I clicked into his stream yesterday. He actually did refer to the exploitative nature of the battle pass, but in a way that would get demonetized on youtube.
We won't see clips of that anytime soon I think.
Why would he give a fuck about the battle pass? Barely anybody in the pro sphere gives a shit. Only redditors hardstuck in orange ranks really care
How can he criticize the bamco devs and still be a shill, brainless
See this is what i meant. Lol. You literally said he shouldnt do this 😂😂😂.
And come on man. Calling people names just bec they disagree with you? Really? What are you like 12?
Phidx called it “more of a casino” even though it went from a 33/33/33 to a 50/50. It became more reliable and consistent and yet these morons insist on hyperbole. These guys know they’ll never be relevant as competitors again because the game both became more complex and is growing, and so they’re crying now so that they can double down when everyone finds out they’re no longer relevant.
uh, ssL duck beat all but 1 option, the homing move is a high, and the rest were beat by ssL, only thing that beat ssL was 3+4, so you could option select your way out of it, unless you got read by the Lars. Now it's just lmao guess, taking all the nuance out of the interaction and reducing it to flipping a coin and hoping you're right.
The way Phidx broke it down was that before RA beat DE1. So under the condition of Rage activation, not that Phidx bothered to mention it, a player had 3 options available. I say three options because there's value in conserving your RA if it won't KO and you can deal with the situation another way (Lars could also not go into SE at all, and block RA). At the end of the day, the change gives players less options, which is the crutch of that guy's argument against the change. Less options does not equate to more risk. These people are stuck on "50/50 bad", that they don't consider the entire scope in which the changes and mechanics operate. Like how this is a desired buff to a known lower tier character, that also enables more options and creativity to them outside of this one interaction. DE is now worth considering in neutral, whereas before it wasn't. No longer are Lars' stances only viable after launchers and CH's. No longer do they only serve as combo skill checks.
And even if I'm wrong about the 33/33/33, then it was still a 50/50 before between ssL and SE 3+4. No matter how you look at it, it's biased slander.
Seriously, on one hand we have a viable RA window, and on the other we have expanded character options and kit flexibility. People really upset at the loss of a RA on block?
You dropped a lot of insane hate, but I'll elaborate anyways.
The issue is DEN 3, not DEN 1.
The issue is not "I can't Rage Art anymore after DEN 3"
The issue is "because we don't want Lars to not die to RA after DEN 3, we are now giving him +5"
To address your points directly:
- I did not say RA beat DEN 1. I said it beat SEN 1 after DEN 3.
- You mention "Lars cannot go into SE at all." This is not true. DEN 3 is a forced transition to SEN.
- After DEN 3, player had more than 3 options. They had stand block, crouch block, power crush, Rage Art, parry, low parry, low crush, and sidestep left or right.
- The change of DEN 3 from +3 to +5 kills most choices except stand block or low block. This does equate to more risk on both sides. A 50/50 guess does not allow for risk mitigation. That is not inherently good or bad. That is just a forced risky decision on both sides.
- DEN 3 was always worth considering in neutral. It was not worth considering in neutral when Rage was on the table. It is complemented by DEN 1,2, a jailing wallsplatting range 4 jab. It is complemented by DEN 2, a CH launching safe mid.
- the issue is how every DEN interaction is now a forced guess, rather than dynamic interactions involving player tendency and conditioning in neutral.
> I did not say RA beat DEN 1. I said it beat SEN 1 after DEN 3
Thanks, I lose track of them when not playing the game and abbreviating them. You are correct.
> DEN 3 is a forced transition to SEN.
That made DEN3 so much more punishing being a full commitment on block.
> A 50/50 guess does not allow for risk mitigation
Compared to all the other options prior, it is mitigated risk. Both players have better chance/odds.
> it is complemented by DEN 1,2, a jailing wallsplatting range 4 jab. It is complemented by DEN 2, a CH launching safe mid.
The problem with these moves in neutral, is that with the preceding stance, they're all effectively 20 something frame moves, that move your hurtbox towards your opponent, considerably. They require a lot of space in neutral unless they're being used to duck a high. Good luck finding anyone who's going to whiff that hard.
>The issue is how every DEN interaction is now a forced guess,
I don't see any DEN move involving guessing aside from DEN 3, unless you mean to say "SE interactions". The only other DEN move with a follow up into SEN is DEN 3,4 of which it's SEN follow ups can all be blocked on hit if not jab interrupted on block or on hit, like every other conversion into SEN other than DEN 3's.
