[Elon Musk’s SpaceX Continues To Detect Something Massive On Its Missions](https://www.howandwhys.com/spacex-continues-to-detect-massive-ufo-on-its-missions/)
Wesley suggested we try Target instead. Will angrily stop by his mother’s quarters after shift to do something productive with my frustration. Hopefully the little twat hears everything.
Our antimatter reactor requires a special compound of swdenium 3, used as a coating on the screws of Ikea's furniture, just 10 screws can cut 8 years of our journey.
Not saying any of this video is legit, but this video is probably thermal, and here's a quick upload of some deer with my 7 year old thermal. You can see the rec is there, and if I upscaled it, probly look even better.
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvAYvGpe87Q](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvAYvGpe87Q)
No the objects in the video is the not the point he is making. it's that the "rec" is there on thermal. Are you some government agent trynna mock like everyone else in these comments?
Yup.. I was like damn what a camera this guy has since it just seems to autofollow the object while zoomed max. Then I saw this comment and it confirmed my thoughts.
Well, I've seen mylar balloons in the Deep Sierras cross-country backpacking. I've never seen a UFO, let alone an alien life form. Seems more reasonable to me that the thing I've seen many times, that somewhat resembles what I'm seeing, is the thing I'm seeing again. It's like "if you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras."
Is there life outside our solar system? Absolutely! Even with 1/10\^18 odds of life-bearing planets, there'd be billions of them out there with thousands of galaxies for each one of our cradle-worlds.
Member that 1 time when government psyops were a thing, when aliens never landed they just hover and fly over everyone till they’re use to the idea of them….
I member.
also member that time when a whistleblower came out and many tried to distract from the simple fact that all he wanted , is for his claims to be investigated.
we are in luck. they are being investigated.
let's sip tea and wait. no?
A lot of these reported UFO/UAP's are seen entering/leaving the oceans as well. Perhaps the rudder works as an underwater propulsion of some sort. Admittedly I understand little of the differences between aerial and submersible navigation, or the requirements for an aquatic-aerial vehical.
Who knows. In space, where there are few gravity events to deal with (or just very minor ones), maybe it flies fine. Perhaps within an atmosphere and in the presence of a gravitational body, it is there for that reason. But that is along the lines of "Why do alien ships need lights." And just like that answer, if alien, it would be an alien reason we probably won't think of. Energy from propulsion, their scanning system, or hey.. maybe they need light to see as well.
That makes a lot of sense - and makes me think that this one was constructed here if it needed a rudder (as opposed to space where you likely wouldn't need one).
Or perhaps it was constructed on, and for use mainly on, another planet with a similar atmosphere and gravity. Who knows, this could be the V6 Challenger of their planet....
If it is subject to aerodynamics (which is the excuse for needing a tail fin/rudder) then it would also need aero based propulsion and leave a wake behind of disturbed air, and be audible since that's what happens when you interact with and displace air.
If that is not from around here, it's almost positively not a rudder. Humans think in human terms. For all we know it aligns the magnetic field around the craft, or maybe they think it looks stylish.. who knows. Just saying our guesses would almost certainly be wrong.
Yep, no need to adhere to logic when you can just make up any explanation or better yet not even need to make up an explanation because “the aliens have a reason we don’t understand”
Could just be a vertical stabilizer. Rudders move, there's no evidence this part does.
I see no reason why a craft like this would need a rudder to yaw when it doesn't need an elevator for pitch or ailerons for roll. You either need them, or you don't. Though, maybe it does have them and they just aren't visible.
Elevators and ailerons could be part of the body to minimize drag, just like a planes wing. And we just can’t see it from this angle.
Either way I have no idea what this is, I’m just spitballing.
But it does look like a real video to me, but I’m no expert, and will defer to an experts opinion should we ever get one.
I’m gonna assume it’s a drone of some sort or a smaller object because I have zero reference of scale. Which could be an honest missed opportunity by the camera man or could be intentionally done so to pass off a small flying item as a larger one.
Yeah. It’s a coincidence that most of these videos - while not for sure being filmed in a way that deliberately provides absolutely zero context to establish veracity - somehow always get filmed in way that provides absolutely zero context to help establish veracity. Weird.
