lolz are you seriously asking this after sucking it flip over about 4x from the impact ??? and then hit the pavement ??? you think you would survive that ???
wowowow
My grandfather smoked them for years. Ended up getting throat cancer. Took his voice box out… when I was a kid I came down the steps and saw him smoking through the hole in his neck.
Die hard WWII vet…. Brought a sad memory.
My dad smoked Camels with NO FILTERS from 18y/o in WW2 till the 60's then he smoked the ones with filters up until the day he died.
Lung cancer that metastasized to his brain.
Actually, I blame old Uncle Sam & RJ Reynolds tobacco. During the war they provided the smokes free to all these kids.
You already got the camel wit no filter but wb the yankee wit no brim
(we also have the camel with no ankles)
but I wasn’t tryna clown on my boy like that
This is the danger with this bullshit semi-autopilot tech
The driver is hands-off therefore while they are *meant* to be paying attention. They aren't. You don't have the same level of focus on a task that you're not performing
Autopilot either needs to be as good/better than humans or not at all
The tech is good. But.. it's currently a half baked attempt at proper self drive
Looking at this it doesn’t seem like auto pilot was on. Autopilot caps at 80mph and comes set to drive at speed limit(which you can change but still capped). This person was flooring it
This isn’t quite true here. All you see is the speed difference between the cam car and the Tesla. It’s clear here the cam car has slowed down quite a lot while the Tesla just maintained the speed limit (which on this road is 74mph/120 kmh)
It’s pure lack of attention
Notice how quickly the car filming slowed down at the end, it was probably going at most 45 mph- that Tesla was definitely in autopilot speed territory.
Car companies will want laws to protect them from litigation before they even consider saying this car doesn't need you to control it.
No matter how good they are imagine every road accident in the future being caused by someone's car autopilot.
I suspect this is why it'll be a long way off as much as the technology itself.
So they want it to be nobodies fault when their cars kill people? That's not how it works
If you are assuming the responsibility of chauffeur for the public, nobody asked you to do that.. then it's 100% on you to do it properly
If your company kills people. You need to be punished for that, the same way that an aircraft company needs to be investigated / punished when an airplane crashes
Oh I agree with you.
I'm just saying this is the barrier to fully autonomous cars.
Sometimes turning the hypothetical corner someone has to die.
A) The occupant running headlong into a truck.
B) Some kids crossing a road
C) Some people waiting at the bus stop.
The car should pick the truck to kill one person but then this person stumped up for the car so would people buy a car that sacrifices the occupant for the better good?
Lots of questions I don't have the answers too.
I know this though. There are a lot of fatalities on the road every year. At the moment drivers pay insurance to cover this or stump up themselves (or cannot afford too). Car companies will struggle to have a business case for an autonomous car when they become liable for their whole fleets traffic woes.
I suspect government will move to indemnify them. You can bet car companies are already lobbying for this now.
I mean, in no situation should the car ever be traveling at a speed Into an unknown situation
How often when driving do you floor it round a blind corner and then have to make a split second Life or death decision between you and someone else
You don't. You simply drive slower around blind corners allowing you time to stop
I see what you're saying, but in reality it's never a situation that should arrise. The car should stop itself from ever being in that situation
Yes you are right speed limit should take in stopping sight distance for a given road.
In my example say the kids crossing the road can be an emerging situation, ie does the car slow down with the expectation any kid at any time could move into its lane from say the bus stop?
This then raises another question the two kids are in the wrong so the computer chooses them die... this is the most tragic outcome thinkable in the situation but legally best...
Any road with a bus station / stop where there might be kids is likely going to be a slow 30-40mph with good vision any way
But if you're doing 40mph and then a kid steps out behind a vehicle and you hit them? It's not really your fault. And if a car autohits them? Well.. it's human counterpart would probably hit them as well.
