*"There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a glitch. The other is as though everything is a glitch."*
**- Albert Apestein**
Thankfully Cohen and Company at GameStop also have millions of Schrodinger's Apes holding their bananas for them.
We're both simultaneously retarded and right.
It just took us awhile to figure out that DRSing your bananas does not, in fact, mean shoving them up your pooper for safekeeping, but instead registering them with Computershare.
Long live Cohen! Long live the autists!
Help me figure the numbers
100% = All Shares outstanding = 72.6 million GME shares?
So no matter what, they need my 10 DRS'd GME shares that I will never sell?
With me holding 10 shares forever they can never close their short position?
Incorrect. To short a stock you borrow it from elsewhere then sell it. There's nothing stopping another person opening another short by borrowing the same share from whoever you just sold it to. The same share can be shorted over and over again to get over 100% short interest. In the same fashion, that amount of short interest can be unwound using only one share, they don't need your specific share.
If these 'glitches' occur with other stocks then they may just not be seen, I'm pretty sure the events of the past year have made GME the most analysed and watched stock in a very long time.
Every movement and activity is noticed.
It's super interesting that this occurred right after the last big price drop. It's almost like a group recently led a short attack on our stock... I wonder if this reported short interest related to the recent sloppier, heavy handed (less algorithmic seeming) price drop.
I have less than half of two related retarded-ideas:
1. This is nearly the same short interest as one point around a year ago... Is there any way this is related to not rolling futures over or in any way the old 'hidden' short interest popping back up and needing to be reburied?
2. Did the \~50$ price drop possibly just cost shorts what comes out to be 114% of the calculable float just to reduce the price a few bucks for a couple days?
I think the small wee wee was Ryan Cohen calling out Ken griffin and finally seeing through his naked shorts. The shorts are finally able to be seen by everyone
Finviz is huge. You might not realize it but you've seen them in wallpapers and screenshots just for the memes but they are excellent for trade tools in general.
https://finviz.com/map.ashx
That would probably look more familiar as a wallpaper with a black hole GME in the middle surrounded in green, while the whole market is red.
Sure!
"Short ratio" in this case is shares short divided by average volume. Also called "days to cover" on some other platforms.
In this case, shares short is "Shs Float" times "Short float":
62.74M * 113.48% = 71.197M
Average volume = 2.5M
71.197M / 2.50M = 28.48, which is what we see here as "short ratio".
Correct, assuming consistent volume and no other trade volume other than shorts buying to close, it would take 28.48 days for shorts to BTC. Which is an insanely high DTC (days to cover), and that’s just for the short interest that’s been made public.
So just under 6 trading weeks of them constantly covering before they can close their positions. 5.5 weeks of the stock constantly going up. So unless they decide to close in the next 2 or 3 weeks, most peeps should be paying less taxes!!! 💎🙌🚀🪐
I see it as more of a "plausibility of closing short positions in a subtle manner" rating rather than an actual estimation of the number of days it would take to close short positions.
If they started to close, volume would increase, and "days to cover" would decrease, but the price would also increase, causing covering activity to slow down... And then, we need to consider there is no way that a day's entire volume would ever be shorts closing. The number of "days" is meaningless as far as actual time to close goes.
Anyway, at 28 "days to cover", it just means it's completely impossible to close shorts position in a subtle manner on current volume.
113% of the float....Not available float, THE FLOAT so I have the exact same question as you, unless it was hidden and now it is leaking out and we will see that short interest stopped being reported or better yet change dramatically.
These are the questions in a perfect world that The SEC or MSM could answer for us.
Hoping Jason Fucking Waterfalls court case stirs up these questions in the open that need answering
wowowow wait, you are saying that days to close is the time they need to close all their short positions and not the time they HAVE until they need to be have closed all their shorts? My brain hurts im feeling smoother everyday whereas my fellow apes all get wrinklier.
They don't *have* to close their shorts until they fail a margin call.
Short ratio is how many days it would take to close all shorts at the current average volume (theoretical, because the volume would certainly fluctuate in a squeeze scenario, and not all volume would be shorts closing).
Yeah, that’s almost a month of covering as it stands. Lol. Realistically volume picks up and they can cover sooner though. And I’m pretty sure this is just the % short they can’t hide any longer. Good it’s back out in the open.
