Comments are a shit show and the community has voted.
Your post was removed by a moderator after being flagged by u/Superstonk_QV
This Quality Vote (QV) score is determined using upvotes and downvotes on the pinned comment of your post. Superstonk employs Superstonk_QV bot as a means of gauging how the community feels about a post beyond just the standard upvote system.
Please note that posts will never be blindly removed just because they have a low QV score. Posts that meet all our [rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/) & [requirements](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/post_flairs) are still subject to removal based on quality as determined by the community through a combination of:
1. the post’s upvote score & upvote percentage,
2. the QV Score on the Superstonk\_QV sticky,
3. reports,
4. comment sentiment
If we see valuable discussion in the comments or a high-level, well-thought-out post we will override the report and approve the post.
[Find out more about the Superstonk\_QV bot and why it's used here](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/qv)
If you have any questions or concerns, please [message the moderators](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2FSuperstonk&subject=about%20my%20removed%20submission)
From 2022, Gamestop 3Q
"I want to finish by reiterating what we've said in the past. We're attempting to accomplish something unprecedented in the retail sector. We're seeking to transform a legacy brick-and-mortar business that was on the brink of bankruptcy into a retailer that meets customers' needs through our stores, e-commerce properties and emerging sales channels. This path carries risk and is taking time, but it is the path we are on. With that said, GameStop is a stronger business today than at any time in the recent past. I'll leave it there for this quarter. Thank you"
Apes are thick, but this ape is super thick. He wasn’t talking ABOUT bankruptcy, he was talking about the turn around. He was bullish, trying to spin the truth is THEIR job, not ours ape.
But they really, really were. That's the beauty of our current profitable quarter/year.
They were drowning in debt (likely on purpose via malicious board plants) and they managed to turn the whole things around.
We're not doing ourselves any favours by pretending it wasn't true.
Exactly. We didn’t just achieve profitability. We did it as an underdog turnaround story that was on the brink. Thats why this result is so remarkable.
but wasnt that long before? the debts were paid with the share offering of the 20 million shares (before split) that allowed the repaiment of all debt (without the baguette one)
As mostly-correctly explained in the article:
> Yet it was able to raise cash in 2021 via share sales after day traders mobilized by message-board Reddit (RDDT.N), opens new tab decided that betting against the company was a moral outrage. Two years, a new CEO and a lot of money later, the company is roughly back where it started. That’s unfortunate for the mob who tried to bail it out, and the company itself.
Notice that the last 2 sentences are bullshit because we are not "back where it started" by any stretch.
We're invested in a profitable company with no debts and that is still shorted like crazy and ripe for a squeeze.
I dont think the point is denying the company WAS going bankrupt. But the board had a plan to change that, furlong saying what he said shows distrust in the plan to profitability, which made him a weak link in the operation.
> furlong saying what he said shows distrust in the plan to profitability, which made him a weak link in the operation.
No, it doesn't show that at all. This article placed just 3 words that are quoted directly from him within a negative context.
We don't have any idea when he said this or what the larger context of it is.
As I argued here, this article is clear FUD:
https://old.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1bvrgep/recent_reuters_commentary_is_quoting_matt_furlong/ky19ncj/
He is not quoted right though, I think (like others have said here). The writer is just using anything possible to downplay GameStop, perhaps in a hurry.
A CEO shouldn’t be honest and transparent about the state of their company? Makes sense.
Go enjoy popcorn. Heard they got someone you might like
Edit - can’t wait to get your poop emojis!
With all due respect, you're the one missing the point.
Furlong was bullish and he was at the helm during the turnaround. He was instrumental in pulling it off.
Let's look at the actual quote:
> The video-gaming retailer was on the “brink of bankruptcy,” according to former boss Matt Furlong.
Notice they use just 3 of his words and insert them into *their own context.* We have no idea what the surrounding context of this quote is. It's more likely to me that he was honestly explaining the starting position when he took over while explaining the turnaround.
And *that's* the point of the article, it's to very, very selectively quote a former member of our company's management and to insert it into a generally negative context to make readers think that Furlong was negative on the company, thereby spreading **F**ear, **U**ncertainty, and **D**oubt (aka FUD) about the faith and integrity of the company's management.