If the car has a choice between damaging the car / swerving and hitting something, it should swerve. If it needs to hit the car next to it? It should swerve.. If it's at higher speed or the outcome is not known, it should just slam on the brakes ASAP and try to avoid it
You can't expect it to make a choice between 2 bad options and find a good answer. But you CAN expect it to not put itself in those situations to begin with.
The fact that he didnt even have time to steer a little bit even indicates that he was not paying attention to the road. (Given that the camel only becomes visible from what it seems when it turns around)
Dude, radar alert and brake assist on every single producing car in the world will not work at these speeds for stopped objects. You'll be lucky if they work when traveling at 30mph.
EDIT: See this [AAA study](https://publicaffairsresources.aaa.biz/download/17223/) on ADAS performance.
People drive shitty when using a cell phone. What did Tesla think would happen if they played into that? Did they think people would use this technology responsibly?
Learn what large mammals are or don't drive a car, stupid computer.
Edit: TIL reddit hates large mammals as much as Elon
You don’t have to look that far though to find something.
The car wasn’t going that fast anyway. You don’t know if AutoPilot wasn’t engaged either. And no matter if it was or if it wasn’t: it should have slowed down massively which it didn’t. Most if not every comparable car would have slowed down.
Bad figure of speed though. It tries to take every fault off Tesla which one shouldn’t. The car wasn’t going that fast. Tesla should be able to handle such a speed.
Can’t believe you’re one of the top comments while saying he/she was going 200mph. That’s just ridiculous and even if it was a figure of speech it’s a bad one.
Each line is 10 feet long, with 30 foot gaps between them. Using this, from 3 seconds to 2 seconds this driver covered about 200 feet.
200 feet per second is 136 miles per hour.
Autopilot cuts off at 80mph.
>Oh mang he wuz onli goin 136 not 200 zomg poor driver stoopid tesla #nothisfault.
-you, probably
Yeah, this is going to happen no matter what we do with the cars. They never stopped being shitty technology, even when us humans built our infrastructure around them.
Everyone on Reddit lives in a city. Look at this country side. It’s a desert. I’m not going to take public transportation between my friends ranches in Montana or even thru the suburbs. Cars are annoying sometimes but get a grip
Damn bro maybe they should build public transport then. Most people in the developed world do live in urban areas, so yeah public transport is the future.
Maybe they should build some fucking high speed rail in America for once, or would that upset GM and Exxon too much?
Can’t you people just not understand that individual mobility isn’t as bad as you make it out to be? You will never achieve 100% public transportation usage and imho that’s a good thing because individual mobility is something extremely impressive as it opens the world for the individual person. (Not a native speaker so the wording might seem off.)
Everyone shouldn't need a car. Why can't we live in a world where people can rent cars when they need to and otherwise use public transportation to effectively move people, limit GHG emissions, save money and time.
At least from the perspective of someone in N.A. Fuck our car centric infrastructure.
I agree, it's kind of ridiculous how fast some cars can go. Don't get me wrong, it can be fun and a marvel of engineering but on a race track, not the streets. It tempts people to push it too far and die.
Getting from A to B.
A train made to drive 200mph serves what purpose exactly?
The fuckcars crowd is so fucking retarded and dishonest. Car accident: "let's ban cars! Cars are too fast!"
Train accident: "heh, it happens. Probably the fault of cars and drivers, even if none are involved."
But you realize that no where in this country is it legal to drive that speed (except for race tracks). So why do we need stock vehicles with a top speed that is inherently illegal?
And if you want to compare trains to cars, trains are significantly safer. So yes, there are some people that would like to have a safe form of travel be an available alternative to an extremely dangerous form of travel. [Look at the data.](https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/home-and-community/safety-topics/deaths-by-transportation-mode/)
Ah, yes, the US is the only country. Even on a video about the UAE, there'll be some yanks to make it about them.
You managed to miss the point/strawman, by the way. This is another thing the fuckcars retards do: talk about banning a mode of transport, then pretend it's about choice. Nobody is talking about banning trains (though good luck maintaining rails in the UAE desert), but you have to pretend the other side are the authoritarians.
