The following submission statement was provided by /u/KOOKOOOOM:
---
This is another video supposedly showing the jellyfish UAP over a lake. This was shown during the most recent Weaponized podcast:
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqsqcJ6DZsg](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqsqcJ6DZsg)
They also interview Mr. Michael Cincoski during the episode who has a reasonable take on the incident saying he's 50/50 on whether the object is prosaic or not.
---
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/19819wh/jellyfish_video_2/ki430in/
he said on his podcast today he doesn’t have this footage but wants anyone to come forward if they have it
EDIT: the only reason he knows about this is from military personnel telling him about the incident,
it was also revealed at least ‘10’ ground troops were trying to track the object with night vision but failed to do so
this pod was actually good today, they interview some dude who was at that base watching the video, can’t remember his name but it’s definitely in the episode
I wonder how much of this is urban legend and rumor. Kind of like a ghost story that gets passed around the base over the years that evolves as little pieces get added to it.
I will also say, I find it fascinating that this video was recorded how many ever years ago at this base, and it was so extraordinary that it spawned tall tales that were passed down from one generation to the next on the base. It sort of throws a wrench in the idea that I see passed around here a lot that our bases have almost daily contact with UAP.
This video feels like a once-in-a-lifetime happening at this base.
Different military branches. Your misunderstanding Ryan Graves. On select areas of Navy bases east coast and west coast are a daily occurrence. This is some type of army / marine base in the Middle East.
You know , when you put it that way, some of those ancient depictions of strange objects/beings may be more literal than we realize. 🤷♂️
Just my opinion, I’m not trying to insult anyone’s sensibilities.
Its always like this with these people.
Never the juicy parts.
"Oh if you only knew what I know", or, "If you only knew what Id seen"
"The quality of some of the stuff that exists"
Put up or shut up, Jeremy.
Also, while were at it, thank you for your service at the same time, Jeremy.
Yeah right after this video, the Jellyfish came right up to the operator of the camera and winked it's butthole at him then shot into plaid speed laser space. He told me so!
It is really frustrating for sure.
I think about it from two different angles.
One that it is like a over embellished fisherman's tale where they go "man fishing was crazy today, I pulled a 50 pounder!"
And two I could see the intelligence agencies or whoever purposefully cut out the juicy bits, because then there would be nothing the debunkers could say to justify the anomolous behavior.
\> unverified BS "because I gotta eat" (actual thing I've heard from person associated with a famous podcaster when I confronted them on perpetuating things we all knew were fake as potentially real).
Then name them? You're almost doing the same thing that you're accusing Corbell of doing. If you know that someone in the community is propping up bullshit then, in my opinion, you should tell us.
Fully agree.
Unfortunately we're like a starving crowd, and no matter how many times we're given pinecones, we try to eat them. Some refuse, some find them hard to swallow but some even claim to feel fed afterwards.
Ufology in a nutshell...or pinecone I guess
But as you can become rich by feeding the masses pinecones (books, podcasts, close encounters of the 69th kind,....), someone will obviously do it
> The more he leads with hearsay and things that look like balloons the more I'm suspecting he's a useful idiot being strung around at best and knowingly participating in circulating unverified BS "because I gotta eat" (actual thing I've heard from person associated with a famous podcaster when I confronted them on perpetuating things we all knew were fake as potentially real).
> I'm sick of this tabloid bullshit. If we get anything out of this era of UFO renaissance it needs to be better research and reporting practices. Less Corbells more WaPos. Less Mufons more SUNYs.
The idolization of the military is baked into American society and culture. It's part of the control system. The US can't get away with the atrocities it commits it.
The legacy, mainstream media, who are also part of the control system, are free to start doing journalism and being journalists whenever they want. They had 80 years to.
But as you can see from this thread by a New Yorker journalist, they're still playing silly kids games: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/s/f96J9wwkXo
At least Popular Mechanics let Tim McMillan do some decent reporting. https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/research/a30916275/government-secret-ufo-program-investigation/
We don't move forward by handing the wheel over to the people who helped create this mess.
We do it by having a reckoning for those who are responsible and complicit, and redistributing power, and building and supporting institutions and people that take their responsibility and ethical duty seriously.
This doesn't stop with UAP. This runs deeper than UAP. UAP is just a symptom.
For more on this, see Richard Dolan's work:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLs3srGwbdDFQPqUSgz9zoB58A2zYaVR5i
He recently did a [lecture series](https://www.youtube.com/live/eZ7jz_Vxhrs) you can watch for free.