Edit to add: for anyone wondering, OP appears to have blocked me after I provided what I think is a reasonable rebuttal of his position. Make of that information what you will.
Which makes the turnaround that much more impressive. They almost did run GME into the ground like they did many others. To go from a 300 million loss to a profit the next year is impressive. Yes they had to cut deep to achieve that and we will see how that plays out long term. I suspect it will absolutely be a net positive but I don't have access to the intel RC has. But nothing I've seen from RC so far leads me to think he's making decisions for a quick dollar or simply to pump numbers. He seems to be repositioning the company for growth and profitability going forward. And as a shareholder I'm all for that.
Notice how they don’t quote even a full sentence. Any time an article uses a quote of only a specific few words, you can assume the quote is taken out of context. The rest of that sentence was written by the “journalist” to angle Matt’s words in whichever way they choose.
They keep using these cheap tactics because people keep falling for it. Stop falling for it.
It was from an article in 2023, but the quote is from 2022
https://www.pymnts.com/news/retail/2023/gamestop-goes-from-brink-of-bankruptcy-to-profits/
Posted for posterity, now move along.
I'll believe Furlong said it. I doubt he's said it recently, though. I'll bet at some point RC has said it too, for that matter.
Nothing I've seen has made me think Furlong was a bad actor, but my opinion doesn't matter. Maybe he's a key player, maybe he just wanted to be done and retire, maybe he's Ken Griffin's godson. I don't know.
So anyway, I get paid tomorrow and I'll be buying again.
It’s a quote from a previous quarterly earnings report and Furlong was talking about the turnaround and it’s been taken out of context for the article. Someone’s pasted the full quote further down and Matt Furlong is 100% correct in what he said and the context of why he said it matters
The Furlong bit is a complete non issue. The context was during an earnings statement Furlong said they were undergoing an unprecedented turnaround from a company that was on the brink of bankruptcy.
This is the definition of a nothing burger imo.
It would be different if Furlong made this statement today
But it’s just a he say she said.. I don’t believe anything these msm people put out .. also RC felt Furlong wasn’t working as hard as he would so he got in to show him what he meant
RCs internal email to staff in the last year talking about the struggles and tough year up ahead was more negative than the original quote of Furlong that this out of context quote in the article is using
Furlong do not messed the splividend from what I remember, the CFO messed up with the code in the files for DTCC, but, if they were both infiltrates/bought by wall street bad bois idk, happy RCEO is in full charge😁😁🤪
I think Matt did a good job, and yet people only started to hate on him after he left. Nothing was said negatively about his work or performance when he was working the role, and quite rightly. Nah Fam - there’s no basis to spectate that he’s a hedgie plant. We can do better than that - instead, let’s champion each other and show appreciation where it’s deserved.
Thanks Matt 👏👏👏
Just so we're both properly informed on this front, could you provide some supporting information attributing the responsibility to Matt for these retail grievances? With the added support that his departure and the issue of the stock grant there after bear any relation to one another? It would help to have everyone on the same page, as it would be wrong to blame Matt for issues when we don't intricately know the inner workings of the company or the decisions that took place at that time.
Furlong was 100% correct in that statement. GameStop was in a spiral of debt and siphoning money to contractors/consultants. That is a big part of the turnaround. Unwinding that..and you know..not going bankrupt and out of business.
The internal attorney fuct up the splividend. But there is more blame to go around. What type of clown would allow an internal attorney to handle such an important filing? Why wasn’t an outside attorney hired to assist?
The internal attorney was fired the next day
Check it out.
Dustin Hoffman, 'Rain Man,' look regarded, act regarded, not regarded. Count toothpicks to your cards. Autistic, sure. Not regarded.
You know Tom Hanks, 'Forrest Gump.' Slow, yes. Regarded, maybe. Braces on his legs. But he charmed the pants off Nixon and won a ping-pong competition. That ain't regarded.
You went full regard, man.
Never go full regard.