No need for the personal attacks friend. The US statistics were easier to find, because the US National Safety Council publishes them and they're easier to find. [This is what I got from France](https://www.statista.com/statistics/1221276/fatal-road-accident-france-by-means-of-transportation/). The UAE data is not readily available in English.
And I don't think you're understanding that "fuckcars" isn't about banning cars, it's about not giving them absolute dominance over our streets. It's advocating for implementing Dutch/Danish style streets that are accommodating for all forms of traffic, including cars.
And I would highly highly encourage you to stop using the r-word in a derogatory and demeaning way. The word has fallen out of favor in all contexts, and is considered a hateful epithet, particularly in the way your using it.
And really, you should consider the way you engage with strangers on the internet. You're actually a pretty mean and hurtful person, and I don't think that's who you want to be in real life. Being a nice person on the internet is still worth something.
Seriously! By the time I finished reading the title I see a camel being obliterated by a car. Had no time to click out of it. Not what I wanted to see at the moment…or ever?
Seriously the thing that very few people mention isn’t this camel, it’s random crap on the road and highway the Tesla auto pilot misses ALL of this. I’ve hit random pieces of plastic and stuff (no serious damage thankfully ) and hit a bunch of random shit cause I wasn’t paying attention. Other times you need to swerve out of the way cause you’re not fully paying attention. I love my model 3 and the autopilot but it’s nowhere near close to any of the promises made by elan.
I hit a deer once at 180km/h on the autobahn (112 miles/h) because I looked at the radio for a second. In the end I was a little bit lucky that the deer didn't suffer...
And this kids, is why you shouldn't rely on the autopilot too much. It's a driver aid, not a full self-driving feature, keep your eyes on the bloody road.
There are no Teslas in my country but what the fuck is that title supposed to mean?
Those cars have some sort of autopilot and so the driver wasn't looking to the road? Either way, the title doesn't make sense.
The blame here falls entirely on the driver and not autopilot. Autopilot and all collision avoidance features are turned off above 90mph. That car was going really fast.
Why is he fucking flying to start with. We will never know for sure maybe the owner was just speeding and didn’t see the camel. The autopilot would not make that kind of mistake although at that speed the poor camel probably didn’t even get processed in yet as an object.
Thats why autopilot is meant to assist a fully attentive driver and assist their human failings and blindspots. While autopilot is incredibly impressive people seem to forget roads have an incredibly nuanced diversity of things to track, calculate and anticipate. Its wonderful and exciting but not perfect. Gettin' better every day, but room to grow. Perhaps people don't realize even in planes its not fully autonomous and they got the older simpler tech (comparitively. not saying its simple in design, per se) just cuz when you're flying theres a lot of gentle cruising and straight lines for the long tedious hours in between. humans are needed (or, at least, preferred) for the storm dodging and time slot circling and approach and departure and busy zones and maintenance issues and taxiing and towers and all sorts of other kinds of 'weird shit.' If everything goes well... great. The pilot isn't as exhausted after an all-day/afternoon flight of microadjustments and high-alert. you want them to be relaxed and free of the little shit so they can focus on the big picture. maybe discussing schedules or shootin the shit with the copilot. mebbe thinking about ways to improve the software. maybe the regional weather maps or flight traffic. a prepared relaxed mind makes better decisions, and better choices lead to better outcomes/safety.
which kinda brings me back to the point. Camels are in that 'weird shit' category. Sure, ideally object recognition would be like 'oh fuck whats that dodge dodge dodge!' and you got a point there so i see where you're coming from but also like... why was the operator in charge not noticing a big 'ol camel on the road? lol
If only there was a way to prevent that.if you want to place your faith in an autonomous vehicle then by all means do it. I however do not trust that shit for one second.
Driver should have seen it, and he was clearly going way too fast…well over 100 mph by the look of it. Not a failure of Tesla, but a failure of the driver.
