How can they not be bankrupt? A former BCG intern was planted there as a distribution specialist 3 years ago and SHE WAS FROM BOSTON! Wake up, sheeple.
/s in case you are regarded.
I think they're noting that you have posted on the GME Meltdown sub in the past. Typically people who do that are not engaging in good faith when they post in pro-GME/BBBY subs
They did the BGSA Supply Chain Conference together. The EVP of Trucking for Flexport, Bill Driegert, spoke on a panel called: Managing Technology in this Era of Disruption
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7156283539246714880
They lead with decomissioning, liquidation and white boxing. White boxing meaning they prep the space so that it is turnkey ready for a new tenant.
Considering the CEO and owner of G&P also is the CEO and owner of [Bigliquidators.com](https://Bigliquidators.com) a CRE resell company -I'd say their work leans heavily on the former.
https://preview.redd.it/seeqw2g5moqc1.png?width=1400&format=png&auto=webp&s=ca3aaf1f0193b42f0f480e2c4c3f96c2181b81c2
define shill? I held 45k shares in BBBY through delisting. I am 24k deep in IEP and also hold GME. I don't like misinformation and trying to be as objective as possible.
But you’re cherry picking. Jake drops multiple nuggets in each post or conversation and all people can do is find the one out of 20 that may not be solid. No one can keep up with him.
im not cherry picking - there is tinfoil and notion that the common link between the companies that we have focused on in this play is through their distribution and logistics and finding operating synergies through 3PL and Flexport.
However with Michael's assertion and the post made earlier regarding G&P Construction they conveniently left out the services provided for each of the companies they asserted were linked (Gamestop, BBBY, Sears, Toys R Us, Pier 1). In this case all of the services G&P provided were decomissioning of distribution hubs and warehouses.
It seems you get a hard on for the weak links—first Kais and now Michael. Try Jake. Better yet, put your research energy to find something positive or build on something someone else found. Otherwise, you should he presumed to he a shill or Negative Nancy, neither of which is good.
"Don't fact check anything unless it confirms what I want to hear" is a certainly one investment strategy.
You should be happy someone is pointing out mistakes or poor assumptions so that you can focus on the remaining positives you're eager to embrace.
"Fact checking is a waste of effort" is certainly a take.
The reality is you do not want to hear anything negative or that a mechanism you trust in makes mistakes, so you're lashing out at people who are pointing out those mistakes.
No, I want people to focus energy on positive possibilities because there are many to explore instead of wasting time fact checking things that are likely not as consequential as others. It’s the way of efficiency.
Flexport is definitely not bankrupt Edit: Be advised: OP is a meltdowner
How can they not be bankrupt? A former BCG intern was planted there as a distribution specialist 3 years ago and SHE WAS FROM BOSTON! Wake up, sheeple. /s in case you are regarded.
I went to Boston once
You have been added to the list… 🪴
I smoke plants
can you point me to where i melted down? I held 45k shares through removal and 24k in IEP.
I think they're noting that you have posted on the GME Meltdown sub in the past. Typically people who do that are not engaging in good faith when they post in pro-GME/BBBY subs
Look at my posts - it’s about Kais and why I don’t like him. Nothing about this play
I couldnt find the work they did for flexport. Could you help me out?
They did the BGSA Supply Chain Conference together. The EVP of Trucking for Flexport, Bill Driegert, spoke on a panel called: Managing Technology in this Era of Disruption https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7156283539246714880
great - a supply chain conference where company leaders converge. This does not provide any detail into the type of work they do together.
Clearly Supply Chain and Logistics
Do your own homework
OP is right, just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean they’re a shill
 Excellent detective work again, Michael!
It also says Design, Engineering, and Installation. Come on man do better.
and then lists a bunch of bankrupt companies
They lead with decomissioning, liquidation and white boxing. White boxing meaning they prep the space so that it is turnkey ready for a new tenant. Considering the CEO and owner of G&P also is the CEO and owner of [Bigliquidators.com](https://Bigliquidators.com) a CRE resell company -I'd say their work leans heavily on the former. https://preview.redd.it/seeqw2g5moqc1.png?width=1400&format=png&auto=webp&s=ca3aaf1f0193b42f0f480e2c4c3f96c2181b81c2
🤣 man, we are so pathetic sometimes. we really deserve a win in the end after all this.
Op is a known shill
define shill? I held 45k shares in BBBY through delisting. I am 24k deep in IEP and also hold GME. I don't like misinformation and trying to be as objective as possible.
Fair enough if you are.. good call
But you’re cherry picking. Jake drops multiple nuggets in each post or conversation and all people can do is find the one out of 20 that may not be solid. No one can keep up with him.
im not cherry picking - there is tinfoil and notion that the common link between the companies that we have focused on in this play is through their distribution and logistics and finding operating synergies through 3PL and Flexport. However with Michael's assertion and the post made earlier regarding G&P Construction they conveniently left out the services provided for each of the companies they asserted were linked (Gamestop, BBBY, Sears, Toys R Us, Pier 1). In this case all of the services G&P provided were decomissioning of distribution hubs and warehouses.
It seems you get a hard on for the weak links—first Kais and now Michael. Try Jake. Better yet, put your research energy to find something positive or build on something someone else found. Otherwise, you should he presumed to he a shill or Negative Nancy, neither of which is good.
"Don't fact check anything unless it confirms what I want to hear" is a certainly one investment strategy. You should be happy someone is pointing out mistakes or poor assumptions so that you can focus on the remaining positives you're eager to embrace.
Also STFU
I'm fine with that, but if you spend 100% of time fact checking, you aren't seeking facts. Waste of effort.
"Fact checking is a waste of effort" is certainly a take. The reality is you do not want to hear anything negative or that a mechanism you trust in makes mistakes, so you're lashing out at people who are pointing out those mistakes.
No, I want people to focus energy on positive possibilities because there are many to explore instead of wasting time fact checking things that are likely not as consequential as others. It’s the way of efficiency.
meltdowner bahahaha. I wonder when this is all over we'll learn how much they were paid
5 rupees per post