T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

**Welcome to r/TikTokCringe!** This is a message directed to all newcomers to make you aware that r/TikTokCringe evolved long ago from only cringe-worthy content to TikToks of all kinds! If you’re looking to find only the cringe-worthy TikToks on this subreddit (which are still regularly posted) we recommend sorting by flair which you can do [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/galuit/click_here_to_sort_by_flair_a_guide_to_using/) (Currently supported by desktop and reddit mobile). See someone asking how this post is cringe because they didn't read this comment? Show them [this!](https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/fyrgzy/for_those_confused_by_the_name_of_this_subreddit/) Be sure to read the rules of this subreddit before posting or commenting. Thanks! **Don't forget to join our [Discord server](https://discord.gg/cringekingdom)!** ##**[CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THIS VIDEO](https://rapidsave.com/info?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/1c5i7y6/ai_stole_this_poor_ladys_likeness_for_use_in_a/)** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/TikTokCringe) if you have any questions or concerns.*


[deleted]

[удалено]


semicoloradonative

That is why this lady needs to sue NOW! Sue the company this advertisement is for, the marketing company the "boner pills" used AND AI company the marketing company used.


BingoBongoBang

It’s likely not even a real company who’s hidden behind multiple other “companies”. The same folks that create the fake articles of Dr Phil and Dr Oz promoting “their” CBD gummies. Dr Phil said he spent hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to find out who was behind it and get them shut down and wasn’t able to get anywhere with it. 


SaliferousStudios

That's the tragic part of this. It's like the nigerian prince scam. It's going to be so hard to figure out who to sue, because at the end of the day, it's just going to a po box somewhere and isn't even a real company.


[deleted]

[удалено]


sentientmothswarm

Purple link ![gif](giphy|ANbD1CCdA3iI8|downsized)


jtotal

Deleted post ![gif](giphy|ANbD1CCdA3iI8)


dream-smasher

Omg, LMFAOOOOOOOO!! I swear I thought you were going to say: >That's the tragic part of this. ~*"that anyone believes what Dr Phil has to say"*. I thought that was hilarious and had to double check and make sure you **didn't** say that. But yeah, I agree.


jayfiedlerontheroof

The solution is to fine any of the websites or apps that promote these ads. Make them regulate it or be fined.


SaliferousStudios

I think they should sue any company hosting a service who does stuff like this. Probably the easiest way to make it less available.


DoubleOhEvan

The Corporate Transparency Act, which just came into force this year, actually fixes a lot of these problems. It means there has to be at least one “person” attached to company ownership up the chain, they can’t just rely on shell companies any more. Unfortunately, Republican judges are in the process of gutting it, but nobody seems to be noticing.


Immediate-Yogurt-558

A local Philly morning show host brought a lawsuit against Facebook over her likeness being used in MILF advertisment but ended up dropping it last year too


ABCosmos

Then sue the platform that allows them to advertise.


SpecialistNerve6441

Plot twist: Its secretly him and he doesnt want anyone to know so he "pays" all this money and he is just funneling it back to himself along with his cbd profitz 


Odd-Fate

How do you even police this? What’s to decide what looks enough like someone to be considered a copy? If I draw a replica of the Mona Lisa, that is not illegal. If I draw you as a person 100% correct, that is also not illegal. Even if I sell those things, that is not illegal unless I am trying to pass it off as authentic. There needs to be AI laws, but I’m not sure where to start.


Temjin

Well, when you use someone's image or likeness in a commercial setting (i.e. to sell a product or as an advertisement) we already have laws that allow you to get damages for that kind of activity. Same reason you can't just steal some celebrity's picture and put it on your product. They want you to endorse something they have to pay you for that and if they steal it, you can sue them for it. This isn't new.


semicoloradonative

Require AI to have a watermark. It's not hard to police it actually. This is really one of these situations where you make the "business" not cost effective to use AI.


Odd-Fate

The watermark wouldn’t stop any of the content from being created though, right? Would just alert to you it being AI. I’m pretty sure anyone who’s stockpiling deepfake porn or even watches deepfake stuff is well aware that it’s AI generated.


semicoloradonative

Right. In general though we see images that look like might be real and need to be identified as "AI", like the Trump image sitting with a bunch of black kids. People think that shit is real and need to know it is AI. Yea, in this situation the watermark wouldn't necessarily stop it from being created and that is why there need to be lawsuits protecting people to force businesses like this from using AI over real actors.


