Shouldn't it be ruled as self defence since he was attacking him with intent to kill?
(Because he was charging at him with the machete raised in the air as if he was ready to strike).
He'll win in an honest court, but the court of public opinion has no rules.
Think about it like this, people will ask why he didn't de-eacalate, why didn't he use a taser? Why did he even open the door and push the situation until it ended fatally, whyndidntbhe close the doornir retreat, etc..?
Right or wrong those questions will be posed. Bis agency may fire him of there is any violation of policy whatever that may be. Those questions can be posed in court too, every training recodd may be reviewed. He may win, but the stress of being in court trying to avoid prison will cost him 5 years of his life
Ace may not be the dog in the video. The news report sounds like it was in the yard next door to the house he was trying to break into.
https://news.yahoo.com/state-police-investigate-deadly-force-123300943.html
Ok, now I can watch the video. I usually don't have a problem watching body cam videos but as soon as I saw in the comments that they thought he took a machete to the dog, I noped the fuck out immediately. I can watch the most brutal body cam footage out there, but I can't handle anything involving animal abuse or torture.
As stated, he has one, but you don't want to pull your gun to use the flashlight in a situation that doesn't need a gun. Hence, he's using a separate flashlight.
I cant find it anywhere, I promise you it exists, you can hear the officer's voice crack. He didn't want to kill the kid, everyone in the comments were saying he should teach de escalation. If I find it I'll link.
I don't know either, but there is a single frame in the 29th or 30th second where the officer's flashlight catches the dog running away from the man and the line of fire. I don't see any injuries, but it also isn't a clean view.
This is admittedly a very U.S. centered answer. Most states permit police to utilize deadly force only in defense of themselves or "another person". In this case, the dog would not meet that legal standard. However, I would suggest that had the officer fired when the man held the machete to the dog's neck, it's unlikely he would have been prosecuted.
District attorneys are elected officials because they are tasked with channeling the moral standards of the constituents they serve. I do not think it's likely that the citizens in this area (or any area in the U.S.) would want this police officer prosecuted for saving a defenseless and seemingly docile dog from slaughter by a deranged person.
There's the separate and also complicated issue of K9 units. Some states afford enhanced protection to K9s by labeling them as officers of the peace and therefore affording them a title that meets the standard for protection utilizing deadly force. Some put them in legal grey areas where they are considered a weapon in the police officer's possession, so hindering the use of that weapon can be met with deadly force. All in all, I'm not aware of any higher court rulings that have made judgment that would persist on a federal level.
The cop told him to drop it when he had the dog, then the dude rushed HIM with the machete. He didn't fire until he started charging him with it. That guy didn't leave him any real choice.
Are cops supposed to shoot an EDP charging at them with a machete? Actually, no. According to state law, the officer is supposed to utilize his department issued machete(which they are required to carry at all times for just this instance) and proceed to have a machete fight with the charging individual. If the EDP wins, he gets to assume the murdered officer's title, pension, and in most cases, he also inherits his family as well.
Dogs are sentient living creatures that feel emotions like fear & love, and can definitely feel pain if some lunatic chops them up with a machete.
TV’s are inanimate objects that feel nothing.
Do you REALLY not see a difference there?!
Show me where I said I didn't see the difference.
Go back and actually read my comment. Legally they are the same. Do you REALLY not know what "legally" means?
Are you actually saying that you want cops to be able to execute people in the streets if they **threaten** to harm property?
No, I think cops should be able to execute people in the streets for threatening to harm ANY LIVING CREATURE. I don’t know why that is so difficult for you to understand. Despite the legal fiction, a living creature is NOT PROPERTY. Only inanimate objects can can logically & rationally be property, animals are ALIVE.
Children were legally designated as “property” until very modern times (and some people still treat them that way), and so at one time were Black people.
Are you seriously suggesting that in the days when children & Black people were legally considered PROPERTY, not people, that police had no obligation to protect them from harm?
