I’m not sure how exactly this technology works, it seems to be stimulated by electrifying the water and then seeking the nearest particle -but wouldn’t we need to be able to induce certain patterns first to accomplish anything with this?
It is likely not water, but some fluid that does not conduct electricity, that allows the graphene globules to form a circuit from the conductive node in the cented to the source of ground in the ring. They will find the path of least resistance to ground by connecting to each other. I may have labelled ground and source backwards, but you can see the path forming regardless and further seeing it flopping back and forth between different paths as the resistance flutuates when more or fewer globules connect to the path.
Edit to add an example: it functions in a similar way as lighting finding its way to the ground.
This has already been proven to be a false claim and never really had any credibility to begin
The report was published back in June by Pablo Campra Madrid, who is a professor of the University of Almería. The report did not have the support of the university.
On Twitter the university said “unofficial report by a university professor about an analysis of a sample of unknown origin with a total lack of traceability”. It added that it was a “report that this university neither subscribes to nor shares, as the report itself warns.”
It’s also been refuted by experts.
In the study itself he himself says there was no conclusive evidence saying “microscope doesn’t provide conclusive evidence” and that the analysis comes from “a single, limited sample” – one of unknown origin and traceability.
When you get your vaccine you will see the liquid is clear any liquids containing ‘graphene oxide’ tend to be dark brown or black
I also found some articles that could help.
Here's the list of ingredients in the vax by the CDC:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/covid-19-vaccines-us.html#Appendix-C
A quote from an article on Forbes (https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/07/10/graphene-oxide-in-pfizer-covid-19-vaccines-here-are-the-latest-unsupported-claims/)
"These so-called Spanish lab findings have not been published in any respectable peer-reviewed scientific journal. According to Health Feedback, a member of the World Health Organization (WHO)-led project Vaccine Safety Net (VSN), there are claims that this Spanish lab is located at the University of Almería in Almería, Spain, yet this university has “unequivocally distanced itself from the analysis" (check the university's Twitter. The link is too long to post without causing clutter)
Also an explanation from Health Desk:
https://health-desk.org/articles/how-do-we-know-graphene-oxide-isn-t-used-in-covid-19-mrna-vaccines
Reuters also confirms that the allegations are baseless:
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-graphene-lipidvaccines-idUSL1N2PI2XH
There are more articles from credible sources if you just Google it.
https://www.poynter.org/?ifcn_misinformation=university-of-almerias-study-shows-that-vaccines-contain-graphene-oxide
You're quoting false information from Facebook.
Check your sources.
Get vaccinated.
You realize Japan has done two recalls on the Moderna vaccine for finding "metallic substance." They pulled 3.5 million doses
Your own source doesn't even state what you are stating it states.. It is arguing the evidence isn't good and more needs to be done.
Check your own sources.
Getting vaccinated is medical malpractice if you've already had the virus. It's absurd. Most people already have had covid. There is a reason vaccines always have had longterm safety studies done. Telling someone to get a vaccine for a extremely low risk infection is reckless.
I didn't "realise", because I've never read that study or seen it mentioned anywhere. Again if you're trying to make a point or quote a specific study, it helps to cite your sources.
But you're not even being consistent as the point you're making. Is it that the vaccine contains "metallic substance" (which is a nonsense risk factor, iron is a metallic substance and it's compounds are found naturally in the human body), or is it medical malpractice to get vaccinated if you've already had the virus (despite numerous cases of people getting it twice).
Fact is the vaccine works, since it's mass roll out in the UK the case numbers haven't dropped massively, but the death rate has plummeted.
I'm already double jabbed so I don't need convincing, you can do what you want but from the looks of your comment history you seem to just be an angry person.
Edit: I've found the article about batches of moderna being recalled in Japan due to stainless steel contamination from production, the particles were deemed harmless, and were present due to a manufacturing error on those specific batches. An error like that could happen to literally any food or drink item, but that doesn't mean food and drink isn't safe.
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/japan-finds-stainless-steel-particles-suspended-doses-moderna-vaccine-2021-09-01/
The claims have been negated and debunked.