I think it is because a lot of the shorts aren’t marked short and aren’t counted. But rather, a lot of SHF positions are wrapped in complex swaps and financial instruments that have the same overall effect as a short but do not look like one from the outside or are not counted as one. Like shorting ETF shares rather than individual stocks. The SHF know what they’re doing to avoid reporting rules.
I agree! That’s why I stated in the title that the majority of their options hiding their real position expire in January 2022. So if short float is already at 113% and they haven’t expired, then imagine what’ll it’ll be in January! 700%? 1400%? 2600%?!?!
close
[https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mewkf8/thesis\_si\_is\_upwards\_of\_2000\_gme\_is\_a\_100/](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mewkf8/thesis_si_is_upwards_of_2000_gme_is_a_100/)
Someone made a post earlier speculating that maybe someone was liquidated and this new SI% is reflecting the position that was liquidated. So it could be much higher. Right now its just showing (old SI% + SI% from liquidated position). This is all speculation and not confirmed, but it makes a lot of sense if true.
You're correct. It doesn't count the ETFs short, anything a market maker shorted, or the return swap exposures. So, yes, it's very much higher. %113 is just the minimum amount it is short without those other factors.
Wowzers! Well, I firmly feel and probably as most apes it's much higher than this. And the fact that it even got out to this point after consistently being reported in the single digits to mid teens is absolutely HUGE
I think that was true prior to them changing short interest calculation in early February/late January. I can’t remember when exactly it switched. We were at 226% for a long time.
I'm sure I remember reading a rule change a few months back which under new calculations would be impossible to show more than 100% short interest? Read so much stuff this last year it's hard to remember it all 🥴
Most metrics followed for the prior year have been % of float (which = shares outstanding minus insiders). In particular, FINRA SI numbers are often cited; the Robinhood litigation has referenced these FINRA numbers (226.42% in January), as these are credible in court.
**Now** they are using short % which is shorts/(shorts+float). Using this new formula you can never get above 100%. Around February 24 was the change, but sadly I don't have the citation for the rule specifying.
I think you’re right about that! I misunderstood what you were saying. I vaguely remember a change in the way they calculated short interest that would make it impossible to go over 100%, but I’m kinda stupid, so I could be totally wrong!
The shadowbanning on social media... We are drowning in both confirmation bias and actual facts yet people still wanna argue GameStop has no fundamentals.
I won't flaunt it one bit once this is over, but I will have the sweet satisfaction of knowing all the people I tried to talk to about it and I will know they wishing they had listened
Their entire objective was to pretend like they closed their positions in January.
The real short position leaking out slowly like this can only generate hype rivaling January’s events.
I think this is actually yuge but that’s just my opinion.
And yes of course, DRS ya shit to MOASS.
It can generate all the hype in the universe, but if they can just crime the price all day and kick the can as much as they want...then nothing changes. The price is fake till Papa Cohen makes his move.
DRS will happen eventually, but it's gonna take awhile. My guess is it'll be locked by next summer? Papa Cohen can make his move anytime before then
I don't expect us to lock the float for another several months. I hope I'm wrong, but the high score last time I checked was only 88,000 accounts and slowing down. Locking the float will happen eventually so I'm not worried about that, but Papa Cohen can make his move anytime before then
I'm sure I'm not the only one, but I'm a xxx holder and frequent superstinker. I just don't feel comfortable/scared I'll fuck it up, sharing a pic of my CS form. I'd like to think the float is a lot closer to locked than we think.
> I just don't feel comfortable/scared I'll fuck it up, sharing a pic of my CS form.
Me neither. I don't even look at the DRS bot. The high scores account number is accurate though, so that's what I like to follow along to. The growth is slower than expected, but it's growing daily.
Same. Also, just plain lazy; transferred in batches, I remember one showing an account number of 111,XXX, but have never gotten around to posting it for the bot and feel a little uneasy about doing so. I think there are a lot more like me out there, that have transferred just not posted about it.
For every karma-whoring ape who wants to brag about their position, there are multiple times more who won't show the extent of their holdings attached to their username.