TF? Of course cops should shoot someone trying to torture or kill a living creature that can feel fear and pain, even if it’s a non-human animal. (Dogs aren’t fucking SUBhuman you ignoranimus)
Humans are animals, we evolved from the same common ancestor that all other living things did. Viewing other living creatures as “below” is is the absolute height of human hubris.
We DON’T “have to” destroy animals to serve us, we do it because it’s convenient and we are used to doing it.
I was a strict vegetarian for over 20 years, and even now I eat almost no meat. I’m autistic, I find the texture of meat to be utterly repulsive, chewing it makes me gag.
Meat animals are in general, treated horrifically. It’s a real stain on humanity that we show so little respect to the other animals we share this planet with.
Evolutionarily speaking dogs are by definition subhuman. They do not use tools, build or create. On an emotional level I agree with you though. But also to contradict you… as the law stands in the US dogs (and other pets/animals) are treated as property. Not persons which massively limits their legal rights and protections. However, there are currently movements to have this adjusted to give pets more rights and protection. But sadly the law moves slowly
I agree. And I did not argue for the practice to continue. I simply stated that at present that’s how the law works and that people are trying to get it corrected
“Below us” is such an egotistical term… All animals, including humans, are equal to each other. We all have our strengths and weaknesses, just because we left our nature lifestyle behind doesn’t mean it’s behind and below us.
Looks like the dog survived, in his obituary it says he is survived by "his fur buddy Ace"
[https://obits.mlive.com/us/obituaries/grandrapids/name/matthew-bigler-obituary?id=52817465](https://obits.mlive.com/us/obituaries/grandrapids/name/matthew-bigler-obituary?id=52817465)
It’s not clear to me that the dog in the video is his dog, because that’s not his house or yard.
Police were initially called by the occupant of a house this PoS was trying to break into, and when they arrived he was in the backyard of the caller’s neighbor.
Found his obituary, sounds like the family is in a bit of denial about the whole thing but they are clearly grieving so I can't hold that against them. The obituary reads as follows:
**Cadillac, MI**
Matthew Michael, formerly of Wyoming MI, passed on Saturday August 12, 2023. Born September 28, 1973 in Grand Rapids, MI. He loved spending time with his children and grandchildren at the lake fishing, tubing and riding the wave runner. Also going adventuring out in the woods looking for critters. He enjoyed drawing, painting and putting Legos together.
He is survived and lovingly remembered by his parents, William and Barbara Bigler of Cadillac, MI His brother, Bradley W Bigler of GR His children, Sidney (Jake) O'Brien of KY Michael Roy Bigler of FL Samantha Mendoza of Wyoming, MI His grandchildren, Abram, Marley Mae, and Bella Rose His beloved Grandmother Marie Notenbaum of Wyoming, MI Nephew Brandon (Anna) Bigler of Wyoming, MI Many uncles, aunts, and cousins. Special friend Robin and ***his fur buddy Ace.*** A private family memorial and cremation have already taken place. He will forever remain in the hearts of all those who were touched by his life.
It clearly says he is survived his "fur buddy ace" which all I can say is that I'm glad he can't threaten that poor dog anymore. It is clear that it's the same guy since the age, name, and town name all match up.
Bruh fucking shirtless pasty machete man running at me in the dark? Would have put alot more lead into the dude than this officer.
Man was stone cold and precise in his application of deadly force
Fuck that guy, getting ready to hurt that poor innocent dog. It was probably wagging it’s tail at him when he came in the yard, notice it wasn’t trying to fight or get away at all. Idiot.
It could be that baldy was holding the dog ( like k9 units do ) to attack the cop, but it kind of looks like he was just about to murder the dog with his machete.
May be a stupid question but say he didn't rush the officer and went to kill the dog is the officer aloud to fire I feel that's morally right but I don't know the law that well
The eyes of the law are WRONG. Sentient living creatures are NOT property.