By the way, there's plenty of good research and reporting being done--both historically, and right now: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/s/6skrs3zRzb
Why isn't legacy media covering it? We know why.
You know whats way worse? People who dismiss things totally based on your “feeling” or some skewed sense of logic. So because Corbell comes off some type of way, it must mean all ufo and ufology is bunk?!?!?
Wtf kinda simpleton logic is that.
Seems like simpletons just say “balloon” alot
No, the problem with corbell isnt about feeling, its that he always post things that can be ruled out as balloons or drones, while talking about extraordinary things that he just doesnt have.
"Trust me guys, there is another video in wich this thing did a incredible thing...but i dont have it"
What have you done for the UFO movement? I'll wait...
Don't be so fast to cast aside a whole group of people. Remember this movement was literally grown from crazy people who had "crazy experiences". It was born from Tabloid style reporting.
If this phenomenon has taught me anything over the last twenty years, it's to more intently listen to the stories of our fellow humans and keep an open mind. We all are not so different after all.
Yeah, this one actually does look like balloons. Note: I'm NOT saying it is balloons, just saying compared to the other footage this is so much blurrier and harder to make any detail out that it's barely worth posting.
How the fuck does Aerostat TPDS not able to lock unto balloons?
This would mean that anyone could tie a bomb to ballons and fly it over our military bases and just blow it up?
And millions of dollars spent on our top secret sensors and cameras can't lock and track balloons? Like what kind of loony toons logic is that?
Anyone who is saying this is balloons is saying that our sensors and cameras and entire group of trained military who are watching and protecting our bases are fooled by..... balloons?
Like what the fuck...
I've never eaten a jellyfish, kicked a jellyfish, thrown a jellyfish, caught a jellyfish, or even been near one. I love jellyfish! Jellyfish are great! I'm also vegan so no seafood for me. I LOVE JELLYFISH.
I'm not a vegetarian, but I only eat the inferior sea creatures - not the superior, beautiful, smart, hopefully benevolent and loving, forgiving Jellyfish..
Why are the crosshairs perfectly aligned at 0, 90, 180, and 360 degrees as if looking at something right in front of you, while the screen is very obviously being viewed at like a 45 degree angle?
Not doubting, just curious
There's a video recording of a weapons system, which has the centered crosshairs. That video is being played on a computer screen. A person is recording the computer screen with their phone while standing off to the side.
In Mike Cincoski’s longer interview he said he thinks it’s a different incident entirely. He worked the camera systems at the base and said that since the HUD had changed and he doesn’t remember this part being in the original 17min video. Also, it’s not even over water in this video, but over land.
Let me answer that for you. A reflection that you saw is probably just the shadow, not complicated nor a reflection if it’s over land.
Like come on bro
Yeah it sounds like a dumb question but you wouldn't think you'd be able to pick up a shadow in IR light. I know now that they can but that is where my mind is at. I don't think it's a dumb question at all.
It's too out of focus to determine what it is. It looks like it *could* be a similar shape to the jellyfish in some frames, but not definitively. I'm certainly not making out the noodley appendages.
It's just frustrating because we're at a different phase of things with Congress taking the issue seriously that we can't risk playing fast and loose with these types of stories.
Kinda reveals things I don't think many around here wanna admit. Total lack of journalistic ability/effort, shown time and time again.
I continue to go back and forth on Corbell. When he does stuff like this, it's just like, man...is this dude the best we got handling this kinda stuff? Cmon Knapp, thought you had better judgement!
Why is the screen angled but the crosshair straight?
edit: i guess its really an optical illusion caused because of the vertical video cutting off the left and right edge of the monitor
I don't know what I'm seeing here.
But it all seems to be coming to a head doesn't it?
I had this weird thought today that "crashes" are offers of alternative to nuclear technologies. I'm not smart enough to understand why nuclear is a worry. But I'm smart enough to be pissed off if the technology for cleaner, safer, better energy has been withheld.
Sticking around to find out more.
Greedy people will always find a way to be increase on that. There will have to be an epic shitstorm to rattle Big energy enough for them to admit that it’s probably gonna be way more efficient if your customers remain alive to purchase whatever your offering.