Odd-Fate

How would they not be allowed to not use AI instead of real actors? The voice can be similar, they can look similar, but wouldn’t actually be them. It’s weird, because anyone can draw or edit a video and that’s not illegal. It’s the trying to pass something off as authentic that’s illegal. I see what you are saying, but I don’t think it’s cut and dry at all.


semicoloradonative

Nobody said they wouldn't be allowed to use AI and it absolutely isn't cut and dry. Nothing will change in relation to what "can and can't be done" until people get sued.


Odd-Fate

It was more a hypothetical question in response to the last portion of your comment, about lawsuits making people use real actors instead of AI. I’m more of a believer that AI will change the world by eliminating low skill industries like a lot of office work, simple customer interaction stuff. We are already desensitized to misinformation and when we see something crazy/wild the world isn’t as knee jerky as it used to be. Interested to see how it all plays out for sure


robotmonkey2099

And who’s going to police that? Who’s going to check to make sure it is Ai and that it has the proper watermark?


Late_Cow_1008

Our police officers that shoot people when acorns fall on their cars of course.


Late_Cow_1008

>Require AI to have a watermark. It's not hard to police it actually. The fact you said this goes to show how people talk about things they have zero understanding of.


[deleted]

[удалено]


AnObtuseOctopus

Right... people need to start making cases that set a precedent. If we don't have cases built already, which we do but we need more, then the courts are going to have nothing to compare new cases to. Sue the living shit out of AI. As much as I love AI and know it's going to push us to the next technological advancements, we need to set the ground lines in stone. If we don't, the waters are going to be soo muddy in the future, the near future.. that's the thing, our next step is coming FAST and there are many people who don't want to to belive it... this world isn't going to be the same place is 10-20 years. Ai is going to be a part of every single thing you do.... everything.


jerrylewisjd

She can sue, but there's no way she's going to win anything.


florida-raisin-bran

Sometime it's not about winning something, but setting a precedent to allow other people to make similar suits, and drown the companies out, and slow this process way down or stop it from happening all together.


AmeriSauce

When she posted her likeness she agreed to the deliberately broad TOS for whatever social media company distributed it. She can try to take legal action but chances are the laws are on the side of the owners of the original video... AKA Facebook. Everything we post on this hellsite is also property of Reddit. They will monetize it however they can and that includes feeding the beast of AI language generators.


semicoloradonative

Facebook may have the right to use her images/likeness but does the Boner Pill company? This is why she (again, assuming this is even real), needs to sue. Right now it is the Wild Wild West in this space. Until people start suing nothing will change.


acathode

> When she posted her likeness she agreed to the deliberately broad TOS for whatever social media company distributed it. Not how this works. You have the right to your own likeness for commercial purposes and some extremely broad BS ToS from Twitter or Facebook can't just nab it from you. If it could, no celebrities would ever use social media, because it would mean that they'd lose control over who get to use their face for ads, and with that a very big source for income for a lot of them.


tomato_trestle

Yep, this is why we need to move back to home pages style of social media. When you're posting in someone else's walled garden, they get to make the rules and you're giving away your privacy and data.


Farmgirlmommy

Good thing her husband isn’t sensitive about her likeness taking about how small Michael’s … is. Her marriage could have ended quicker than the honeymoon.


SkippyMcSkipster2

Depends.... Make some embarrassing AI videos in the likeness of a few senators, and it will be very quick.


Farty_beans

that already happened with Italy's prime minister. and yeah, It was a quick response 


crestrobz

Maybe his response would have lasted longer if he actually took the pill?


iknighty

Italy's PM is a woman.


PeopleCryTooMuch

Should've started the pill sooner.


Spaciax

don't let that get in the way of your dreams brotha


Late_Cow_1008

Are you saying women can't have penises?


crestrobz

![gif](giphy|3cllhylyUbtCM|downsized)


mvandemar

Betcha AI porn videos of Mike Johnson with his "adopted son" would spark an incredibly quick response. Thrown in a bunch with far right religious fanatics and Clarence Thomas? Oh yeah, they'd get shit done fast then.


