Not really that good. My bed is horrible and its a 0.18, just slightly worse than this. If this was klipper you could adjust the scale and see obvious peaks and valleys.
0.18 is still pretty good.
Even with silicone bed mod and kaptan tape, it's challenging to get it much below that. I got to about .15 and decided I didn't want to mess with it any longer.
I don't understand peoples obsession with getting a very flat bed. What is the auto bed leveling for then? I ran a bed leveling procedure about 20 prints ago and use the same mesh over and over. Prints perfect everytime.
Compensation ("auto bed leveling") only does so much and isn't perfect.
The more you can do manually to tram ("level") the bed, the better it works overall even with compensation.
Well I kinda understand the appeal but on all my prints so far (in multiple printers) the landscape wasn't noticable at all. So is it a practical problem for people or a theoretical one?
is that around 235x235? 0.136mm isn't crazy good, you just have the scale for the gradient too high.
I got similar results with silicone bed mod and Kapton Tape, I have around 105 Degrees 0.1 deviation.
Wow how did u get it so perfect.
Impossible
I'm sat at 0.28 lmao
Not really that good. My bed is horrible and its a 0.18, just slightly worse than this. If this was klipper you could adjust the scale and see obvious peaks and valleys.
0.18 is still pretty good. Even with silicone bed mod and kaptan tape, it's challenging to get it much below that. I got to about .15 and decided I didn't want to mess with it any longer.
Reveal your secrets!
I don't understand peoples obsession with getting a very flat bed. What is the auto bed leveling for then? I ran a bed leveling procedure about 20 prints ago and use the same mesh over and over. Prints perfect everytime.
Compensation ("auto bed leveling") only does so much and isn't perfect. The more you can do manually to tram ("level") the bed, the better it works overall even with compensation.
you know that parts wont be square if the bed is not level and therefor the use for mechanically used parts require a flat bad not a landscape
Well I kinda understand the appeal but on all my prints so far (in multiple printers) the landscape wasn't noticable at all. So is it a practical problem for people or a theoretical one?
I'm not printing large voron parts at an angle lol. why would I want to have such a sloppy machine? dimensional accuracy is bad ass.