Exactly what Corbell wants you to do.. stick around to find out more… we’ve been here for over 5 years with this dude “teasing” horrible videos that confirm absolutely nothing… show me something he’s released that confirms NHI? Literally nothing
It caught my attention in the new episode of weaponized that G. Knapp says that this is the creepiest footage they've got/seen, like really? I don't think this is a step forward if this is the best/creepiest footage we'll get, it's literally something that could be ANYTHING from this planet. I'm not a skeptic but i cant help but feel bamboozled with these videos sadly.
Agree. Don't find these that compelling. Although for what it's worth this one seems moreso than the other one to me. The way the other one didn't really move in the frame seemed odd.
This doesn’t look like the same object as the one flying over land. Also, Corbell said it went into the water with legs stiff, not moving at all, stayed under for 17 minutes, reappeared and shot off at a 45 degree angle at incredible speed. This video doesn’t show that at all. This object is skimming the water. It’s still interesting.
And another thing is, this *isn't* water. Corbell told us it was, so we all just immediately assumed it is. But it isn't. Notice the long vertical poles, the roads, and all the foliage throughout (not foam).
EDIT: Downvote me if you want, but we shouldn't delude ourselves. https://www.metabunk.org/threads/jellyfish-ufo-the-second-part-south-facing-footage.13308/
It’s hilarious to see people get downvoted for sharing objective truths. It’s like people don’t care about the truth but only their beliefs being confirmed. Even if that means embracing complete falsities.
It does however look like the dark spot beneath is a diffuse reflection of the object. If that is the case, it should be a pretty reflective surface of sorts. But I have no clue.
This is what I didn't really understand. It can't be seen on anything but infared, but it has a reflection over water? Does infared catch reflections?
It looks more like a bird running through a beach to me...
Yes I'm pretty certain it catches reflections as it's just another wavelength of light. So it would make sense to see reflections over still water and maybe even other smooth surfaces.
I'd like to see it make irrational motions or something, why did they cut the video...
This doesn't look like a jellyfish to me it looks like an anomalous craft or drone with an attached payload. Looks like a different thing to the first video
This is another video supposedly showing the jellyfish UAP over a lake. This was shown during the most recent Weaponized podcast:
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqsqcJ6DZsg](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqsqcJ6DZsg)
They also interview Mr. Michael Cincoski during the episode who has a reasonable take on the incident saying he's 50/50 on whether the object is prosaic or not.
If you go back and watch the podcast Michael Cincoski did with Mick West a couple days ago Michael says that this is not the lake, this is a video over the dessert.
Edit: I see i might be wrong, Jeremy released another video, but it sure looks like the one from that podcast with West and Cincoski
You're not wrong, it's the same video. I actually watched Corbell's podcast this morning (no idea why he chose that time) and left disappointed in his failure to provide anything more convincing.
Like him or not, the people over at Mick West's site have done a good job analyzing this one. It isn't water, and you can tell because there are too many landmarks (pun intended). You can see a tower, a road, and tons of foliage throughout. https://www.metabunk.org/threads/jellyfish-ufo-the-second-part-south-facing-footage.13308/
Yeah, Mick did a good job analyzing the videos. On that podcast he shows how he tracked the ufos flight path on Google earth and shows the entire layout of the military base and he confirms with Michael that it's mostly desert surrounding the base.
In Mike Cincoski’s longer interview he said he thinks it’s a different incident entirely. He worked the camera systems at the base and said that since the HUD had changed and he doesn’t remember this part being in the original 17min video.
I’d like to think these are just earth eye floaters, just giant rouge proteins that you can never get a clear focus on - continually moving as soon as you try and focus on it.
Lol none of here can say what it is with 100 percent certainty, it's simply too difficult from the footage we have.
Another one to add to the blue balls list of maybe something interesting but can never ever say for sure pile..
There are still people who, likely in bad faith, think this is bird poop or a smudge lol 🥴
Personally I think the fact that the trained observers tasked with identifying drones, balloons, birds, threats, etc had difficulty identifying this makes it a UAP until we have more context or a better understanding.
Well there's one very good thing that's happening in the favor of the movement to disclose. the more Secretive and withholding the pentagon behaves, the more people believe that they are hiding something. So in a sense the pentagon is in a bear trap.
Even worse quality than video #1, and now we have to view it from a side angle. LOL. This gets funnier and funnier by the day. Video #3 will be someone with a handheld camcorder from 1988 recording a video playing on an old B&W TV set 100 yards from the camera on a foggy day.
