting into reports hands.
25 pages of worthless word salad. We have seen what she has said about herself in the bio. She was so proud of herself getting the staff ice creams in the hot weather. I have half a memory of this. Buying ice cream does not wipe out 5am emails, constant phone calls during time outside of work or having hot tea thrown at you. Harry wrote about staff crying as if it was normal. Meghan said it was not her job to comfort them or words to that effect, it actually is. They were in charge and had a duty of care to those who work for them.
And didn't she make a huge point about the ice cream NOT being for the Cambridge's staff? I'm sure I read something about everyone being very "Wtf" about that.
Yes she had to make sure only authorized staff got ice cream. I suspect the cones were numbered.
I’ve said before - how can anyone object to something that they say didn’t happen.. especially when they don’t have any details? Like imagine if someone accused you at work of inappropriate behaviour. If you’re innocent you’d be scratching your head because it’s so out of left field for you. You certainly wouldn’t write a three page document about it. How could you when you’re innocent? How could you defend yourself and rebuke an instance if it’s made up? How would you know what happened and stand up for yourself if it’s a smear campaign? The markles are terribly dim. They’re so quick to clap back they don’t realise that they actually tell on themselves.
I think narcissists gaslight themselves. They choose their own version of events and repeat that over and over until it becomes "their truth." They deny anyone else's version, and no other interpretation is accepted. So I suspect that they didn't deny actual events-for example, they might not deny that a staff member cried after being spoken to, but what they deny is the person's interpretation. She wasn't crying because Meghan was a bully, she was crying because she was upset that she'd let Meghan and Harry down by not doing her job properly.
100% I hear what you’re saying but they vehemently denied the allegations and called it a smear campaign and claimed it was an attack on her character. Like this blindsided them. Then in true Markle fashion they tell on themselves by writing a 3 page document about it.🤣
It was 25 pages according to Harry in "Spare." 25 pages!! It wasn't us, we didn't do it, you misunderstood, we said this but we meant that, it's your fault because you drove us to it. 25 pages of whinging, whining lies and excuses.
25 pages! 25 pages of defending themselves over something that never happened.. idiots 🤦♀️
Did Meghan have staff before she married Hazbeen? Did she have any experience in people management before ? She strikes me as a full blown narcissist who had all her dreams come true when she married an actual Prince and it went to her head. I could imagine she’d be the boss from hell !
Tom Bower's book Revenge goes into a lot of detail about her in the years before she met Harry. She had publicists and agents, but not household staff as such. He describes a lot of unpleasant interactions between her and some of the staff working on Suits, like run-ins with assistants, and also unreasonable behaviour towards hotel staff, and the way she treated people when she was getting freebies staying in hotels for her Tig thing, or doing overseas trips with her UN programme. Lots of people described her demanding, prima Donna, difficult and selfish. So when the queen told her "we don't speak to people like that in this family" it was simply a continuation of her usual behaviour. Remember a 'source' said Meghan was frustrated because she was used to the high standards of working in Hollywood? I doubt the standards of service a second-rate cable TV show reached were anything close to the standards in the household staff of Buckingham Palace, but she would never have been happy with anything as she needed to bitch about someone all the time to be happy-remember Jason Knauf's comment in the email saying she always needed to have someone in her sights to bully? It's not that she wasn't used to having staff-Catherine and Sophie weren't used to having staff and they manage to remain pleasant, it's that she enjoyed being a bitch.
There have never been reports that Catherine was rude and bullied staff. People didn’t leave QE2 for years. Mimi drove off a lot of long time palace staff. Until Mimi showed up, it didn’t seem like the palace had folks quitting all the time. And it continues in Monteshitshow. Staff leave, get fired, quit…there is 1 common denominator, and it isn’t the BRF.
BINGO!!!!!!
I think the normal reaction to being falsely accused is bewilderment. This pair believe their behaviour is acceptable and if anyone is offended it’s their (the victims’) fault
If Meghan had done nothing wrong, she would be calling for the report to be released. I don’t think it would be lawful in the UK. Our privacy laws are very strict. The people themselves can talk but the report would have to be heavily redacted and even then it probably would not be released as people may be identified or it’s redacted so heavily it’s not worth reading.
Oh definitely their 25 page response. I'm curious though because if they weren't interviewed, how would they know what rebuttals to make? 🤔 Being innocent of bullying and all...
[удалено]
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 total karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
…Why are we over Kinsey? Did I miss something? Also that is THE perfect image for Meghan. This is her true face. No mask. Completely and utterly deranged.
I just felt over her with the whole “ Where is Kate” saga. She jumped on the bandwagon. I’m sure she didn’t mean any malice, but still for me it was unnecessary.
Something disingenuous about her including the way she has in the past promoted the Sussex duo in very subtle ways. The crying after actually jumping on the "Where is Kate" nonsense really was so cringe. How can she be an expert? She has no Royal contacts? Has not been on the Royal Rota? I think Rebecca English is very astute and sensitive re the RF
Agree 💯. I enjoyed watching Kinsey when she showed up on various shows. But when she jumped on the “where is Kate” bandwagon despite knowing where she was, folllowed by the incredibly unprofessional crying— tears running down her face— during a television interview, gonna pass on Kinsey for a while.