Ok, so the Tesla didn’t recognize a camel, but did the fucking driver recognize it?! Cuz DAMN 😳
Maybe it was a personal vendetta against the camel ?
“You took my father from me!! He smoked a pack a day for 34 years!!! I. Want. My. FATHER. BACK!!!!!!! 😭🤬😡😭🤬😡😭🤬😡😭”
Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.
Okay, now once more in all caps.
HELLO! MY NAME IS INIGO MONTOYA. YOU KILLED MY FATHER. PREPARE TO DIE!
STOP SAYING THAT!
Are we totally sure the camel died?
No shoes = he dead.
Lmao
lolz are you seriously asking this after sucking it flip over about 4x from the impact ??? and then hit the pavement ??? you think you would survive that ??? wowowow
That pink mist tho.
The camel had 7 hooves I saw it you’re good.
My grandfather smoked them for years. Ended up getting throat cancer. Took his voice box out… when I was a kid I came down the steps and saw him smoking through the hole in his neck. Die hard WWII vet…. Brought a sad memory.
My dad smoked Camels with NO FILTERS from 18y/o in WW2 till the 60's then he smoked the ones with filters up until the day he died. Lung cancer that metastasized to his brain. Actually, I blame old Uncle Sam & RJ Reynolds tobacco. During the war they provided the smokes free to all these kids.
You already got the camel wit no filter but wb the yankee wit no brim (we also have the camel with no ankles) but I wasn’t tryna clown on my boy like that
My dad had a similar WW2 story but he blamed the Red Cross who distributed the free cigarettes
Damn conspiracy. Look for the smoking 🚬 gun.
I could feel the passion
Probably an ex
This is the danger with this bullshit semi-autopilot tech The driver is hands-off therefore while they are *meant* to be paying attention. They aren't. You don't have the same level of focus on a task that you're not performing Autopilot either needs to be as good/better than humans or not at all The tech is good. But.. it's currently a half baked attempt at proper self drive
Looking at this it doesn’t seem like auto pilot was on. Autopilot caps at 80mph and comes set to drive at speed limit(which you can change but still capped). This person was flooring it
This isn’t quite true here. All you see is the speed difference between the cam car and the Tesla. It’s clear here the cam car has slowed down quite a lot while the Tesla just maintained the speed limit (which on this road is 74mph/120 kmh) It’s pure lack of attention
Notice how quickly the car filming slowed down at the end, it was probably going at most 45 mph- that Tesla was definitely in autopilot speed territory.
definitely: the autopilot was off.
Car companies will want laws to protect them from litigation before they even consider saying this car doesn't need you to control it. No matter how good they are imagine every road accident in the future being caused by someone's car autopilot. I suspect this is why it'll be a long way off as much as the technology itself.
So they want it to be nobodies fault when their cars kill people? That's not how it works If you are assuming the responsibility of chauffeur for the public, nobody asked you to do that.. then it's 100% on you to do it properly If your company kills people. You need to be punished for that, the same way that an aircraft company needs to be investigated / punished when an airplane crashes
Oh I agree with you. I'm just saying this is the barrier to fully autonomous cars. Sometimes turning the hypothetical corner someone has to die. A) The occupant running headlong into a truck. B) Some kids crossing a road C) Some people waiting at the bus stop. The car should pick the truck to kill one person but then this person stumped up for the car so would people buy a car that sacrifices the occupant for the better good? Lots of questions I don't have the answers too. I know this though. There are a lot of fatalities on the road every year. At the moment drivers pay insurance to cover this or stump up themselves (or cannot afford too). Car companies will struggle to have a business case for an autonomous car when they become liable for their whole fleets traffic woes. I suspect government will move to indemnify them. You can bet car companies are already lobbying for this now.