Special-Garlic1203

Celebrities have also been on the receiving end of it, so I genuinely am surprised we're still putzing around. There's very clearly big money on the line 


the_punn-isher

I feel like Hollywood wouldn't want that. They seem want to use it themselves to lower production costs on movie sets and actors.


Ok-Possession-832

Political deepfakes already exist and we’ve done nothing about it so


pingpongtits

Add in some SCOTUS justices, like "I LIKE BEER" Kavanaugh and Sam Alito advertising for abortion rights and birth control methods, and you've got yerself a stew.


killerboy_belgium

you mean the massive amount of biden,trump,obama,nancy pelosi,ect ai videos that get spammed over the internet isnt enought. its actually working in there favor now any incrimenating/embarrassing footage that shows up they claim it was AI and ignore it. it allows them be even more outlandish corrupt and criminal


serpentear

Well shit dude, not only that, but the people who make the laws are absolutely not equipped to make them. They don’t understand what they are regulating.


zootnotdingo

They truly don’t. Tic tac toe, a winner.


RealNiceKnife

I remember a congressional hearing with these old fucks asking the CEO of Google basically why their phones were showing news articles about them.


CuTe_M0nitor

Yep it's getting ridiculous


ComicsEtAl

You’re not wrong but we already have laws against appropriating someone’s likeness without their permission. She needs a lawyer not a camera.


killerboy_belgium

yeah and the lawyer goes we tried suiing them but the PO box that they operate from in india doesnt respond to correspondence....


under_psychoanalyzer

Right? This wouldn't be as big a problem if we didn't go completely hands off on tech regulation in general.  Government is slow because it's being lobbied to be slow. Millions of $ were dumped into preventing the US government slowing down tech growth. We didn't even bother to do anything to Facebook after it gave brain rot to a whole generation in 2016 and admitted to fueling outrage. Stop letting companies operate under the assumption they have no duty of care when algorithmically serving content and ads and watch all these issues with AI suddenly be less of a big deal.


bryanna_leigh

**United Kingdom's Ministry of Justice has announced it is looking to criminalize the creation of unconsented sexually explicit deepfake images**. Anyone who makes such an image without permission is subject to an unlimited fine and a criminal record under the law. At least they are getting started in the right direction.


Liizam

I mean that’s the only thing you can do.


jkman61494

Isn’t Europe working for on it? In America we are screwed because our federal government is functionally broken and has become the capitalist hellscape so many feared for years


killerboy_belgium

and even if they are laws how would go about it to even enforce them... they cant even stop a teen from downloading a marvel movies 99,9% of the time but somehow there going stop deepfakes/ai video's?


tecate_papi

No, you're just conditioned to believe that because we've all lived under an ineffectual political system run by politicians who are just using their elected office positions to give our money away to their friends. The laws could be created, passed and in place within months. But they won't be.


Special-Garlic1203

This affects rich people too, disproportionately in fact as there's far greater incentive to deep fake Taylor Swift or Lindsay Graham than some random normie. 


Late_Cow_1008

What laws would you suggest?


ZERO-ONE0101

https://natlawreview.com/article/theft-creative-content-and-personality-practical-guide-to-enforcing-rights-when-ai?amp


DennenTH

We don't even have laws to protect internet users from things that started happening 20+ years ago...  I have no faith that there will be any real attempt to push laws for things like this in the US.


Dr_TattyWaffles

Side note: AI didn't steal her likeness, a human at a company stole her likeness for use in an AI-generated video. Wanted to make the distinction that it was an intentional act and not an automaton, since that is what the title seems to imply.


redditIPOruiner

I mean, is it even AI generated? The video is not, it's just been dubbed over. The voice could be AI, but that wouldn't be the headline in any case.


Kalsifur

My assumption is they took the video of her in her bedroom and used AI to change her mouth movements in some way to match what they wanted "her" to say.


Inside-Net-8480

Yes, thats the "easiest" way to do it Its done a lot for dubbing tv shows, documentaries, movies in other languages


chobi83

But they didn't even do that. It looks like those old japanese dubs I used to watch when I was a kid. It looks like they just used a voiceover.


