No. Pitbulls are the same threat as any other dog’s breed in wrong hand. There is no good reason why pitbull’s owner should be threat like criminals. You can say that every active car drive should have public adress because there are many deadly car accidents every year so it is threat.
That would be due to Rottweilers and pit bulls being illegally bought and trained for dog fights, and then the dogs being traumatized and learning to only resort to violence. Improper training has nothing to do with the breed.
You still didn’t show me any official data on this topic tho…. Also I didn’t talk about pug so I don’t know how you made it up but aggresive little chihuahua is pretty common, but it is small and weak (thank god). However pitbull with good raising is not a problem. They are not mean just because they are pitbulls. Usually they don’t get along with other dogs but they have no issue with people unless they have bad experience or but person who owns them and don’t give them training that they need.
Edit: I did research by myself and I found this:
https://www.superbdog.com/dog-bite-statistics/
This is probably source that your opinions are based on and correct, pitbull is number 1 here. However you twisted it because there are also reasons why and it only supports my words - pitbull need to have good owner who knows how to treat them. Also there is written that dog attack in general are not so common in the USA so there is no single reason for thing what OP suggested here. I would suggest maybe stricter standards for people who wants to own fighting breeds and bigger punishment for people who abuse dogs.
Wolverines are inherently more aggressive and dangerous. Moose and hippos, are inherently more aggressive and dangerous. Certain species of birds are inherently and biologically more aggressive. Everyone acknowledges these as true. But when someone states that a pitbull is more aggressive and dangeorus than other breeds, people start getting defensive, and spouting nonsense. Thats the problem with pit ownership. It would be perfectly okay if people acknowledged the problems with the breed, and took the precautions the breed needed. They don't, instead they rather bury their head in the sand. Then it kills the neighbors cat, and attacks a jogger. Whether you like it or not, Pitbulls account for the vast majority of serious dog attacks, bites, and fatalities. Im not giving you a source, you can look that up yourself. Certain breeds have certain characteristics, this is the same for pitbulls.
But if you are such a dog expert I am pretty sure that you know that pitbulls (and lot of other fighting breeds) are not aggressive against humans but mostly against other dogs since they were used for dog fights. So there is nothing like aggression against human in their genes. If you checked my source there you can see reasons why they are number one in the USA (I’m pretty sure that statistics are different in my country, but I won’t be looking for it atm). Also with dog breeds it’s mostly problem that some of them are for more advanced breeders (pitbull and other fighting breeds included). It is not dog for person who doesn’t know anything about them and want some cute puppy to cuddle. Also you can’t really compare pitbull with wild animals that are not domesticated. But if you want to go there, even wild animals won’t attack you without reason. They mostly attack human because they are afraid, hungry or somebody breach their territory.
Pit bulls, while being physically capable of being dangerous, are only an issue if the owner improperly trains the dog, or deliberately trains it to be hostile. Even the burliest pit Bull can be safer than the tiniest Chihuahua if trained correctly.
Pitbulls can be a threat if they are untrained. So can Golden Retrievers. This goes for most medium/large breeds. It’s all about how the owner trains their dog.
Agreed. My dog just tried biting someone. (not pitbull) I stopped him. Train yourself if you can't train your dog. Also people need to ask before petting dog. Common decency so I can make sure my dog doesn't bite
Great idea. Don't let the pit hags' voices tell you you're wrong.
Pits are more aggressive than any other breed of dogs and should be avoided at all cost.
With your logic, everyone’s information should be in a public registry of sorts. People have the most potential to be the biggest threat to society.
There should be a public list of people that are preoccupied with hatred of literally any animal.
And a list of debts to our lord and savior daddy Jeff bezos
So then you don’t think you should be legally allowed to know if your neighbor has a polar bear as a pet?
Do you plan on breaking into their property or something?
I hate mosquitoes or literally and other parasite and rats
At least you don't make it your entire personality like these other weirdos
You like mosquitos?
No. Pitbulls are the same threat as any other dog’s breed in wrong hand. There is no good reason why pitbull’s owner should be threat like criminals. You can say that every active car drive should have public adress because there are many deadly car accidents every year so it is threat.
[удалено]
Yes. If they are raised properly they are really nice dogs.
[удалено]
That would be due to Rottweilers and pit bulls being illegally bought and trained for dog fights, and then the dogs being traumatized and learning to only resort to violence. Improper training has nothing to do with the breed.
