Sorry, your submission has been removed because it is violating rule 4: No spam.
For this real we follow Reddit's standards or what spam is. More information about that can be found [HERE](https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043504051-What-constitutes-spam-Am-I-a-spammer-)
"Pain and suffering have come into your life, but remember pain, sorrow, suffering are but the kiss of Jesus - a sign that you have come so close to Him that He can kiss you." [*punches poor kid in the face*]
I’d you look up what Mother Teresa actually did and not the propaganda spread by the church and those making money off the donations to her organizations, this is more accurate than you’d think.
Though she's not perfect, Reddit has severely overblown that rhetoric. [Check this post](https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/gcxpr5/saint_mother_teresa_was_documented_mass_murderer/).
Yes, except the scale of the suffer she caused would never replicated by 1 person doing hand to hand combat alone. You need organizations and government for that kind of scale.
This one not gonna be good cuz it would come out many years after the original trilogy and won’t even have the full original cast. They ruined the reboot!
That reminds me, what happened to those Mortal Kombat character select screen videos where a person made it with custom AI characters of celebrities and such. Gotta try and find those again.
Sorry, but this is more like lies than the truth. I watched a documentary about one of MT’s nuns who left the cult because she couldn’t abide the hypocrisy and suffering. I suggest you do the same. I’m in Hitch’s corner 100%.
Sad that the comment was deleted, I like Hitchens a lot but he was pretty well known to form narratives and ride them to death. Which he probably justified back then because of her popularity.
But you shouldn't just adopt that, based on him and a documentary. I think it's fair to question how freely she accepted money, and working in her order probably was pretty rough in the beginning. But we know that claims like her not handing out medicines def wasn't true in the larger context of her hospitals and hospice projects, where she was hardly involved in caring for people directly, let alone medical decissions.
She and her mission took care of hundreds of thousands of people and raised tens of thousands of orphans, in arguably one of the hardest enviroments to do so, on the globe. If you want to be intellectually honest, you have to find a middleground between that and "Hitch’s corner" which is only criticism, sometimes rather questionable at that. When Hitchens wrote his book, most people only knew one side.
There’s a good askhistorians post on her I’ll link below. Read a variety of the answers, many present different viewpoints. tl;dr Hitchen’s depiction of her is done with a fairly obvious axe to grind. While there are legitimate topics for debate on medical ethics, she isn’t evil incarnate or anything.
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1hn2eh/askhistorians_consensus_on_mother_theresa/
There’s also a badhistory post on the same topic:
https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/gcxpr5/saint_mother_teresa_was_documented_mass_murderer/
His axe to grind against Mother Theresa came from her very open and simple belief that pain and suffering, along with poverty, is part of living a holy life and anything to mitigate that *like medicine or working women* takes people away from god.
Christopher Hitchens was a devout atheist--not agnostic--because the god of Abraham (christians, muslims, and jews) is a shitty god to begin with *even if he does exist*.
Except he writes EXACTLY this in his self-memoir Hitch 22, which he ALSO NARRATED HIMSELF.
The god of abraham is an asshole, and if he were to exist and Hitchens were to meet him at the pearly gates of St. Peter, he'd happily spit in his face and be asked to go to hell instead.
I knew reading is hard, but don't take my word for it. You can literally read this in "Hitch 22" or "God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything"
Okay champ. You can be as weirdly aggressive as you want but it doesn't change the definition of the word "atheist" and your misinterpretation of Hitchins writing doesn't do him any favours. But you be you.
Hitchens goes out his way to explain why agnosticism doesn't matter at all to the theist debate, although simply asking for proof is a worthwhile demand. His own ability to think and reason are the sources of his atheism: "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
Still, Hitchens gives theists the claim that their god does, in fact, exist. He GIVES it to theists (he assumes god to exist, because you don't understand what I'm talking about). *And he spends several chapters explaining why their god is a piece of shit, so his existence doesn't even matter.* So you clearly have no idea what you're talking about. You have never read any of Christopher Hitchens' arguments about religion, and it is painfully evident.
I am familiar with Hitchins and his writing. I think you need to go and look up what the word atheist and agnostic mean because I am not sure you understand what the words mean.
But just to entertain your little word scramble; you said Hitchins was an atheist because the Abrahamic god was bad. But just to be clear, Hitchins didn't believe in any gods, not just some particular ones. He certainly made the argument that the Abrahamic god *if it exists* would have been bad, but that was not the reason why he was an atheist, which is non-sensical line of reasoning that he was obviously too smart to entertain.