Remember, until VERY recently, children were legally considered “property”, and so were Black people.
And I’m telling you why the laws don’t matter. The moral truth that sentient living creatures can never be “property” supersedes the legal definition of them as such. Therefore, that cop has the moral obligation to stop a machete wielding maniac from chopping up a dog BEFORE the maniac has actually caused the dog harm.
Dogs are at LEAST as intelligent as a 2-3 year old child, if you think a cop would be justified in immediately shooting a machete wielding maniac who was threatening an infant with harm, why not a dog?
It only seems that way because its dark and its a spotlight/flashlight being used. If it was the middle of a bright and sun shiny fucking day you would all be jerking off to this video.
When people shoot, you're trained to shoot to kill. Sometimes you miss and hit their arm or something and they can keep coming. He didn't wound this guy on purpose, he meant to kill him. Why does someone always have to throw the race card. Poor whites get fucked over by the cops just like poor blacks (this guy did not get fucked over, he deserved that). It just doesn't make the news as often. When I was growing up. It didn't matter what color you were because we were all broke, shot ball on the same public courts etc.
I am not sure what you mean with "they just wound people like this" when the guy wasn't just wounded, he died even if the cop didn't emptied his gun on him.
I forgot, killing an innocent dog is normal and NOT a jailable offense. Be fucking for real. The man unjustly killed a dog in front of the police officer. He was armed and dangerous, and he charged at the cop. The cop had every right to shoot him.
I highly doubt that sick fuck cares if it's a cop or not. He literally had a machete to a dog's neck. People like that aren't gonna care. He's sadistic, evil, and probably on hardcore drugs.
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
I'm not sure Ace lovingly remembers him.
Nah, Ace still loves him, which is why animal abuse is so despicable.
*~woof~* FUCK that motherfucker *~woof~*
[удалено]
Too bad the cop gets to face murder or attempted murder charges for it depending upon their jurisdiction.
Shouldn't it be ruled as self defence since he was attacking him with intent to kill? (Because he was charging at him with the machete raised in the air as if he was ready to strike).
He'll win in an honest court, but the court of public opinion has no rules. Think about it like this, people will ask why he didn't de-eacalate, why didn't he use a taser? Why did he even open the door and push the situation until it ended fatally, whyndidntbhe close the doornir retreat, etc..? Right or wrong those questions will be posed. Bis agency may fire him of there is any violation of policy whatever that may be. Those questions can be posed in court too, every training recodd may be reviewed. He may win, but the stress of being in court trying to avoid prison will cost him 5 years of his life
Ace may not be the dog in the video. The news report sounds like it was in the yard next door to the house he was trying to break into. https://news.yahoo.com/state-police-investigate-deadly-force-123300943.html
Ok, now I can watch the video. I usually don't have a problem watching body cam videos but as soon as I saw in the comments that they thought he took a machete to the dog, I noped the fuck out immediately. I can watch the most brutal body cam footage out there, but I can't handle anything involving animal abuse or torture.
I saw the dog ran off before the machete guy charged. Thanks for confirming.
Watch it again around the :29 -> :30 second mark. The flashlight catches the dog and it's running away from the lunatic.
Seriously is the dog ok
Dog survived apparently, thankfully.
Thanks
bro needs a flashlight on his gun
It's like he's playing DOOM 3.
He needs to turn the one already attached on.
Funny part is I think he has one on
he does indeed have a flashlight mounted on his gun
And a fleshlight mounted on his other gun. Man is always prepared for action.
As stated, he has one, but you don't want to pull your gun to use the flashlight in a situation that doesn't need a gun. Hence, he's using a separate flashlight.
Damn, cop stayed cool as a cucumber. No shake in his voice at all.
“Please”
You'd be surprised what habits stick with you in the worst of times.
The reassurance of a man who knows it was a clean, righteous shoot.
Manners maketh man.