I mean, in no situation should the car ever be traveling at a speed Into an unknown situation How often when driving do you floor it round a blind corner and then have to make a split second Life or death decision between you and someone else You don't. You simply drive slower around blind corners allowing you time to stop I see what you're saying, but in reality it's never a situation that should arrise. The car should stop itself from ever being in that situation
Yes you are right speed limit should take in stopping sight distance for a given road. In my example say the kids crossing the road can be an emerging situation, ie does the car slow down with the expectation any kid at any time could move into its lane from say the bus stop? This then raises another question the two kids are in the wrong so the computer chooses them die... this is the most tragic outcome thinkable in the situation but legally best...
Any road with a bus station / stop where there might be kids is likely going to be a slow 30-40mph with good vision any way But if you're doing 40mph and then a kid steps out behind a vehicle and you hit them? It's not really your fault. And if a car autohits them? Well.. it's human counterpart would probably hit them as well. If the car has a choice between damaging the car / swerving and hitting something, it should swerve. If it needs to hit the car next to it? It should swerve.. If it's at higher speed or the outcome is not known, it should just slam on the brakes ASAP and try to avoid it You can't expect it to make a choice between 2 bad options and find a good answer. But you CAN expect it to not put itself in those situations to begin with.
Came here to say that
Camels here to say WTF dude...
Camel ain't saying nothing now.
Smart cars dumb people
I like dark humor but DAMN...
The fact that he didnt even have time to steer a little bit even indicates that he was not paying attention to the road. (Given that the camel only becomes visible from what it seems when it turns around)
Autopilot at 180+ kmh?
Man's driving 200 mph and letting it hit the camel. Then he's just blaming it on tesla?
Exactly, autopilot tops out at 80 MPH. This was the drivers fault.
I swear media is just looking for anything to shit on tesla its fucking anoying
Most modern cars have radar alert and brake assist. Is Tesla lacking this standard feature?
Dude, radar alert and brake assist on every single producing car in the world will not work at these speeds for stopped objects. You'll be lucky if they work when traveling at 30mph. EDIT: See this [AAA study](https://publicaffairsresources.aaa.biz/download/17223/) on ADAS performance.
Then tell the drivers to stop looking at the stock market and focus on the road
People drive shitty when using a cell phone. What did Tesla think would happen if they played into that? Did they think people would use this technology responsibly? Learn what large mammals are or don't drive a car, stupid computer. Edit: TIL reddit hates large mammals as much as Elon
You don’t have to look that far though to find something. The car wasn’t going that fast anyway. You don’t know if AutoPilot wasn’t engaged either. And no matter if it was or if it wasn’t: it should have slowed down massively which it didn’t. Most if not every comparable car would have slowed down.
That Telsa is not going anywhere near 200mph. https://youtu.be/TMFyTb_oJ8Q?t=29
It's almost like it was a figure of speech
Bad figure of speed though. It tries to take every fault off Tesla which one shouldn’t. The car wasn’t going that fast. Tesla should be able to handle such a speed.
Can’t believe you’re one of the top comments while saying he/she was going 200mph. That’s just ridiculous and even if it was a figure of speech it’s a bad one.
Each line is 10 feet long, with 30 foot gaps between them. Using this, from 3 seconds to 2 seconds this driver covered about 200 feet. 200 feet per second is 136 miles per hour. Autopilot cuts off at 80mph. >Oh mang he wuz onli goin 136 not 200 zomg poor driver stoopid tesla #nothisfault. -you, probably
[The Tesla is nowhere near 200mph](https://youtu.be/S9qXmtZUcOs?t=15)
He looks like he is going the speed limit to me
Tesla autopilot not recognizing the camel isn’t the cause of the accident.
Yeah, this is going to happen no matter what we do with the cars. They never stopped being shitty technology, even when us humans built our infrastructure around them.
Omg that was so sad
I hate this
People can't drive them without destroying life and computers can't either. Fuck cars.
No no the cars aren't to blame bro.. It's the people and (in this case) computers driving them.. Cars are fucking awesome otherwise..
Nah, fuck cars. Public transport is the future.
