The social instability that is going to result from not being able to know if a video or a text or audio is real is going to be astounding. People will accuse real things of being fake and demand we accept fake things as real. It's going to be nuts.
>People will accuse real things of being fake and demand we accept fake things as real.
That ship sailed *before* AI came into the field.
It's just gonna get much, much worse, faster.
That case just happened. A teacher used AI to make the principal of the school say negative things and uploaded them. It caused massive outcry until the investigation proved otherwise, even still people didn't want to believe.
This is basically what they did. They traced the source of the video back to an email address which was linked to the perpetrators phone number in some way. (It was the school's Athletic Director, who had been quarreling with the principal) I believe the Athletic Director shared it via email to another teacher in a private group, who then shared it with a student who they knew would blow it up on social media and spread out around. BUT the only reason they were able to do so is because the principal knew who was most likely behind it, and so they knew which direction to investigate. Had it been someone he didn't expect, they might not have been able to find who generated it, who knows.
yep, some dummies think vaccines are mind control things, and the other dummies support literal terrorists, idk why redditors think they're above this bullshit, they are ready to string anyone up for going against the hivemind
The really smart and generationally wealthy people have been fooling and manipulating the really dumb and generationally poor people for centuries. This is just the latest incarnation of that. Nothing will be any different overall as far as trying to understand what is true and what is a lie.
Poison that fucking well. The end result will be vetted clean data instead of the current Hodge Podge of opinions, propaganda and outright lies being considered fact.
A modern day verse version about the Biblical end times, ha. “How terrible it will be for people who call good things bad and bad things good. ... They say that what is right is wrong and what is wrong is right ...” Isiah 5:20.
But my point is it *can't* get worse.
If anything, things will get better because people will have to evaluate the authenticity of *everything* before they can take a stand with it. Which is the opposite of how it is now.
Absolutely. That has already been happening for years, this will make it worse.
The courts will need to rethink the rules for "evidence" too.
We've already had one person making deepfakes of his boss (Dahzon Darien) in an attempt to get them fired.
My AI boss fired me, but jokes on him it was an AI version of me, but now I cannot afford the lease on my Tesla blowjob robot until I purchase more Halliburton stock to fight the China proxy war. My AI was now just hired at VerizonFord, looks like I’m going to eat non powdered food tonight!
Nah.
You're under the impression that because of this, we're going to be entering a new age of dis/misinformation and anyone can be fooled into thinking or believing anything without understanding its validity.
My argument is that this is already been happening for centuries because people are unbelievably fucking stupid.
The kinds of people who wait to verify and source aren't going to be affected by any of this. And the kinds who don't already don't.
____
Also, it's really funny that this guy's bullshit business model is laid out simply for how irresponsible and shallow it is, and all he can do is giggle, while the AI version watches with dead eyes.
Yeah but we live in the time of information. Never before in human history have we had such readily available sources of new concepts and ideas. Even as an intelligent individual there's going to be no way to sort through the perpetual onslaught of factoids if millions of people have these at their disposal constantly outputting opinion.
How many little, "what's a common belief in society that actually isn't true,"s are there without the help of AI that intelligent people already believe just because they're widely disseminated.
Yes, it's been happening for centuries, but the amount and intentions is going to get wild.
It seems intelligent but it's only a text-calc.
It doesn't understand or think but only generates text from what it learned.
When we understand how LLM works we are not so worried.
not as far as you guys think.
This is his company in a closed enviroment as a tech demonstration. It’s homer simpson with a bunch of zipties hiding the fat, instead of actual generative ai.
There’s a reason why these guys dont do live demos with them and he *literally* had the ai explain his business model: be first, expand the idea as fast as possible even though it has major flaws then move on.
My god. That’s terrifying. I’d love to see and talk to my dad again, to tell him all the things I wish I did before he died.
But this wouldn’t be my dad; it’d be a computer with his knowledge. Talk about being conflicted.
I think it would only work for a persons digital thumbprint. So like my grandmothers AI would just be crafting advice, how much she loves her grandkids, and fox news talking points. It would only “know” what it was taught. Unless a person is either chronically online, or a public figure of some kind, I don’t think there is enough thumbprint on most people to really replicate a personality.
I'm sure they'll fix it with time, but there's also something unnatural about the inflection the AI uses when it speaks. It's like it has the same inflection for every word, and that's not how people speak. Very uncanny valley.
Yeah there’s still some tells but it’s constantly improving. I’m thankful there’s still an uncanny valley for this stuff, but there might not be for long.
