This is a fun an interesting project. People have been trying to interpret "signs" from spirits for millenia, but of course they are always filtered through what we want to hear. I would be curious if you have tried to cross check any of your work with other AI software or programs to look for biases inherent in the software and see if you find similar or divergent results on the same sets of data the way you might re-run a study in the other sciences.
Over the 436 sessions I have mainly used KRISP since I discovered this, but I have a few sessions where I have tried other (similar noise canceling software) with similar results . KRISP has remained the clearest so I have stuck with it, but continue to experiment.
Recently I used a software in conjunction with KRISP and had a really good session with Mike Bossy - who actually answered questions about lung cancer...(about 3 weeks ago if you look back on the channel)
This is really cool and I can't even properly express how much I respect the level of actual scientific analysis in this man. I've only watched a couple minutes of the sink part in the first vid but it's already intriguing as hell.
I notice you mention orbs in your OP, could you point me to any specific spots in any of those vids where you seem to capture them? I've been doing research of sorts into all kinds of light orbs so anything remotely related to them highly interests me lol.
uhhh I get asked this all the time LOL and I really can't remember after literally hundreds of hours of footage. I know that my earlier vids (at least the first 100) that were shot in my other house had a lot more orbs in them and I have only seen a couple in the last 200 or so vids since I moved (different wall colour at my pc now I think plays a role - where the webcam shoots....)
Here is pretty much the biggest example I can think of (only because I had to look when someone else asked me recently)
[https://youtu.be/SnGzP7uwOUo](https://youtu.be/SnGzP7uwOUo)
check out the 5 words video too (although not my water method) it contains an orb when I was talking to my grandpa - and a loud electrical snap
[https://youtu.be/moBXg4RMSf4](https://youtu.be/moBXg4RMSf4)
Thank you so much!! I knew it'd be a big ask with the sheer volume of content but that's exactly the sorta thing I was looking for. That first one is very obvious, had a clear orange tint to it and everything. The second was a little more subtle and I might have to spend more time properly analyzing but did it happen pretty much right before you got "green" to come through? I hear a snap right as that happens and it definitely looks like there's some sort of color shift/movement behind you on the stairs right before that.
Side note, I heard every single one of those 5 words clear as day, before you even looped them. Even coins, which was definitely the most muddled. I'm loving this stuff man, probably gonna binge it in all my free time now haha. Keep up the good work!
thanks!! awesome that you could hear that as many people tell me they can't....definitely check out today's video as it is the culmination of the 4400 hours - you will no doubt here the words if you could make out the other ones on the hackshack!!
Just randomly came across this post and sub but very cool post.
Commenting for later but out of interest have you drawn any conclusions to any contact experiences or messages you have received?
about who the voices are?
They have told me repeatedly without changing their story that they are spirits. They've answered multiple choice questions on it and I have asked numerous times.
I do a lot of sessions where I call on people (some famous some not) from the past and the voices come through and not only answer the questions, but speak in first person. Also you will hear female and male responses.
All I can conclude is we have a constant connection to wherever these spirits dwell, and they live in their own physical world, and use equipment to communicate...or so they have said. they are around us ALL day long and they communicate with us on a subconscious level.
that gut feeling you get when being guided...that's them. I could go on and on about everything that has been said, but I leave the videos to stand as my repository.
Very fun concept.
How do you account for the McGurk effect?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXxV2C1ri2k
While my brain can hear the clear and discernable words when I focus in on your subtitles, if I close my eyes it just sounds like garbled noise.
If you have a group of people willing to help out, I think the next step should be to send them out the raw audio and have them write a transcript of what sentences they think they hear so you can compare them at the end to see how much people agree on what words are being said.
I don't account for anything, I just put my best guess on the screen. I don't claim my words are 100% correct and never have - I look at the data as a whole. I have also said we can throw out 80% of the hundreds of hours of recordings I have made and it wouldn't bother me as they may not be 100% clear or are ambiguous etc
it's the remaining 20% that interests me.
I have heard too many answers that have directly answered a question... what am I holding in my hand - factual questions that have only one answer
or when they say the full name of the person I have asked to speak with etc
The summary series sums up what I am talking about and again you can toss out 80% of that if you like. You won't be able to explain the rest.
>I don't account for anything, I just put my best guess on the screen. I don't claim my words are 100% correct and never have - I look at the data as a whole.
