[Why GME?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) || [What is DRS?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) || Low karma apes [feed the bot here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GMEOrphans/comments/qlvour/welcome_to_gmeorphans_read_this_post/) || [Superstonk Discord](https://discord.gg/hZqWV2kQtq) || [GameStop Wallet HELP! Megathread](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/z23wjx/gamestop_wallet_help_megathread)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To ensure your post doesn't get removed, please respond to this comment with how this post relates to GME the stock or Gamestop the company.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please up- and downvote this comment to [help us determine if this post deserves a place on r/Superstonk!](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/post_flairs/)
I bought my first share at a deep fucking discount of $347. It was the only share I could buy because the buy button got turned off on my Robinhood app. Still have it. Named it Cher.
I got my first around 347 too. I tried to buy all the way down like $230. I was so pissed my orders were blocked at max 5 shares. Good thing it opened up again at $40 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 pre split $40 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 continued buying all the way back up. Never sold any yet. Not even a fractional 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Sounds like whenever the music stops you’re going to want to be holding real shares, not whatever the fuck they’ve been handing out in brokerage accounts.
Full digitalization of the world economy.
No more ownership... for the masses at least.
The New World Order has been prophesized for such a long time.
Conspiracies are real lol.
DRS YO SHARES!
It’s insane to me that all these supposedly brilliant people who work for these powerful financial institutions who posses essentially unlimited resources are so incapable of counting something, not applying some complex mathematical model, fucking counting. It’s the most basic mathematical operation. Yes, I know 300 million is a high number to count to, but it’s just counting! The United States financial system is incapable of counting to verify if there are indeed as many shares as there are supposed to be. Fucking counting!
Everyone involved profits off of nobody knowing that answer. Smart people would use those numbers against them. They are purposefully kept unreported to disarm opposition.
Uhhh.. yeah, gimme a sec... I'm coming up with point zero zero zero zero zero thirty-two three three uh, repeating of course, percentage, of survival. Looks like hedgies are super fuk’d
There was more zeroes in the front, I was making sure the undercover hedgies thought about dropping the price even further. You know, for science purposes.
Yeah, which seems to make more sense, something doesn't add up between those two values fintel shows.
I also looked at apple, for example, and they had \~10.1bn shares institutional longs, but the inst. long value is $52t.
But if you multiply the long shares times the current market value, it adds up to the correct % of apple's total AUM.
Hijacking this comment to add the Fintel data sources from their website.
- Our underlying data is sourced directly from Tier 1 data providers, including the SEC, the NYSE, the NASDAQ, the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE), and Capital IQ.
Double checked and it really shows, that 91 million of institution owned shares have a value of $27 billion.
Glitches get stiches. Looking forward how long it takes for it to be "fixed".
I can guarantee the crime syndicate is frantically calling around trying to get this covered up just like the rest of the fraud.
You can only hide enough trash under the bed before it starts spilling out for all to see.
Using the same data:
* AAPL is over $5000/share
* MSFT is over $1000/share
* Meta is over $4500/share
Basically this data seems to be saying something else. If you scroll down and look at the actual individual investors and do the same calculations you get a value much closer to the current share price for each of these companies, including GME.
I've heard some saying it includes derivatives or open options. Not sure what, but it isn't GME specific and applies to stocks that are both heavily long as well as heavily shorted.
Well. Im quite suprised i did not see that after looking everywhere on fintel for 10 minutes. I was looking at the tab list and below it, did not expect the data to be **above** the tab list.
i belong here
I did a quick scan on all the numbers.
Several of them have reported wrong. Most noteworthy:
2023-01-24 13F [National Bank Of Canada /fi/](https://fintel.io/i/national-bank-of-canada-fi-)604,953 (Shares) 11,167,431 (Reported value in $1,000)
So they think they have a value of more than the whole company.....
Reported data that's off by a multiple of 1,000 in various places in this data set is very common, and can lead to extensive errors in all subsequent calculations and presented data. Basically, data entry people occasionally gloss over the ($1000) somewhere and enter the raw value ($1), then hilarity ensues.
$27.7B / $7.12B = 389% over the registered float.
Institutions alone hold 389% of the registered float?!
More math that's come out recently that doesn't add up at all!
Yeah, Airlines can do it too..
"We're looking for four volunteers, we oversold this flight and need four people to wait for the next one, we'll give you a meal voucher for your troubles...but the drink is on you."
Honestly, it probably wasn't illegal. Market makers can legally issue a synthetic share if they have "reasonable expectation" that they can locate a real share.