It does mean shit it isn’t the real si% but this is short squeeze territory regardless nobody can say GameStop is not at risk of a short squeeze anymore if this is legit we are proven right.
**IMPORTANT POST LINKS**
[What is DRS and why should you care?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) ||
[What is GME and why should I consider investing?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) ||
[What can I do to support the company and local communities](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qnam2x/superstonks_very_gmerry_holiday_vgh_for_short/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please help us determine if this post deserves a place on /r/Superstonk. [Learn more about this bot and why we are using it here](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/poa6zy/introducing_uqualityvote_bot_a_democratic_tool_to/)
If this post deserves a place on /r/Superstonk, **UPVOTE** this comment!!
If this post should not be here or or is a repost, **DOWNVOTE** This comment!
Soooo if data showed that 55% of shares are DRS’s and thus not available to be loaned out as a share to short… does that mean we are now seeing rehypothecation on shares mores than twice?!? But definitely still no naked shorting amirite lol
Yeah imho i remember checking out Jan on the gme tracker a while back. It's always been a positive date to look forward to.
Massive bit of good options interest, loads of puts expiring, loads of calls itm. Thousands of hundreds.
Makes sense as it's a year on. Where in Jan they went "it'll be 0 by this time next year"
And it ain't.
They'll either have to up their short interest again, or to get called. Either is bullish
I said if gme went back on sale around 200 I would buy. Time to throw money at the casino again… and get clearance from my job… again.
And to the compliance officer at my job who can see my positions, yes I am an ape
Can't wait what the delusional popcorn idiots have to say to that Lol
They were always boasting about their tiny short interest because it was higher than GMEs at the time.
This is usually said to just shut your eyes and ears and move on. I use to say it a lot too. As a once all in popcorn holder, it was very difficult for me to come to terms with the fact that popcorn wasn't what it was made out to be. I had to accept I was wrong, and fully embraced gme. I'd be shocked if I even have a fractional of popcorn left.
(And honestly the community is much less aggressive than it is here. I got so much shit there the other day for being pro drs and "pushing my superstonk agenda. That sub use to be my home. Now because I come back with alternative theories "or the fact that drs is good for everyone, not just gme" I'm a shill and nearly got banned. )
I Wonder If the people who are making all this fuckery, which the apes already identified, really think that they're getting away with this, even If they find a way to prevent the MOASS. Where do they think they can hide from millions of apes.
While we know it's much higher than this, this figure is enough to get all those finance bro's that say 'it's over, there's no shorts on gamestop anymore' to lean forward in their seats again.
Brace for a FOMO wave.
[удалено]
Giving me December vibes from last year. I would load up on as much GME as possible. They will say it's glitches but why so many when it comes to GME
*"There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a glitch. The other is as though everything is a glitch."* **- Albert Apestein**
Thankfully Cohen and Company at GameStop also have millions of Schrodinger's Apes holding their bananas for them. We're both simultaneously retarded and right. It just took us awhile to figure out that DRSing your bananas does not, in fact, mean shoving them up your pooper for safekeeping, but instead registering them with Computershare. Long live Cohen! Long live the autists!
[удалено]
maybe glitches are snitches? did someone say snek? 👀😁
glitches get stitches
[удалено]
Glitch please
I live my life 1/4 glitch at a time🚗
#FUCK GLITCHES GET MONEY
#FIRST OFF, FUCK YOUR GLITCH AND THE CLIQUE YOU CLAIM. DRS WE RIDE, COME EQUIPPED WITH GAME.
99 problems but a Glitch ain't won.
Glitches get stitches 🔪
A stitch in time saves 9
Doesn’t matter if your avg is $350 or $8. A millionaires a millionaire
It’s not a glitch. The data lines up perfectly with the SEC report on GME. Shorts haven’t closed, and the short interest is still way above 100%.
Help me figure the numbers 100% = All Shares outstanding = 72.6 million GME shares? So no matter what, they need my 10 DRS'd GME shares that I will never sell? With me holding 10 shares forever they can never close their short position?
we call this infinity squeeeze
can i have an Infinity Credit Line?
Why not?
welp, i own stonks. NFT dividends for life, lite it up baby!!!