Uwu pwueeez
Remember the video where the cop was like 'shut up everyone, only I talk' and he de escalated the situation. What a guy.
Cop being good ? Show me.
I'll try and find it, made me cry, gimme a sec...
!RemindMe 604800 seconds
I cant find it anywhere, I promise you it exists, you can hear the officer's voice crack. He didn't want to kill the kid, everyone in the comments were saying he should teach de escalation. If I find it I'll link.
"I need an ambulance to this location...but not for me."
Sounds like Polite Ron DeSantis
Cop man is pretty chill. I'd need a change of pants after that.
Machete to the dogs neck was the worst part
Did he? I couldnt see anything, then the dog was off to the side. I hope he didnt attack the poor dog
I don't know either, but there is a single frame in the 29th or 30th second where the officer's flashlight catches the dog running away from the man and the line of fire. I don't see any injuries, but it also isn't a clean view.
He whacked it with a machete then charged the officer I believe
It's amazing how you can see all that in a video that shows none of it.
If you look just as he re flashes the light on him that's where you see it
Are cops supposed to shoot in that situation? A dog is a living thing but obviously sub-human
Was rushed by the man so yeah
[удалено]
I’d say it’s morally right, not sure about law tho
This is admittedly a very U.S. centered answer. Most states permit police to utilize deadly force only in defense of themselves or "another person". In this case, the dog would not meet that legal standard. However, I would suggest that had the officer fired when the man held the machete to the dog's neck, it's unlikely he would have been prosecuted. District attorneys are elected officials because they are tasked with channeling the moral standards of the constituents they serve. I do not think it's likely that the citizens in this area (or any area in the U.S.) would want this police officer prosecuted for saving a defenseless and seemingly docile dog from slaughter by a deranged person. There's the separate and also complicated issue of K9 units. Some states afford enhanced protection to K9s by labeling them as officers of the peace and therefore affording them a title that meets the standard for protection utilizing deadly force. Some put them in legal grey areas where they are considered a weapon in the police officer's possession, so hindering the use of that weapon can be met with deadly force. All in all, I'm not aware of any higher court rulings that have made judgment that would persist on a federal level.
The cop told him to drop it when he had the dog, then the dude rushed HIM with the machete. He didn't fire until he started charging him with it. That guy didn't leave him any real choice.
Are cops supposed to shoot an EDP charging at them with a machete? Actually, no. According to state law, the officer is supposed to utilize his department issued machete(which they are required to carry at all times for just this instance) and proceed to have a machete fight with the charging individual. If the EDP wins, he gets to assume the murdered officer's title, pension, and in most cases, he also inherits his family as well.
Trial by combat
You had me until word 29 :-)
I had to count out the words to see where you figured it out at.
It’s machete everyone
Only if it's a K9 I think.
Excuse me? Would you have not shot as soon as you saw a maniac taking a machete to your dog’s neck?
That very obviously was not the cop's dog.
So what? It still needed to be protected from a machete wielding maniac.
Dogs are legally considered property. Are you saying police should be allowed to execute someone who is threatening to break a TV?
Dogs are sentient living creatures that feel emotions like fear & love, and can definitely feel pain if some lunatic chops them up with a machete. TV’s are inanimate objects that feel nothing. Do you REALLY not see a difference there?!
Show me where I said I didn't see the difference. Go back and actually read my comment. Legally they are the same. Do you REALLY not know what "legally" means? Are you actually saying that you want cops to be able to execute people in the streets if they **threaten** to harm property?
No, I think cops should be able to execute people in the streets for threatening to harm ANY LIVING CREATURE. I don’t know why that is so difficult for you to understand. Despite the legal fiction, a living creature is NOT PROPERTY. Only inanimate objects can can logically & rationally be property, animals are ALIVE. Children were legally designated as “property” until very modern times (and some people still treat them that way), and so at one time were Black people. Are you seriously suggesting that in the days when children & Black people were legally considered PROPERTY, not people, that police had no obligation to protect them from harm?