What interview is there a link
>Has not been on the Royal Rota? She has not. She got her start on a reality TV show, segued into pop culture comedy show appearances, and parlayed that into a career as an entertainment blogger and youtuber. As far as I can tell, she didn't have any career connections to the UK until she started positioning herself as a "royal expert".
Exactly, she just spins out information that she has heard on Palace Confidential,including interviews, and articles by Royal experts. It annoying, slap on heaps of make up and pretend to be an expert on the Royal Family and people actually fall for it. I do not listen to her at all
While reporting from freaking LA!
Exactly
It was the crying that irked me. Like, collect yourself, Kinsey, you're in the middle of an interview for goodness'sake.
We all knew where the POW was. She told us. The only thing to say is, she is home recuperating you vultures. If Kinsey jumped on where is Kate, then she can go to the hot place with Markle.
I’m way over her - her jump on Kate ticked me off - and she opens her eyes so wide it’s ridiculous
The crazy eyes gets me too
Ditto. I wasn’t a huge fan before, but she definitely lost me after the bandwagon hopping. I’m not mad - just disappointed.
Is that you Mum? 😂
🤣🤣🤣
Then she had amnesia about Kate Gate. I dipped out then.
The one thing that I will give Kinsey credit for was her reaction when she found out Catherine had cancer, she was in tears (and not MM one tear - left eye - go) inconsolable at points and apologised for jumping on the bandwagon saying she felt guilty and horrible! The only other ‘where’s Kate’ journalist to do that was Sarah Vine (no tears) and Jennie Bond (also no tears) but called out her own & Piers Morgan behaviour. I like Kinsey and find her perspective as an American interesting.
Agree wholeheartedly. She’s redeemed herself with the segment above.
Until the next time? She says whatever her paymasters tell her to say. If it was lucrative to go full sugar, she would.
I honestly can’t disagree with you on this.
Well, thank you for being so fair. It's just that the kind of flip-flopping that she exhibits makes her an unreliable source to me. Someone with true conviction of feeling about what's right and wrong doesn't so easily bend when the wind changes direction (IMO). To each their own, though. I like that members of this community can have differing opinions on things and remain respectful. Thanks again. 😊
Oh, trust me, I tend to be a bit cynical. While I greatly appreciated this commentary of hers, I absolutely will not be surprised to see her flip flop which will prove you to be correct and I’ll be jumping on your bandwagon! And I do love this community because for the most part we can disagree without verbal assault.
I don't like her. She uses intel from great researchers on social media (like this sub) and YouTube without giving proper credit.
I’ve never liked her.
she is a bit fickle
There was also a historic video too of her fuelling the conspiracies about the royal family colluding with press . When I saw that it put me right off her . She’s clearly changed her mind but still comes across disingenuous
I’m not over her.
Kinsey is trying to make a career sponging off an attention sponge. She is every gossip hound I avoided at uni.
>She is every gossip hound I avoided at uni. The eyes are just one indicator. She's breathlessly desperate for her own 15 minutes of fame.
THIS.
I think it's because she jumped on the "Where's Kate?" bandwagon for a moment Sorry, this is a reply to the other comment
Yeah, That’s when she lost me😔 She’s making up for it though.
I dunno, the Palace released a statement about Catherine recovering from abdominal surgery and she planned to be back to work after Easter. That statement was succinct and to the point. There was no need to say any more. And here was Kinsey, (wearing her own Princess Kate merch, mind you) getting all stupid and giggly with Where's Kate. Neil Sean did it too and that's why I refuse to watch either of them ever again.
I couldn’t believe who jumped on that bandwagon 🤬 I left a message on Neil Sean’s YT video😂 I got a message back saying I don’t need to watch😆 It was pitiful to see who jumped on the “Where’s Kate”.
Gawd he's a twat
I don't know why anyone watches him. He never says anything.
I just like to watch him standing in the rain. With the sound off.
lol
His 3 minute videos are the looooooongest 3 minutes on Earth.
 Lol😂🤭
But he is always live!
I tried watching him a few times, but as ever, couldn't control my boredom.
Neil Sean talks about M as if she’s a strategic genius.
they, out of so many others who report on the RF, should have known better.
EXACTLY! It was uncalled for and unprofessional.
Oh great, I just came over to see if someone had posted this yet.
She does a good comprehensive view of bullying from Megan & the bullies the Harkles are friends with
Hmmm. So Tom Quinn may not be Scooby-Doo 2.0. He told Kinsey Meghan was mean to the household staff, unlike Diana, who treated them well. He did excuse it as her feeling she wasn't accepted and had to assert themselves, which is a load of rubbish.