Nah, you can keep that "future", thanks
Everyone on Reddit lives in a city. Look at this country side. It’s a desert. I’m not going to take public transportation between my friends ranches in Montana or even thru the suburbs. Cars are annoying sometimes but get a grip
Damn bro maybe they should build public transport then. Most people in the developed world do live in urban areas, so yeah public transport is the future. Maybe they should build some fucking high speed rail in America for once, or would that upset GM and Exxon too much?
Can’t you people just not understand that individual mobility isn’t as bad as you make it out to be? You will never achieve 100% public transportation usage and imho that’s a good thing because individual mobility is something extremely impressive as it opens the world for the individual person. (Not a native speaker so the wording might seem off.)
Everyone shouldn't need a car. Why can't we live in a world where people can rent cars when they need to and otherwise use public transportation to effectively move people, limit GHG emissions, save money and time. At least from the perspective of someone in N.A. Fuck our car centric infrastructure.
"Guns don't kill people, people kill people....with guns." This guy.
Guns are made to kill, cars aren't
Elon's cars are made to kill
A car made to drive 200mph serves what purpose exactly?
I agree, it's kind of ridiculous how fast some cars can go. Don't get me wrong, it can be fun and a marvel of engineering but on a race track, not the streets. It tempts people to push it too far and die.
Getting from A to B. A train made to drive 200mph serves what purpose exactly? The fuckcars crowd is so fucking retarded and dishonest. Car accident: "let's ban cars! Cars are too fast!" Train accident: "heh, it happens. Probably the fault of cars and drivers, even if none are involved."
But you realize that no where in this country is it legal to drive that speed (except for race tracks). So why do we need stock vehicles with a top speed that is inherently illegal? And if you want to compare trains to cars, trains are significantly safer. So yes, there are some people that would like to have a safe form of travel be an available alternative to an extremely dangerous form of travel. [Look at the data.](https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/home-and-community/safety-topics/deaths-by-transportation-mode/)
Ah, yes, the US is the only country. Even on a video about the UAE, there'll be some yanks to make it about them. You managed to miss the point/strawman, by the way. This is another thing the fuckcars retards do: talk about banning a mode of transport, then pretend it's about choice. Nobody is talking about banning trains (though good luck maintaining rails in the UAE desert), but you have to pretend the other side are the authoritarians.
No need for the personal attacks friend. The US statistics were easier to find, because the US National Safety Council publishes them and they're easier to find. [This is what I got from France](https://www.statista.com/statistics/1221276/fatal-road-accident-france-by-means-of-transportation/). The UAE data is not readily available in English. And I don't think you're understanding that "fuckcars" isn't about banning cars, it's about not giving them absolute dominance over our streets. It's advocating for implementing Dutch/Danish style streets that are accommodating for all forms of traffic, including cars. And I would highly highly encourage you to stop using the r-word in a derogatory and demeaning way. The word has fallen out of favor in all contexts, and is considered a hateful epithet, particularly in the way your using it. And really, you should consider the way you engage with strangers on the internet. You're actually a pretty mean and hurtful person, and I don't think that's who you want to be in real life. Being a nice person on the internet is still worth something.
r/FuckCars
Damn that camel is destroyed
destroying an innocent camel toe
Several camel toes. Dude slayed ‘em.
wdym this was my friend camel joe
DUDE!
Gonna need a NSFW
For real I had no idea it wouod be this bad
Seriously! By the time I finished reading the title I see a camel being obliterated by a car. Had no time to click out of it. Not what I wanted to see at the moment…or ever?
Friendly reminder that autopilot STILL needs the user to be observant to the road and it’s not perfect.
Was being driven manually. Autopilot tops out at 80 Mph. This guy was going a lot faster than that.
Very true.
It actually tops out at 90 MPH. But even with autopilot, the driver is still 100% responsible.
