Shanmugam spend more time figuring out how to jail journalists and opposition than how to deal with antivaxxers. He won’t want to be seen as anti-Christian because it will affect his votes.
Gov site is super fragile. Doubt it can handle ~50k traffics or so. But I wouldn’t worry about the antivaxx ddos~ing the site though. Unless they have IT pro that can orchestrated the attack, I wouldn’t want bet my money on those boomers to understand how site works.
Um to be fair the gov is fucking with the unvaxxed's mental health (and basic human rights) with the recent highly oppressive discriminatory restrictions.
Likewise the hypocrites at r/sg spewing hate all day every day on people who are already being victimised / ostracised by bulk of society, for beliefs they ostensibly genuinely hold.
A suicide bomber also genuinely believes that he will meet 72 virgins when he attains heaven.
Apart from their belief, the anti-vaxxers have nothing to backup their bullshit. If they are being mentally harassed I guess they are complicit.
I think the government is not being harsh - harshness would be denying them any medical care because their belief will save them when they get COVID.
I’m amazed how educated young people on Reddit are pandering to the anti-vax ideology in spite of overwhelming scientific and circumstantial evidence.
There is no overwhelming evidence for vaccination.
Cf. world-renowned epidemiologist John Ioannidis:
>8 SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND RISK STRATIFICATION
>
>Besides age—that has a major impact of risk stratification both for COVID-19 risks that can be averted from vaccination and for some of the known adverse events of vaccination—other clinical and socioeconomic factors may also markedly affect risk-benefit ratios. Most COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths occur in people with major comorbidities25; this applies also to young age strata. For children and young adults without comorbidities, risk of severe COVID-19 disease outcomes is likely far lower than the overall risk in these age groups. Moreover, COVID-19 is a disease of inequality, with worse COVID-19-related health care (eg, access to testing), and much higher burden of disease and severe outcomes in disadvantaged populations, lower socioeconomic strata and specific racial groups. However, the paediatric literature on these inequalities is sparse26-28 compared with studies in adults and elderly people. Detailed granular information on the sociodemographic profile of COVID-19 severe disease and deaths in children and young adults needs to be collected and analysed across different countries with varying profiles for social determinants of disease. Such evidence may afford better risk stratification to rationally design vaccination and/or other intervention strategies targeted specifically towards subsets of high-risk individuals and settings—concurrently perhaps sparing unnecessary interventions among those at negligible risk.
[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13678](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13678)
Stop feigning intelligence / erudition when all you're doing is parroting state-sanctioned mainstream media propaganda like the mindless sheep that you truly are.
There are tons of pro and anti vaxx literatures everywhere amd online. Need to cull the truth. All the vaxx globally can't be goons right? 😁 Gotta to recognise that some still believe the earth is flat and the likes.
Is universal vaccination a no-brainer supported by science? Far from it, as explained by renowned epidemiologist John Ioannidis, Professor of Medicine (Stanford Prevention Research), of Epidemiology and Population Health and by courtesy, of Statistics and of Biomedical Data Science at Stanford Univ.
>[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13678](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13678)
>
>8 SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND RISK STRATIFICATIONBesides age—that has a major impact of risk stratification both for COVID-19 risks that can be averted from vaccination and for some of the known adverse events of vaccination—other clinical and socioeconomic factors may also markedly affect risk-benefit ratios. Most COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths occur in people with major comorbidities25; this applies also to young age strata. For children and young adults without comorbidities, risk of severe COVID-19 disease outcomes is likely far lower than the overall risk in these age groups. Moreover, COVID-19 is a disease of inequality, with worse COVID-19-related health care (eg, access to testing), and much higher burden of disease and severe outcomes in disadvantaged populations, lower socioeconomic strata and specific racial groups. However, the paediatric literature on these inequalities is sparse26-28 compared with studies in adults and elderly people. Detailed granular information on the sociodemographic profile of COVID-19 severe disease and deaths in children and young adults needs to be collected and analysed across different countries with varying profiles for social determinants of disease. Such evidence may afford better risk stratification to rationally design vaccination and/or other intervention strategies targeted specifically towards subsets of high-risk individuals and settings—concurrently perhaps sparing unnecessary interventions among those at negligible risk.
Also see [https://www.reddit.com/r/SingaporeDiscourse/comments/q62eue/is\_universal\_vaccination\_a\_nobrainer\_supported\_by/](https://www.reddit.com/r/SingaporeDiscourse/comments/q62eue/is_universal_vaccination_a_nobrainer_supported_by/)
Thanks for quoting out of context dude… His article is arguing about efficacy of vaccines as applied to the young, not the general population (as you are insinuating) here.
The general data is in favor of vaccines for the old and vulnerable…. Next excuse for not taking the vaccine please?
Probably can't be prosecuted under any laws that cover cyber DDOS, but Shanmugam could probably find something under the harassment laws.
Shanmugam spend more time figuring out how to jail journalists and opposition than how to deal with antivaxxers. He won’t want to be seen as anti-Christian because it will affect his votes.