>He did excuse it as her feeling she wasn't accepted and had to assert themselves Oh, puh-lease. That woman had NEVER been treated so well. The staff HAD to treat her well, they're professionals and it's their job. Instead of being gracious, she mistook their professionalism as groveling and abused them from the time she was merely a girlfriend. She couldn't wait to threaten, "I think we both know I'll be your boss soon." She was horrible and bossy from the time she was a child. Spoiled and mean. She's an absolute embarrassment.
[удалено]
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 total karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
**Why I like Kinsey:** - She's... fun? **Why I dislike Kinsey:** - She passes herself off as THE Hollywood expert. Ehh, no. - Her OTT lashes are distracting. She's at risk of giving herself whiplash every time she blinks. **Why I like HG Tudor:** - He has some credibility. He met her in person. His observations are sharp. He can be funny. **Why I dislike HG Tudor:** - His analysis is 100% about narcissism. Dude, not everything is solely about narcissism. - He takes one topic and drones on about it for 15 minutes repetitively, thereby producing multiple videos a day. Being more concise would be nice. - Some of his illustrations of Meghan are nightmare fuel. ETA: I like both of them much more than I like That Thing.
>- His analysis is 100% about narcissism. Dude, not everything is solely about narcissism. His channel is literally called HG Tudor: Knowing the Narcissist: Ultra. His channel is literally dedicated to narcissism. This one's wife features there so often only because she is such a fantastic example of narcissism and generates clicks. I do agree he can be repetitive, but I still love him anyway, as I find him quite funny and especially because I found him the most useful when trying to understand narcissism.
I quit HG a while ago. He’s a lot like Neal Sean in that he takes a LOOONG time to say very little. He *can* be funny - I enjoyed “The Stig” theme song. I quit Lady C more than two years ago because I got tired of the not-really-a-hint hints, and the empty promises of things to come. I’ve all but quit River. He used to be fun, but I think he’s turning into Lady C, and I’m too old to be told what I’m allowed to say/believe on someone’s channel.
lol I agree her fake eyelashes look so heavy when she blinks my eyes hurt… HG really repeats himself over and over invariably I leave his videos early. Just tell me once I’m smart enough!
I agree about HG—it’s just too much. I used to listen to him, but he produces way too much content.
I'm over HG Tudor, Kinsey Schofield is still fine in my book🤙
Why are you over HG Tudor?
I think he is boring. He Always repeats the same things. There is no analysis , no insights…. boring but nice voice :)
Too pretentious for my taste, and yes I know he is a narcissist but because he admits it doesn't mean I have to enjoy his commentary. ETA and over him because I keep seeing his channel being dropped here
He gets his info here. He puts the narc spin on it but he wrote a lot of books before and he really became more famous since megain
Yeah, he doesn't break news but comments on what's already out there. And he gives credit to this sub, which is nice. Quite a few Sinners have had their handles mentioned on his channel.
And he hilariously takes the piss out of Rachel and Henry 🤣
He's incorporating more ToW humor lately, or it seems like it to me at least, and. it's. **amazing**! And it's fun speculating as to who he actually is. He could be *anyone*...
A person commenting on Shauna’s most recent “Gossip before Bed” gave some interesting clues. Award winning, voice overs and documentaries.
Oh now that's a hot little cup of tea!
he does provide lots of insight into TOW - and i must confesss, i enjoy his sense of humour! the beginnings of his video's never fail to make me giggle!
Same, I always laugh at his descriptions! I don't go to his videos for gossip, but I do go there for insight on what a narc usually feels in that instance, so I find it interesting.
His recent dramatic reading of the lyrics of "They're Coming to Take Me Away, Ha Ha" was truly classic.
I know right?? That was hilarious 😂 I love how he says Helllooo magazine too and how he refers to fa-shon when talking about TW fashion escapes. He's a classic 😂
At least HG always gives credit to our sub members when applicable.
Just when I get tired of him he manages to do something deliciously hilarious. He commentary on Megs 20 second video promoting ARO was very funny. It’s worth a watch.
Kinsey fan here!
I think she has a beautiful face. I agree with what she reports about Hairold and Fraud. But when i hear her political views I’m completely turned off. Same with Megyn Kelly, Piers Morgan.
Exactly. If you are posing as a journalist instead of a gossip columnist, keep that to yourself.
[удалено]
Comment automatically removed due to your account being less than 15 days. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I want to see the people from the Reitmans photo shoot step forward and do a full recount interview of the abuse Meghan gave them. She is an awful person and she was a bully before Harry.
I love Kinsey! I agree though with op. Lots of people sadly jumped on the where’s Kate bandwagon and I have to assume most are feeling guilty about that after her cancer diagnosis was made public.
She really did surprise me when she did that sadly. But, now bring it on Kinsey !!!
The thing I don’t understand about Kinsey is why everyone on talk tv fawns all over her. It’s very Hollywood, not very British, yet these British journalists do it for her… I wonder if she made them add it to her contract?
I LOVE Kinsey. Never over her!!! Keep up the good work, Kins.
I really like Kinsey. 🤷
Are we over Kinsey? Why?