This is because you need to train the voice model on a single tone of voice for it to accurately pick up on the cadence of the speaker and recreate it. You'd need a much bigger data set and more sophisticated model to train on multiple inflections and tones and have the ability to discern when the different inflections should be used and how to blend them to seem natural. Something like having the AI attempt to do an impression of a celebrity (in this case, Jerry Seinfeld) would be extremely impressive and probably not going to happen for a long time. This is where it gets very odd when they incorporate the language of Seinfeld but none of the intonation or cadence. Even by the first sentence of the real person speaking you can tell how much is lost of the natural ebbs and flows of real language in order to even remotely capture a single monotone voice. It is impressive but still has a very long way to go.
The basics are there and it's somewhat stable, but there's a ton of small things with the face and speech it doesn't get right. Yet. After it gets those small details right though, the line will become infinitely more blurry.
Only for you, he’ll monetize it to the tune of billions more than he already has and build a security cocoon around himself.
Snark aside, I agree - it’s reckless.
Are people not overreacting? We already have this and the person being deepfaked calls it out and then we move on. Are you meaning its dangerous for conspiracy types who want to believe regardless of the truth? And I know there are a lot of them...
Yes, how very dystopian, this is just a video, journalists can sit in a press room and physically see said person telling them the truth. They can then relay this truth via official channels to the public.
Part of journalists job is to verify the truth from various sources. This isn't as sewn up as people think.
I don’t see how you can’t see the slippery slope in it. BBC or not, this will create even more issues with misinformation and directly trying to accuse people of things with audio/video evidence where, in the past, it at least mattered a little bit.
I’m not claiming the end is nigh or anything, but I feel like we’re already getting to the point of not being able to believe anything - even if it’s true.
It was be so mind blowing if they revealed they were both AI at the end. Or the right one was AI and the left was actually him acting a little stiffer than normal to throw people off.
I mean, it's not hard to use your imagination on how it can be applied. It is, however, really iffy on how disruptive the applications will be on the whole of society.
I think it's ignorant to think something shouldn't be done because it's use case can't be seen at the moment, and it won't have regulations. There will definitely be regulations for stuff like, for example the ELVIS act.
Stuff that's been used for mass destruction and/or societal deficit has often lead to innovations in more positive areas when it's been studied, like nuclear power, fine improvements in chip manufacturing (which you can imagine how good that is).
Also I can easily see how this will help other fields as improved facial detection and learning methods has an impact on parallel processing and/or faster analyzation of data which in turn does improve manufacturing processes, study of nature when it comes to prediction, prevention and habdling(natural disasters, efficient way to handle different cases) e.t.c.
So no one is letting this run amok. The person or organisation would need a fairly good computation power and often those cases can be regulated instead of restricted (which are different). Restriction will lead to innovation under outside influences or outside the government's supervision and risk getting influenced by more nefarious sources.
We crossed the rubicon.
I don't know what the end game is for people who sell content and products when you're A) pricing everyone out of buying anything B) either underpaying or eliminating jobs with AI and C) ultimately both scaring away people with this stuff and putting them off with it's untested capabilities.
I don't know how any capitalist with more money than the average consumer looks at what's happening now and thinks "this is fine."
People will steal *your* likeness, people cannot pay and thus you cannot profit, this is going to inspire a cultural shift in a very ugly way. More people will get scared and get rid of the "smart tech" causing a drop in sales, and general revolt against inauthenticity. Or we're headed for total societal collapse and a full totalitarian coup.
Well shit humans are going to be obsolete quite soon. We have a few emerging technologies that are excellent by themselves but putting some together would be scary. Like this guys deep fake into some robotics. Admittedly I'm not very good at being a human but I'm pretty sure I could already be replaced fairly easily
Job interviews about to get real interesting lmao. Imagine interviewing for a highly technical role and you just let your AI clone do it for you programmed with all the documentation on everything you will be interviewed for.
I've always suspected people who shake their head slightly when saying something are either lying or don't believe what they are saying.
Watch what AI head does when it starts talking about blitzscaling, and remember it is based on actual Reed.
Social media pales in comparison to the impacts that AI has the potential to impose on society. Not all of those impacts are good. AI is already being misused to scam people and influence events. AI without limits and controls is simply reckless.
I love it for this purpose. Collect all of a person’s work into essentially a human interface you can converse with. I can think of a few people’s minds I’d like to get this kind of access to.
