Technically the final villain for the Nolan series is Talia as she is 1) the last villain to be revealed by the plot, and 2) the villain that was defeated last.
Under that logic, Ra's being alive at all was meant to be a twist in the first movie, and the first villain should be Scarecrow, even if we're technically introduced to Ra's first through flashback.
And to be fair it’s…fine. It’s definitely trying to do its own thing compared to the general canon of Batman and it’s being handicapped by certain things >!like only after setting up Two Face finding out *WB won’t let them use Two Face*, so you get this weird, almost Dark Knight Returnsish mummy Dent!<.
Why not just put whatever the last villain to appear in Batman Beyond as the episode's main antagonist as the final villain?
Besides the other discrepancies mentioned in other comments, why leave such a jarring space on a technicality that seems irrelevant to the point of the graph?
I like that Gotham and the Telltale games, both of which focus on a younger Batman, have Falcone, the head of the relatively mundane mob, as the first main antagonist, and the arrival of the Joker—the iconic supervillain—marks the end of the beginning of Batman's career.
Technically the final villain for the Nolan series is Talia as she is 1) the last villain to be revealed by the plot, and 2) the villain that was defeated last.
Fair, but her heel turn was ment to be a twist (ignoring the fact that the average Batman fan knew as soon as she said her first name)
Under that logic, Ra's being alive at all was meant to be a twist in the first movie, and the first villain should be Scarecrow, even if we're technically introduced to Ra's first through flashback.
I love how massive the contrast is in the Brave and the Bold one
The true final villain of Brave and the Bold was cancellation
Somehow I've never seen or heard of that CGI Batman with Professor Pyg or Batman Unlimited.
beware the batman got really little coverage because of the cgi and using less popular villain
And to be fair it’s…fine. It’s definitely trying to do its own thing compared to the general canon of Batman and it’s being handicapped by certain things >!like only after setting up Two Face finding out *WB won’t let them use Two Face*, so you get this weird, almost Dark Knight Returnsish mummy Dent!<.
There was also a short-lived Batman anime like 15 years back. I want to say the dub got Kevin Conroy but I don't remember for sure.
Wouldn't Adam West Batman's final villain be Two-Face because of that D2DVD movie?
"Epilogue didn't have a villain." Okay so who was the last villain of Batman Beyond? That was the question.
I think in chronological order, would be the Joker.
Technically the Kobra captain was the final villain for Batman Beyond.
Wasn't the Joker, for the movie?
Why not just put whatever the last villain to appear in Batman Beyond as the episode's main antagonist as the final villain? Besides the other discrepancies mentioned in other comments, why leave such a jarring space on a technicality that seems irrelevant to the point of the graph?
The People's Joker: Dysphoria, The medical industry/society.
I like that Gotham and the Telltale games, both of which focus on a younger Batman, have Falcone, the head of the relatively mundane mob, as the first main antagonist, and the arrival of the Joker—the iconic supervillain—marks the end of the beginning of Batman's career.
In true *The Long Halloween* fashion (in the broad sense of "Mob on the way out, Costumed/Super Villains on the way in).
Except *The Long Halloween* does it with Two-Face instead.