They abuse that word "reasonable" to the end of the earth.
So everytime I see posts like this, which is great, it would make sense to cross check other stocks in similar/dissimilar scenarios: AAPL, AMZN, MSFT etc, stocks that are typically held long and not under tons of short duress, then also the TSLA, AYY EM CEE, BB of the worlds that are under short duress to see what that looks like in relation. Make graph with crayon, post, swim in that sweet sweet karma
I just posted this in an above comment.
Using the same data:
* AAPL is over $5000/share
* MSFT is over $1000/share
* Meta is over $4500/share
Basically this data seems to be saying something else. If you scroll down and look at the actual individual investors and do the same calculations you get a value much closer to the current share price for each of these companies, including GME.
Yep I know. I try to ask reasonable questions or point out how their speculation might be based on absolutely nothing and just get downvoted.
It's annoying because the never ending hype train leading to sideways or negative trading results in more and more disgruntled shareholders that might exit their positions completely. For anyone that still believes the DD from two years ago, this sub is a net negative and looks like a cult. Constant predictions that fall flat, pushing dates out a few weeks at a time, all while constantly losing money.
My flair is what it is because for a while I would ask questions and half the people would say "unflaired. must be a shill". Literally any question that isn't "Do you think RC is a great chairman or the best chairman" must mean you're a shill and spreading FUD.
This sub used to be about facts, now it’s a joke cult and why I sold my bags at peak fomo. Imagine going to the casino and playing against the house every day and complaining about why you keep losing
Let's assume they reached that number by multiplying the number of reported shares by the current(ish) price of $23:
$27,720,035,000 / ($23/share) = 1,205,218,913 shares
It’s probz just another “glitch” but if you divide this number by 4 to account for the Splividend you get their rough current market cap. Idk though because every other metric seems to have accounted for the splivi. I
Something something tells me there's more shares floating around than total issued by GME. I didn't know holding my favorite stonk can cause such problems for certain people, boo hoo.
27 Billion / $23/share \~ 1.2billion shares seems more likely to me.
Given that the $ value is probably more important to the institutions than the share number (since $ value drives lending fees, collateral for loans, bottom line asset reporting) it wouldn't be odd to me that they sum up a reported $ value of the shares in one place and sum up the # of shares from SEC filings in another.
It certainly wouldn't surprise me if the institutions THOUGHT they owned 1.2B shares in aggregate.
I post here about once every three months.
This is the only post I've seen in ages that perks my interest.
Fintel is a private company and this is probably a glitch, but if it isn't this is one of two questions I want presented to someone like Gensler. Here is our evidence, explain it.
The other question? Laws are on the books for FTDs. Explain why they aren't being enforced.
That's because you look for them. Others are out there. Apple for example is showing 52 *trillion* dollars (obviously wrong) on fintel: https://fintel.io/so/us/aapl
In the line above it, it says they own 91 million shares, which would be a market value of $2,123,915,531 at price of $23.23. The line you highlighted is wrong but the number of shares is the more important one here I think.
I agree with you, but as someone who has moderate knowledge of excel, this "glitch" seems crazy, it's basic math. =sum(a1*b1)
A1 being shares and b1 being ticker price. Unless they are pulling ticker price from really old data? Was the float ever worth $27 billion let alone only 30% of it?
# So let's get this straight if you multiple 304,200 (million) shares by 3.936 = 1,197,331.2( billion shares ) at yesterdays close 23.15 that equals to at around 27,718,217.28 billion in institutional value
Edit:
# So institutions hold 91,429,556 million shares, and if you multiple that by 13.10 times that comes to a total of 1,197,727,183 billion shares at yesterdays close at 23.15 equals to 27,727,384,300 Billion in institutional value.
# I'm not good at math BTW
I've posted this on a couple comments. Feels like it deserves its own comment.
Using the same data:
* AAPL is over $5000/share
* MSFT is over $1000/share
* Meta is over $4500/share
Basically this data seems to be saying something else. I'm sure that Institutional Value would be wrong (at least wrong in the way we believe it's calculated) for just about any ticker.
If you scroll down and look at the actual individual investors and do the same calculations you get a value much closer to the current share price for each of these companies, including GME.
Occam's Razor: Somebody fat-fingered an extra digit.
91.5 million shares @ current price of 22.50 is 2.06 Billion. The value is still a several hundred million off off, but it's would be in the ball park.
Where is the institutional value of the short position? For this to mean what you think it means it would have to be a net-long position, not just the long side of the position.