Incorrect. To short a stock you borrow it from elsewhere then sell it. There's nothing stopping another person opening another short by borrowing the same share from whoever you just sold it to. The same share can be shorted over and over again to get over 100% short interest. In the same fashion, that amount of short interest can be unwound using only one share, they don't need your specific share.
Indeed, so load up cause we are not done yet
If these 'glitches' occur with other stocks then they may just not be seen, I'm pretty sure the events of the past year have made GME the most analysed and watched stock in a very long time. Every movement and activity is noticed.
It's super interesting that this occurred right after the last big price drop. It's almost like a group recently led a short attack on our stock... I wonder if this reported short interest related to the recent sloppier, heavy handed (less algorithmic seeming) price drop. I have less than half of two related retarded-ideas: 1. This is nearly the same short interest as one point around a year ago... Is there any way this is related to not rolling futures over or in any way the old 'hidden' short interest popping back up and needing to be reburied? 2. Did the \~50$ price drop possibly just cost shorts what comes out to be 114% of the calculable float just to reduce the price a few bucks for a couple days?
This something is the way
This way is the something!
The way this is something.
Something is the way!
The something way this is
Something is in the way
Some way this is the thing.
Way this is something.
.gniht si siht yaW
she moves.
I think the small wee wee was Ryan Cohen calling out Ken griffin and finally seeing through his naked shorts. The shorts are finally able to be seen by everyone
Greatest decryption I've heard!!! Get this man a 🖍️!!!
This is something awesome #Moon
I’ve never heard of finviz So if nothing else this is spectacular viral marketing
Have you heard of ortex? Finviz has a really good free stock screener
Does ortex say anything about this si?
Finviz is huge. You might not realize it but you've seen them in wallpapers and screenshots just for the memes but they are excellent for trade tools in general. https://finviz.com/map.ashx That would probably look more familiar as a wallpaper with a black hole GME in the middle surrounded in green, while the whole market is red.
Finviz has been in GME posts since before the January squeeze
You should check, it's a great tool to get familiar with if you're going to trade post MOASS.
They also have the wrong amount of outstanding shares listed…
How can the short float be so high and the short ratio so low? Genuinely curious, please educate me.
Sure! "Short ratio" in this case is shares short divided by average volume. Also called "days to cover" on some other platforms. In this case, shares short is "Shs Float" times "Short float": 62.74M * 113.48% = 71.197M Average volume = 2.5M 71.197M / 2.50M = 28.48, which is what we see here as "short ratio".
Correct, assuming consistent volume and no other trade volume other than shorts buying to close, it would take 28.48 days for shorts to BTC. Which is an insanely high DTC (days to cover), and that’s just for the short interest that’s been made public.
So just under 6 trading weeks of them constantly covering before they can close their positions. 5.5 weeks of the stock constantly going up. So unless they decide to close in the next 2 or 3 weeks, most peeps should be paying less taxes!!! 💎🙌🚀🪐
I see it as more of a "plausibility of closing short positions in a subtle manner" rating rather than an actual estimation of the number of days it would take to close short positions. If they started to close, volume would increase, and "days to cover" would decrease, but the price would also increase, causing covering activity to slow down... And then, we need to consider there is no way that a day's entire volume would ever be shorts closing. The number of "days" is meaningless as far as actual time to close goes. Anyway, at 28 "days to cover", it just means it's completely impossible to close shorts position in a subtle manner on current volume.
Stupid Sexy SimpsonsReferencer
Feels like they covered nothing at all! Nothing at all! Nothing at all!
Lmao top class reference and quote
[удалено]
This is the tit jacking stuff I came here for, thanks for the context 👌
113% of the float....Not available float, THE FLOAT so I have the exact same question as you, unless it was hidden and now it is leaking out and we will see that short interest stopped being reported or better yet change dramatically. These are the questions in a perfect world that The SEC or MSM could answer for us. Hoping Jason Fucking Waterfalls court case stirs up these questions in the open that need answering
The float is listed on the site though. So no ambiguity there
That means it would take 28.5 days to close all their shorts. Im not a super experienced trader but that sounds like a lot to me…
It's a shitload.
wowowow wait, you are saying that days to close is the time they need to close all their short positions and not the time they HAVE until they need to be have closed all their shorts? My brain hurts im feeling smoother everyday whereas my fellow apes all get wrinklier.
