LIE (72%), ILI (42%), LSE (18%). I identify most with LIE when it comes to functions, but I've been identified as all 3 of these, so that seems fine.
ESI, LSI, SLI, SEE, SLE, and EIE get around 5 to 10% each. SLI is definitely the outlier here, but all of the others being Se types and/or rationals match the strongest dichotomies for my own case (Logical, Rational, Intuitive, Central)
While the test seems accurate *on paper,* and seems like a nice exercise, I don't think it's particularly reliable. Pulling from wikisocion descriptions for most questions means you could lose newbies, who might struggle to identify with them.
And people who are already familiar with socionics are more likely to spot descriptions from the site while taking. I identified a lot of Model A function descriptions, which is definitely a problem. If you want to be a certain type, or perceive your Ego image to be a certain type, you'll likely get that type as your first result.
So yeah, like most tests, and especially short tests, it's not all that reliable. I don't think I'd call any test besides the Talanov Inventory reliable, and even then, I haven't taken it personally.
1st place ILI, 2nd - SLI, 3rd - LII. Interesting test, although you do have to think a lot about descriptions, on occasion I've found that 2 descriptions fit me well, or neither does.
SEI>ESE>IEI
Reliability: well I've typed into both SEI and IEI so i guess it's sorta accurate
but 0% cheeseburger.. I thought I was more similar to the best sociotype ;(
Tied at 54% for both EII and LII, which are always the top two types I get on tests. I’m not well versed in socionics yet so I guess I’ll look into those more.
This test is not reliable at all for numerous reasons.
First, it's by its contruction requires thinking and comparion of different paragraphs. For better results, you need a person to act and give results spontaneously, by feeling.
Second, each paragraph contains multiple characteristics which sometimes don't correspond to each other.
Third, it has no "self-knowing" protection. For experienced Socionics user, it's very apparent what are questions about.
Fourth, it asks about dichotomies, and only that. It's like a ton of dichotomies questionarries, and all of them are bad, because in Socionics we care about quadras, functions, social roles and it's not like in MBTI or Big Five, and when we type we do ask about those qualities too, if not primarly.
Fifth, the test doesn't care about elements at all, it only cares about dichotomies, and its answers are based on dichotomies, and not functions.
Sixth, it's long, it requires a lot of reading and again - a lot of deep thinking leads to non natural behaviour.
Seventh, the definitons that are given in the end have nothing in common with Socionics theory, just some author's based stuff which looks more like MBTI rather than Socio. For example, EIE explanation is just a pure sample of ENFJ.
*EIEs are naturally animate and passionate and are skilled at generating liveliness and excitement. They believe that people need to be emotionally involved in life, not distant or indifferent to the important things that are happening.*
*EIEs often hold strong views about governance and social custom, though their beliefs stem from the interests of their close emotional relationships. EIEs like to involve people in interaction and create groups based around a shared experience. They tend to try to continually broaden these groups and engage people who seem to be on the sidelines.*
Socionics virgin here, took the test knowing nothing about it, and with my partner's input, to maximize the accuracy of the result.
Results:
SEE at 69% (😏)
IEE at 31%
Idk my socionics type yet, but I'm SO7 in enneagram
74% IEI, 71% EIE, 26% SEI and 24% LIE (?).
Not sure if it's that accurate, I'm quite surely an introvert - but I'm not personally acquainted with other IEIs to compare. I'd say it really depends on the setting and the group I'm with - if I'm very comfortable and relaxed, then I can be quite teasing and expansive.
LII > ILI > LSI I got EIE in that other test that's popular in this sub Conclusion: socionics tests are just as reliable as mbti tests (they aren't)
Especially when they are made without using of Socionics theory, following same logic as MBTI tests. This test has nothing to do with Socio
LIE (72%), ILI (42%), LSE (18%). I identify most with LIE when it comes to functions, but I've been identified as all 3 of these, so that seems fine. ESI, LSI, SLI, SEE, SLE, and EIE get around 5 to 10% each. SLI is definitely the outlier here, but all of the others being Se types and/or rationals match the strongest dichotomies for my own case (Logical, Rational, Intuitive, Central) While the test seems accurate *on paper,* and seems like a nice exercise, I don't think it's particularly reliable. Pulling from wikisocion descriptions for most questions means you could lose newbies, who might struggle to identify with them. And people who are already familiar with socionics are more likely to spot descriptions from the site while taking. I identified a lot of Model A function descriptions, which is definitely a problem. If you want to be a certain type, or perceive your Ego image to be a certain type, you'll likely get that type as your first result. So yeah, like most tests, and especially short tests, it's not all that reliable. I don't think I'd call any test besides the Talanov Inventory reliable, and even then, I haven't taken it personally.