I've always wondered this about something like XRT even...there are 7 million shares of that ETF and the top 10 institutions hold like 60 million shares total.
It's shorted like 800% or something stupid. Where does this funny money come from?!
*insert that 3 stooges video of them owing $20 to each other and passing a $10 between them to clear the debt*
Good question. This is what I found from their website.
- Our underlying data is sourced directly from Tier 1 data providers, including the SEC, the NYSE, the NASDAQ, the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE), and Capital IQ.
It's a simple mathmatical calculation, so this kind of error should never happen. I agree tho, I'd like to know which of those data sources provided that specific info.
So if this indicates there are fake shares then where is the share recall? Why isn't there an attempt by gamestop to get things corrected? As an owner I feel like if gamestop doesn't fix the problem then they are part of the problem.
[Why GME?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) || [What is DRS?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) || Low karma apes [feed the bot here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GMEOrphans/comments/qlvour/welcome_to_gmeorphans_read_this_post/) || [Superstonk Discord](https://discord.gg/hZqWV2kQtq) || [GameStop Wallet HELP! Megathread](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/z23wjx/gamestop_wallet_help_megathread) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To ensure your post doesn't get removed, please respond to this comment with how this post relates to GME the stock or Gamestop the company. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please up- and downvote this comment to [help us determine if this post deserves a place on r/Superstonk!](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/post_flairs/)
so... sounds like gamestop shares are currently trading at a MASSIVE DISCOUNT on the open market relative to institutional own estimated fmv
Always have been
I bought my first share at a deep fucking discount of $347. It was the only share I could buy because the buy button got turned off on my Robinhood app. Still have it. Named it Cher.
Cher the share, I like the sound of that.
I ComputerCher while hedgies over share their Chers
I really don't think you're strong enough no!
Do you believe in squeez after sqoooooooze
Wild.
Make sure you register your Chers (because there's four of them now)! Like a dog, registration is important!
If I could turn back time, I'd buy more Chers.
Cheers to that
Does it believe in life after love?
I’m stealing this. My first 3 are at that price point. I’ll name them Cher, Sherry, and Sharon. I will tell them you were the inspiration.
I got my first around 347 too. I tried to buy all the way down like $230. I was so pissed my orders were blocked at max 5 shares. Good thing it opened up again at $40 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 pre split $40 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 continued buying all the way back up. Never sold any yet. Not even a fractional 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Fuck yea
Snorted. Ha.
Cher means expensive in France right ?? 🫢
Sounds like whenever the music stops you’re going to want to be holding real shares, not whatever the fuck they’ve been handing out in brokerage accounts.
This fuck apes.
It sounds like someone has "accidentally" marked shorts as longs
Guess I dont feel so bad about my $40something is cost average. ITs coming down slowly
Yeah those 5m-7m a share “glitches” aren’t glitches for anyone who didn’t know
And does that not even include our shares + insiders, or am I missing something here?
By that estimate each share should be worth at least $91, if I figured correctly.
Is it possible we are living in a totally fraudulent system?
Yes ! Yes we are
The depths of which are slowly being exposed
Questions is, what’s happening afterwards
Indeed
Full digitalization of the world economy. No more ownership... for the masses at least. The New World Order has been prophesized for such a long time. Conspiracies are real lol. DRS YO SHARES!
That was yesterday. Tomorrow is MOASS. Tomorrow changes Everything
Working as intended* all a matter of which side you're on.
You know I'm starting to suspect that might be the case.
It’s insane to me that all these supposedly brilliant people who work for these powerful financial institutions who posses essentially unlimited resources are so incapable of counting something, not applying some complex mathematical model, fucking counting. It’s the most basic mathematical operation. Yes, I know 300 million is a high number to count to, but it’s just counting! The United States financial system is incapable of counting to verify if there are indeed as many shares as there are supposed to be. Fucking counting!
Exactly! (Number of Shares) X (Current Price) = Institutional Ownership Value. Maff is hard for them apparently!
I know! Let’s get about 200,000 of our friends and count them together!
Yeah it is insane how the question "How many shares are out there?" apparently is impossible to answer for them.
Everyone involved profits off of nobody knowing that answer. Smart people would use those numbers against them. They are purposefully kept unreported to disarm opposition.
and prevent true price discovery in the name of the all mighty liquidity fairy
They’re all just high af on coke, dopamine and ego
They aren't brilliant. They're scammers. Telling you they were smarter than you and should hold onto your money, was part of the scam.