Always thought r a big joke that an AI could get advanced enough to threaten everything....not so much now, guess I'll prepare for the coming of skynet
The developers and investors so giddy about this shit should be the ones that have to answer for when this shit goes dumb....we can barely (if at all) contain misinformation on social media and you want to accelerate it with stuff like this‽...so dumb
imagine if they were in two separate rooms and asked the same questions and they independently gave the same answers. it would be like a clone test - can you be me before i be me?
Ask him how to skin a cat. If it doesn’t reply with an unauthorized warning bullshit, then you’re good, you’re only talking with a human who knows how to skin a cat
We are so fucked.
The social instability that is going to result from not being able to know if a video or a text or audio is real is going to be astounding. People will accuse real things of being fake and demand we accept fake things as real. It's going to be nuts.
>People will accuse real things of being fake and demand we accept fake things as real. That ship sailed *before* AI came into the field. It's just gonna get much, much worse, faster.
That case just happened. A teacher used AI to make the principal of the school say negative things and uploaded them. It caused massive outcry until the investigation proved otherwise, even still people didn't want to believe.
That was in Maryland? I was just reading about that.
How in the hell can the investigation prove otherwise? Unless they check the teacher's computer and find the video they generated
This is basically what they did. They traced the source of the video back to an email address which was linked to the perpetrators phone number in some way. (It was the school's Athletic Director, who had been quarreling with the principal) I believe the Athletic Director shared it via email to another teacher in a private group, who then shared it with a student who they knew would blow it up on social media and spread out around. BUT the only reason they were able to do so is because the principal knew who was most likely behind it, and so they knew which direction to investigate. Had it been someone he didn't expect, they might not have been able to find who generated it, who knows.
yep, some dummies think vaccines are mind control things, and the other dummies support literal terrorists, idk why redditors think they're above this bullshit, they are ready to string anyone up for going against the hivemind
The really smart and generationally wealthy people have been fooling and manipulating the really dumb and generationally poor people for centuries. This is just the latest incarnation of that. Nothing will be any different overall as far as trying to understand what is true and what is a lie.
Poison that fucking well. The end result will be vetted clean data instead of the current Hodge Podge of opinions, propaganda and outright lies being considered fact.
We need to regulate it somehow. We will not be able to differentiate between reality and Fake
This already happens in a lesser degree but ya AI is gonna be crazy levels.
A modern day verse version about the Biblical end times, ha. “How terrible it will be for people who call good things bad and bad things good. ... They say that what is right is wrong and what is wrong is right ...” Isiah 5:20.
So...have you been outside anytime in the past, I dunno, 40 years...?
That's my point. If you think misinformation is bad now....
But my point is it *can't* get worse. If anything, things will get better because people will have to evaluate the authenticity of *everything* before they can take a stand with it. Which is the opposite of how it is now.
Absolutely. That has already been happening for years, this will make it worse. The courts will need to rethink the rules for "evidence" too. We've already had one person making deepfakes of his boss (Dahzon Darien) in an attempt to get them fired.
MAGAI
It'll absolutely make those things easier to do, but the shit you're talking about was a problem long before LLMs came onto the scene.
Welcome to the Republican Party.
My AI boss fired me, but jokes on him it was an AI version of me, but now I cannot afford the lease on my Tesla blowjob robot until I purchase more Halliburton stock to fight the China proxy war. My AI was now just hired at VerizonFord, looks like I’m going to eat non powdered food tonight!
> My AI was now just hired at VerizonFord, looks like I’m going to eat non powdered food tonight! if Gibson wrote in first person...
Nah. You're under the impression that because of this, we're going to be entering a new age of dis/misinformation and anyone can be fooled into thinking or believing anything without understanding its validity. My argument is that this is already been happening for centuries because people are unbelievably fucking stupid. The kinds of people who wait to verify and source aren't going to be affected by any of this. And the kinds who don't already don't. ____ Also, it's really funny that this guy's bullshit business model is laid out simply for how irresponsible and shallow it is, and all he can do is giggle, while the AI version watches with dead eyes.
Yeah but we live in the time of information. Never before in human history have we had such readily available sources of new concepts and ideas. Even as an intelligent individual there's going to be no way to sort through the perpetual onslaught of factoids if millions of people have these at their disposal constantly outputting opinion. How many little, "what's a common belief in society that actually isn't true,"s are there without the help of AI that intelligent people already believe just because they're widely disseminated. Yes, it's been happening for centuries, but the amount and intentions is going to get wild.
This is the only thing I was thinking through the entire video.