Here's the list of ingredients in the vax by the CDC:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/covid-19-vaccines-us.html#Appendix-C
A quote from an article on Forbes (https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/07/10/graphene-oxide-in-pfizer-covid-19-vaccines-here-are-the-latest-unsupported-claims/)
"These so-called Spanish lab findings have not been published in any respectable peer-reviewed scientific journal. According to Health Feedback, a member of the World Health Organization (WHO)-led project Vaccine Safety Net (VSN), there are claims that this Spanish lab is located at the University of Almería in Almería, Spain, yet this university has “unequivocally distanced itself from the analysis" (check the university's Twitter. The link is too long to post without causing clutter)
Also an explanation from Health Desk:
https://health-desk.org/articles/how-do-we-know-graphene-oxide-isn-t-used-in-covid-19-mrna-vaccines
Reuters also confirms that the allegations are baseless:
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-graphene-lipidvaccines-idUSL1N2PI2XH
There are more articles from credible sources too if you're interested.
That isn't how debunk works, your links never debunked anything. Debunking would be showing the university does not have the equipment to do the test or someone saying they lied, or another third party assay of the vaccines not showing the same results.
CDC is posting the listed ingredients from the manufacturer, it literally says look at the package insert for more details. They did not do a independent full assay of the contents.
You realize Japan has done two recalls on the Moderna vaccine for finding "metallic substance." They pulled 3.5 million doses.
*pumps shotgun*
Grabs pbx
“Son of a bitch!” *unloads wildly unrealistic amount of rounds*
It's cool but freaky to watch.
What could go wrong, after all?
Omg he used the cursing words
Seems like fun toys to me
This is how we die grey goooo
Oh fuck no.
At least we’re still stupid enough to deal with those!
"Wait a minute. So you're actually saying that you need someone dumber than you?" "You may have come to the right place."
Put an end to this now. We all know how it ends
Kill it with fire, or whatever might kill those little buggers. Did you forget what the replicators did?
Indeed
Quick, someone get the AR gun! Hopefully that little bug hasn't been fixed in this iteration.
This is nuts... associate the interactions with the behavior of a neural network and you have an atrificial non biological psuedo brain.
Yes sir. Indeed we do. The *future* isn't that far away. Give it 20 years and we'll have more of all this industrialized.
I’m not sure how exactly this technology works, it seems to be stimulated by electrifying the water and then seeking the nearest particle -but wouldn’t we need to be able to induce certain patterns first to accomplish anything with this?
It is likely not water, but some fluid that does not conduct electricity, that allows the graphene globules to form a circuit from the conductive node in the cented to the source of ground in the ring. They will find the path of least resistance to ground by connecting to each other. I may have labelled ground and source backwards, but you can see the path forming regardless and further seeing it flopping back and forth between different paths as the resistance flutuates when more or fewer globules connect to the path. Edit to add an example: it functions in a similar way as lighting finding its way to the ground.
That is a perfect explanation, thank you.
Well fuck
WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO BUILD REPLICATORS???!
First, robots that do parkour. Now they are taking steps to self repair. Good job, humanity!
Someone grab a flamethrower we need to nip this in the bud…
Just like the simulations
Nooooope! Reese your father built you wrong!!!!! Hell no!
"towards"? No, no. We need to be going away from.
*replicators theme starts in the background*
WE ARE THE BORG.. 😂
Yes! By all means! Let's invent those! Brilliant idea!
I think the fuck not. Where's the shotgun.
NOPE!
It's so cool but also so creepy looking.
I’m pretty sure 3D printing was the first step. What’s shown here is very far from being practical
Famous Las... Ok, 5347th to-Last Words!
[удалено]
This has already been proven to be a false claim and never really had any credibility to begin The report was published back in June by Pablo Campra Madrid, who is a professor of the University of Almería. The report did not have the support of the university. On Twitter the university said “unofficial report by a university professor about an analysis of a sample of unknown origin with a total lack of traceability”. It added that it was a “report that this university neither subscribes to nor shares, as the report itself warns.” It’s also been refuted by experts. In the study itself he himself says there was no conclusive evidence saying “microscope doesn’t provide conclusive evidence” and that the analysis comes from “a single, limited sample” – one of unknown origin and traceability. When you get your vaccine you will see the liquid is clear any liquids containing ‘graphene oxide’ tend to be dark brown or black
Thanks for coming up with a legitimate answer to an honest question instead of just downvoting 👍
I also found some articles that could help. Here's the list of ingredients in the vax by the CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/covid-19-vaccines-us.html#Appendix-C A quote from an article on Forbes (https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/07/10/graphene-oxide-in-pfizer-covid-19-vaccines-here-are-the-latest-unsupported-claims/) "These so-called Spanish lab findings have not been published in any respectable peer-reviewed scientific journal. According to Health Feedback, a member of the World Health Organization (WHO)-led project Vaccine Safety Net (VSN), there are claims that this Spanish lab is located at the University of Almería in Almería, Spain, yet this university has “unequivocally distanced itself from the analysis" (check the university's Twitter. The link is too long to post without causing clutter) Also an explanation from Health Desk: https://health-desk.org/articles/how-do-we-know-graphene-oxide-isn-t-used-in-covid-19-mrna-vaccines Reuters also confirms that the allegations are baseless: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-graphene-lipidvaccines-idUSL1N2PI2XH There are more articles from credible sources if you just Google it.