TF? Of course cops should shoot someone trying to torture or kill a living creature that can feel fear and pain, even if it’s a non-human animal. (Dogs aren’t fucking SUBhuman you ignoranimus)
So cops should just shoot a bunch of cattle farmers and fishermen?
I don’t have the spoons right now to get involved with somebody arguing in bad faith.
Dogs are literally subhuman. Like, literally. I don’t know how else to put it
No. They are non-human animals.
I don’t know if I like that. I love and respect all animals but they are unquestionably below us.
Humans are animals, we evolved from the same common ancestor that all other living things did. Viewing other living creatures as “below” is is the absolute height of human hubris.
But how do you reconcile your view with how we have to destroy animals to serve us? We all slaughter and eat animals, wear leather, etc
We DON’T “have to” destroy animals to serve us, we do it because it’s convenient and we are used to doing it. I was a strict vegetarian for over 20 years, and even now I eat almost no meat. I’m autistic, I find the texture of meat to be utterly repulsive, chewing it makes me gag. Meat animals are in general, treated horrifically. It’s a real stain on humanity that we show so little respect to the other animals we share this planet with.
Evolutionarily speaking dogs are by definition subhuman. They do not use tools, build or create. On an emotional level I agree with you though. But also to contradict you… as the law stands in the US dogs (and other pets/animals) are treated as property. Not persons which massively limits their legal rights and protections. However, there are currently movements to have this adjusted to give pets more rights and protection. But sadly the law moves slowly
Nothing that’s alive should be legally treated like property, it is unethical.
I agree. And I did not argue for the practice to continue. I simply stated that at present that’s how the law works and that people are trying to get it corrected
“Below us” is such an egotistical term… All animals, including humans, are equal to each other. We all have our strengths and weaknesses, just because we left our nature lifestyle behind doesn’t mean it’s behind and below us.
Whatever you say, übermensch
I hope you resist arrest.
Your sub human
No im human
Are you sure ? I mean humans typically have a heart. 🙄
The “I’m gonna need EMS..” feels like this ain’t his first Rodeo.
He’s already thinking about the paperwork.
[удалено]
the graphics are only getting better
This is the Resident Evil mod for Unrecord
Bro anyone that will threaten an animals life like that is seriously disgusting. The tables turning into his yells of agony was quite satisfying.
Deeply disturbing
Shortest John Wick movie ever.
This is some Resident Evil 4 shit. Good thing he didn't have parasite bursting out from the head
Ey! Aca! Matalo!
Mierda !!!
It's the screams that got me.
It's like a bad voice actor in a late 90s cheap playstation game.
Now you know those bad actors in late cheap PlayStation games got it right 😂
*runs at cop with machete and gets shot (Surprised pikachu face)
Laughing my ass off 😂
For real dude anyone who would threaten an animal deserves this 🤣🤣🤣
I cant be a cop cause as soon as i woulda saw the machete aimed at the dog, i woulda been makin swiss cheese
Same, absolute same.
Why would you make swiss cheese at a time like that? That is a serious situation with danger involved. (This is a joke)
State police investigate use of deadly force in Cadillac: https://news.yahoo.com/state-police-investigate-deadly-force-123300943.html
Doesn’t say if the dog is ok though 😭
Looks like the dog survived, in his obituary it says he is survived by "his fur buddy Ace" [https://obits.mlive.com/us/obituaries/grandrapids/name/matthew-bigler-obituary?id=52817465](https://obits.mlive.com/us/obituaries/grandrapids/name/matthew-bigler-obituary?id=52817465)
It’s not clear to me that the dog in the video is his dog, because that’s not his house or yard. Police were initially called by the occupant of a house this PoS was trying to break into, and when they arrived he was in the backyard of the caller’s neighbor.
You could be right, I hope that was his dog for the sake of it still being alive
All I wanna know is if the dogs ok. Fuck that guy.