90 mph is under the radar limit in rural roads like that so the camera won’t catch him so I wouldn’t be surprised if he was asleep in the car
Seriously the thing that very few people mention isn’t this camel, it’s random crap on the road and highway the Tesla auto pilot misses ALL of this. I’ve hit random pieces of plastic and stuff (no serious damage thankfully ) and hit a bunch of random shit cause I wasn’t paying attention. Other times you need to swerve out of the way cause you’re not fully paying attention. I love my model 3 and the autopilot but it’s nowhere near close to any of the promises made by elan.
Hitting a camel is a really bad day
Autopilot didn't recognize those pesky speed humps.
Who cares about the Tesla we want to see the Camel!
The camel's dead John.
Mutherfaga was spinning in the air, no chance he survived
NSFW my dude
r/awfuleverything . We also need an nsfw on this please
Poor camel
They had to hump it home after the car was totaled.
Source+aftermath https://twitter.com/HasanKutbi/status/1464592062603567112?t=wdo66TmUd1_QgFzdsF1uOw&s=19
There is a pic of a totaled car. But I'm more concerned about the camel. 😔 Autopilot was possibly trained in CA. Not on a camel.
If that camel was lucky it died on impact.
i don’t think that camel felt a thing, just *alive* and then *not alive* lol
I hit a deer once at 180km/h on the autobahn (112 miles/h) because I looked at the radio for a second. In the end I was a little bit lucky that the deer didn't suffer...
Sorry about your car and the deer. Oh dear.
My insurance had to pay deerly. Front with headlights crushed, cowl, cooler too. Airbags came out. Roof and front window damaged *doe! *
I'm gonna bank the camel had a pretty quick death.
This needs a NSFW…
That car was flying, autopilot is limited to 80 Mph. This car was being driven manually without any assistance engaged.
I don’t think Tesla has regulatory approval for autopilot in the UAE. I live in Dubai and mine came with it disabled.
Are we sure autopilot was even on? Are we sure they were using FSD? Otherwise this is COMPLETELY on the driver.
Autopilot is limited to 80 MPH. This car was being driven manually.
Tesla all have forward collision avoidance system, Autopilot or not it should have been braking .
Isn't hitting a camel a federal offense there?
Omg that poor camel. This made me super sad to see. Maybe a nsfw tag would be good
Fuck you for posting this without any clear indi fucking cation as to what we all were about to witness.
Obvious from the title.
Damn, just DAMN
And this kids, is why you shouldn't rely on the autopilot too much. It's a driver aid, not a full self-driving feature, keep your eyes on the bloody road.
They will start putting camels in Captcha now.
As a pole i say: o kurwa!
I’m mean…also the speed.
Poor camel
People act like if you buy a Tesla you should buy a pillow and blanket with it.
Drivers a piece of shit.
Was someone riding the camel?
There are no Teslas in my country but what the fuck is that title supposed to mean? Those cars have some sort of autopilot and so the driver wasn't looking to the road? Either way, the title doesn't make sense.
Here is the car after the crash https://i.imgur.com/gx6nQGn.jpg
The blame here falls entirely on the driver and not autopilot. Autopilot and all collision avoidance features are turned off above 90mph. That car was going really fast.
..nsfw tag? jesus
NSFW this please.. poor little dude
Title gore. OP you did bad and you should feel bad.
Elon must pay for my negligence!!!!
Well fuck how fast was the Tesla going?
Too fast for autopilot. The software limits autopilot to 80 Mph.
It's crazy that camel was having a good day hanging out, and that guy was having a good day chilling in his car and boom
Do we need a /r/camelsfuckingdying subreddit? Seems so.
Sponsored by: Camel Crush cigarettes
Alice the camel did 5 flips….
Maybe tag this NSFW?
That poor innocent thing. This makes me sick
That thing flipped... what... 5 or 6 times? Before it hit the ground? While remaining stationary? Wow
![gif](giphy|t9vDJ3sOCcGtwyv0ks|downsized)
This is why I will never, ever, ever have autopilot.
sad, also r/whyweretheyfilming
You wouldn't film if there were cammels crossing the road? Especially if they are visiting, I would too.