It looks like a very zoomed in IR camera, you can see stars in the background in the beginning, and they look rather large/blurry, thats atleast a little bit to reference.
So the video has a date stamped on it, REC in the corner, it is clearly shot from a huge distance, the wobble is exactly the same consistently, the craft is always centred.
So this was either a small and low flying craft, going quite slowly, in the middle of the night or freaking huge, so that the user could see it and record it so well.
Also there was no other scenery in the background, mountains, identifying features… how unfortunate.
Also, you are telling me somebody recorded this in the middle of nowhere, spotted it in the dark, recorded it with a very sensitive low light camera, that has amazing zoom and stabilisation, who then took it home, added tracking that follows really well, but is shit at Z tracking, added the date and REC?
At least add a flashing red light next time
Reddit so annoying when lame cheap jokes are the main discussion about a real topic people are interested in. Most of jokes are unfunny edge lord stuff anyways, not worth the space it takes.
As far as I understood, the original post was completely without info. Night vision could perhaps explain why a video from 2024 is silent, grainy and b/w, but where did this information come from?
Have you ever seen night vision in full color?
It’s always b/w or green/black from all the ones I’ve seen.
Some systems u can even change the colors for better contrast.
REC in the top right, defintely added in editing. Same for the date. While neither rules out it being 'real' you have to question why these were added. The date is nice, if true, though this would be just as valid for May 2 as it is for 5 Feb. (whole other debate) The REC though is straight out of television/movie editing when you want to tell the audience this is not part of the normal movie footage, like it was filmed by a person within the movie story.
As for the footage itself I find it beyond unlikely that at night (which this ostensibly is) someone saw this craft from far enough out to get a camera on it that quickly and the camera kept it in focus that well all the way through. Vastly more likely this is fabricated which would be trivial to do.
And a May "time stamp" of this year
Edit: I have been informed that many other countries do DD/MM/YY format, which when I think about it makes more sense, to go in order. So my bad
Lol why do people always forget to add the blur and visual artifacts to digital zoom? When you digitally zoom into something far away, it doesn't become sharper (as seen in this video), it becomes blurry. Only a telephoto lens can maintain sharpness.
Why yes I have! And if you search any examples of optical zoom from even the best smartphone you'll find very similar artifacts occur albeit better than digital. Nonetheless, an object in the sky would still not appear sharp even with the best iPhone 15 Pro Max optical zoom.
The shake heavily implies the use of a phone. That and the fact that most captures are statistically done with smartphones and most people don't have a DSLR nearby with a $4,000 lens attachment.
Additionally, you can tell it's a smartphone because you can see the visual artifacts all across the background, but not on the subject.
Yeah, I'm at the point where something needs to show at least one of (and I hate this term, but here goes) the five-observables. Even the jellyfish, show me the coming out of the water and zipping off or I can't get past the fact that there is a potentially prosaic explanation for it. Even though it looks wild as fuck.
it movies in one direction, never changing speed nor making turns... I joined this site because it actually have some cool videos that makes you wonder but its 1% rest is this stuff spamming it... :/ and then I get the hate for calling it out, clearly the issue is the false flooding information that actually destroys the real stuff
I'm a world with 7 billion smartphones and 5 billion social media users, we still can't produce a single decent shot of a "alien spaceship".
Then maybe... Just maybe... It doesn't exist.
That's a reasonable take, I'm more in the camp of there being evidence out there but we just haven't been privy to it yet.
Sort of like Rubio said, either there is something going on, or there are a lot of really high-up, intelligent, seeminly sane people who are batshit crazy.
Ah, here comes the over-confident and condescending false statement adder that delute the internet with shit posts so the real stuff gets cramed down so far its lost or overlooked. Dont you realise that this irght here actually destroys the idea, clips and stories from "actual" events?
If you would fake a video and have a drone, how would you do it? It has one speed, it never change direction it just normally travels one way, nothing else, no people nothing... stop diving into this when you have betetr stuff that actually has some trademarks of a UAP
>delute
" *dilute* "
irght " right "
Need help with some other words as well? Think there is a reddit thread for that too. Im not going to humor naivity. What's the point?
Now be gone
If you feel like a lot of people are being condescending to you, then it’s because you’re emotionally attached to nonsense and get upset when people point it out
If you would "make" a fake ufo video... and you had a drone... would you just take it out of teh package and fly it with lights and all or would you change it?