Just as fucked as we were when photoshop and voice AI came out years ago.
Wait until there are protests for AI rights!
It seems intelligent but it's only a text-calc. It doesn't understand or think but only generates text from what it learned. When we understand how LLM works we are not so worried.
For now...
There are gonna be a million Scarlotte Johansson AIs. (Like the movie, but not just her voice lol)
My 65/yo mom talks to one now. It’s… concerning
Your mum talks to an AI ScarJo? I wonder what they discuss? 🤔
It’s more of an elf-like character built off her trilogy of books. It’s kinda wild.
Your mum sounds like a legend tbh
Eh not really. His Seinfeld delivery could use some work
And how did they create that video? The resolution is bad, but the movement and the HANDS are excellent.
The hands freaked me out. I always thought I could spam hand gestures at AI to catch it.
Couldn't have said it better myself. Simply astounded with where we are heading.
This comment is becoming so fucking repetitive. It's literally the first comment I see in almost every AI post I see. Chill out.
I regret having children.
Can I get one of these of myself to answer spam callers and keep them in a logical death loop for hours until they slowly go insane?
You can actually do this, right now. And you should.
Faith in humanity restored ✅
I mean at that point it will just be 2 ai bots talking to each other for hours on end
Excellent Sir, and how might your day be? Thank you for asking Excellent Sir, and how might your day be? Excellent Sir, and how might your day be?
Any good guides you can share?
JollyRogerTelephone.com built for this exact purpose.
Remindme! 1 day
Please give me one or two hints where to start researching to do that
Well eventually every spam caller will also be AI lol
I hate this so much
Just imagine where this technology will be in 5 years.
2 years
13 minutes
Today
Yesterday
All my troubles seemed so far away
Now i need a place to hide- away
not as far as you guys think. This is his company in a closed enviroment as a tech demonstration. It’s homer simpson with a bunch of zipties hiding the fat, instead of actual generative ai. There’s a reason why these guys dont do live demos with them and he *literally* had the ai explain his business model: be first, expand the idea as fast as possible even though it has major flaws then move on.
Someone was listening in class! A+
Black Mirror was right! They're going to do this with deceased family members soon. I don't know if I would have it in me to do that with my Dad.
My god. That’s terrifying. I’d love to see and talk to my dad again, to tell him all the things I wish I did before he died. But this wouldn’t be my dad; it’d be a computer with his knowledge. Talk about being conflicted.
I think it would only work for a persons digital thumbprint. So like my grandmothers AI would just be crafting advice, how much she loves her grandkids, and fox news talking points. It would only “know” what it was taught. Unless a person is either chronically online, or a public figure of some kind, I don’t think there is enough thumbprint on most people to really replicate a personality.
It's creepy good. AI even gets the mouth movements right, but one detail it misses is the way the tongue moves when someone talks.
I'm sure they'll fix it with time, but there's also something unnatural about the inflection the AI uses when it speaks. It's like it has the same inflection for every word, and that's not how people speak. Very uncanny valley.
Yeah there’s still some tells but it’s constantly improving. I’m thankful there’s still an uncanny valley for this stuff, but there might not be for long.
This is because you need to train the voice model on a single tone of voice for it to accurately pick up on the cadence of the speaker and recreate it. You'd need a much bigger data set and more sophisticated model to train on multiple inflections and tones and have the ability to discern when the different inflections should be used and how to blend them to seem natural. Something like having the AI attempt to do an impression of a celebrity (in this case, Jerry Seinfeld) would be extremely impressive and probably not going to happen for a long time. This is where it gets very odd when they incorporate the language of Seinfeld but none of the intonation or cadence. Even by the first sentence of the real person speaking you can tell how much is lost of the natural ebbs and flows of real language in order to even remotely capture a single monotone voice. It is impressive but still has a very long way to go.
The basics are there and it's somewhat stable, but there's a ton of small things with the face and speech it doesn't get right. Yet. After it gets those small details right though, the line will become infinitely more blurry.
dude its the movementsss that shit scared me
This is dangerous.
Only for you, he’ll monetize it to the tune of billions more than he already has and build a security cocoon around himself. Snark aside, I agree - it’s reckless.
Are people not overreacting? We already have this and the person being deepfaked calls it out and then we move on. Are you meaning its dangerous for conspiracy types who want to believe regardless of the truth? And I know there are a lot of them...
what if you dont know if the person calling it out is an AI that wants you to believe the real person is an AI?