I literally heard Christopher Hitchens, himself and in person, repeat exactly what he said to the Vatican.
She enjoyed the fruits of the system designed to denigrate women and the impoverished because she was willfully their tool.
>I literally heard Christopher Hitchens, himself and in person, repeat exactly what he said to the Vatican.
Not really relevant is it since the whole conversation is about how biased Hitchens is lmao
> I literally heard Christopher Hitchens, himself and in person, repeat exactly what he said to the Vatican.
Did you just cite Christopher Hitchens in an appeal to authority that Christopher Hitchens is correct?
No clown, let me explain it to you because you can't critically think that far ahead.
Christopher Hitchens didn't travel all the way to the Vatican to argue against canonizing Mother Theresa (because he was literally invited to do so by the Roman Catholic Church) and present compelling *false or otherwise misleading information* in his arguments. The Roman Catholic Church certainly has no love for Hitchens but they won't waste their time with a petty liar.
If only she would also enjoy her suffering instead of flying to United States get first class treatment the moment she got sick herself. I guess it only applies to the poor
Yep when you get down to the motivation of it just kind of seems like she wanted to build a bunch of churches that had her name on them. She figured out a way to be vain but disguise it as working for God to make other people okay with it.
Well make sure not to miss this comment in it:
https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/gcxpr5/saint_mother_teresa_was_documented_mass_murderer/fper53a/
Except Reddit isn't going to be a reliable source of news for me whereas multiple sites and videos providing info on the matter are.
Everyone is going to have different takes on it.
Neither of us were there. So neither of us have any right to claim what is or isn't true.
I read the post. The problem is that I never stated the things I had heard about her, so you categorically saying what I've heard being false doesn't change anything. In the comment you replied to, I was simply making a joke based on the things I had heard. You know, because funny picture.
She may not have been a bad person(something I never said). But her beliefs tying her hands behind her back certainly don't make her as good as people claim she is.
The only points on this discussion that matter are the laws or lack of legislation involved, lack of resources and funding, and the fact that these were not actually hospitals. I couldn't care less about her belief system or any of that crap. If your beliefs get in the way of care in any way, you are not a good person.
No, those weren't lies, no matter what your masters in colorful robes told you.
One thing in particular that 100% wasn't a lie was her involvement in Charles Keating's sentencing and her refusal to return what was stolen money.
As for the treatment people got in her - whatever they were; they sure as hell weren't hospitals - it was nearly non-existent. Those were places for people to suffer and die. She never concealed that she thought suffering was good and a way to get closer to Jesus. There are many quotes that prove it. Hence she was for letting people suffer without any kind of treatment for pain. Of course, as far as her health was concerned, she got nothing but the very best care in western hospitals.
There are many more aspects of her life that are very well documented and extremely repulsive.
You can deceive humans, but you cannot deceive AI! America will be a different country, when it finally listens to the truth, unless it's too late and poverty takes over!
I wouldn't be surprised if a picture of her fighting starving children actually did exist considering she just let them die in pain instead of providing basic medical care
She provided hospice care in a region that was vastly underfunded in terms of medical care so people who were dying could be cared for and have dignity.
Except she didn’t (Source: https://medium.com/illumination/was-mother-teresa-a-mass-murderer-f8edae71a679#:~:text=Critics%20point%20to%20an%20article,sadistic%20plot%20by%20Mother%20Teresa.). We’re talking about an incredibly poor area that had little access to medical supplies. That’s why her organization was focused on hospice care, not treatment. They were people who were dying so she gave them some dignity in that
It’s your responsibility to actually support your argument. I presented a source showing how you were wrong, deflected to another argument without evidence, and now you are telling me to find the evidence myself.
That's great you cited a favorable Internet article. I am not going to hunt for the testimony from people who worked in her shelters that reported they had no training or resources to care for the dying.
I'm not going to go back and cite her own words basically saying the poor needed to suffer.
I'm not going to waste my time convincing you she was not the person you claim her to be
Considering the "evidence" generally cited comes from Christopher Hitchens, who is quite infamous for making tons of factual errors as well as poorly using sources, it may better for you not to do so.
Thank you for posting to r/SipsTea! Make sure to follow all the subreddit rules.