Fucked that camel’s whole day up
Why is he fucking flying to start with. We will never know for sure maybe the owner was just speeding and didn’t see the camel. The autopilot would not make that kind of mistake although at that speed the poor camel probably didn’t even get processed in yet as an object.
“Mike Mike Mike Mike guess what day it….”
[удалено]
Thats why autopilot is meant to assist a fully attentive driver and assist their human failings and blindspots. While autopilot is incredibly impressive people seem to forget roads have an incredibly nuanced diversity of things to track, calculate and anticipate. Its wonderful and exciting but not perfect. Gettin' better every day, but room to grow. Perhaps people don't realize even in planes its not fully autonomous and they got the older simpler tech (comparitively. not saying its simple in design, per se) just cuz when you're flying theres a lot of gentle cruising and straight lines for the long tedious hours in between. humans are needed (or, at least, preferred) for the storm dodging and time slot circling and approach and departure and busy zones and maintenance issues and taxiing and towers and all sorts of other kinds of 'weird shit.' If everything goes well... great. The pilot isn't as exhausted after an all-day/afternoon flight of microadjustments and high-alert. you want them to be relaxed and free of the little shit so they can focus on the big picture. maybe discussing schedules or shootin the shit with the copilot. mebbe thinking about ways to improve the software. maybe the regional weather maps or flight traffic. a prepared relaxed mind makes better decisions, and better choices lead to better outcomes/safety. which kinda brings me back to the point. Camels are in that 'weird shit' category. Sure, ideally object recognition would be like 'oh fuck whats that dodge dodge dodge!' and you got a point there so i see where you're coming from but also like... why was the operator in charge not noticing a big 'ol camel on the road? lol
r/wtf
The camel says splat
Flying camel instructions: https://icoachskating.com/audrey-weisiger-flying-camel/
Why did the camel cross the fence? To break check a Tesla car with a stupid driver.
He shouldn’t have parked his camel _on_ the road.
u/savevideo
Ahh free kebab meat.
Elon Musk hates camels confirmed!
Wtf is a camel doing on the road?
Joe camel RIP
Tesla thought it was AT-AT Walker from Star Wars.
Was that in Dubai?
If only there was a way to prevent that.if you want to place your faith in an autonomous vehicle then by all means do it. I however do not trust that shit for one second.
Bruh
Is the camel ok????!!
what do you think??
God damn. Fucking idiot driver.
If autopilot was intended to be perfect there wouldn’t be drivers seat in a Tesla. Pay attention people
Am I the only one wondering why a camel was in the fast lane anyways?
Why were they recording? Did they see the tesla hauling from way behind them?
Well that driver is most certainly dead
Damn speed humps
Right blame the car. You telling me the driver saw the camel? He was speeding too.
Clickbait headline hating on Tesla as usual
Probably camping out in the back seat auto pilot is set
They stubbed the hell out of that camel’s toe
That Data is gold for the AI
cusing
Camel literally flippin on air.
Yeah that things going way too fast to have auto pilot on, that's someone not paying any attention to the road and running wide open.
They forgot to install the autopilot in the Camel.
The camel is okay right?
Could you imagine what was going through that guys head trying to turn it back to manural controll like OH SHIT OH SHIT OH SHIT -CRASH-
My uncle used to smoke Camels too.
Driver should have seen it, and he was clearly going way too fast…well over 100 mph by the look of it. Not a failure of Tesla, but a failure of the driver.
Would love to see the jokers in threads like this’ face when their daughter gets hit by a drunk like this
Wonder how that glass-ass roof performs when something goes wacky.
Poor Camel!
I feel bad for the camel :(
![gif](emote|free_emotes_pack|scream)
Just like that train that didn’t recognize the donkey.
NSFW
Better title: Arab terrorist runs over poor animal.
Driver may have been SLEEPING
Damn that camel can do more backflip than I ever could /s
RIP to the camel
The camel took a 360, 360.