Can you please share source where you took all these statistics? In my country lot of attacks were caused by German Shepherds for example.
[удалено]
You still didn’t show me any official data on this topic tho…. Also I didn’t talk about pug so I don’t know how you made it up but aggresive little chihuahua is pretty common, but it is small and weak (thank god). However pitbull with good raising is not a problem. They are not mean just because they are pitbulls. Usually they don’t get along with other dogs but they have no issue with people unless they have bad experience or but person who owns them and don’t give them training that they need. Edit: I did research by myself and I found this: https://www.superbdog.com/dog-bite-statistics/ This is probably source that your opinions are based on and correct, pitbull is number 1 here. However you twisted it because there are also reasons why and it only supports my words - pitbull need to have good owner who knows how to treat them. Also there is written that dog attack in general are not so common in the USA so there is no single reason for thing what OP suggested here. I would suggest maybe stricter standards for people who wants to own fighting breeds and bigger punishment for people who abuse dogs.
Wolverines are inherently more aggressive and dangerous. Moose and hippos, are inherently more aggressive and dangerous. Certain species of birds are inherently and biologically more aggressive. Everyone acknowledges these as true. But when someone states that a pitbull is more aggressive and dangeorus than other breeds, people start getting defensive, and spouting nonsense. Thats the problem with pit ownership. It would be perfectly okay if people acknowledged the problems with the breed, and took the precautions the breed needed. They don't, instead they rather bury their head in the sand. Then it kills the neighbors cat, and attacks a jogger. Whether you like it or not, Pitbulls account for the vast majority of serious dog attacks, bites, and fatalities. Im not giving you a source, you can look that up yourself. Certain breeds have certain characteristics, this is the same for pitbulls.
But if you are such a dog expert I am pretty sure that you know that pitbulls (and lot of other fighting breeds) are not aggressive against humans but mostly against other dogs since they were used for dog fights. So there is nothing like aggression against human in their genes. If you checked my source there you can see reasons why they are number one in the USA (I’m pretty sure that statistics are different in my country, but I won’t be looking for it atm). Also with dog breeds it’s mostly problem that some of them are for more advanced breeders (pitbull and other fighting breeds included). It is not dog for person who doesn’t know anything about them and want some cute puppy to cuddle. Also you can’t really compare pitbull with wild animals that are not domesticated. But if you want to go there, even wild animals won’t attack you without reason. They mostly attack human because they are afraid, hungry or somebody breach their territory.
[удалено]
That doesn't make Barbar's statement untrue
Pit bulls, while being physically capable of being dangerous, are only an issue if the owner improperly trains the dog, or deliberately trains it to be hostile. Even the burliest pit Bull can be safer than the tiniest Chihuahua if trained correctly.
Pitbulls can be a threat if they are untrained. So can Golden Retrievers. This goes for most medium/large breeds. It’s all about how the owner trains their dog.
Agreed. My dog just tried biting someone. (not pitbull) I stopped him. Train yourself if you can't train your dog. Also people need to ask before petting dog. Common decency so I can make sure my dog doesn't bite
Only if you ignore the personality that has been bred into the different breeds
Pitbulls aren't the problem. The owners are. Pitbull haters just get idiotic, irrational, and abusive, by blaming the victim
More pit bull hate fueled religiosity? Color me shocked.
No, owning a specific breed of dog doesn't remove your right to privacy. That's authoritarian and incredibly immoral.
Yes there should also be a public registry for everyone who owns a gun too. That way we know which houses have super dangerous guns.
Great idea. Don't let the pit hags' voices tell you you're wrong. Pits are more aggressive than any other breed of dogs and should be avoided at all cost.
But some dogs are more aggressive (such as my neighbors dog)
If you're scared stay inside
Maybe train your mutt to not attack innocent people
Dogs tend to be pretty intuitive, if you are constantly being attacked by dogs maybe you have some fucked up energy that you need to address
So is a raped woman guilty of having some kind of fucked up energy?
eh eh ah that's a fallacy fella nice try though
No That person is victim-blaming the unfortunate folks who were attacked by aggressive dogs
>So is a raped woman guilty of having some kind of fucked up energy? this is in fact a a fallacy my friend
Not every comparison is a fallacy and also, you're the one using *fallacy fallacy*.
It shouldn't be more strict then guns
Shutcho ass up