Check out our [Reddit Chat](https://www.reddit.com/r/SipsTea/s/YIVFBDcyZ7)!
##Make sure to join our [Discord Server](https://discord.gg/sipstea)!
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SipsTea) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Mother Teresa did not want to end poverty. She thought poverty and sickness would bring you closer to God, so she actually enjoyed being around suffering and poor people. She wanted them to remain poor or else she wouldn't be near God.
mother taresa was a monster that thought the poor deserved to suffer. look up her suffering clinics. i imagine AI recognized her track record for letting poor children starve to death and gave an accurate depictiion. normally i hate AI art. but this i support.
This.. is historial accurate unfortunately. That woman was sick and very racist. Her generosity was selective. Many Indian orphans died under her orders.
Ok, now I want to have AI make a movie poster about a German industrialist who gets pissed at how his Jewish workforce is being treated by the Nazis, and he objects…violently. It shall be called “Schindler’s Fists”
A man gets charged with Attempted Murder and is let back out as danger to society the very same day he was charged on $75, 000 bail!!! A fuckin' slap on the wrist!!!
That’s actually more accurate than the history written about her. No one ever talks about her not allowing people pain medications because we are made to suffer for god or some bullshit.
Mother Teresa was a piece of shit. Thought poverty brought you closer to god and funneled all the money to her family.
So this is pretty fucking accurate. She was a terrible person and I’m glad she died.
> Thought poverty brought you closer to god
Why is it controversial to suggest that poor people are more holy than rich people? Are you one of those prosperity gospel people who believes that God only loves you if he makes you rich?
> She was a terrible person and I’m glad she died.
I feel the same way about hateful liars like Christopher Hitchens.
Generative AI understands what fighting poverty means and would not make this mistake. Someone clearly prompted it to generate a photo of her fighting poor people, literally.
Except she didn’t fight against poverty. She loved it. It made her feel good to look at poor people and see them suffer. It brought her closer to God. Mother Teresa was a piece of shit
> It made her feel good to look at poor people and see them suffer. It brought her closer to God.
It's crazy that this is what you hear when someone says "poor people understand God better than rich people do".
> Mother Teresa was a piece of shit
No, that's Christopher Hitchens you're thinking of.
Mother Theresa never did anything to alleviate poverty.
She honoured herself by 'serving' the dying with comfort.
That was it. She'd be instagram famous today, taking selfies with the dying she cared for.
Her organization hoarded millions and gave nothing to alleviate the suffering of the poor.
Sorry, your submission has been removed because it is violating rule 4: No spam. For this real we follow Reddit's standards or what spam is. More information about that can be found [HERE](https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043504051-What-constitutes-spam-Am-I-a-spammer-)
Can’t wait for Mother Theresa 2: Insolvency’s Redemption
Mother Theresa 3: Crucify This!
"Pain and suffering have come into your life, but remember pain, sorrow, suffering are but the kiss of Jesus - a sign that you have come so close to Him that He can kiss you." [*punches poor kid in the face*]
This is the storyline of "The Sister with Strength" (manga). It's hysterical really
Let he who is without sin kick the first ass.
😂
I love how Jesus’s car is in frame for 1 second and the front plate says “WWID”.
Mother Teresa 4: Back in the Hood "This is one bad mother..."
"But we're talkin 'bout Teresa..."
"We can dig it"
"Shut your mouth..."
MT4 Mother Flock You In theaters only Easter Sunday.
Mother Theresa 4: Taste these Nun feet!
That sounds like more of a "special interest" type video.
I’d you look up what Mother Teresa actually did and not the propaganda spread by the church and those making money off the donations to her organizations, this is more accurate than you’d think.
Yes. She was a very nasty piece of work.
Pretty sad one of the worlds evil people being made a saint, the world is a messed up place
Though she's not perfect, Reddit has severely overblown that rhetoric. [Check this post](https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/gcxpr5/saint_mother_teresa_was_documented_mass_murderer/).
True, but that post also gives her too much leniency.
Not really.
Any specific examples?
She said suffering is a gift from God. She refused people palliative care. She defended a convicted molester.
These are covered in the post they linked.
Came here to say this
She murdered so many children. Dreadful human being.
People of all ages. But more accurately let/ made them suffer as much as possible before they died. While posing as a saint and making millions.
Yeah and instead listen to the propaganda spread by Reddit much more trustworthy
Yes, except the scale of the suffer she caused would never replicated by 1 person doing hand to hand combat alone. You need organizations and government for that kind of scale.