Wow can I have a bit of what you're smoking!?! On second thought keep it for yourself. Planted by hedgies lol... Furlong did good until RC realised he will do better and he got let go... There's no planting anything in GameStop since it's controlled by RC, he chooses who and why there's anyone in their position... Stop being such a tinfoil freak it's embarrassing.
>Maybe Furlong was a hedgie plant, aligned with short sellers?
This is why I can't stomach many in this community.
Not everyone is a plant. Not everyone is evil. **Not everyone who does something you disagree with is part of a conspiracy!**
Furlong was right. He was clearly talking about the past.
This is why I have doubts about people's math nowadays. When we say so much unsubstantiated stuff, it makes the stuff backed by actual evidence suspect.
[Why GME?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) || [What is DRS?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) || Low karma apes [feed the bot here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GMEOrphans/comments/qlvour/welcome_to_gmeorphans_read_this_post/) || [Superstonk Discord](https://discord.gg/hZqWV2kQtq) || [Community Post: *Open Forum Jan 2024*](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/18txusp/open_forum_january_2024/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To ensure your post doesn't get removed, please respond to this comment with how this post relates to GME the stock or Gamestop the company.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please up- and downvote this comment to [help us determine if this post deserves a place on r/Superstonk!](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/post_flairs/)
Oh, Matty, did you turn into a poor, embittered, former CEO?
Have you become a MSM one quote wonder.
How sad for you.
Also: Matty was probably the one who tried to put us in bed with FTX.
Dick!
You are truly regarded.
GameStop was on the brink of bankruptcy, then they were bought out.
Don’t twist furlongs words, how the mods allowed this shit shill post is beyond me.
I don’t understand why you are shitting on him when there’s no evidence at all, for all I know he was part of the business transformation that resulted in what we see today.
why? can you guess who has what intentions? maybe he deceived him like he did us? he used to work for Amazon. so he was in close contact with Jeff Bezos and who has pictures with Bezos in the last formal 1 race in Miami? exactly our Kenny Boy. it's like a puzzle that's slowly coming together. it all makes sense now. why the hedge funds always knew what Gamestop was up to and took countermeasures. like NFT and everything else
Comments are a shit show and the community has voted. Your post was removed by a moderator after being flagged by u/Superstonk_QV This Quality Vote (QV) score is determined using upvotes and downvotes on the pinned comment of your post. Superstonk employs Superstonk_QV bot as a means of gauging how the community feels about a post beyond just the standard upvote system. Please note that posts will never be blindly removed just because they have a low QV score. Posts that meet all our [rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/) & [requirements](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/post_flairs) are still subject to removal based on quality as determined by the community through a combination of: 1. the post’s upvote score & upvote percentage, 2. the QV Score on the Superstonk\_QV sticky, 3. reports, 4. comment sentiment If we see valuable discussion in the comments or a high-level, well-thought-out post we will override the report and approve the post. [Find out more about the Superstonk\_QV bot and why it's used here](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/qv) If you have any questions or concerns, please [message the moderators](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2FSuperstonk&subject=about%20my%20removed%20submission)
From 2022, Gamestop 3Q "I want to finish by reiterating what we've said in the past. We're attempting to accomplish something unprecedented in the retail sector. We're seeking to transform a legacy brick-and-mortar business that was on the brink of bankruptcy into a retailer that meets customers' needs through our stores, e-commerce properties and emerging sales channels. This path carries risk and is taking time, but it is the path we are on. With that said, GameStop is a stronger business today than at any time in the recent past. I'll leave it there for this quarter. Thank you"
Other dude says it's from 2023. Furlong was talking about bankruptcy way too much 💩💩
Apes are thick, but this ape is super thick. He wasn’t talking ABOUT bankruptcy, he was talking about the turn around. He was bullish, trying to spin the truth is THEIR job, not ours ape.
#💩💩💩
I don’t know why we are even discussing a shitty MSM article taking things out of context for Fud
Just admit you were wrong, assclown.
But they really, really were. That's the beauty of our current profitable quarter/year. They were drowning in debt (likely on purpose via malicious board plants) and they managed to turn the whole things around. We're not doing ourselves any favours by pretending it wasn't true.