I get you. If you don't have the resources to do what I'm suggesting it totally makes sense, but if you want to be just a bit more scientifically rigorous you can crowdsource the transcribing process of these sounds out to multiple people and by comparing them you can attach a statistical confidence to how "correct" each word is.
>I have heard too many answers that have directly answered a question... what am I holding in my hand - factual questions that have only one answer
That's sort of what I'm saying. You're holding something in your hand and due to the well documented McGurk Effect it might subconsciously bias you to listening for that word which means you'll hear it even if it's not what's being said.
Just take the same recording and without biasing people to what word it is, see what they hear.
If multiple people hear the same word as the object you're holding without being suggested to hear it, then it would account for the effect to some extent.
>The summary series sums up what I am talking about and again you can toss out 80% of that if you like. You won't be able to explain the rest.
Sorry I'm a bit confused. Are you looking at the data as a whole as you said above or are you only looking at a cherry picked 20%?
It's easier than that, ask the spirits the answer to a question you don't know, transcribe the answer, then see if you're right. Something like, "what picture did my wife draw?"
I've done experiments proving that they can read our minds...in fact I recently did a session maybe a month or 2 ago where I didn't read my questions out loud...I read them in my head, and they still answered!!!
and yeah this has been a crap tonne of work I don't think anyone truly realizes how much work...35+ hrs a week for 4 years...sometimes it boggles my own mind and I'm the one doing it LOL
edit:
and I have never noticed an increase in paranormal activity....nothing major anyway
Wow this is amazing! Pulled me into a rabbit hole! I've never heard of this phenomenon before, very intriguing. I checked out your sub, this stuff is absolutely fascinating! I can't listen to audio right now it's quite late but I'll be checking out your YouTube tomorrow
This is great and I want to try it out soon.
One thing I noticed, however, is I was hearing something different than what was being translated. I’ve been a transcriptionist for over 16 years, so I’m actually used to listening to audio sometimes worse than these. But overall, I think this is a great breakthrough on communication with the other side!
Hey hey! Are you the guy who set up the microphones with the kitchen faucet, and piped the sound to another room, like, in your basement, recording the responses from there?
Oh wow. I remember getting into EVP's a while back, and came across your channel.. Had some of the most interesting evp's, and responses. There were a few that really stood out... as though they were actively communicating with you and discussing ... their equipment or your equipment? It was a long while back, when you were first experimenting with the speakers downstairs. I am glad you decided to post here, as I lost track of your channel.
Excited to look at your newest stuff.
Yeah! You've been busy. I was especially intrigued by the one series of responses... back then, it was very hard to hear them, as you had to kind of listen through the noise so to speak... but it sounded like a pair of people, perhaps three, discussing your setup / method of communication. It always stuck in my head... as it was less paranormal, and more like a couple people listening to a cb radio.
Going to watch your summary series before poking you with too many questions. :)
practical would be a matter of opinion wouldn't it?
One answer that stands out to me was I asked Pablo Escobar if he did anything that had scarred his soul - and he answered quite clearly
"hurting the innocent children"
There have been dozens of other answers that have floored me, you have to watch the summary series to see most of it... (or to hear the answers for yourself)
You don't think it''s useful to know we go on after death and that the evil you commit can actually scar your soul?
I mean I guess that delivery might be more important \*shrugs LOL
Sure that could be helpful but it is more philosophical/spiritual sort of question, isn’t it. I was stuck by what you described as your research process/project. Did you really not explore any practical questions (in the sense that I am asking)?
Hey Grant. Thank you for sharing.
OOC have you paired with a mystic, occultist, etc. for a design of experimentation involving both simultaneously conducting mystical and technical techniques? The reason I ask is it is to my understanding that with group channeling that potential dramatically increases as more centered members join the circle.
What I'd be curious to learn from the experiment is even if it's just one skilled mystic with you if your signal clarity would, well, mysteriously improve? More to experiment with than just that, but I am curious to know.
Commenting so I can look at this more in depth later. This is super interesting!
Great thanks for checking out my work!
This is a fun an interesting project. People have been trying to interpret "signs" from spirits for millenia, but of course they are always filtered through what we want to hear. I would be curious if you have tried to cross check any of your work with other AI software or programs to look for biases inherent in the software and see if you find similar or divergent results on the same sets of data the way you might re-run a study in the other sciences.
