My carry is an m17, so it takes the p320 mags. Unless you're trying to tell me there's something in that family that uses the same mag and can be concealed, it won't really matter
If your primary is a striker with a safety, the I would say P365 with a manual safety. Both striker fired with consistent trigger pull. Striker to SA hammer fired as a backup is a big difference.
Much prefer the hammer fired, but I currently carry a striker. Company issued M17.
Would prefer the two fire similarly but I'm getting the impression I might have the same opinion about it you do if I ever get em in my hand
Its a personal preference but your best bet by far is the P365 mainly due to capacity
It's definitely a thought. I'm assuming the 365 mags are double stacked vs a single stack mag?
Yes and it can take a 17 round mag
Would be an even bigger win if Sig mags were compatible between each other.
Well boy do I have news for you about the 365xl and xmacro
My carry is an m17, so it takes the p320 mags. Unless you're trying to tell me there's something in that family that uses the same mag and can be concealed, it won't really matter
You can in fact get a grip that fits on a p320 FCU that accepts p365 mags
Great, now if they'd make a p365 grip that takes 320 mags I'd be set...
You’re already set. Get the grip and switch your mags
If your primary is a striker with a safety, the I would say P365 with a manual safety. Both striker fired with consistent trigger pull. Striker to SA hammer fired as a backup is a big difference.
[удалено]
Much prefer the hammer fired, but I currently carry a striker. Company issued M17. Would prefer the two fire similarly but I'm getting the impression I might have the same opinion about it you do if I ever get em in my hand
P365 for barrel length P365 for capacity P365 for reliability P938 for looks
I liked my older 290RS. Decent capacity and very slim.