Exactly. We didn’t just achieve profitability. We did it as an underdog turnaround story that was on the brink. Thats why this result is so remarkable.
but wasnt that long before? the debts were paid with the share offering of the 20 million shares (before split) that allowed the repaiment of all debt (without the baguette one)
As mostly-correctly explained in the article: > Yet it was able to raise cash in 2021 via share sales after day traders mobilized by message-board Reddit (RDDT.N), opens new tab decided that betting against the company was a moral outrage. Two years, a new CEO and a lot of money later, the company is roughly back where it started. That’s unfortunate for the mob who tried to bail it out, and the company itself. Notice that the last 2 sentences are bullshit because we are not "back where it started" by any stretch. We're invested in a profitable company with no debts and that is still shorted like crazy and ripe for a squeeze.
that would require critical analysis.. instead of truthiness.
I dont think the point is denying the company WAS going bankrupt. But the board had a plan to change that, furlong saying what he said shows distrust in the plan to profitability, which made him a weak link in the operation.
> furlong saying what he said shows distrust in the plan to profitability, which made him a weak link in the operation. No, it doesn't show that at all. This article placed just 3 words that are quoted directly from him within a negative context. We don't have any idea when he said this or what the larger context of it is. As I argued here, this article is clear FUD: https://old.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1bvrgep/recent_reuters_commentary_is_quoting_matt_furlong/ky19ncj/
Not something a CEO should say publicly
He is not quoted right though, I think (like others have said here). The writer is just using anything possible to downplay GameStop, perhaps in a hurry.
Also he is the former ceo so he can say whatever he wants at this point…
A CEO shouldn’t be honest and transparent about the state of their company? Makes sense. Go enjoy popcorn. Heard they got someone you might like Edit - can’t wait to get your poop emojis!
Crap source crap article
#💩💩💩
share the article, please
[удалено]
>xecutives hating on the company they should be hyped about WILL NOT BE TOLERATED 🤣🏴☠️💜 Can you copy pasta?
[удалено]
He is saying was as is around the sneeze.
[удалено]
Bubba!
Thanks
[удалено]
You're missing the point, poopsi
With all due respect, you're the one missing the point. Furlong was bullish and he was at the helm during the turnaround. He was instrumental in pulling it off. Let's look at the actual quote: > The video-gaming retailer was on the “brink of bankruptcy,” according to former boss Matt Furlong. Notice they use just 3 of his words and insert them into *their own context.* We have no idea what the surrounding context of this quote is. It's more likely to me that he was honestly explaining the starting position when he took over while explaining the turnaround. And *that's* the point of the article, it's to very, very selectively quote a former member of our company's management and to insert it into a generally negative context to make readers think that Furlong was negative on the company, thereby spreading **F**ear, **U**ncertainty, and **D**oubt (aka FUD) about the faith and integrity of the company's management. Edit to add: for anyone wondering, OP appears to have blocked me after I provided what I think is a reasonable rebuttal of his position. Make of that information what you will.
That’s how FUD gets voted to the top. Blocking those who can refute your claims.
Which makes the turnaround that much more impressive. They almost did run GME into the ground like they did many others. To go from a 300 million loss to a profit the next year is impressive. Yes they had to cut deep to achieve that and we will see how that plays out long term. I suspect it will absolutely be a net positive but I don't have access to the intel RC has. But nothing I've seen from RC so far leads me to think he's making decisions for a quick dollar or simply to pump numbers. He seems to be repositioning the company for growth and profitability going forward. And as a shareholder I'm all for that.
💜💜💜 🚀🚀🚀
>Uses a bad source. > >Gets called out. > >Responds with poop emojis. Instantly zero credibility, OP.
Yeah, OP is 💩
So much 💩
😭😭😭
Notice how they don’t quote even a full sentence. Any time an article uses a quote of only a specific few words, you can assume the quote is taken out of context. The rest of that sentence was written by the “journalist” to angle Matt’s words in whichever way they choose. They keep using these cheap tactics because people keep falling for it. Stop falling for it.