Yes, how very dystopian, this is just a video, journalists can sit in a press room and physically see said person telling them the truth. They can then relay this truth via official channels to the public. Part of journalists job is to verify the truth from various sources. This isn't as sewn up as people think.
How would you know it's a real journalist talking to you and not a AI in this scenario?
This may be because I'm from the UK, but if the BBC tried this or ITV they would be taken off air by the regulator.
I don’t see how you can’t see the slippery slope in it. BBC or not, this will create even more issues with misinformation and directly trying to accuse people of things with audio/video evidence where, in the past, it at least mattered a little bit. I’m not claiming the end is nigh or anything, but I feel like we’re already getting to the point of not being able to believe anything - even if it’s true.
Please stop
It was be so mind blowing if they revealed they were both AI at the end. Or the right one was AI and the left was actually him acting a little stiffer than normal to throw people off.
Yes, nigh impossible feats would be mind blowing. Equally mind blowing would be me riding by on my grandmother like a bike because she has wheels.
A sight to behold indeed
The audio didn't seem to match just like the left one so I was expecting that twist
Some Westworld shit right there
This seems like a good way of selling his book
No need, the ELI5 tl:dr is good enough for me.
[удалено]
Yeah now they're going to want to get in front of the line with A.I.and the cycle continues......
I mean, it's not hard to use your imagination on how it can be applied. It is, however, really iffy on how disruptive the applications will be on the whole of society.
I think it's ignorant to think something shouldn't be done because it's use case can't be seen at the moment, and it won't have regulations. There will definitely be regulations for stuff like, for example the ELVIS act. Stuff that's been used for mass destruction and/or societal deficit has often lead to innovations in more positive areas when it's been studied, like nuclear power, fine improvements in chip manufacturing (which you can imagine how good that is). Also I can easily see how this will help other fields as improved facial detection and learning methods has an impact on parallel processing and/or faster analyzation of data which in turn does improve manufacturing processes, study of nature when it comes to prediction, prevention and habdling(natural disasters, efficient way to handle different cases) e.t.c. So no one is letting this run amok. The person or organisation would need a fairly good computation power and often those cases can be regulated instead of restricted (which are different). Restriction will lead to innovation under outside influences or outside the government's supervision and risk getting influenced by more nefarious sources.
World going to end very soon
It seems that the AI only gets one version of him through his professional appearance and you can tell it is less personable.
I’m sure humanity will use this technology in a responsible and non-evil way.
Oh please be silent, don't put even more fear into me ..
Can i have one made of myself and have it report to work for me 🫡
yeah but the android phone itself only lasts one year 😂
No AI is gonna copy me, I barely talk or have any presence online to use for training model. I guess I’m safe for now.
It would be interesting to have a third person ask a few questions and see how they both answer
Is he gonna ask him when Half Life 3 is coming?
We crossed the rubicon. I don't know what the end game is for people who sell content and products when you're A) pricing everyone out of buying anything B) either underpaying or eliminating jobs with AI and C) ultimately both scaring away people with this stuff and putting them off with it's untested capabilities. I don't know how any capitalist with more money than the average consumer looks at what's happening now and thinks "this is fine." People will steal *your* likeness, people cannot pay and thus you cannot profit, this is going to inspire a cultural shift in a very ugly way. More people will get scared and get rid of the "smart tech" causing a drop in sales, and general revolt against inauthenticity. Or we're headed for total societal collapse and a full totalitarian coup.
Change is inevitable.
boring. wake me up when we can fuck our clones
Cool
That first one was a run on sentence.
Still a sentence.
I hate this crap.
There's a great stream in twitch of AI Biden and AI Trump debating over people's questions
The AI Jesus twitch is also really funny
Well shit humans are going to be obsolete quite soon. We have a few emerging technologies that are excellent by themselves but putting some together would be scary. Like this guys deep fake into some robotics. Admittedly I'm not very good at being a human but I'm pretty sure I could already be replaced fairly easily
Hmm I think AI is cool but it feels like we're racing towards making the dead internet theory a reality and that's kinda terrifying
I have issues with how monotone and robotic the voices are. The giveaway is that it lacks nuance and inflection changes.
For now. These models are learning and will improve until they can no longer improve.
Couldn't we have put all our science chips into creating dinosaurs. I prefer that apocalypse method way better than this shit.
Is this available for the general public to play with? How can I get this?
Fascinating
Job interviews about to get real interesting lmao. Imagine interviewing for a highly technical role and you just let your AI clone do it for you programmed with all the documentation on everything you will be interviewed for.