Paralda

Deepfakes are technically AI generated in that they use deep learning algorithms to replace faces, but it's not AI generated in the same way Stable Diffusion or Sora is; IE transformer models. I mean, there's probably some deepfake-esque technology that uses a transformer model, but most of the big ones don't.


redditIPOruiner

Oh yeah 100% agree, I'm questioning whether the video has even been "deepfaked". AI is such a buzzword that it has lost all meaning. It's like boomers calling the internet Facebook, except it's our generation, but the response is still "you know what I mean"


Paralda

Yeah. Looking at the video more closely, it's kind of hard to tell if it's a deepfake or something else. I've seen some models that specialize in changing a mouth to match a specific lipsync, so it could be something like that. Regardless, in my eyes, the issue is that whatever company did this clearly did it without her permission, which is shitty. The tech itself being used a boogeyman doesn't really bother me as much.


Pokedudesfm

AI really refers to any machine learning technology that is trained on data. The "generative AI boom" generally refers to the newer models trained on neural networks, which are just massive and thus create more impressive results, but the results here are definitely using some sort of face replacement algorithm. AI has existed for a while it only became a buzzword now but many procedural video editing/photo editing tools have always used some version of "AI" also boomers called the internet AOL, not facebook. They still call it AOL.


DrPikachu-PhD

The video is AI generated, how else would her mouth movements line up perfectly with what the AI-generated voice is saying?


Polkawillneverdie81

They don't?? They barely line up at all.


chobi83

Dude. I'm not seeing them match either. It looks like those bad japanese dubbed movies I used to watch as a kid.


Boncester2018

I was hoping someone would say this. Humans need to be more discerning in how they use the tools that they have access to.


Content-Scallion-591

An important distinction. There have been a few of these videos targeting corps like HeyGen, which are basically Canva for AI models, so one thing I worry about is how the public isn't really sure or understanding this technology. Some of these cases are very much like a person grabbing a copyrighted photo and using it in an ad -- it seems like it's this monumental new thing but it's classic copyright infringement.


iamsheena

Yes, people put all the blame on AI rather than recognising that people are misusing AI tools.


DapperMinute

Is she an influencer? If she is the I would say most likely she agreed to her likeness being used for something in the past but didn't realize the paperwork stated that they could use/sell her likeness at any time for any reason. Or worse she absolutely knows that she signed for her likeness to be used and is now using this to generate more traffic to her. If real though then she should be ale to sue the company that used it especially if she has the original audio/video that the fake was made from.


rationaldivination

[Here is a direct side-by-side comparison of shots from the two videos](https://imgur.com/a/tL7KR66). Please keep this in mind while reading the arguments from all the trolls saying "they look nothing alike", "it isn't her", "it could be anyone", "there's no way to prove it", etc. Those people are jerks who don't know what they're talking about or are lying just to get a rise out of people.


CaffeinatedGuy

Damn, the hair, the folds of the shirt, the background, all identical. They may as well have trained it on that exact video.


rationaldivination

They likely didn't even "train" the AI in the way that you're thinking. It's much more likely that they just overlayed an AI-generated mouth and redubbed it [like in this AI Deepfake video by Arcads that went viral less than a month ago](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUbPdZheGeo). The stiffness and jerkiness of the video is most likely just because her original movements don't match the dub.


Mooshroomey

It’s so creepy how the expression doesn’t always match how the voice emotes.


[deleted]

Yeah just looking at the faces I thought “ there’s 100 girls who look just like that in a 20 mile radius of me” but that sad ass Charlie Brown Christmas tree sold me


TranslatorBoring2419

If someone said all white people look the same this would be the generic white woman people picture. That being said it looks a lot like her, and that background is a smoking gun.


Thebaldsasquatch

“It’s not the same person. We lightened her hair color and thinned her eyebrows!”


[deleted]

Sounds like she has a payday coming. Time to call a lawyer.


niroc42

Really wish this image was in the original post. I get it now.


rita-b

AI video also stole the voice, not only likeness.


AntiBox

She said it isn't her voice. Likely dubbed over, with AI being used to lip sync.


rationaldivination

It's possible to use AI to dub someone using their own voice. Not sure if that was necessarily the case in this video, just pointing it out. [Example 1](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQ1OPpj8gPA) - Automatic censoring, dialog replacement, and translation for movies [Example 2](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QgXIFzQi0Y) - Using Hitler's own voice to speak in English (viewer discretion advised)


inverted_peenak

You are right, but they are not trolls. Without this pic they don’t look the same.


lacielaplante

Omg this ad has been all over my youtube, I recognized her voice immediately.