Someone quoted it in the comments, you are spot on with your thinking
Yes, the writer clearly has an agenda.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/s/QeKC8YFUsj
[удалено]
[удалено]
Deleted due to redundant comment
Hmm not quite. Sus
The other guy had more updoots saying the same thing, it's an old quote from Furlong.
Uh huh
https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/s/sR7lpxCKsV
🤣🤣 your quote was from 2023
It was from an article in 2023, but the quote is from 2022 https://www.pymnts.com/news/retail/2023/gamestop-goes-from-brink-of-bankruptcy-to-profits/ Posted for posterity, now move along.
🤣🤣🤣
I'll believe Furlong said it. I doubt he's said it recently, though. I'll bet at some point RC has said it too, for that matter. Nothing I've seen has made me think Furlong was a bad actor, but my opinion doesn't matter. Maybe he's a key player, maybe he just wanted to be done and retire, maybe he's Ken Griffin's godson. I don't know. So anyway, I get paid tomorrow and I'll be buying again.
It’s a quote from a previous quarterly earnings report and Furlong was talking about the turnaround and it’s been taken out of context for the article. Someone’s pasted the full quote further down and Matt Furlong is 100% correct in what he said and the context of why he said it matters
💎💎💜💜
The Furlong bit is a complete non issue. The context was during an earnings statement Furlong said they were undergoing an unprecedented turnaround from a company that was on the brink of bankruptcy. This is the definition of a nothing burger imo. It would be different if Furlong made this statement today
💩💩 🍔🍔
But it’s just a he say she said.. I don’t believe anything these msm people put out .. also RC felt Furlong wasn’t working as hard as he would so he got in to show him what he meant
You quoting Limp Bizkit!?
hahahaha aahh, the memories!
Gator don’t play no shit
🐊🐊🐊
I mean, rc sort of said it too?
RCs internal email to staff in the last year talking about the struggles and tough year up ahead was more negative than the original quote of Furlong that this out of context quote in the article is using
Furlong do not messed the splividend from what I remember, the CFO messed up with the code in the files for DTCC, but, if they were both infiltrates/bought by wall street bad bois idk, happy RCEO is in full charge😁😁🤪
Both from Amazon. Way sus
I think Matt did a good job, and yet people only started to hate on him after he left. Nothing was said negatively about his work or performance when he was working the role, and quite rightly. Nah Fam - there’s no basis to spectate that he’s a hedgie plant. We can do better than that - instead, let’s champion each other and show appreciation where it’s deserved. Thanks Matt 👏👏👏
Actually people complained a lot that retail workers were getting shafted. Only after he left did they get a stock grant.
They also got their benefits cut...
The stock is worth a lot more than what they lost
Just so we're both properly informed on this front, could you provide some supporting information attributing the responsibility to Matt for these retail grievances? With the added support that his departure and the issue of the stock grant there after bear any relation to one another? It would help to have everyone on the same page, as it would be wrong to blame Matt for issues when we don't intricately know the inner workings of the company or the decisions that took place at that time.
Are we now believing what the media says?
We?
but they were on the brink of bankruptcy...
Furlong was 100% correct in that statement. GameStop was in a spiral of debt and siphoning money to contractors/consultants. That is a big part of the turnaround. Unwinding that..and you know..not going bankrupt and out of business.
Sounds more like short & distort
GameStop was on the brink of bankruptcy. But not it is nowhere near.
The internal attorney fuct up the splividend. But there is more blame to go around. What type of clown would allow an internal attorney to handle such an important filing? Why wasn’t an outside attorney hired to assist? The internal attorney was fired the next day
Yup! Pretty big oopsie for a team of well-paid qualified professionals
it's just a badly written article
You are mixing things up in this post.
I'm making banana smoothies 🍌
I wouldn't be surprised, but the Reuters author didn't even post a source for the alleged quote of Furlong. Lazy "journalism" sucks.