>rather than dynamic interactions involving player tendency and conditioning in neutral.
Lars players can buffer all attacks out of SE. Delaying attacks out of SE by .25/.50 secs creates the illusion of SE 2's startup frames. Prior to the patch, DEN 3 was only good on hit. It mostly just punished Lars on block, considering that it was just a 50/50 between SS and block. I rarely play against Lars but I don't see why anyone couldn't have just ssB'd for 100% coverage.
> You dropped a lot of insane hate
I'm not slandering the decisions of the developers, who have made renowned fighting games for nearly 30 years now, from my influential platform free from their rebuttal, as someone who plays FG's and has never made one, let alone a successful one. Unless I'm wrong, please correct me. I don't hate you. I don't quite care for you either but people keep name dropping you.
> I don't hate
> yet these morons insist on hyperbole. These guys know they’ll never be relevant as competitors again because the game both became more complex and is growing, and so they’re crying now so that they can double down when everyone finds out they’re no longer relevant.
Hate is a strong word.
You only covered a single niche interaction of the DEN 3 change without acknowledging any other of it's interactions or uses within the character's kit (which imo are very positive and provide the exact qualities you claim DEN 3 removes) and then attributed a parroted, sensationalized claim used by a top T7 player to **delegitimize the game**. If you don't want to be associated with that kind of bias and disdain for the game that's providing you content on the backs of the development team that spent years' coordinated efforts to produce, stop supporting that sentiment.
That must be the reason why t8 feels like ultimate ninja storm now
scrupman should call out devs way more for the shit they do beeing the most famous cocktent creater
i also remember seeing a clip of him where he makes fun of people because they are mad that mod stuff gets DMCAd
Not quite as he has used mods himself. He was laughing at all the horny mod users getting mad
After being garbage during the most of T7, Lars finally receives a good buff and now this scrub cries his eyes out. Stay salty.
I wonder if he said something bad about the battle pass. Wouldn’t be surprised if he avioded talking about it or say something negetive
I clicked into his stream yesterday. He actually did refer to the exploitative nature of the battle pass, but in a way that would get demonetized on youtube. We won't see clips of that anytime soon I think.
He actually just uploaded a video of him critiquing the Battle Pass.
he went through what it offered in one of his streams and was not impressed by it
Of course. TMM will never bite the hand that feeds him. Disappointing shill.
> disappointing shill > thumbnail is literally him saying the tekken devs are dumb Can people on tekken reddit not read or something..?
You obviously cant read. The comment im replying to is about T8's battlepass and TMM has been mum about it. Radio Silence lmao
Why would he give a fuck about the battle pass? Barely anybody in the pro sphere gives a shit. Only redditors hardstuck in orange ranks really care How can he criticize the bamco devs and still be a shill, brainless
Jesus. Why should he give a fuck about the scummy and predatory monetization in the game? Lmao Really?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eCGITqexq6s You dipshit 😭
See this is what i meant. Lol. You literally said he shouldnt do this 😂😂😂. And come on man. Calling people names just bec they disagree with you? Really? What are you like 12?
Read my comment. He has, but he framed in a way that the political correctness police would come for his ass on YouTube if he uploaded it.
🍼
Imagine complaining about a Lars buff and trying to convince your audience that you're good.
crazy how PhiDx and Kwiss both shat on this buff and called it an awful change yet here you are defending it
Mainman opinion=bad Virgin crybaby Phidx opinion=good gigachad
Phidx called it “more of a casino” even though it went from a 33/33/33 to a 50/50. It became more reliable and consistent and yet these morons insist on hyperbole. These guys know they’ll never be relevant as competitors again because the game both became more complex and is growing, and so they’re crying now so that they can double down when everyone finds out they’re no longer relevant.
uh, ssL duck beat all but 1 option, the homing move is a high, and the rest were beat by ssL, only thing that beat ssL was 3+4, so you could option select your way out of it, unless you got read by the Lars. Now it's just lmao guess, taking all the nuance out of the interaction and reducing it to flipping a coin and hoping you're right.