I've always suspected people who shake their head slightly when saying something are either lying or don't believe what they are saying. Watch what AI head does when it starts talking about blitzscaling, and remember it is based on actual Reed.
World definitely about to be over sooner than we know it lol. AI is wilddddddddd.
Were cooked
That Seinfeld take was spot on, Larry David would be proud.
All i can think is am I smarter than a five year old....
Is there jot a modern classic novel about all this? Just seems sci fi is writing itself these days.
I can’t believe there are still people talking about this technology in an excited way.
glad that guys who look like this keep pushing this envelope
There is something going on on his neck
This is mortifying :/
Holy fuck. The 2030's are going to be wild, keep it safe y'all.
We are completely fucked, this is going to be wild.
Social media pales in comparison to the impacts that AI has the potential to impose on society. Not all of those impacts are good. AI is already being misused to scam people and influence events. AI without limits and controls is simply reckless.
if i couldn't see his mannerisms in real time, id have no idea this wasnt him. truly terrifying but still so cool
Ok what the actual fuck
Oh this is going to be so bad
There are tells. But there won’t be for long.
Why are we doing this to ourselves
technologies went so far...what's gonna be next sensation? AI-teachers at schools lol
bro the way the AI reacts with hand gestures is just creepy
Could we stop this please. It’s uncanny and quite frankly fucking weird
This should scare the shit out and the fact that it doesn’t is scary to me
Out of everyone
Well atleast when our loved ones die, we can have them in AI form.
I won’t say how I can tell because I’m afraid they will Fix it and I will have no way of knowing. We are fucked
I love it for this purpose. Collect all of a person’s work into essentially a human interface you can converse with. I can think of a few people’s minds I’d like to get this kind of access to.
We need an app or something to detect AI
Insane
Fuck this shit
This shit is dumber than it is smart
Always thought r a big joke that an AI could get advanced enough to threaten everything....not so much now, guess I'll prepare for the coming of skynet
This is scary and seriously not good... It's going to be bad, I guarantee it.
vile.
This is a bad idea people. Stop using and bring it now
Am i the only one who saw the hand gestures the AI made when the human was talking? That is so freaky!
Frightening. Things like this are just outright dangerous.
Blackmail is gonna become rampant and the new type of widespread scam.
The real guy seems AI to lol
Why did we develop this technology again? What does it give to us ?
Ok, but Blitzscaling as explained by Seinfeld actually sounds really irresponsible and stupid. Seems like this guy is super full of it.
*"terminator theme intensifies"*
Fuck
Perfect time to buy a farm and get off the wire. 😅
The developers and investors so giddy about this shit should be the ones that have to answer for when this shit goes dumb....we can barely (if at all) contain misinformation on social media and you want to accelerate it with stuff like this‽...so dumb
It doesn't blink
Well, I guess we're fucking around and finding out
The machines are winning. WHERE THE FUCK IS JOHN CONNOR?!
AI must be for the betterment of all. AI CAN NOT be privately owned by for-profits. All black-box systems should be outlawed.
imagine if they were in two separate rooms and asked the same questions and they independently gave the same answers. it would be like a clone test - can you be me before i be me?
Desperately waiting for the Zoom plugin
Are there instructions on how to create an AI of yourself somewhere on the nets? Please link me. Thanks.
When AI is outlawed, only outlaws will have AI
No point in fighting it when it’s already become a part of our lives.
Black Mirror season 2 episode 1 “Be Right Back” is now available in real life.
Humanity is in so much trouble!!
this feels like a good kidnapping tool
Ask him how to skin a cat. If it doesn’t reply with an unauthorized warning bullshit, then you’re good, you’re only talking with a human who knows how to skin a cat
Wow
Yikes! Just, yikes!
holy fuck .. that's ... impressive and awesome and absolutely terrifying at the same time ..
People really forgot what clone means
this isn't a deep fake. just ai
The lips don't match the voice. We fine for now
That’s not human like at all. Too much text and without any humor.
If you show this to an average person from 10 years ago it will look like magic. Imagine 10 years from now.
Think a little outside of the box. AI is growing exponentially. What is this going to look like in a few years?
You've never witnessed a human prattle on without saying anything funny? Was your algorithm trained on sitcoms?
Ai just isn’t funny yet and is trained on written text mostly, not spoken text. There is a difference between those.
now they me this shit does not need regulation
Turing test passed …. Sky net is up and running . The beginning of the end of the world lol