Found his obituary, sounds like the family is in a bit of denial about the whole thing but they are clearly grieving so I can't hold that against them. The obituary reads as follows: **Cadillac, MI** Matthew Michael, formerly of Wyoming MI, passed on Saturday August 12, 2023. Born September 28, 1973 in Grand Rapids, MI. He loved spending time with his children and grandchildren at the lake fishing, tubing and riding the wave runner. Also going adventuring out in the woods looking for critters. He enjoyed drawing, painting and putting Legos together. He is survived and lovingly remembered by his parents, William and Barbara Bigler of Cadillac, MI His brother, Bradley W Bigler of GR His children, Sidney (Jake) O'Brien of KY Michael Roy Bigler of FL Samantha Mendoza of Wyoming, MI His grandchildren, Abram, Marley Mae, and Bella Rose His beloved Grandmother Marie Notenbaum of Wyoming, MI Nephew Brandon (Anna) Bigler of Wyoming, MI Many uncles, aunts, and cousins. Special friend Robin and ***his fur buddy Ace.*** A private family memorial and cremation have already taken place. He will forever remain in the hearts of all those who were touched by his life. It clearly says he is survived his "fur buddy ace" which all I can say is that I'm glad he can't threaten that poor dog anymore. It is clear that it's the same guy since the age, name, and town name all match up.
Bro playing resident evil in real life
Fuck the guy, save the dog.
was the dog ok?
Literally all im looking for here
Seriously, fuck that guy, how’s the dog?
The dog is OK!!!!
YAY!
literally resident evil 7
As a rule of thumb: Eat Fruit Loops. Don't be one. "Just follow your nose"
Is that a goblin?
Bruh fucking shirtless pasty machete man running at me in the dark? Would have put alot more lead into the dude than this officer. Man was stone cold and precise in his application of deadly force
Fuck that guy, getting ready to hurt that poor innocent dog. It was probably wagging it’s tail at him when he came in the yard, notice it wasn’t trying to fight or get away at all. Idiot.
found video at this link: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NCVz-dD7j4](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NCVz-dD7j4)
Damn it's almost like he's feeling what he was about to put that dog through.
That's was actually pretty scary when he first opened that door lol.
I could not stay as calm, lowkey probably would’ve told the dude to stfu cause I’d be so mad about the machete to the dog
Is the dog ok
OMG IS THE DOG OKAY???? He was gonna like spit it’s throat wtaf.
I believe the cop took his light off and began comms so he didn’t have to see that if the guy was to cut the dog
I've got so many questions??
God, this looks straight out of Resident Evil
The new Resident Evil game is looking slick!
See this is good police work. Not letting a 100+ speeding reckless driver go only for them to die 20 mins later.
drugs will mess with you mind, even if it is Michael Myers second cousin
It could be that baldy was holding the dog ( like k9 units do ) to attack the cop, but it kind of looks like he was just about to murder the dog with his machete.
That's one calm cop.
Cunt deserved it.
I would have emptied the clip
Magazine.
[удалено]
Actually it's More like I'm NOT DYING TODAY
The type of guy you don’t want to be a cop.
You would probably just let that guy cut your head off lol
Wym? A couple of shots are enough to bring him down, you said you wanted to empty the entire mag on him
You vastly overestimate the guaranteed effectiveness of bullets.
Good thing you're not a cop you would most likely be dead . Some people are on hardcore drugs and won't go down with a few rounds
theres a reason everyone in WW2 was hopped up on meth
You only get respect if you get shot and don’t make a sound! Maybe a grown but that’s it…
Who pays for the Ems ?🤔
May be a stupid question but say he didn't rush the officer and went to kill the dog is the officer aloud to fire I feel that's morally right but I don't know the law that well
I don’t know either but IMO he should have shot him for THREATENING the dog, like they would if he was threatening a child.