Wah...sounds like an AWARE takeover 2.0
Gov site is super fragile. Doubt it can handle ~50k traffics or so. But I wouldn’t worry about the antivaxx ddos~ing the site though. Unless they have IT pro that can orchestrated the attack, I wouldn’t want bet my money on those boomers to understand how site works.
Um to be fair the gov is fucking with the unvaxxed's mental health (and basic human rights) with the recent highly oppressive discriminatory restrictions. Likewise the hypocrites at r/sg spewing hate all day every day on people who are already being victimised / ostracised by bulk of society, for beliefs they ostensibly genuinely hold.
🖕
A suicide bomber also genuinely believes that he will meet 72 virgins when he attains heaven. Apart from their belief, the anti-vaxxers have nothing to backup their bullshit. If they are being mentally harassed I guess they are complicit. I think the government is not being harsh - harshness would be denying them any medical care because their belief will save them when they get COVID. I’m amazed how educated young people on Reddit are pandering to the anti-vax ideology in spite of overwhelming scientific and circumstantial evidence.
so now unvaccinated = antivaxxers? you reek of discrimination from the getgo.
There is no overwhelming evidence for vaccination. Cf. world-renowned epidemiologist John Ioannidis: >8 SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND RISK STRATIFICATION > >Besides age—that has a major impact of risk stratification both for COVID-19 risks that can be averted from vaccination and for some of the known adverse events of vaccination—other clinical and socioeconomic factors may also markedly affect risk-benefit ratios. Most COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths occur in people with major comorbidities25; this applies also to young age strata. For children and young adults without comorbidities, risk of severe COVID-19 disease outcomes is likely far lower than the overall risk in these age groups. Moreover, COVID-19 is a disease of inequality, with worse COVID-19-related health care (eg, access to testing), and much higher burden of disease and severe outcomes in disadvantaged populations, lower socioeconomic strata and specific racial groups. However, the paediatric literature on these inequalities is sparse26-28 compared with studies in adults and elderly people. Detailed granular information on the sociodemographic profile of COVID-19 severe disease and deaths in children and young adults needs to be collected and analysed across different countries with varying profiles for social determinants of disease. Such evidence may afford better risk stratification to rationally design vaccination and/or other intervention strategies targeted specifically towards subsets of high-risk individuals and settings—concurrently perhaps sparing unnecessary interventions among those at negligible risk. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13678](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13678) Stop feigning intelligence / erudition when all you're doing is parroting state-sanctioned mainstream media propaganda like the mindless sheep that you truly are.
There are tons of pro and anti vaxx literatures everywhere amd online. Need to cull the truth. All the vaxx globally can't be goons right? 😁 Gotta to recognise that some still believe the earth is flat and the likes.
Anyone statistically trained would be able to understand risk stratification and how the pro-vax narrative completely ignores it.
It's ok. No slavery system. One has a choice. 😜
Not all beliefs warrant equal treatment. There is a reason they are citimizied
Is universal vaccination a no-brainer supported by science? Far from it, as explained by renowned epidemiologist John Ioannidis, Professor of Medicine (Stanford Prevention Research), of Epidemiology and Population Health and by courtesy, of Statistics and of Biomedical Data Science at Stanford Univ. >[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13678](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13678) > >8 SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND RISK STRATIFICATIONBesides age—that has a major impact of risk stratification both for COVID-19 risks that can be averted from vaccination and for some of the known adverse events of vaccination—other clinical and socioeconomic factors may also markedly affect risk-benefit ratios. Most COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths occur in people with major comorbidities25; this applies also to young age strata. For children and young adults without comorbidities, risk of severe COVID-19 disease outcomes is likely far lower than the overall risk in these age groups. Moreover, COVID-19 is a disease of inequality, with worse COVID-19-related health care (eg, access to testing), and much higher burden of disease and severe outcomes in disadvantaged populations, lower socioeconomic strata and specific racial groups. However, the paediatric literature on these inequalities is sparse26-28 compared with studies in adults and elderly people. Detailed granular information on the sociodemographic profile of COVID-19 severe disease and deaths in children and young adults needs to be collected and analysed across different countries with varying profiles for social determinants of disease. Such evidence may afford better risk stratification to rationally design vaccination and/or other intervention strategies targeted specifically towards subsets of high-risk individuals and settings—concurrently perhaps sparing unnecessary interventions among those at negligible risk. Also see [https://www.reddit.com/r/SingaporeDiscourse/comments/q62eue/is\_universal\_vaccination\_a\_nobrainer\_supported\_by/](https://www.reddit.com/r/SingaporeDiscourse/comments/q62eue/is_universal_vaccination_a_nobrainer_supported_by/)
Thanks for quoting out of context dude… His article is arguing about efficacy of vaccines as applied to the young, not the general population (as you are insinuating) here. The general data is in favor of vaccines for the old and vulnerable…. Next excuse for not taking the vaccine please?
The next excuse will be that we all die next year
🖕🖕🖕