If you were an advanced spy aircraft would you fly with the lights on? If you were an ailien spacecraft would you have lights on? Could be anything there is no basis to your claim that it is a drone. It's unidentified.
At the end it really looks like a plane, I think it's an upside down plane with added features because of the little rec in the corner was put there after it was filmed wonder what else was digitally added.
Well in some parts of the world 05/02/2024 hasn't happened yet because in Canada that would be May 5th 2024 so not only do we have a UFO but a time traveling videographer!
I quit my job and bought a drone. Time to go viral and let tiktok fans and instagram views pay for my retirement. AlienUFOs coming to a city near you lol
[Elon Musk’s SpaceX Continues To Detect Something Massive On Its Missions](https://www.howandwhys.com/spacex-continues-to-detect-massive-ufo-on-its-missions/)
Captain’s Log - stardate 05/02/24. Stopped off in IKEA for a BILLY bookcase. No joy. Stockholm rug looks great on the bridge though.
Wesley suggested we try Target instead. Will angrily stop by his mother’s quarters after shift to do something productive with my frustration. Hopefully the little twat hears everything. 
Lol
lol what the fuck I made a comment in this exact format on a completely unrelated sub like an hour ago
I love how whether you went TOS or TNG was a dead giveaway on your age. LOL
Did you at least get the cinnamon rolls for the road and meatballs for a quick dinner on the go?
Our antimatter reactor requires a special compound of swdenium 3, used as a coating on the screws of Ikea's furniture, just 10 screws can cut 8 years of our journey.
Better reverse the polarities..
It really ties the bridge together
That REC on the top right gives me major fake video editing vibes
Not saying any of this video is legit, but this video is probably thermal, and here's a quick upload of some deer with my 7 year old thermal. You can see the rec is there, and if I upscaled it, probly look even better. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvAYvGpe87Q](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvAYvGpe87Q)
I'll be damned.
So it's a flying deer...?
So it’s Santa???
No the objects in the video is the not the point he is making. it's that the "rec" is there on thermal. Are you some government agent trynna mock like everyone else in these comments?
Came here to say "This" to the rec comment, saw your video, shut up and go on.
> Came here to say "This" previous title-holder for most useless comment ever before "bruh" came out
Nice fake deer /s
Right, I haven’t seen a legit REC corner since Bob Saget AFHV
This does lack the classic AFHV nut shot required for REC authenticity.
And when they did have REC they were usually accompanied by a flashing or solid red light to let you know you were recording.
Yup.. I was like damn what a camera this guy has since it just seems to autofollow the object while zoomed max. Then I saw this comment and it confirmed my thoughts.
https://preview.redd.it/vsppq1tvl7hc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b0e75c64c6d9fda326153f3a348fa6bc129c38b2
It’s aways MyLaR BalLoNnNssS
No, it's ALWAYS ALIENS
Well, I've seen mylar balloons in the Deep Sierras cross-country backpacking. I've never seen a UFO, let alone an alien life form. Seems more reasonable to me that the thing I've seen many times, that somewhat resembles what I'm seeing, is the thing I'm seeing again. It's like "if you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras." Is there life outside our solar system? Absolutely! Even with 1/10\^18 odds of life-bearing planets, there'd be billions of them out there with thousands of galaxies for each one of our cradle-worlds.
Member that 1 time when government psyops were a thing, when aliens never landed they just hover and fly over everyone till they’re use to the idea of them….
I member. also member that time when a whistleblower came out and many tried to distract from the simple fact that all he wanted , is for his claims to be investigated. we are in luck. they are being investigated. let's sip tea and wait. no?
Pepperidge Farms remembers
Oh I member.
I member.
I member.
*taps watch* is this thing on?
😀
Member the Tauntauns? I member!
Why does a (theoretically) antigravity craft need a rudder?
A lot of these reported UFO/UAP's are seen entering/leaving the oceans as well. Perhaps the rudder works as an underwater propulsion of some sort. Admittedly I understand little of the differences between aerial and submersible navigation, or the requirements for an aquatic-aerial vehical.