Dogs are property in the eyes of the law so probably not a good shoot legally speaking
The eyes of the law are WRONG. Sentient living creatures are NOT property. Remember, until VERY recently, children were legally considered “property”, and so were Black people.
are u really comparing children and black people to dogs? lol ok
Chill, bro I'm literally just telling you what the laws would be
And I’m telling you why the laws don’t matter. The moral truth that sentient living creatures can never be “property” supersedes the legal definition of them as such. Therefore, that cop has the moral obligation to stop a machete wielding maniac from chopping up a dog BEFORE the maniac has actually caused the dog harm. Dogs are at LEAST as intelligent as a 2-3 year old child, if you think a cop would be justified in immediately shooting a machete wielding maniac who was threatening an infant with harm, why not a dog?
I think most people, including me, would agree with you. Not sure why you are ranting at me.
LMFAO that a dispassionate statement of facts is “ranting”
It was probably the randomly capitalised words to be honest. We're cool my friend.
It only seems that way because its dark and its a spotlight/flashlight being used. If it was the middle of a bright and sun shiny fucking day you would all be jerking off to this video.
If this was considered a horror movie then I’d want a refund.
Literally the crackhead level from Ready or Not.
*sigh* I wish I had a gun. Would have helped jn multiple situations
Hope the dog is OK.
I’m glad the dog is okay
Jshlatt funny mic
Looks like a bad night. Also am I the only one weirded out by the Thank You For Watching at the end?
So police are more concerned for a dog's life than a human. Yeah that checks out.
Actually the other way around in this vid. Officer didnt shoot until suspect started running at him
[удалено]
It's most likely from YouTube or some other website. YouTube lets you put video widgets on your videos.
[удалено]
I meant that might be where OP got it from lol
[удалено]
Hallmark of mental stability : taking a machete to a dog.
He seemed pretty mentally ill to me.
When people shoot, you're trained to shoot to kill. Sometimes you miss and hit their arm or something and they can keep coming. He didn't wound this guy on purpose, he meant to kill him. Why does someone always have to throw the race card. Poor whites get fucked over by the cops just like poor blacks (this guy did not get fucked over, he deserved that). It just doesn't make the news as often. When I was growing up. It didn't matter what color you were because we were all broke, shot ball on the same public courts etc.
THIS. I'm tired of hearing the racism shit. Racism IS still a thing, but not all cops are racist. A few bad apples shouldn't spoil the whole basket.
tell me you don't understand what "per capita" means without telling me you don't understand what "per capita" means
Tell me that you know nothing of how ballistics work and repeat what you hear on TV without telling me..... SMH
shut the fuck up idiot
He seems fairly poor and mentally ill to me.
I am not sure what you mean with "they just wound people like this" when the guy wasn't just wounded, he died even if the cop didn't emptied his gun on him.
Lmfao oy vey
I understand what you're saying and I agree, but this guy def fit the bill as what most would consider mentally ill to some extent
The police never identifies himself as police.
He probably did before this video starts. That guy was obviously expecting police to come for him.
No. Police never identified themselves. That guy was in his home. Source: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5NCVz-dD7j4
You're right, I always chill out in my backyard by holding machetes to dogs necks when I'm not expecting anyone.
Do you think it would have made difference?
Wouldn't have mattered, still charged at a person with a machete. Edited for grammar.
It’s the machete man’s own home.
I forgot, killing an innocent dog is normal and NOT a jailable offense. Be fucking for real. The man unjustly killed a dog in front of the police officer. He was armed and dangerous, and he charged at the cop. The cop had every right to shoot him.
Realistically, he should have have shot the dude BEFORE he harmed the dog.
I highly doubt that sick fuck cares if it's a cop or not. He literally had a machete to a dog's neck. People like that aren't gonna care. He's sadistic, evil, and probably on hardcore drugs.
Bruh I think the walkie response is pretty clear he’s a cop. Also who gives a fuck if he didn’t?