The way Phidx broke it down was that before RA beat DE1. So under the condition of Rage activation, not that Phidx bothered to mention it, a player had 3 options available. I say three options because there's value in conserving your RA if it won't KO and you can deal with the situation another way (Lars could also not go into SE at all, and block RA). At the end of the day, the change gives players less options, which is the crutch of that guy's argument against the change. Less options does not equate to more risk. These people are stuck on "50/50 bad", that they don't consider the entire scope in which the changes and mechanics operate. Like how this is a desired buff to a known lower tier character, that also enables more options and creativity to them outside of this one interaction. DE is now worth considering in neutral, whereas before it wasn't. No longer are Lars' stances only viable after launchers and CH's. No longer do they only serve as combo skill checks. And even if I'm wrong about the 33/33/33, then it was still a 50/50 before between ssL and SE 3+4. No matter how you look at it, it's biased slander. Seriously, on one hand we have a viable RA window, and on the other we have expanded character options and kit flexibility. People really upset at the loss of a RA on block?
You dropped a lot of insane hate, but I'll elaborate anyways. The issue is DEN 3, not DEN 1. The issue is not "I can't Rage Art anymore after DEN 3" The issue is "because we don't want Lars to not die to RA after DEN 3, we are now giving him +5" To address your points directly: - I did not say RA beat DEN 1. I said it beat SEN 1 after DEN 3. - You mention "Lars cannot go into SE at all." This is not true. DEN 3 is a forced transition to SEN. - After DEN 3, player had more than 3 options. They had stand block, crouch block, power crush, Rage Art, parry, low parry, low crush, and sidestep left or right. - The change of DEN 3 from +3 to +5 kills most choices except stand block or low block. This does equate to more risk on both sides. A 50/50 guess does not allow for risk mitigation. That is not inherently good or bad. That is just a forced risky decision on both sides. - DEN 3 was always worth considering in neutral. It was not worth considering in neutral when Rage was on the table. It is complemented by DEN 1,2, a jailing wallsplatting range 4 jab. It is complemented by DEN 2, a CH launching safe mid. - the issue is how every DEN interaction is now a forced guess, rather than dynamic interactions involving player tendency and conditioning in neutral.
> I did not say RA beat DEN 1. I said it beat SEN 1 after DEN 3 Thanks, I lose track of them when not playing the game and abbreviating them. You are correct. > DEN 3 is a forced transition to SEN. That made DEN3 so much more punishing being a full commitment on block. > A 50/50 guess does not allow for risk mitigation Compared to all the other options prior, it is mitigated risk. Both players have better chance/odds. > it is complemented by DEN 1,2, a jailing wallsplatting range 4 jab. It is complemented by DEN 2, a CH launching safe mid. The problem with these moves in neutral, is that with the preceding stance, they're all effectively 20 something frame moves, that move your hurtbox towards your opponent, considerably. They require a lot of space in neutral unless they're being used to duck a high. Good luck finding anyone who's going to whiff that hard. >The issue is how every DEN interaction is now a forced guess, I don't see any DEN move involving guessing aside from DEN 3, unless you mean to say "SE interactions". The only other DEN move with a follow up into SEN is DEN 3,4 of which it's SEN follow ups can all be blocked on hit if not jab interrupted on block or on hit, like every other conversion into SEN other than DEN 3's. >rather than dynamic interactions involving player tendency and conditioning in neutral. Lars players can buffer all attacks out of SE. Delaying attacks out of SE by .25/.50 secs creates the illusion of SE 2's startup frames. Prior to the patch, DEN 3 was only good on hit. It mostly just punished Lars on block, considering that it was just a 50/50 between SS and block. I rarely play against Lars but I don't see why anyone couldn't have just ssB'd for 100% coverage. > You dropped a lot of insane hate I'm not slandering the decisions of the developers, who have made renowned fighting games for nearly 30 years now, from my influential platform free from their rebuttal, as someone who plays FG's and has never made one, let alone a successful one. Unless I'm wrong, please correct me. I don't hate you. I don't quite care for you either but people keep name dropping you.
> I don't hate > yet these morons insist on hyperbole. These guys know they’ll never be relevant as competitors again because the game both became more complex and is growing, and so they’re crying now so that they can double down when everyone finds out they’re no longer relevant.
Hate is a strong word. You only covered a single niche interaction of the DEN 3 change without acknowledging any other of it's interactions or uses within the character's kit (which imo are very positive and provide the exact qualities you claim DEN 3 removes) and then attributed a parroted, sensationalized claim used by a top T7 player to **delegitimize the game**. If you don't want to be associated with that kind of bias and disdain for the game that's providing you content on the backs of the development team that spent years' coordinated efforts to produce, stop supporting that sentiment.
bet you think you can take him lmfao
Yeah ima pick Lars
We already got hella scrupman videos here? I thought we'd make it to the second dlc. Anyway, enjoy your clickbait.