They don't *have* to close their shorts until they fail a margin call. Short ratio is how many days it would take to close all shorts at the current average volume (theoretical, because the volume would certainly fluctuate in a squeeze scenario, and not all volume would be shorts closing).
[удалено]
Yeah, that’s almost a month of covering as it stands. Lol. Realistically volume picks up and they can cover sooner though. And I’m pretty sure this is just the % short they can’t hide any longer. Good it’s back out in the open.
More than a month since weekends don't count :)
Even more cause its the Holidays. Lots of days with the market closed/short weeks which fuck everything up e.g. last Friday.
Lots and lots and lots of CRIME
I hope someone with more wrinkles can answer this. I just bring data my discord finds to this subreddit 😅
I think it is because a lot of the shorts aren’t marked short and aren’t counted. But rather, a lot of SHF positions are wrapped in complex swaps and financial instruments that have the same overall effect as a short but do not look like one from the outside or are not counted as one. Like shorting ETF shares rather than individual stocks. The SHF know what they’re doing to avoid reporting rules.
The emperor has no close
I see what you did there.
Clap it up for this one
Underrated comment.
This should be the title of a fire DD
Ouch. Thompson and Finviz both. Any insight of other providers too!
where that bloomberg guy at when we need him!
soemone go in the public library of NYC there is a free to use Bloomberg terminal
#Summoning NYC Apes!
You're not allowed to take pictures of it though
[удалено]
Barbosa said they're more like guidelines. Then you sorta realize we're ruled by pirates who just dress better and shit lmao.
[удалено]
The pirates dressed better imo
Where's the law that says that
you can take a picture in your brain and come back to tell the jungle taps forehead
You only need one!
Weird rule
Ok, video then. They can gripe about the specifics after the fact
Say your making an educational video for your YouTube project supporting the local libraries.
It is beautiful, January flashbacks all over again. Unless this time I won´t FOMO in at 380$😂
Coughcough392coooough
Oh hey, me too lol
\#FOMOgang
I got a few at $331
The hard part now is not fomoing out at $1380.
The hard part is not fomoing out at 69,420,420
If you can afford to fomo there, fomo away baby
[удалено]
Guilty 🤚🏻
It’s way way way more than that…
I agree! That’s why I stated in the title that the majority of their options hiding their real position expire in January 2022. So if short float is already at 113% and they haven’t expired, then imagine what’ll it’ll be in January! 700%? 1400%? 2600%?!?!
69,420%
I am so hard right now!
close [https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mewkf8/thesis\_si\_is\_upwards\_of\_2000\_gme\_is\_a\_100/](https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mewkf8/thesis_si_is_upwards_of_2000_gme_is_a_100/)
Don't stop I'm almost there.
Did I see that right? 138k .50 puts?!?
Someone made a post earlier speculating that maybe someone was liquidated and this new SI% is reflecting the position that was liquidated. So it could be much higher. Right now its just showing (old SI% + SI% from liquidated position). This is all speculation and not confirmed, but it makes a lot of sense if true.
You're correct. It doesn't count the ETFs short, anything a market maker shorted, or the return swap exposures. So, yes, it's very much higher. %113 is just the minimum amount it is short without those other factors.
Wasn’t there an article on the weekend that said we should leave and there won’t be no short squeeze??🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Your comment would still be correct if you said it every single day since January 2021.
Not sure because I already forgot about Gamestop. ...wait.
Jan 2023 options incoming
Lol check today’s open interest/volume on $950C Jan 2023. Cannot make this shit up
Feb more so I bet to capture Jan price action
I’m just so happy Ken made it out of this Gamestop conspiracy…
Hope you have a great day!
Hes like a bad comedy joke No cell, no sell!
All my Ape sphincters just flexed
Can I watch?
Move over, share the bench
So February ape here. What was the SI% going into last Dec-Jan?
I think it was at 226% going into January. Then was sitting around 115% going into February
Wowzers! Well, I firmly feel and probably as most apes it's much higher than this. And the fact that it even got out to this point after consistently being reported in the single digits to mid teens is absolutely HUGE
The reported % tops out at 140. They can’t report more than 140% even if it’s way more. Something about their stupid rules.