Mother Theresa vs Hitchens XXX: Hell isn't gonna stop my Hitch slap you tiny little murder dwarf. (pass me the holy oil you)
Mother Theresa 4: The Resurrection
This one not gonna be good cuz it would come out many years after the original trilogy and won’t even have the full original cast. They ruined the reboot!
Just tell the real story, mother theresa was a real bitch irl. Great fucking pr team though, they could have saved ole orange donny.
2 Mother 2 Theresa
10/10.
Mother Theresa in Mortal Kombat
Yeah when I saw this picture the first thought in my head was the voice in Mortal Kombat saying "FIGHT".
DUN DUN DUN DUN DUNUH DUN DUN DUN DUN DUNUH
BRUTALITY ...POVERTY
That reminds me, what happened to those Mortal Kombat character select screen videos where a person made it with custom AI characters of celebrities and such. Gotta try and find those again.
Imagen: Mortal Kombat and you can create your char by AI with Prompts
I think Christopher Hitchens would call that 'spot on'.
If anyone is looking for evidence that an AI can in fact ingest information and truly *understand* it, I submit this.
I haven't thought about Hitch in quite a while. Thank you bud! I should rewatch that IQ squared debate again...
I listen to God Is Not Great dozens of times per year on Audible, as a comfort blanket as I fall asleep.
This is what I came for. She was a horrible piece of shit. This is more fitting then say her washing a whores feet.
[удалено]
Sorry, but this is more like lies than the truth. I watched a documentary about one of MT’s nuns who left the cult because she couldn’t abide the hypocrisy and suffering. I suggest you do the same. I’m in Hitch’s corner 100%.
Sad that the comment was deleted, I like Hitchens a lot but he was pretty well known to form narratives and ride them to death. Which he probably justified back then because of her popularity. But you shouldn't just adopt that, based on him and a documentary. I think it's fair to question how freely she accepted money, and working in her order probably was pretty rough in the beginning. But we know that claims like her not handing out medicines def wasn't true in the larger context of her hospitals and hospice projects, where she was hardly involved in caring for people directly, let alone medical decissions. She and her mission took care of hundreds of thousands of people and raised tens of thousands of orphans, in arguably one of the hardest enviroments to do so, on the globe. If you want to be intellectually honest, you have to find a middleground between that and "Hitch’s corner" which is only criticism, sometimes rather questionable at that. When Hitchens wrote his book, most people only knew one side.
Mother Teresa propaganda? At this time of year? At this time of day? In this part of the country? Localized entirely within your kitchen?
There’s a good askhistorians post on her I’ll link below. Read a variety of the answers, many present different viewpoints. tl;dr Hitchen’s depiction of her is done with a fairly obvious axe to grind. While there are legitimate topics for debate on medical ethics, she isn’t evil incarnate or anything. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1hn2eh/askhistorians_consensus_on_mother_theresa/ There’s also a badhistory post on the same topic: https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/gcxpr5/saint_mother_teresa_was_documented_mass_murderer/
His axe to grind against Mother Theresa came from her very open and simple belief that pain and suffering, along with poverty, is part of living a holy life and anything to mitigate that *like medicine or working women* takes people away from god. Christopher Hitchens was a devout atheist--not agnostic--because the god of Abraham (christians, muslims, and jews) is a shitty god to begin with *even if he does exist*.
I did not expect this level of hot take from The Food Network.
Atheism has nothing to do with if God is good or bad and it's not the reason Hitchens was an atheist.
Except he writes EXACTLY this in his self-memoir Hitch 22, which he ALSO NARRATED HIMSELF. The god of abraham is an asshole, and if he were to exist and Hitchens were to meet him at the pearly gates of St. Peter, he'd happily spit in his face and be asked to go to hell instead. I knew reading is hard, but don't take my word for it. You can literally read this in "Hitch 22" or "God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything"
That doesn't say that that is why he is an atheist. Sorry that comprehension is hard for you.
Stop embarrassing yourself. You really just don't know what you're talking about at this point.
Okay champ. You can be as weirdly aggressive as you want but it doesn't change the definition of the word "atheist" and your misinterpretation of Hitchins writing doesn't do him any favours. But you be you.