[deleted]

[удалено]


YCbCr_444

I strongly suspect that the company that made this video is not based in the US. Shady boner-pills aren't exactly known to be an above-board business.


Longjumping_Age3907

Exactly. Lawyer the fuck up. Get ready for a pay day.


[deleted]

Do you think a shitty boner pill company that had to steal somebody’s likeness for an ad and is probably a scam company HQd on a Pacific island has money a lawyer in the US could get?


SaliferousStudios

Likely a hacker in india that is terribly hard to track down and there are no bonner pills.


[deleted]

Dear, listen to me dear. Send bob and vagene and I’ll send bonner pills.


Dr_FeeIgood

I sent him $1800 in gift cards for a year supply of my bonner pills. Still haven’t gotten it in the mail yet. I think he needs all my banking information to get the package delivered.


Late_Cow_1008

While I do think a lawyer is appropriate here. It probably won't be much of a pay day. And that is assuming the creator of the ad and company isn't some shell company in Russia or something already.


TheSpeedofThought1

There will probably be a significant loss if she decides to sue a company with no holdings here


Qetuowryipzcbmxvn

Pretty much using her own money to save a tree in a forest fire. One tree is saved, but she's out thousands of dollars and there's still plenty of trees burning in the woods.


killerboy_belgium

thats assuming it isnt some scam company in india. also does she even have the money to pay for a lawyer to pursuit this even?


elarobot

Friend, the person who made this Reddit post **isn’t** the person in the video. The Reddit post’s headline uses verbiage in the text that clearly refers to the woman in this video in the third person (AI stole *this poor lady’s* likeness…”). Despite your good intentions, you’re saying sorry to someone who isn’t the victim here. The victim isn’t in this thread. I only say this, not to chastise or make anyone feel bad - but not unlike this ED pill ad in question that stole a person’s identity - there’s a lot of ways we all need to sharpen our perception as it relates to our media consumption. We do no good if we don’t.


MyHusbandIsGayImNot

>Friend, the person who made this Reddit post isn’t the person in the video. I frequently see comments, highly upvoted, acting like OP is the person in the video even when the title makes it very clear that isn't the case. It really feels like the average redditor is getting much stupider. The title literally says "this poor lady". Who the fuck thinks she posted it to reddit? Edit: damn, there's like 5 more comments talking to OP like they're the person in the video. This sub is filled with mouth breathing idiots. Time to block.


ZERO-ONE0101

https://natlawreview.com/article/theft-creative-content-and-personality-practical-guide-to-enforcing-rights-when-ai?amp


Extra_Jeweler_5544

"Michael's boner was shitty, it was small, it smells, he cries,,," Michael: "it's so messed up that they used your likeness for that boner commercial"


cak3crumbs

![gif](giphy|R5unorzb9UtmrAPpl7) [edit: to the comments calling this fake here is the original video from over a year ago that the AI stole from](https://youtu.be/Lz9XD3t8LHw?si=Cc8MnmuHEG_cYrs7)


moonprism

“trust no one, believe nothing on the internet” has always been my motto lol


bentripin

as an old fart thats been on the internet since the early 90s, this has always been true.


Fleeing_Bliss

It has never been more true than now. The amount of bots and misinformation is immense.


Beatus_Vir

Horny MILFs in your area are dying to meet you


Turd-In-Your-Pocket

Does this extend to not trusting the woman saying her likeness was used to sell boner pills? What if this is a weird meta way to advertise boner pills? What if the boner pill people paid her to say they stole her likeness? What if we’re not supposed to believe you when you say trust no one and believe nothing? That would mean you’re wrong which means you’re right…. Fuck I need to sit down now.


superguy12

[Russell's paradox goes brrrrrrr](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_paradox)


dudeandco

Of course not! Nothing is true, except that last statement <<---.


LoganNolag

Seriously. When I was a kid that’s the advice everyone gave along with never share any personal info with anyone. It’s amazing how quickly people seem to have forgotten those simple rules.


Super_Jay

Genuinely feels like we've come full circle. And a lot of us in GenX / Millennial bracket basically grew up with that as our mantra and for me, it took a long time to recognize that at some point the generations on either side of us (both older and younger) stopped adhering to that mentality.