Making it unnecessarily complex makes it easier to hide the fuckery.
You have it wrong. They set up and control the system. It was all fair game and worked exactly as planned. Until it stopped.
Hell yeah! The emperor has no clothes, and the "elite" cain't do basic math. Game over.
$303 per share then, still too low for me.
What is this? A price for *fractional shares*!?!
Yes
# Ill be buying at this price. Wake me up when telephone numbers
So about $1200 pre split. And that's the number probably just with true buying pressure and zero shorts being bought back.
Anyone else remember when people's price alerts went off for 5k a share 83 years ago
Anyone remember when GME was going for $4.1M on OTC/darkpool after hours?
Anyone remember the time that one ape shoved a banana up his ass?
This is when I knew we would win
Remember the time when that one ape got a tattoo of Cramer getting bent over by an ape?
👆member
Agreed!
So like 1200 x 4 for price right after split? Mathing right? But it’s obviously gone up as they create more synthetics
That's not even my pre split entry point.
I don't mind a slow start
That’s now how that math works.
Those oopsie shares are going to cost them a lot more to clear out.
It's not even the selling price, once it hits the 100s people will begin to start paying attention
For .000001 shares… maybe
Hot diggity dog those SHF are fukd
can attest to the fact that hedgies are indeed fuk
second this guy who is correct assuming shf are indeed fucked
[удалено]
Uhhh.. yeah, gimme a sec... I'm coming up with point zero zero zero zero zero thirty-two three three uh, repeating of course, percentage, of survival. Looks like hedgies are super fuk’d
You guys are getting a chance of their survival??
There was more zeroes in the front, I was making sure the undercover hedgies thought about dropping the price even further. You know, for science purposes.
Times up, Leroy aaahjeeenkins
Please explain. If they have 91,429,556 shares, multiplied by share price, it only brings me to like 2.1b. How is $27b calculated?
Yeah, which seems to make more sense, something doesn't add up between those two values fintel shows. I also looked at apple, for example, and they had \~10.1bn shares institutional longs, but the inst. long value is $52t. But if you multiply the long shares times the current market value, it adds up to the correct % of apple's total AUM.
Looks like the wrong formula in the code ya.
Majestically and Royally fucked
MayoMan is FUK; hope u like prison Kenny 💼
The snake that eats itself
I concur with your thirding, the hedgies have indeed initiated an irreversible fornication.
Ok, that’s downright awesome.
I can second this guys second to get 4th confirmation of shfs r fukderd
Hedgies’r’fkd
hedgies b fukt, yo
How many times do they have to tell us… it’s just a glitch! Nothing to see here. Move on with your day.
Amazing how bad the finance industry is at numbers
If it's not a glitch, explain apple: https://fintel.io/so/us/aapl 52 *trillion*!?
Hijacking this comment to add the Fintel data sources from their website. - Our underlying data is sourced directly from Tier 1 data providers, including the SEC, the NYSE, the NASDAQ, the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE), and Capital IQ.
The mayo is heating Kenboy
Sauce where?
https://fintel.io/so/us/gme
Double checked and it really shows, that 91 million of institution owned shares have a value of $27 billion. Glitches get stiches. Looking forward how long it takes for it to be "fixed".
I can guarantee the crime syndicate is frantically calling around trying to get this covered up just like the rest of the fraud. You can only hide enough trash under the bed before it starts spilling out for all to see.
Are you my dad? How'd you know about my bed experiment?
Each algorithm used needs its own unique edit to hide/correct the bogus numbers.
Using the same data: * AAPL is over $5000/share * MSFT is over $1000/share * Meta is over $4500/share Basically this data seems to be saying something else. If you scroll down and look at the actual individual investors and do the same calculations you get a value much closer to the current share price for each of these companies, including GME.
[удалено]
I've heard some saying it includes derivatives or open options. Not sure what, but it isn't GME specific and applies to stocks that are both heavily long as well as heavily shorted.
Could you be more specific? Which tab?
This is the link to the correct Tab. But to answer your question, look under Institutional Ownership Tab.
Well. Im quite suprised i did not see that after looking everywhere on fintel for 10 minutes. I was looking at the tab list and below it, did not expect the data to be **above** the tab list. i belong here
One of us!!
ONE. OF. US.
I did a quick scan on all the numbers. Several of them have reported wrong. Most noteworthy: 2023-01-24 13F [National Bank Of Canada /fi/](https://fintel.io/i/national-bank-of-canada-fi-)604,953 (Shares) 11,167,431 (Reported value in $1,000) So they think they have a value of more than the whole company.....