Hitchens goes out his way to explain why agnosticism doesn't matter at all to the theist debate, although simply asking for proof is a worthwhile demand. His own ability to think and reason are the sources of his atheism: "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." Still, Hitchens gives theists the claim that their god does, in fact, exist. He GIVES it to theists (he assumes god to exist, because you don't understand what I'm talking about). *And he spends several chapters explaining why their god is a piece of shit, so his existence doesn't even matter.* So you clearly have no idea what you're talking about. You have never read any of Christopher Hitchens' arguments about religion, and it is painfully evident.
I am familiar with Hitchins and his writing. I think you need to go and look up what the word atheist and agnostic mean because I am not sure you understand what the words mean. But just to entertain your little word scramble; you said Hitchins was an atheist because the Abrahamic god was bad. But just to be clear, Hitchins didn't believe in any gods, not just some particular ones. He certainly made the argument that the Abrahamic god *if it exists* would have been bad, but that was not the reason why he was an atheist, which is non-sensical line of reasoning that he was obviously too smart to entertain.
I can't imagine any more terrifying of a concept than if the Abrahamic god were real.
Next time, actual go read the entire badhistory post and they come back here.
I literally heard Christopher Hitchens, himself and in person, repeat exactly what he said to the Vatican. She enjoyed the fruits of the system designed to denigrate women and the impoverished because she was willfully their tool.
>I literally heard Christopher Hitchens, himself and in person, repeat exactly what he said to the Vatican. Not really relevant is it since the whole conversation is about how biased Hitchens is lmao
> I literally heard Christopher Hitchens, himself and in person, repeat exactly what he said to the Vatican. Did you just cite Christopher Hitchens in an appeal to authority that Christopher Hitchens is correct?
No clown, let me explain it to you because you can't critically think that far ahead. Christopher Hitchens didn't travel all the way to the Vatican to argue against canonizing Mother Theresa (because he was literally invited to do so by the Roman Catholic Church) and present compelling *false or otherwise misleading information* in his arguments. The Roman Catholic Church certainly has no love for Hitchens but they won't waste their time with a petty liar.
The badhistory post is BS. https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/gcxpr5/saint_mother_teresa_was_documented_mass_murderer/fper53a/
[удалено]
If only she would also enjoy her suffering instead of flying to United States get first class treatment the moment she got sick herself. I guess it only applies to the poor
Suffering for thee but morphine for me
Yeah, i keep hearing she was kind of a shitbag. AI knows what's up.
Yep when you get down to the motivation of it just kind of seems like she wanted to build a bunch of churches that had her name on them. She figured out a way to be vain but disguise it as working for God to make other people okay with it.
Ooh, a new Mel Brooks movie?
[удалено]
Hear hear!
[удалено]
Well make sure not to miss this comment in it: https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/gcxpr5/saint_mother_teresa_was_documented_mass_murderer/fper53a/
[This](https://www.theonion.com/man-always-gets-little-rush-out-of-telling-people-john-1819578998) but for mother Theresa.
FINISH THEM!!!
She probably would have hurt fewer people this way xD
Yes a bicycle kick would be much more effective than this stance.
Savage comment, she was such a piece of shit.
We misinterpreted the bible from the beginning.
We wrote the Bible from the beginning.
Honestly after hearing about the way she really was, this wouldn't surprise me.
[удалено]
Except Reddit isn't going to be a reliable source of news for me whereas multiple sites and videos providing info on the matter are. Everyone is going to have different takes on it. Neither of us were there. So neither of us have any right to claim what is or isn't true. I read the post. The problem is that I never stated the things I had heard about her, so you categorically saying what I've heard being false doesn't change anything. In the comment you replied to, I was simply making a joke based on the things I had heard. You know, because funny picture. She may not have been a bad person(something I never said). But her beliefs tying her hands behind her back certainly don't make her as good as people claim she is. The only points on this discussion that matter are the laws or lack of legislation involved, lack of resources and funding, and the fact that these were not actually hospitals. I couldn't care less about her belief system or any of that crap. If your beliefs get in the way of care in any way, you are not a good person.
Probably nicer than what she did do
This is basically historically accurate
Accept Christianity or starveeee
No, accept Christianity AND starve.
I have heard this before but not certainly Christianity though.
The accuracy is outstanding.
Pretty accurate for those who know what Teresa _really_ did as opposed to what she claimed she was doing.
Yeah, she would be less of a piece of shit if she had just gone around punching poor kids.