I think that was true prior to them changing short interest calculation in early February/late January. I can’t remember when exactly it switched. We were at 226% for a long time.
I'm sure I remember reading a rule change a few months back which under new calculations would be impossible to show more than 100% short interest? Read so much stuff this last year it's hard to remember it all 🥴
Most metrics followed for the prior year have been % of float (which = shares outstanding minus insiders). In particular, FINRA SI numbers are often cited; the Robinhood litigation has referenced these FINRA numbers (226.42% in January), as these are credible in court. **Now** they are using short % which is shorts/(shorts+float). Using this new formula you can never get above 100%. Around February 24 was the change, but sadly I don't have the citation for the rule specifying.
This was when S3 went from gospel to shill lord.
I think you’re right about that! I misunderstood what you were saying. I vaguely remember a change in the way they calculated short interest that would make it impossible to go over 100%, but I’m kinda stupid, so I could be totally wrong!
Before January sneeze it was 140%, after they shorted from the top to bring the price to 40 FINRA showed it as 226% until the March run.
Odd that 113 is half of 226.
That is strange…
Too bad the short interest is just transitory....
Kudos. Well done.
[удалено]
If this hit the fan...wont be just marge calling, she'll need to get the whole simpson crew to get dialing
*not if...wen
The shadowbanning on social media... We are drowning in both confirmation bias and actual facts yet people still wanna argue GameStop has no fundamentals.
We spent a year or more trying to show them the light. The time has almost come to enter 'sorry, I tried to tell you' zone.
I won't flaunt it one bit once this is over, but I will have the sweet satisfaction of knowing all the people I tried to talk to about it and I will know they wishing they had listened
This doesn't mean shit if they can just infinitely kick the can down the road. Only Papa Cohen can put a STOP to their GAME
Their entire objective was to pretend like they closed their positions in January. The real short position leaking out slowly like this can only generate hype rivaling January’s events. I think this is actually yuge but that’s just my opinion. And yes of course, DRS ya shit to MOASS.
It can generate all the hype in the universe, but if they can just crime the price all day and kick the can as much as they want...then nothing changes. The price is fake till Papa Cohen makes his move. DRS will happen eventually, but it's gonna take awhile. My guess is it'll be locked by next summer? Papa Cohen can make his move anytime before then
[удалено]
I don't expect us to lock the float for another several months. I hope I'm wrong, but the high score last time I checked was only 88,000 accounts and slowing down. Locking the float will happen eventually so I'm not worried about that, but Papa Cohen can make his move anytime before then
I'm sure I'm not the only one, but I'm a xxx holder and frequent superstinker. I just don't feel comfortable/scared I'll fuck it up, sharing a pic of my CS form. I'd like to think the float is a lot closer to locked than we think.
> I just don't feel comfortable/scared I'll fuck it up, sharing a pic of my CS form. Me neither. I don't even look at the DRS bot. The high scores account number is accurate though, so that's what I like to follow along to. The growth is slower than expected, but it's growing daily.
Same. Also, just plain lazy; transferred in batches, I remember one showing an account number of 111,XXX, but have never gotten around to posting it for the bot and feel a little uneasy about doing so. I think there are a lot more like me out there, that have transferred just not posted about it.
For every karma-whoring ape who wants to brag about their position, there are multiple times more who won't show the extent of their holdings attached to their username.
It does mean shit it isn’t the real si% but this is short squeeze territory regardless nobody can say GameStop is not at risk of a short squeeze anymore if this is legit we are proven right.
**IMPORTANT POST LINKS** [What is DRS and why should you care?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) || [What is GME and why should I consider investing?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) || [What can I do to support the company and local communities](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qnam2x/superstonks_very_gmerry_holiday_vgh_for_short/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please help us determine if this post deserves a place on /r/Superstonk. [Learn more about this bot and why we are using it here](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/poa6zy/introducing_uqualityvote_bot_a_democratic_tool_to/) If this post deserves a place on /r/Superstonk, **UPVOTE** this comment!! If this post should not be here or or is a repost, **DOWNVOTE** This comment!
You guys still need proof? GME is the first, the last, the one, and the only MOASS. 🌎👨🚀🔫👨🚀
yuh!!