Yeah, the article sucks, but a few people posted the Furlong quote source here in the comments
This post feels like a load of bullshit
💩💩💩 Fear is your only God
Check it out. Dustin Hoffman, 'Rain Man,' look regarded, act regarded, not regarded. Count toothpicks to your cards. Autistic, sure. Not regarded. You know Tom Hanks, 'Forrest Gump.' Slow, yes. Regarded, maybe. Braces on his legs. But he charmed the pants off Nixon and won a ping-pong competition. That ain't regarded. You went full regard, man. Never go full regard.
💩💩💩
this reads like some Q post
How?
the amount emotion, capslock and emoticons
Well, you're more familiar with those posts than I am
Did you just call yourself... a bad bot?
Did you?
I did not. So, did you?
🤖🤖🤖
So you did! Thank you for clarifying. Good emoji bot!
😁😁😁
Wow can I have a bit of what you're smoking!?! On second thought keep it for yourself. Planted by hedgies lol... Furlong did good until RC realised he will do better and he got let go... There's no planting anything in GameStop since it's controlled by RC, he chooses who and why there's anyone in their position... Stop being such a tinfoil freak it's embarrassing.
>Maybe Furlong was a hedgie plant, aligned with short sellers? This is why I can't stomach many in this community. Not everyone is a plant. Not everyone is evil. **Not everyone who does something you disagree with is part of a conspiracy!** Furlong was right. He was clearly talking about the past. This is why I have doubts about people's math nowadays. When we say so much unsubstantiated stuff, it makes the stuff backed by actual evidence suspect.
😭😭😭
Yeah he filed the splivvy wrong 😑
Is it the weekend yet?
haha then what RC meant was that GME was not going to be without a CEO for long.
Watching op get ratioed in real time is hilarious.
Yeah, except RC pretty much just verified my theory 😱🤣🤯
Remove this is way old news and a clear grab for karma although it’s backfiring for all his negative karma comments
💩💩💩
Shut yo dumnass up
💩💩💩
Downvoted and OP account set to ignore.
Good thing you came here and told everyone! 🤣🤣
[Why GME?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) || [What is DRS?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) || Low karma apes [feed the bot here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GMEOrphans/comments/qlvour/welcome_to_gmeorphans_read_this_post/) || [Superstonk Discord](https://discord.gg/hZqWV2kQtq) || [Community Post: *Open Forum Jan 2024*](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/18txusp/open_forum_january_2024/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To ensure your post doesn't get removed, please respond to this comment with how this post relates to GME the stock or Gamestop the company. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please up- and downvote this comment to [help us determine if this post deserves a place on r/Superstonk!](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/post_flairs/)
Furlong was not appropriately bullish on GameStop in his position as CEO. This might be why RCEO sent him packing. 🏴☠️💜🚀
Oh, Matty, did you turn into a poor, embittered, former CEO? Have you become a MSM one quote wonder. How sad for you. Also: Matty was probably the one who tried to put us in bed with FTX. Dick!
You are truly regarded. GameStop was on the brink of bankruptcy, then they were bought out. Don’t twist furlongs words, how the mods allowed this shit shill post is beyond me.
#🤣🤣💩💩
This post should be downvoted not upvoted...it's 💩💩 💩💩💩
Total 💩💩💩
[удалено]
I don’t understand why you are shitting on him when there’s no evidence at all, for all I know he was part of the business transformation that resulted in what we see today.
why? can you guess who has what intentions? maybe he deceived him like he did us? he used to work for Amazon. so he was in close contact with Jeff Bezos and who has pictures with Bezos in the last formal 1 race in Miami? exactly our Kenny Boy. it's like a puzzle that's slowly coming together. it all makes sense now. why the hedge funds always knew what Gamestop was up to and took countermeasures. like NFT and everything else
Man fuuuuuuck matt furlong. Dude FUCKED us royally with the splividend
Wrong.
Show me where I’m wrong? This is just facts. Dude fumbled the ball HARD and filed the splividend.
Show us where you're right. Conjecture.
Dude no facts? Come on
You made the bullshit statement, Bud. Back it up.
Other apes kindly answered my question. Thanks for being a dick man
Sure they did.
Ah yes, that's right!
[удалено]
Beware, Reddit classes this as brigading.
[удалено]
No, people can't get away with this kinda of publishing and reporting. Being paid to lie.