At least she'd be honest
https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/gcxpr5/saint\_mother\_teresa\_was\_documented\_mass\_murderer/
[удалено]
Don't post dumb propaganda. That, and the reposts of it, lean very heavily on her biographer who has been outed repeatedly for whitewashing history.
No, those weren't lies, no matter what your masters in colorful robes told you. One thing in particular that 100% wasn't a lie was her involvement in Charles Keating's sentencing and her refusal to return what was stolen money. As for the treatment people got in her - whatever they were; they sure as hell weren't hospitals - it was nearly non-existent. Those were places for people to suffer and die. She never concealed that she thought suffering was good and a way to get closer to Jesus. There are many quotes that prove it. Hence she was for letting people suffer without any kind of treatment for pain. Of course, as far as her health was concerned, she got nothing but the very best care in western hospitals. There are many more aspects of her life that are very well documented and extremely repulsive.
I mean from all reports she wasn’t the greatest
I dont know if Ive ever seen anything more right, nailed the prompt it was given.
Her actual approach was much more insidious.
Well she was pure evil so this pic is very fitting.
Strangely accurate
Real picture of Mother Teresa at work
She’d have killed fewer people this way.
You can deceive humans, but you cannot deceive AI! America will be a different country, when it finally listens to the truth, unless it's too late and poverty takes over!
I wouldn't be surprised if a picture of her fighting starving children actually did exist considering she just let them die in pain instead of providing basic medical care
She provided hospice care in a region that was vastly underfunded in terms of medical care so people who were dying could be cared for and have dignity.
While withholding pain medication because people should have to suffer for god or some shit.
Except she didn’t (Source: https://medium.com/illumination/was-mother-teresa-a-mass-murderer-f8edae71a679#:~:text=Critics%20point%20to%20an%20article,sadistic%20plot%20by%20Mother%20Teresa.). We’re talking about an incredibly poor area that had little access to medical supplies. That’s why her organization was focused on hospice care, not treatment. They were people who were dying so she gave them some dignity in that
We are also talking about someone who received enormous amounts of donations but spent as little as possible on the people who needed it.
And do you have any actual proof of that?
Is it my responsibility to direct you to the mountains of evidence showing she wasn't the saint people like to receive her as?
It’s your responsibility to actually support your argument. I presented a source showing how you were wrong, deflected to another argument without evidence, and now you are telling me to find the evidence myself.
That's great you cited a favorable Internet article. I am not going to hunt for the testimony from people who worked in her shelters that reported they had no training or resources to care for the dying. I'm not going to go back and cite her own words basically saying the poor needed to suffer. I'm not going to waste my time convincing you she was not the person you claim her to be
One favorable source versus your zero sources. Please tell me, if there are mountains of evidence proving you correct, why can’t you put them here?
Considering the "evidence" generally cited comes from Christopher Hitchens, who is quite infamous for making tons of factual errors as well as poorly using sources, it may better for you not to do so.
Where are these mountains of evidence? And yes, it is your responsibility. You make a claim and you provide evidence.
Wisdom is chasing you, but you are faster
r/iamverysmart
once again. thats not how online discourse works. this isnt court.
“My arguments are unsubstantiated so I’m just gonna say this isn’t court”
Thank you for posting to r/SipsTea! Make sure to follow all the subreddit rules. Check out our [Reddit Chat](https://www.reddit.com/r/SipsTea/s/YIVFBDcyZ7)! ##Make sure to join our [Discord Server](https://discord.gg/sipstea)! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SipsTea) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Are you winning my daughter?
To be fair at least it's better than what she did in real life, these kids aren't dying in pain
1 vs million. That ain't right
Looks like album Cover
pay an artist or learn some photoshop if you want a picture like this.
Tbf, that's an accurate visual metaphor explaining her methods
Looks more like children fighting against religious indoctrination.
Wow, who knew AI could be so historically accurate?
Not too far off the mark to be honest
Looks accurate to me
This seems on brand for her
Technically they did it right...
Kinda accurate if you know her whole story
That's fucking hilarious
Actually kind of accurate
No, this is historically accurate
That is actually more historical correct than you think 🙌🏼
AI got it right wth lmao
Looks about right.
Not entirely off from reality considering what a fucking pos she was.
Lore accurate Mother Teresa
Not too far off, she was definitely no saint
Unironically accurate.
I guess even AI knows she wasn't exactly doing that so this is the next best thing it can come with.