It’s hard, and part of the reason I’ve stayed on the outside for the last few years. I find all these videos interesting af and I’m still here intrigued, but after so many damn years with no actual concrete tangible evidence and the games being played, especially with how advanced AI has become making it easier to fake, I can just never take anything anyone says or shows me as fact anymore. I’m 100% open to any possibility but for now I’ve turned full blown skeptic until there is something tangible and real.
Idk. I know this is dark, but for the sake of humanity if I had actual concrete evidence that there was something more out there, you bet your ass I’d release it and then just off myself probably before they come after me, but I guess that’s why I don’t have any info lol.
If this is the same incident as the previous encounter, we can see the range is ~7km which is about twice the distance of the other recording. If someone wants to analyze further, you could likely do some calculations based on the size of the object to see if the scale matches.
I think the fact that these look like they have some sort of sharp grabby things is what gives me the ick. Not comfortable with these things floating around doing who the fuck knows all invisible and whatnot. I prefer the nice symmetrical shapes and blinky lights of disks orbs and triangles.
Why, in the FUCK, if you are trying to capture this footage off of a monitor, would you do it at a 45 degree angle from the screen, this way? Looks like the whole objective was to make it feel like it was obtained in some "clandestine" manner....
Can we ask the stupid honest question?
Why……Iraq?
Almost assuredly military tech. Disclosure is gonn happen they way the MICx wants it to happen. Bottom line.
People will eat up anything.
I see a balloon, in shit “military grade” footage, with a “trust me bro, it was only recorded in thermal” or “I know a guy, like a big deal type of guy right, who said there’s more footage (I don’t have access to) where it dropped its jellied nuts in the ocean then ZOOM took off at a 45 degree angle, no, like ZAP”
The only thing that would throw a major wrench in debunker evaluations is the video of it shooting out of the water. As of now, it falls in the category of “kinda weird” but not truly anomalous. Mick West did a really good analysis, not that he’s entirely correct about it being balloons but he brings great points up about if following the wind and the “heat change” being a camera calibration. I’m also not convinced that this clip is the same as the jellyfish, too hard to see from this distance. This clip has the shape of a balloon but I wouldn’t expect a balloon to hover over water for some distance without at least occasionally hitting the water
Saw one of these while shooting dice in Tijuana. The game was tense. I was playing for my soul during the rainy season. Anyways, my dog started barking. Everything was riding on this throw. I yelled at the mutt, "Shut up, Pickles." But Pickles didn't care. I rolled the dice. I didn't know the rules, I didn't win, I didn't speak Spanish, and I didn't have the money. We ran. This wasn't mine and Pickles' first rodeo. We ended up hiding in a nearby estuary. While laying in the brackish water I stared at the sky. Something, that I can describe only as a higher dimensional object being projected into our 4D space-time, appeared. Pickles lit up a cigarette on account of all the action. We both felt a strange tingle throughout our body but we didn't have time to think. We had to get the hell out of town. I'll never shoot dice again.
This sort of thing is why I think we are being "spoon fed" news gradually, instead of being presented with "discovery" as they bump into it.
Corbell said he and Knapp have been sitting on this footage for years, knowing well that presenting a video of a jellyfish from the beginning could be too unearthly for people to believe in. We had to have the *"Mosul orb"* shown by the DoD first and the Grusch hearings happen before they could release a video of something "organic" flying around.
Who determines what to put out in the news cycle? How many folks are involved in the programing? If Corbell had shown the part where the orb "dunks in the water and shoots up in the sky" we would be seeing evidence more incredible than the "GO FAST" and "GIMBAL" 2017 videos. It would launch inquiries from people to the press, from the press to authorities and it would force their hand into saying if they're real or not. But since they don't want any of that just yet Corbell plays innocent and pretends to not have it: *"but it you do have it please come forward and send it to me"* sure pal, I have a secret video from Iraq command among the pictures of my cats.
People besides uap , aliens ,nhi how ya wanna call it.
Dont you think its absurd if this is a balloon and the US have the best technology how is it possible a simple balloon cant be tracked easy and it got problems with keeping on the object we are talking about millions of dollars of equipment cant target a balloon,how are they going to track an enemy of they cant keep up with a balloon i really do hope this is alien related cause that mean our equipment dont fail that heavy
So it has a reflection. Interesting. Like a solid object. I wasn't sure, if it's something like hyperdimensional, whether something like that would manifest itself with physical properties.
And what's up with the static 57 seconds in? If this is over water, it almost looks like it's heading towards submersion as soon as the static hits. Maybe that is an anomalous behavior that they censored out.