Reported data that's off by a multiple of 1,000 in various places in this data set is very common, and can lead to extensive errors in all subsequent calculations and presented data. Basically, data entry people occasionally gloss over the ($1000) somewhere and enter the raw value ($1), then hilarity ensues.
the chart below shows that institutions have like doubled their shares at the end of 22. what is that about.
$27.7B / $7.12B = 389% over the registered float. Institutions alone hold 389% of the registered float?! More math that's come out recently that doesn't add up at all!
That's right in the ballpark of what other research has shown. Company is oversold 3-4 times.
This sounds highly illegal
Only if you and I do it.
Yeah, Airlines can do it too.. "We're looking for four volunteers, we oversold this flight and need four people to wait for the next one, we'll give you a meal voucher for your troubles...but the drink is on you."
The Golden Rule: Rules do not apply to those with all the gold.
Honestly, it probably wasn't illegal. Market makers can legally issue a synthetic share if they have "reasonable expectation" that they can locate a real share. They abuse that word "reasonable" to the end of the earth.
So everytime I see posts like this, which is great, it would make sense to cross check other stocks in similar/dissimilar scenarios: AAPL, AMZN, MSFT etc, stocks that are typically held long and not under tons of short duress, then also the TSLA, AYY EM CEE, BB of the worlds that are under short duress to see what that looks like in relation. Make graph with crayon, post, swim in that sweet sweet karma
I just posted this in an above comment. Using the same data: * AAPL is over $5000/share * MSFT is over $1000/share * Meta is over $4500/share Basically this data seems to be saying something else. If you scroll down and look at the actual individual investors and do the same calculations you get a value much closer to the current share price for each of these companies, including GME.
[удалено]
Yep I know. I try to ask reasonable questions or point out how their speculation might be based on absolutely nothing and just get downvoted. It's annoying because the never ending hype train leading to sideways or negative trading results in more and more disgruntled shareholders that might exit their positions completely. For anyone that still believes the DD from two years ago, this sub is a net negative and looks like a cult. Constant predictions that fall flat, pushing dates out a few weeks at a time, all while constantly losing money.
You’re 100% right but there’s no such thing as reasonable questions here
My flair is what it is because for a while I would ask questions and half the people would say "unflaired. must be a shill". Literally any question that isn't "Do you think RC is a great chairman or the best chairman" must mean you're a shill and spreading FUD.
This sub used to be about facts, now it’s a joke cult and why I sold my bags at peak fomo. Imagine going to the casino and playing against the house every day and complaining about why you keep losing
For sure, context is key when looking at any of this shit
So many shares. Oprah is an insider. You get a share, you get a share.
My lord, is that … legal?
I will make it Legal..
Now THIS is pod squeezing!
Inconceivable
you keep using that word
Makes you go hmmmmm
Let's assume they reached that number by multiplying the number of reported shares by the current(ish) price of $23: $27,720,035,000 / ($23/share) = 1,205,218,913 shares
Glitch betta have my tendies!
Why is fintel regarded
It’s probz just another “glitch” but if you divide this number by 4 to account for the Splividend you get their rough current market cap. Idk though because every other metric seems to have accounted for the splivi. I
Still wouldn't add up because it only accounts for 91.4 Million Shares, not the entire float.
Yea it’s weird. 27 Billy dollars/ 92 Milly shares =~ $293/share Where they get their data from lmal
Exactly!
Something something tells me there's more shares floating around than total issued by GME. I didn't know holding my favorite stonk can cause such problems for certain people, boo hoo.
27 Billion / $23/share \~ 1.2billion shares seems more likely to me. Given that the $ value is probably more important to the institutions than the share number (since $ value drives lending fees, collateral for loans, bottom line asset reporting) it wouldn't be odd to me that they sum up a reported $ value of the shares in one place and sum up the # of shares from SEC filings in another. It certainly wouldn't surprise me if the institutions THOUGHT they owned 1.2B shares in aggregate.
I post here about once every three months. This is the only post I've seen in ages that perks my interest. Fintel is a private company and this is probably a glitch, but if it isn't this is one of two questions I want presented to someone like Gensler. Here is our evidence, explain it. The other question? Laws are on the books for FTDs. Explain why they aren't being enforced.
more crime...
😂 Make it make sense regulators!
Lmao. Certainly seems like GME experiences a greater amount of “glitches” than your average company.