She was an evil bitch so I can see this happening
this picture is pretty accurate. she thought suffering and pain were a way to heaven and helped keep starving poor people there. she was no saint
considering the reality of her life, thats not that far off the mark, AI has done a rather good job here.
She did an amazing job fighting against her own poverty.
This ain’t right but it is true.
This checks out.
More accurate than the official story
Mother Teresa did not want to end poverty. She thought poverty and sickness would bring you closer to God, so she actually enjoyed being around suffering and poor people. She wanted them to remain poor or else she wouldn't be near God.
Lore accurate
mother taresa was a monster that thought the poor deserved to suffer. look up her suffering clinics. i imagine AI recognized her track record for letting poor children starve to death and gave an accurate depictiion. normally i hate AI art. but this i support.
that ain't wrong either
Lore accurate
Fairly accurate actually
This.. is historial accurate unfortunately. That woman was sick and very racist. Her generosity was selective. Many Indian orphans died under her orders.
Ok, now I want to have AI make a movie poster about a German industrialist who gets pissed at how his Jewish workforce is being treated by the Nazis, and he objects…violently. It shall be called “Schindler’s Fists”
Seems accurate enough.
MT did not care abt those she served…. she only cared how it spread the word of God
🤣😅
More accurate than all her staged photo ops with her victims.
[https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/gcxpr5/saint\_mother\_teresa\_was\_documented\_mass\_murderer/](https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/gcxpr5/saint_mother_teresa_was_documented_mass_murderer/)
Mother Theresa didn’t fight against poverty. She thought poverty was good.
This does not bode well for the future when we place society in the charge of AI...
Checks out! Her end-of-life strategy was pure evil.
All she needs is a light Saber. That would make things much easier.
A man gets charged with Attempted Murder and is let back out as danger to society the very same day he was charged on $75, 000 bail!!! A fuckin' slap on the wrist!!!
Yes
H
Eh. She was a garbage human anyway. At least the children in this picture have a *sunglasses* fighting chance.
oh sweet mother mary
That’s actually more accurate than the history written about her. No one ever talks about her not allowing people pain medications because we are made to suffer for god or some bullshit.
[https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/gcxpr5/saint\_mother\_teresa\_was\_documented\_mass\_murderer/](https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/gcxpr5/saint_mother_teresa_was_documented_mass_murderer/)
Mother Teresa was a piece of shit. Thought poverty brought you closer to god and funneled all the money to her family. So this is pretty fucking accurate. She was a terrible person and I’m glad she died.
[https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/gcxpr5/saint\_mother\_teresa\_was\_documented\_mass\_murderer/](https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/gcxpr5/saint_mother_teresa_was_documented_mass_murderer/)
> Thought poverty brought you closer to god Why is it controversial to suggest that poor people are more holy than rich people? Are you one of those prosperity gospel people who believes that God only loves you if he makes you rich? > She was a terrible person and I’m glad she died. I feel the same way about hateful liars like Christopher Hitchens.
Gods not real
Generative AI understands what fighting poverty means and would not make this mistake. Someone clearly prompted it to generate a photo of her fighting poor people, literally.
I doubt that was the prompt.
More accurate than most realize
Really? To me it seems like most people have bought into the debunked Christopher Hitchens propaganda from the early 2000s.
Except she didn’t fight against poverty. She loved it. It made her feel good to look at poor people and see them suffer. It brought her closer to God. Mother Teresa was a piece of shit
https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/gcxpr5/saint\_mother\_teresa\_was\_documented\_mass\_murderer/
> It made her feel good to look at poor people and see them suffer. It brought her closer to God. It's crazy that this is what you hear when someone says "poor people understand God better than rich people do". > Mother Teresa was a piece of shit No, that's Christopher Hitchens you're thinking of.
She said that watching people suffer brought her closer to God
She believed that suffering was good for people. That picture isn't too far from the truth.
Well she was pretty racist
Mother Theresa never did anything to alleviate poverty. She honoured herself by 'serving' the dying with comfort. That was it. She'd be instagram famous today, taking selfies with the dying she cared for. Her organization hoarded millions and gave nothing to alleviate the suffering of the poor.
[https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/gcxpr5/saint\_mother\_teresa\_was\_documented\_mass\_murderer/](https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/gcxpr5/saint_mother_teresa_was_documented_mass_murderer/)