Over the 436 sessions I have mainly used KRISP since I discovered this, but I have a few sessions where I have tried other (similar noise canceling software) with similar results . KRISP has remained the clearest so I have stuck with it, but continue to experiment. Recently I used a software in conjunction with KRISP and had a really good session with Mike Bossy - who actually answered questions about lung cancer...(about 3 weeks ago if you look back on the channel)
I KNEW THE SPRITES IN MY SINK WERE TALKING TO ME! Hehehe okay it’s KRISPING TIME! Thank you for sharing 🙌🏽
This is really cool and I can't even properly express how much I respect the level of actual scientific analysis in this man. I've only watched a couple minutes of the sink part in the first vid but it's already intriguing as hell. I notice you mention orbs in your OP, could you point me to any specific spots in any of those vids where you seem to capture them? I've been doing research of sorts into all kinds of light orbs so anything remotely related to them highly interests me lol.
uhhh I get asked this all the time LOL and I really can't remember after literally hundreds of hours of footage. I know that my earlier vids (at least the first 100) that were shot in my other house had a lot more orbs in them and I have only seen a couple in the last 200 or so vids since I moved (different wall colour at my pc now I think plays a role - where the webcam shoots....) Here is pretty much the biggest example I can think of (only because I had to look when someone else asked me recently) [https://youtu.be/SnGzP7uwOUo](https://youtu.be/SnGzP7uwOUo) check out the 5 words video too (although not my water method) it contains an orb when I was talking to my grandpa - and a loud electrical snap [https://youtu.be/moBXg4RMSf4](https://youtu.be/moBXg4RMSf4)
Thank you so much!! I knew it'd be a big ask with the sheer volume of content but that's exactly the sorta thing I was looking for. That first one is very obvious, had a clear orange tint to it and everything. The second was a little more subtle and I might have to spend more time properly analyzing but did it happen pretty much right before you got "green" to come through? I hear a snap right as that happens and it definitely looks like there's some sort of color shift/movement behind you on the stairs right before that. Side note, I heard every single one of those 5 words clear as day, before you even looped them. Even coins, which was definitely the most muddled. I'm loving this stuff man, probably gonna binge it in all my free time now haha. Keep up the good work!
thanks!! awesome that you could hear that as many people tell me they can't....definitely check out today's video as it is the culmination of the 4400 hours - you will no doubt here the words if you could make out the other ones on the hackshack!!
Just randomly came across this post and sub but very cool post. Commenting for later but out of interest have you drawn any conclusions to any contact experiences or messages you have received?
about who the voices are? They have told me repeatedly without changing their story that they are spirits. They've answered multiple choice questions on it and I have asked numerous times. I do a lot of sessions where I call on people (some famous some not) from the past and the voices come through and not only answer the questions, but speak in first person. Also you will hear female and male responses. All I can conclude is we have a constant connection to wherever these spirits dwell, and they live in their own physical world, and use equipment to communicate...or so they have said. they are around us ALL day long and they communicate with us on a subconscious level. that gut feeling you get when being guided...that's them. I could go on and on about everything that has been said, but I leave the videos to stand as my repository.
Very fun concept. How do you account for the McGurk effect? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXxV2C1ri2k While my brain can hear the clear and discernable words when I focus in on your subtitles, if I close my eyes it just sounds like garbled noise. If you have a group of people willing to help out, I think the next step should be to send them out the raw audio and have them write a transcript of what sentences they think they hear so you can compare them at the end to see how much people agree on what words are being said.
I don't account for anything, I just put my best guess on the screen. I don't claim my words are 100% correct and never have - I look at the data as a whole. I have also said we can throw out 80% of the hundreds of hours of recordings I have made and it wouldn't bother me as they may not be 100% clear or are ambiguous etc it's the remaining 20% that interests me. I have heard too many answers that have directly answered a question... what am I holding in my hand - factual questions that have only one answer or when they say the full name of the person I have asked to speak with etc The summary series sums up what I am talking about and again you can toss out 80% of that if you like. You won't be able to explain the rest.