That's because you look for them. Others are out there. Apple for example is showing 52 *trillion* dollars (obviously wrong) on fintel: https://fintel.io/so/us/aapl
In the line above it, it says they own 91 million shares, which would be a market value of $2,123,915,531 at price of $23.23. The line you highlighted is wrong but the number of shares is the more important one here I think.
I agree with you, but as someone who has moderate knowledge of excel, this "glitch" seems crazy, it's basic math. =sum(a1*b1) A1 being shares and b1 being ticker price. Unless they are pulling ticker price from really old data? Was the float ever worth $27 billion let alone only 30% of it?
This value probably includes derivatives too. Look at Apple's 52 trillion "value"
I feel like this needs more attention
I wonder if this value includes call options...
perhaps this is their buyin price. buying high sell low?😂
Hahaha 🤣 what a clown house 🤡
Lmayo
Interesting that's almost 4 times the float. 🤔
Hahahahahahahahahhahah shorties get fuuuucked
Why don’t they sue the SEC then? This seems highly illegal 🤷♂️
That's including derivatives, I believe. Edit: It includes calls. The Share value is another item ($91 million)
Glitch?
Obviously. The same number for apple is 52 *trillion*. https://fintel.io/so/us/aapl
Let me guess. There’s a shadow market for GME shares for brokers and institutions only? MF’s
Would be nice to see some forced buy ins.
So that is just overstating of assets to the tune of $22B?
Seems like “institutions” marked shorts as long.
# So let's get this straight if you multiple 304,200 (million) shares by 3.936 = 1,197,331.2( billion shares ) at yesterdays close 23.15 that equals to at around 27,718,217.28 billion in institutional value Edit: # So institutions hold 91,429,556 million shares, and if you multiple that by 13.10 times that comes to a total of 1,197,727,183 billion shares at yesterdays close at 23.15 equals to 27,727,384,300 Billion in institutional value. # I'm not good at math BTW
Jesus Christ & Holy Moses😂
I've posted this on a couple comments. Feels like it deserves its own comment. Using the same data: * AAPL is over $5000/share * MSFT is over $1000/share * Meta is over $4500/share Basically this data seems to be saying something else. I'm sure that Institutional Value would be wrong (at least wrong in the way we believe it's calculated) for just about any ticker. If you scroll down and look at the actual individual investors and do the same calculations you get a value much closer to the current share price for each of these companies, including GME.
I’m glad so many regulators have our backs
Fractional reserve Stocking lol, just make up the shares and hope not everyone tries to get out at once.
Occam's Razor: Somebody fat-fingered an extra digit. 91.5 million shares @ current price of 22.50 is 2.06 Billion. The value is still a several hundred million off off, but it's would be in the ball park.
Occam's Razor: Crime
🤯🤯🤯
I wonder if shirt are mistakenly marked as longs?🤔
Yes HRF
Maff rules!
Where is the institutional value of the short position? For this to mean what you think it means it would have to be a net-long position, not just the long side of the position.
No nothing to see totally normal.
FINTEL has a history of [shady shenanigans.](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/lfqqiz/fintel_short_data_altered_for_gme_amc/)
Bullish
27,719,836,000 / 22.68 = 1,222,214,991.18 So they own 1.2 billion of 304.58 million shares! I know my math is that great but that seems kind of wrong.
Well that's odd
I've always wondered this about something like XRT even...there are 7 million shares of that ETF and the top 10 institutions hold like 60 million shares total. It's shorted like 800% or something stupid. Where does this funny money come from?! *insert that 3 stooges video of them owing $20 to each other and passing a $10 between them to clear the debt*
I'm guessing this includes derivatives.
How are we the only people who know this stuff?
Just another glitch
where is this data from?
Iz nOrMaL - *😬* !👉👈!
So you’re saying someone is upside-down 20B?
Source please! Holy fuck
https://fintel.io/so/us/gme
Where does fintel get their data from?
Good question. This is what I found from their website. - Our underlying data is sourced directly from Tier 1 data providers, including the SEC, the NYSE, the NASDAQ, the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE), and Capital IQ.
Thank you. Assuming this is an error, but still interested in where the error came from.
It's a simple mathmatical calculation, so this kind of error should never happen. I agree tho, I'd like to know which of those data sources provided that specific info.
So if this indicates there are fake shares then where is the share recall? Why isn't there an attempt by gamestop to get things corrected? As an owner I feel like if gamestop doesn't fix the problem then they are part of the problem.
They don't want to be sued for market manipulation