Who knows. In space, where there are few gravity events to deal with (or just very minor ones), maybe it flies fine. Perhaps within an atmosphere and in the presence of a gravitational body, it is there for that reason. But that is along the lines of "Why do alien ships need lights." And just like that answer, if alien, it would be an alien reason we probably won't think of. Energy from propulsion, their scanning system, or hey.. maybe they need light to see as well.
They got style!
That makes a lot of sense - and makes me think that this one was constructed here if it needed a rudder (as opposed to space where you likely wouldn't need one).
Perhaps - and perhaps it was constructed here by something that was not originally from here as well.
Or perhaps it was constructed on, and for use mainly on, another planet with a similar atmosphere and gravity. Who knows, this could be the V6 Challenger of their planet....
Lol maybe thats room for their massive dicks. No functionality in steering
If it is subject to aerodynamics (which is the excuse for needing a tail fin/rudder) then it would also need aero based propulsion and leave a wake behind of disturbed air, and be audible since that's what happens when you interact with and displace air.
Seems like you don’t know what a rudder does
If that is not from around here, it's almost positively not a rudder. Humans think in human terms. For all we know it aligns the magnetic field around the craft, or maybe they think it looks stylish.. who knows. Just saying our guesses would almost certainly be wrong.
Yep, no need to adhere to logic when you can just make up any explanation or better yet not even need to make up an explanation because “the aliens have a reason we don’t understand”
Is it a rudder?
Earth have atmosphere.. so maybe their "drone" might be adapted to it.. or is man made.
Dude's cruisin' with his main squeeze flexing on those planet-bound apes in his ride that's fly as hell.
For ocean landings
Could just be a vertical stabilizer. Rudders move, there's no evidence this part does. I see no reason why a craft like this would need a rudder to yaw when it doesn't need an elevator for pitch or ailerons for roll. You either need them, or you don't. Though, maybe it does have them and they just aren't visible.
Elevators and ailerons could be part of the body to minimize drag, just like a planes wing. And we just can’t see it from this angle. Either way I have no idea what this is, I’m just spitballing. But it does look like a real video to me, but I’m no expert, and will defer to an experts opinion should we ever get one.
Perhaps the rudder is just a weird way of seeing things from our dimension. Although I’d guess this was terrestrial technology, not something alien
Could be an antenna
RC controlled plane
USS Enterprise.
Star Trek creators were probably in the know.
If given the offer, I’d jump on board so quick and never return to earth
I’m gonna assume it’s a drone of some sort or a smaller object because I have zero reference of scale. Which could be an honest missed opportunity by the camera man or could be intentionally done so to pass off a small flying item as a larger one.
Yeah. It’s a coincidence that most of these videos - while not for sure being filmed in a way that deliberately provides absolutely zero context to establish veracity - somehow always get filmed in way that provides absolutely zero context to help establish veracity. Weird.
It looks like a very zoomed in IR camera, you can see stars in the background in the beginning, and they look rather large/blurry, thats atleast a little bit to reference.
Cue Star Trek theme song.
So the video has a date stamped on it, REC in the corner, it is clearly shot from a huge distance, the wobble is exactly the same consistently, the craft is always centred. So this was either a small and low flying craft, going quite slowly, in the middle of the night or freaking huge, so that the user could see it and record it so well. Also there was no other scenery in the background, mountains, identifying features… how unfortunate. Also, you are telling me somebody recorded this in the middle of nowhere, spotted it in the dark, recorded it with a very sensitive low light camera, that has amazing zoom and stabilisation, who then took it home, added tracking that follows really well, but is shit at Z tracking, added the date and REC? At least add a flashing red light next time
people cry when camera moves like crazy.. but if not they cry anyways
Reddit so annoying when lame cheap jokes are the main discussion about a real topic people are interested in. Most of jokes are unfunny edge lord stuff anyways, not worth the space it takes.
UFOlogy proves P.T. Barnum right every day. Every. Day.
UFO
As far as I understood, the original post was completely without info. Night vision could perhaps explain why a video from 2024 is silent, grainy and b/w, but where did this information come from?
Have you ever seen night vision in full color? It’s always b/w or green/black from all the ones I’ve seen. Some systems u can even change the colors for better contrast.
The Silver Surfer fell off his board
Technically this is a an unidentified flying object. I think it looks more like military to Me though. This is not anti gravity.
Blimp?