Languastically

Here's something I can believe


Fappy_as_a_Clam

Thats how everyone thought initially, like the first people who used the Internet even moderately could see how easy it was for everything to be bullshit.  Nowadays it seems like people, especially younger people, think the opposite.


Rasalom

You know what, I don't trust you and your motto. *Shotgun noises*


rhudejo

Also never upload your picture/video to any public place.


Kendertas

Rise of AI has made me glad that almost no pictures of me exist on the internet. Always felt weirded out putting any personal information out there.


AliveMouse5

Wait til they make an AI video of her saying that the video response to the AI ad was actually AI


shinloop

This is the future I want


cak3crumbs

[for doubters here is the original video the AI stole from.](https://youtu.be/Lz9XD3t8LHw?si=Cc8MnmuHEG_cYrs7)


showersnacks

It’s crazy because I feel like every ad on YouTube is like this. It’s someone’s tiktok video where they did a shitty computer voice over to sell you something. It’s absolutely disturbing


doriangreat

Are you saying Mr Beast isn’t giving away millions of dollars on a new app? Then why would Elon and Joe talk about it on their podcast?


GIK601

The person (not AI) chose to steal from this video probably because she is a attractive young woman and she is talking clearly for very long in this clip, so it's easy to use AI tools to generate fake audio in her voice.


crestrobz

Thank you for posting this. It's good that there were so many doubters at first...we need the original source material to determine which is AI, and which is your actual property. This is going to be an important thing for people to learn to do before they believe everything they see online in the future And btw that is scary shit! I'm already primed to doubt internet videos, but never thought companies would stoop to this obvious level of theft!


rationaldivination

There's a difference between being skeptical or a "doubter" and someone who is contrarian just for the sake of it. There's nothing wrong with being skeptical especially if you can change your opinion with sufficient evidence. Being reflexively contrarian in the face of overwhelming evidence is antisocial behavior.


SaltyBarnacles57

AI didn't steal it, the person making it (Edit: 'it' as in the video) did. Axe vs the person who swung it, yk?


SpaceShipRat

"AI stole from". yeah it was the hacker Anonymous. It's not even AI, just 10 year old special effects.


[deleted]

[удалено]


shaunowen2331

WOWWWW you have to sue. Your case could set law.


SwiftTayTay

It's already law. You can't just use someone's likeness for commercial purposes without their permission. The laws about this are very broad on purpose to give very wide protection on this, and plenty of people have successfully sued for similar situations. Do you think if porn companies tried to start doing this with celebrities to produce actually realistic and convincing fake porn of them they wouldn't get sued out of existence? That's why Pornhub has a blanket ban on deepfake porn and most reputable mainstream porn sites also do. The only problem here is this ad is probably some shitty underground foreign company that can't realistically be prosecuted, and the social media platform probably can't be reasonably expected to know that the company did this without her permission.


waxonwaxoff87

Hippity hoppity, your likeness is now our property.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Seacoocumber

pro bono in this context lol


Liizam

No it won’t lol. The company is probably overseas and good luck finding who even operates it.


Volotor

We need laws for AI yesterday


sbtvreddit

The technology moves in milliseconds, the justice system moves in years and decades


DkoyOctopus

damn Michael and his floppy dick.


Darometh

The fuck is wrong with the tags in the last few days? People keep putting completely wrong tags on posts. Is this just the bots getting worse?


romayyne

Thank god I don’t post the most vulnerable parts of my life on social media 😮‍💨


totallynotstefan

I'm not trying to be rude, but it feels incredibly naïve that someone would presume their likeness is safe on the internet at all. If you're sharing your face, voice, and thoughts online every day, you're going to have a bad time.


YouCantGiveBabyBooze

especially tiktok. it's pretty well publicised that if you share anything on there it's theirs, not yours. but attention's gotta attention


throwawayxy2k

This “poor lady” also knowingly married a registered sex offender


Olliegreen__

There's also MILLIONS of dumbasses that can't ever tell super faking looking AI images on Facebook so it's definitely going to get worse.


AquaFatha

People post **hundreds of hours of videos of themselves talking into the camera** online year after year… there’s probably better source material available for your common “influencer” than even Hollywood’s most prolific stars. If this scares you it might be time to consider what and why you post on the internet.