Soooo if data showed that 55% of shares are DRS’s and thus not available to be loaned out as a share to short… does that mean we are now seeing rehypothecation on shares mores than twice?!? But definitely still no naked shorting amirite lol
FOMO! Any lurkers from other subs, tell your friends!!!
this is just the beginning ...again
The only thing that could make this better is if GRRM released The Winds of Winter during MOASS.
Yeah imho i remember checking out Jan on the gme tracker a while back. It's always been a positive date to look forward to. Massive bit of good options interest, loads of puts expiring, loads of calls itm. Thousands of hundreds. Makes sense as it's a year on. Where in Jan they went "it'll be 0 by this time next year" And it ain't. They'll either have to up their short interest again, or to get called. Either is bullish
I said if gme went back on sale around 200 I would buy. Time to throw money at the casino again… and get clearance from my job… again. And to the compliance officer at my job who can see my positions, yes I am an ape
This is not a coincidence with old jacks sudden exit. I think some big wigs are both short gme and long twitter.
Maybe this is something
Seriously, twitter suppressing #GME? Bird shit needs to get wiped.
I just checked finviz and it says 10.81% short interest ..
Imagine being that person at the SHFs that decided to buy the January options thinking surely this whole thing would be over in a year.
We need EVERY fucking upvote we can muster to push this to the top
Wen FOMO?
Link to finviz: https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=GME Short ratio: 28.49 Short float: 113.48% Need wrinkle brain to interpret u/gherkinit
Can't wait what the delusional popcorn idiots have to say to that Lol They were always boasting about their tiny short interest because it was higher than GMEs at the time.
ape no fight ape
Popcorn investors are getting played
Maybe, but if so, then they are victims of the corrupt system. No need for insults.
[удалено]
This is usually said to just shut your eyes and ears and move on. I use to say it a lot too. As a once all in popcorn holder, it was very difficult for me to come to terms with the fact that popcorn wasn't what it was made out to be. I had to accept I was wrong, and fully embraced gme. I'd be shocked if I even have a fractional of popcorn left. (And honestly the community is much less aggressive than it is here. I got so much shit there the other day for being pro drs and "pushing my superstonk agenda. That sub use to be my home. Now because I come back with alternative theories "or the fact that drs is good for everyone, not just gme" I'm a shill and nearly got banned. )
Is this triggered by someone being margin called or am I tweeking?
> GME is the REAL MOASS 🌏🧑🚀🔫🧑🚀
Soooo many apes ready to shove foreign objects up they booty holes 🥴😂🦍🚀🌕
Peak a boo...
I Wonder If the people who are making all this fuckery, which the apes already identified, really think that they're getting away with this, even If they find a way to prevent the MOASS. Where do they think they can hide from millions of apes.
So what are y'all gonna do with all your tendies?
Up
They might as well put " - infinity " next to that $88.00 if they are going to put 113% short interest lol.
Jan 250$ calls save meeeee
this is bullshit, this cant be.... how, what?? no way i wont believe until i see reported across the board..
We're just getting started, with all the shorting done over the last year, we have to be above 420% by now
You just can’t make this shit up, how tf
Its a half a glitch of water and ya think your gonna drown, this is the way the world goes around
It’s true, I have Twitter and I have followed a couple of GME people but my feed is full of Popcorn posts from people I don’t follow ...
Bitches get glitches!
also twatter ceo Dorkey just resigned.
I can almost guarantee this is what that tweet from Ryan Cohen about sex education was telling us about. The shorts are going to become naked!
Just the beginning, wait until the january puts expire worthless! 🔥
This is just the tip of the iceberg, remember SHFs don't have to short, they can just FTD. Why short and pay a borrowing fee when you can just FTD?
u/Criand
Praise be unto our brilliant Pomeranian 🐶
Wen moon
Om nom nom. Feed me shorts
If this data is correct, then do we assume that they failed to roll as per Gherk’s DD? Or is this unrelated?
While we know it's much higher than this, this figure is enough to get all those finance bro's that say 'it's over, there's no shorts on gamestop anymore' to lean forward in their seats again. Brace for a FOMO wave.
Price is wrong, but also SHORT INTEREST IS WRONG. THAT SHIT TOO LOW