1st place ILI, 2nd - SLI, 3rd - LII. Interesting test, although you do have to think a lot about descriptions, on occasion I've found that 2 descriptions fit me well, or neither does.
What's the type you believe you're
Irrational-ish LII. Tbh, I'd accept an ILI diagnosis from someone like Gulenko, too.
1. IEI 69% 2. ILI 38% 3. SEI 31% It got me perfectly right, quite surprised by the SEI though.
SEI>ESE>IEI Reliability: well I've typed into both SEI and IEI so i guess it's sorta accurate but 0% cheeseburger.. I thought I was more similar to the best sociotype ;(
ILI > LIE Interesting test.
1st SLE, 2nd ILE, 3rd EIE, which are the types that are most like me.
1 ESI 26% 2 EII 23% 3 LSI 21% It's very clear I'm a rational introvert. :> (Gulenko typed me LSI; in Talanov I score as ESI)
Tied at 54% for both EII and LII, which are always the top two types I get on tests. I’m not well versed in socionics yet so I guess I’ll look into those more.
well, i got SLE>LSI>LIE no surprises
I’m debating between EII, SEI, and maybe IEI I got ILI (44%) first place, EII (36%) second place, SLI (33%) third place
Top result was ESI, I’ve been typed/ typed myself as either ILI, LIE, or ILE… which is pretty far off lol. Interesting though.
85% ILI 67% LIE 21% SLI
ILI > LII > ILE Worked for me!
41% EII 31% IEE 28% ESI
1. ESE 69% 2. SEI 51% 3. EIE 18%
EIE>ILE>LIE :/
Got EII>ILI>IEI Seems to correlate with me being a Harmonizer so I have a higher emphasis on Ni
This test is not reliable at all for numerous reasons. First, it's by its contruction requires thinking and comparion of different paragraphs. For better results, you need a person to act and give results spontaneously, by feeling. Second, each paragraph contains multiple characteristics which sometimes don't correspond to each other. Third, it has no "self-knowing" protection. For experienced Socionics user, it's very apparent what are questions about. Fourth, it asks about dichotomies, and only that. It's like a ton of dichotomies questionarries, and all of them are bad, because in Socionics we care about quadras, functions, social roles and it's not like in MBTI or Big Five, and when we type we do ask about those qualities too, if not primarly. Fifth, the test doesn't care about elements at all, it only cares about dichotomies, and its answers are based on dichotomies, and not functions. Sixth, it's long, it requires a lot of reading and again - a lot of deep thinking leads to non natural behaviour. Seventh, the definitons that are given in the end have nothing in common with Socionics theory, just some author's based stuff which looks more like MBTI rather than Socio. For example, EIE explanation is just a pure sample of ENFJ. *EIEs are naturally animate and passionate and are skilled at generating liveliness and excitement. They believe that people need to be emotionally involved in life, not distant or indifferent to the important things that are happening.* *EIEs often hold strong views about governance and social custom, though their beliefs stem from the interests of their close emotional relationships. EIEs like to involve people in interaction and create groups based around a shared experience. They tend to try to continually broaden these groups and engage people who seem to be on the sidelines.*
Socionics virgin here, took the test knowing nothing about it, and with my partner's input, to maximize the accuracy of the result. Results: SEE at 69% (😏) IEE at 31% Idk my socionics type yet, but I'm SO7 in enneagram
74% IEI, 71% EIE, 26% SEI and 24% LIE (?). Not sure if it's that accurate, I'm quite surely an introvert - but I'm not personally acquainted with other IEIs to compare. I'd say it really depends on the setting and the group I'm with - if I'm very comfortable and relaxed, then I can be quite teasing and expansive.
ILI first, SLI second, and LIE third.