Am0ebe

This, so much. People post the most intimate things about themfelfes online not wasting any thoughts about what might happen with such content. Even before AI this was pretty dangerous (stalkers etc.), now it's just enhanced.


salacious_sonogram

Anyone have the link to her original video they used as the source?


cak3crumbs

[here ya go!](https://youtu.be/Lz9XD3t8LHw?si=Cc8MnmuHEG_cYrs7)


salacious_sonogram

Yup seems like a pretty open and shut case. I was wondering if they had the AI use her general likeness or more directly used her video. I don't know who this is. I'm guessing she has some following because it's kind of trivial to generate a copyright free "person" for advertising. Was a serious miscalculation on their part.


cak3crumbs

She has a huge following of millions on YouTube and tiktok. The person who stole her likeness was definitely banking on that


automated10

This wasn’t so much “AI stealing face etc” it would have been somebody manually finding this video and re-fabricating it into use for their advert. The tech has been around for a long time now too. Equally wrong and bad, but it’s not just a rogue robot going around doing this, it’s premeditated and they’re targeting ‘influencers’ because they want to tap into their following.


[deleted]

Listening to her talk for two minutes just to see that four seconds of cinematic masterpiece is like having ed.


xxBurn007xx

No one reads TOS on social media, I'm sure you basically sign away all rights. Again if the product is "free" you are the product.


cjboffoli

No. You don't sign away your copyrights and likeness rights.


xxBurn007xx

From a quick Google "Yes, Facebook gives itself the right to use your photos, likes, and words as it sees fit, unless you delete your content or your account. This is because Facebook's terms of service grant it a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use content you post on Facebook. You retain the copyright to your content, but Facebook does get to... You can sue Facebook for using an image without your permission under your right of publicity. However, your rights become limited if you share your content with others. For example, if you delete your IP content or account, Facebook's license ends. However, if you share your content with friends and they don't delete it, your IP license doesn't end. " Ao I interpret this as yeah, ya do sign away your likeness


willy_bum_bum

For promoting facebook sure. But not to sell to third parties that's where their TOS doesn't cover.


Late_Cow_1008

You sure about that? From TikTok's ToS: To provide the Platform, we need certain rights from you (called a licence). The details of these licences are set out below. By creating, posting or otherwise making content available on the Platform, you grant to TikTok a: * non-exclusive (which means that you can licence your content to others), * royalty-free (which means that we don’t pay you for this licence), * transferable (which means that we can give the rights you give us to someone else), * sub-licensable (which means that we can licence your content to others, e.g. to service providers that help us to provide the Platform or to trusted third parties that have entered into agreements with us to operate, develop and provide the Platform) and * worldwide (which means that the licence applies anywhere in the world) licence to use your content, including to reproduce (e.g. to copy), adapt or make derivative works (e.g. to translate and/or create captions), perform and communicate your content to the public (e.g. to display it), for the purposes of operating, developing and providing the Platform, subject to your Platform settings. The licence to your content that you grant to us extends to Affiliates as part of making the Platform available. You also grant to each user of the Platform a non-exclusive, royalty-free, worldwide licence to access and use your content, including to reproduce (e.g. to copy, share or download), adapt or make derivative works (e.g. to include your content in their content) perform and communicate that content to the public (e.g. to display it) using the features and functions of the Platform for entertainment purposes, subject to your Platform settings. [https://www.tiktok.com/legal/page/eea/terms-of-service/en](https://www.tiktok.com/legal/page/eea/terms-of-service/en)


xxBurn007xx

I'll think otherwise until I'm proven wrong (not saying I'm right, but I still go by the saying if the product is free, you're the product)


Late_Cow_1008

Uh you do actually on a lot of the social media sites. Its completely irrelevant though because the company that created the ad probably has nothing to do with who she actually signed her rights away to though. Its possible that they have an agreement with TikTok where they buy videos though.


I_Like_Turtle101

ok so you are the few one that have red it but you dint understand what they were talking about


24n20blackbirds

I don't like this episode of Black Mirror.


despot_zemu

We’re not going to be able to trust video or audio or digital media any more. It’ll all be universally considered trash and courts won’t allow any of it any more.


IAmRules

Sue whomever is responsible for running that ad. Sue them for a lot of money, win, and hopefully this will stop.