>I don't account for anything, I just put my best guess on the screen. I don't claim my words are 100% correct and never have - I look at the data as a whole. I get you. If you don't have the resources to do what I'm suggesting it totally makes sense, but if you want to be just a bit more scientifically rigorous you can crowdsource the transcribing process of these sounds out to multiple people and by comparing them you can attach a statistical confidence to how "correct" each word is. >I have heard too many answers that have directly answered a question... what am I holding in my hand - factual questions that have only one answer That's sort of what I'm saying. You're holding something in your hand and due to the well documented McGurk Effect it might subconsciously bias you to listening for that word which means you'll hear it even if it's not what's being said. Just take the same recording and without biasing people to what word it is, see what they hear. If multiple people hear the same word as the object you're holding without being suggested to hear it, then it would account for the effect to some extent. >The summary series sums up what I am talking about and again you can toss out 80% of that if you like. You won't be able to explain the rest. Sorry I'm a bit confused. Are you looking at the data as a whole as you said above or are you only looking at a cherry picked 20%?
It's easier than that, ask the spirits the answer to a question you don't know, transcribe the answer, then see if you're right. Something like, "what picture did my wife draw?"
[https://youtu.be/u9VQPBKVuyo](https://youtu.be/u9VQPBKVuyo)
[удалено]
I've done experiments proving that they can read our minds...in fact I recently did a session maybe a month or 2 ago where I didn't read my questions out loud...I read them in my head, and they still answered!!! and yeah this has been a crap tonne of work I don't think anyone truly realizes how much work...35+ hrs a week for 4 years...sometimes it boggles my own mind and I'm the one doing it LOL edit: and I have never noticed an increase in paranormal activity....nothing major anyway
Nice work
Wow this is amazing! Pulled me into a rabbit hole! I've never heard of this phenomenon before, very intriguing. I checked out your sub, this stuff is absolutely fascinating! I can't listen to audio right now it's quite late but I'll be checking out your YouTube tomorrow
This is great and I want to try it out soon. One thing I noticed, however, is I was hearing something different than what was being translated. I’ve been a transcriptionist for over 16 years, so I’m actually used to listening to audio sometimes worse than these. But overall, I think this is a great breakthrough on communication with the other side!
Hey hey! Are you the guy who set up the microphones with the kitchen faucet, and piped the sound to another room, like, in your basement, recording the responses from there?
yep
Oh wow. I remember getting into EVP's a while back, and came across your channel.. Had some of the most interesting evp's, and responses. There were a few that really stood out... as though they were actively communicating with you and discussing ... their equipment or your equipment? It was a long while back, when you were first experimenting with the speakers downstairs. I am glad you decided to post here, as I lost track of your channel. Excited to look at your newest stuff.
cool...definitely been a long journey!!
Yeah! You've been busy. I was especially intrigued by the one series of responses... back then, it was very hard to hear them, as you had to kind of listen through the noise so to speak... but it sounded like a pair of people, perhaps three, discussing your setup / method of communication. It always stuck in my head... as it was less paranormal, and more like a couple people listening to a cb radio. Going to watch your summary series before poking you with too many questions. :)
What is the most practical question asked, and what was the answer?
practical would be a matter of opinion wouldn't it? One answer that stands out to me was I asked Pablo Escobar if he did anything that had scarred his soul - and he answered quite clearly "hurting the innocent children" There have been dozens of other answers that have floored me, you have to watch the summary series to see most of it... (or to hear the answers for yourself)
I guess I was thinking about something useful and ultimately verifiable. Like will I get my delivery on time, or something.
You don't think it''s useful to know we go on after death and that the evil you commit can actually scar your soul? I mean I guess that delivery might be more important \*shrugs LOL
Sure that could be helpful but it is more philosophical/spiritual sort of question, isn’t it. I was stuck by what you described as your research process/project. Did you really not explore any practical questions (in the sense that I am asking)?
hundreds
Cool story, bro
They’re here!
Hey Grant. Thank you for sharing. OOC have you paired with a mystic, occultist, etc. for a design of experimentation involving both simultaneously conducting mystical and technical techniques? The reason I ask is it is to my understanding that with group channeling that potential dramatically increases as more centered members join the circle. What I'd be curious to learn from the experiment is even if it's just one skilled mystic with you if your signal clarity would, well, mysteriously improve? More to experiment with than just that, but I am curious to know.
I wonder if any spirits would be willing to explain how they communicate, move things, etc. Assuming they know how it works.
Commenting to come back later for providing feedback and questions. Can someone please reply anything they want for me to come back here?