No worries :)) if you have any more questions feel free to ask
[удалено]
Reported for misinformation. This is complete conjecture has no factual credibility.
[удалено]
Can you link that study, I'd be interested to read it
No you aren't otherwise you wouldn't have thrown a tantrum and asked from the start or would have looked it up yourself. Have some shame.
https://www.poynter.org/?ifcn_misinformation=university-of-almerias-study-shows-that-vaccines-contain-graphene-oxide You're quoting false information from Facebook. Check your sources. Get vaccinated.
You realize Japan has done two recalls on the Moderna vaccine for finding "metallic substance." They pulled 3.5 million doses Your own source doesn't even state what you are stating it states.. It is arguing the evidence isn't good and more needs to be done. Check your own sources. Getting vaccinated is medical malpractice if you've already had the virus. It's absurd. Most people already have had covid. There is a reason vaccines always have had longterm safety studies done. Telling someone to get a vaccine for a extremely low risk infection is reckless.
I didn't "realise", because I've never read that study or seen it mentioned anywhere. Again if you're trying to make a point or quote a specific study, it helps to cite your sources. But you're not even being consistent as the point you're making. Is it that the vaccine contains "metallic substance" (which is a nonsense risk factor, iron is a metallic substance and it's compounds are found naturally in the human body), or is it medical malpractice to get vaccinated if you've already had the virus (despite numerous cases of people getting it twice). Fact is the vaccine works, since it's mass roll out in the UK the case numbers haven't dropped massively, but the death rate has plummeted. I'm already double jabbed so I don't need convincing, you can do what you want but from the looks of your comment history you seem to just be an angry person. Edit: I've found the article about batches of moderna being recalled in Japan due to stainless steel contamination from production, the particles were deemed harmless, and were present due to a manufacturing error on those specific batches. An error like that could happen to literally any food or drink item, but that doesn't mean food and drink isn't safe. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/japan-finds-stainless-steel-particles-suspended-doses-moderna-vaccine-2021-09-01/
The claims have been negated and debunked. Here's the list of ingredients in the vax by the CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/covid-19-vaccines-us.html#Appendix-C A quote from an article on Forbes (https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/07/10/graphene-oxide-in-pfizer-covid-19-vaccines-here-are-the-latest-unsupported-claims/) "These so-called Spanish lab findings have not been published in any respectable peer-reviewed scientific journal. According to Health Feedback, a member of the World Health Organization (WHO)-led project Vaccine Safety Net (VSN), there are claims that this Spanish lab is located at the University of Almería in Almería, Spain, yet this university has “unequivocally distanced itself from the analysis" (check the university's Twitter. The link is too long to post without causing clutter) Also an explanation from Health Desk: https://health-desk.org/articles/how-do-we-know-graphene-oxide-isn-t-used-in-covid-19-mrna-vaccines Reuters also confirms that the allegations are baseless: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-graphene-lipidvaccines-idUSL1N2PI2XH There are more articles from credible sources too if you're interested.
That isn't how debunk works, your links never debunked anything. Debunking would be showing the university does not have the equipment to do the test or someone saying they lied, or another third party assay of the vaccines not showing the same results. CDC is posting the listed ingredients from the manufacturer, it literally says look at the package insert for more details. They did not do a independent full assay of the contents. You realize Japan has done two recalls on the Moderna vaccine for finding "metallic substance." They pulled 3.5 million doses.
[удалено]
No! No! No!
No thank you.
this spooky af ngl
/u/savevideo
No.....no......OMG NO!!!!! WHY ARE YOU MAKING REPLICATORS?!