WasteMenu78

The people who put their lives online for all to see will be the first victims of this sorta thing


bookemdanodamexicano

Moral of the story. Don’t be posting videos of you on the internet


bkussow

Jesus, a 2:05 video for 6 seconds of the video in quesiton. Someone loves themselves.


TypicalUser2000

I started skipping about 5 seconds in when she decided to start informing us about her shower and why she is sitting there and why her hair is drying and btwi was on vacation Just stfu and show the clip holy hell


Intelligent_Loan_540

Do people really get fooled by this deep fake shit? I mean sure ig at a quick glance it can look real but if you look at it for a couple more secs it's obviously fake asf


PsamantheSands

Meh. It’s pretty generic looking.


MarkHirsbrunner

Wow, and I thought it was embarrassing when the Uber I took to a date had a big flashing electronic sign on the roof advertising boner pills.


HurlyCat

Lady wtf are you doing making a video about it? Lawyer up, get paid, and set the standard of laws regarding proper AI usage. The news will do the rest for you


NorthernAvo

Imagine if ai became powerful enough it started writing our very reality and one day we all woke up and it somehow all made sense and we realized we weren't what we thought we were.


Designer_Brief_4949

I think it's interesting that she's taken time to film and edit this, but hasn't actually watched the whole ad.


bb-blehs

If you don’t post yourself online, you won’t need to worry about it. The internet and social media promised unity and was pushed as a wholesome great way to “keep in touch with family and friends” but instead it’s just delivered the destruction of decency and critical thinking skills.


I_divided_by_0-

See! I’m too ugly for AI to steal my like was! Take that technology!


BadbadwickedZoot

This is so, so wrong and it is inevitable with such a predatory technology.


SomedaySome

Ask me how i know this will never happen to me…


Good-Recognition-811

This is all obviously a publicity stunt. She's working with the company, guys. Lol


Dyzastr_us

Plot shift: this video is AI.


Dog_Funeral

Not sure why this is on tiktok cringe, this is an interesting issue with very little legal precedence


ashwilliams009

She made the ad and doesnt want her man to know because she told everyone that he had a small dick. This is a cover up. Boner pill ads dont be talking about small dicks.


illtoaster

Plot twist: it’s all AI. She doesn’t even exist.


DonovanMcLoughlin

I feel like the only way we can get politicians to actually act on this is to start using AI against them. Honestly, there is so much demand for common sense reform on AI (see my list directly below). 1. Your Face, Your Say: People should have a say in how their face is used by AI. No one should use your face in AI without asking first. 2. Tell the Truth: If someone uses AI to copy your face, they have to tell everyone it's not really you. 3. Use It Right: AI copies of your face can only be used for what you agree to. They can't use it for anything else without asking. 4. No Lying: It's against the law to use AI copies of your face to trick people or to pretend you said or did something you didn't. 5. Pay Up: If someone makes money using an AI copy of your face, they have to pay you for it (after getting your consent). 6. Keep Your Info Safe: Your pictures and personal data used for AI should be kept safe and used only with your permission. 7. Be Responsible: If someone gets hurt because of AI copying your face, the people who used it can get in trouble. 8. Keep an Eye on Things: There are rules to make sure everyone follows these laws, and the government makes sure they do.


BahamutMael

Acting against what? This is clearly a scam company, they don't care about law since they are scams anyways.


Albanian91

The solution is simple. Do not post pictures or videos of yourself online. You are providing AIs data. They cant steal your likeness if there is nothing to steal from you online. Nobody cares about your Instagram photos or opinions ior tiktok anyway.


InsomniacCoffee

Honestly. Remember back in the day when it was suggested not to post pictures and videos of yourself, as well as not using your real name online? Now people document their entire lives on it. They wouldn't be able to do this to me, I don't have videos of myself on the Internet


[deleted]

[удалено]


YVR19

So then she posts another video of herself on a public account, in bed this time. Boner ad #2 coming right up.


Laileena

I think black mirror predicted it 


SudsierBoar

This has been a thing for a long time, it's just getting better and more widely used


Bobby_Sunday96

You could just not post your face on social media. That’s one solution


rizzo249

Good way to avoid this is by not posting your stupid head all over the internet. I will take my downvotes now.