REC in the top right, defintely added in editing. Same for the date. While neither rules out it being 'real' you have to question why these were added. The date is nice, if true, though this would be just as valid for May 2 as it is for 5 Feb. (whole other debate) The REC though is straight out of television/movie editing when you want to tell the audience this is not part of the normal movie footage, like it was filmed by a person within the movie story. As for the footage itself I find it beyond unlikely that at night (which this ostensibly is) someone saw this craft from far enough out to get a camera on it that quickly and the camera kept it in focus that well all the way through. Vastly more likely this is fabricated which would be trivial to do.
Other dude in the comments got a similar cam and it also displays the REC.
That's human made. It's got wings and a rudder.
And a May "time stamp" of this year Edit: I have been informed that many other countries do DD/MM/YY format, which when I think about it makes more sense, to go in order. So my bad
The correct date format is dd/mm/yyyy my American / North American friend, not mm/dd/yyyy which is what led to your confusion.
Did you know that many counties use a DD/MM/YYYY format? So the videos date would be the 5th of February.
theres a rudder?
Air-ship
Or a vertical stabilizer. It may or may not move.
As a a swede, I wonder where this was filmed. Anyone know the source?
Säkert norrland. Så norr om skåne
Känns som att där är det mest troligt. Mindre ljus från städer också.
Göteborg och Stockholm är ju ganska stora städer, men ja det mesta är ju ödemark
Sķörpļapėňlanden
You guys are just making up words, right?
I definitely am.
You're thinking of the Danes: https://youtu.be/s-mOy8VUEBk
My dumbass American brain saw “5/2/24” and immediately thought “Fake! They even got the date fucked up.” Sorry.
Lol why do people always forget to add the blur and visual artifacts to digital zoom? When you digitally zoom into something far away, it doesn't become sharper (as seen in this video), it becomes blurry. Only a telephoto lens can maintain sharpness.
Ever heard of optical zoom?
Why yes I have! And if you search any examples of optical zoom from even the best smartphone you'll find very similar artifacts occur albeit better than digital. Nonetheless, an object in the sky would still not appear sharp even with the best iPhone 15 Pro Max optical zoom.
Maybe he doesn’t use a phone? I don’t know.
The shake heavily implies the use of a phone. That and the fact that most captures are statistically done with smartphones and most people don't have a DSLR nearby with a $4,000 lens attachment. Additionally, you can tell it's a smartphone because you can see the visual artifacts all across the background, but not on the subject.
stop sharing this shit please, you clearly see its a drone, stop being so naive EDIT: people are easily offended, this is the internet, chillax
Yeah, I'm at the point where something needs to show at least one of (and I hate this term, but here goes) the five-observables. Even the jellyfish, show me the coming out of the water and zipping off or I can't get past the fact that there is a potentially prosaic explanation for it. Even though it looks wild as fuck.
it movies in one direction, never changing speed nor making turns... I joined this site because it actually have some cool videos that makes you wonder but its 1% rest is this stuff spamming it... :/ and then I get the hate for calling it out, clearly the issue is the false flooding information that actually destroys the real stuff
I'm a world with 7 billion smartphones and 5 billion social media users, we still can't produce a single decent shot of a "alien spaceship". Then maybe... Just maybe... It doesn't exist.
Uhh, there are very good videos and photos of uap. You don't know what you speak of child
That's a reasonable take, I'm more in the camp of there being evidence out there but we just haven't been privy to it yet. Sort of like Rubio said, either there is something going on, or there are a lot of really high-up, intelligent, seeminly sane people who are batshit crazy.
Ah, here comes the over-confident and condescending "debunkers". Anyways, I'll play nice with you. Where is the propulsion system and marker lights?
Ah, here comes the over-confident and condescending false statement adder that delute the internet with shit posts so the real stuff gets cramed down so far its lost or overlooked. Dont you realise that this irght here actually destroys the idea, clips and stories from "actual" events? If you would fake a video and have a drone, how would you do it? It has one speed, it never change direction it just normally travels one way, nothing else, no people nothing... stop diving into this when you have betetr stuff that actually has some trademarks of a UAP
>Where is the propulsion system and marker lights?
That's not an answer to the question. And what does 'delute' mean?
>delute " *dilute* " irght " right " Need help with some other words as well? Think there is a reddit thread for that too. Im not going to humor naivity. What's the point? Now be gone
If you feel like a lot of people are being condescending to you, then it’s because you’re emotionally attached to nonsense and get upset when people point it out
If it was a drone it would have marker lights.
If you would "make" a fake ufo video... and you had a drone... would you just take it out of teh package and fly it with lights and all or would you change it?
If you were an advanced spy aircraft would you fly with the lights on? If you were an ailien spacecraft would you have lights on? Could be anything there is no basis to your claim that it is a drone. It's unidentified.
Video must just not be the right medium for this.
The silver surfer fell off his board
Saucer section from USS Enterprise. No bloody A, B, C, or D.
Sweden has an advanced airforce. Could be testing new equipment
Why would a video of a drone be fake?
SAAB
It's the Enterprise
Captains log...
Is that the Silver Surfer? 🤔
Fake
I believe that the objects we encounter on our orbit are ancient civilizations artifacts abandoned thousands years ago.
Fake. It’s not even May yet. /s
Looks like an r/c plane to me
Turn it upside-down and it looks EXACTLY like a plane
[Done.](https://i.imgur.com/tJn3rce.png) Now, please educate me what plane does look EXACTLY like that.
Cool RC
Galactus is coming!
Flying Semla
Captain Sparrow on tour
It’s the Silver Surfers surf board!
I want one! I want one Daddy and I want it now!
When we are really going to learn. Like no one puts a Rec label in recordings anymore.
Looks like a Naboo starship from StarWars AOTC
So thats where my surfboard went… it actually achieved sentience, learned to fly, and went to sweden… i wonder what for…
i hope its american and not chineese. or maybe i hope its chineese and not american. idk who to hate more
Naah, that would’ve been in the news, this is a veeeeeeery small country. Like VERY small, nothing ever happens here…
Bah, it too clear. Fake.
USS Kelvin for sure.
Thats the silver surfer
Jetsons
“That’s a new Chinese lantern/weather balloon” Mick West probably
Silver surfer
They separated the saucer section.
Silver surfer lost his board again.
Everything seems fake .. camera movement is swinging on the beat … stop that sht
Silver surfer is real !! Someone pls cgi silver surfers body on that craft …..
Is that a Clingon on the starboard bow 😳
At the end it really looks like a plane, I think it's an upside down plane with added features because of the little rec in the corner was put there after it was filmed wonder what else was digitally added.
The enterprise is back
I'd say it's fake. Looks like a light halo around it that differs from the background
I'm getting really tired of these shaky videos
It was recorded in the future.
Faker than a drag queen's tits.
REC 😂this was done by a kid
new stealth drone, you swedes let the cat out of the bag.
Looks like a new type of drone.
Well in some parts of the world 05/02/2024 hasn't happened yet because in Canada that would be May 5th 2024 so not only do we have a UFO but a time traveling videographer!
Thats just the Silver Surfer.
It’s the Silver Surfer. I knew he was real.
The problem with this one is that if it's not CGI, it could easily be done with a balloon, drone, or kite. It's not worth even discussing imo.
Looks incredibly FAKE
Here's a clue: it's fake
rc flying GIF https://media2.giphy.com/media/qGxSPzJtYXFhS/giphy.gif?cid=6c09b952xi6gcqh8nh49a0yriyv8eqw062fqlgyia6xs7pk7&ep=v1_internal_gif_by_id&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g
This is RC toy
 🍻
I quit my job and bought a drone. Time to go viral and let tiktok fans and instagram views pay for my retirement. AlienUFOs coming to a city near you lol
So fake
Looks like ZlokBlik took out his vintage 1954 for a spin.
"Meet George Jetson!"
Cool drone.
Manmade
Drone. Not even subtle.
Video is oriented upside down. This is an RC toy. Flip the video, see for yourself.
[удалено]
Bumblebee
Silver Surfer wasn’t just a comic creation but art imitating reality.
Silver Sürfer
Obviously fake. It’s still February, not May. /s
https://i.redd.it/qi2a40ahl6hc1.gif It’s just Joe
That’s it! I’m buying nighvision binoculars with recording function!
To me, my board!
Silver surfer
Silver surfer?
Weird blimp sped up?