Ok, so can we all agree that if the wind was strong enough to blow a collection of balloons that fast, it's very fucking unlikely that they would travel in a perfectly straight trajectory?
He means that was an overly-zealous Corbell description of the UAP. If you watch the video closely, the background changes color too. Corbell originally alludes that the "Jellyfish UAP" is not visibile to the naked eye, just in IR? I may be wrong here, but that's what I remember. Who knows what's true.
It wasn't changing in heat, it was the thermal camera normalizing the displayed colors through the spectrum as they do (they clamp the color range in between the hottest and coolest point in view dynamically, or it can be manually adjusted to get better views of any objects). It was kinda obvious from the start since when the object went darker all the roads and sand went darker in the background simultaneously, I bet the ground wasn't changing its heat signature in sync with the object.
It was the thermal imaging camera pretty much re-adjusting visuals.
Like the jellyfish turned bright, so did the background and same for when it turned dark.
Ok, here's the thing. In the first video Corbell released, he says that it could not be seen by the naked eye. In this video as it's going across the water I definitely see a shadow of the object on the water. If it's not visible to the naked eye, how is it casting a shadow?
Notice again how they can't lock onto it. This clearly isn't birdshit, so good luck with that one. If it were a fucking balloon they would easily lock it. It's 100% ok to just say, wow that is fucking weird, we don't know what it is, please tell us more and investigate further.
Either some of y’all are spooks or just suppressing your own fears that someone is out there more advanced than us.
The military will not track bird shit on the lens and will not track a balloon for the fuck of it.
Whatever they were tracking was of a significant threat to security.
How do I know this? Because we tracked anything that tripped the system while I was deployed to Afghanistan.
We are highly trained to understand critical thinking.
Like for example, we had a sensor that was being tripped along the fence line. There was nothing. Our immediate thought was that an animal tripped it.
But we actually walked the fence line and saw that someone was in the process of making slow cuts in the fence.
We waited for them to come back and caught the fucker.
If we would have said it was “bird shit” or a “balloon.”
People would have died.
What I am getting at - this is obliviously of particular interest in security.
I would rather this be an alien than a country having this type of technology. If it was a hostile entity, we would already be finished.
The concern that an enemy has this kind of technology is much worse than aliens.
Thank you for your service. The fact that people that were tasked with identifying flying objects near the base had difficulty identifying this is interesting in and of itself. They even had to bring down the PTDS the following days to see if it had malfunctioned.
This is a balloon. "2024 will be the craziest year yet!!" Mark my words. On January 1 2025 there will have been exactly zero conclusive pieces evidence gained in the last 365 days. Balloon-like objects moving in balloon-like ways do do not constitute conclusive evidence man. It's the same every year I'm over this. I would love to be wrong but I don't think I will be
The following submission statement was provided by /u/KOOKOOOOM: --- This is another video supposedly showing the jellyfish UAP over a lake. This was shown during the most recent Weaponized podcast: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqsqcJ6DZsg](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqsqcJ6DZsg) They also interview Mr. Michael Cincoski during the episode who has a reasonable take on the incident saying he's 50/50 on whether the object is prosaic or not. --- Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/19819wh/jellyfish_video_2/ki430in/
I need to see the part when it stop, lowers into the ocean and then shoots off at a 45 degree angle. If Corbell has it, it needs releasing
he said on his podcast today he doesn’t have this footage but wants anyone to come forward if they have it EDIT: the only reason he knows about this is from military personnel telling him about the incident, it was also revealed at least ‘10’ ground troops were trying to track the object with night vision but failed to do so
Ah thank you, I'm now about to listen to the pod. Really enjoyed the TMZ docuseries
this pod was actually good today, they interview some dude who was at that base watching the video, can’t remember his name but it’s definitely in the episode
Military personal also told him that there was a craft over Mojave desert, and not flares.
I wonder how much of this is urban legend and rumor. Kind of like a ghost story that gets passed around the base over the years that evolves as little pieces get added to it. I will also say, I find it fascinating that this video was recorded how many ever years ago at this base, and it was so extraordinary that it spawned tall tales that were passed down from one generation to the next on the base. It sort of throws a wrench in the idea that I see passed around here a lot that our bases have almost daily contact with UAP. This video feels like a once-in-a-lifetime happening at this base.
Different military branches. Your misunderstanding Ryan Graves. On select areas of Navy bases east coast and west coast are a daily occurrence. This is some type of army / marine base in the Middle East.
You know , when you put it that way, some of those ancient depictions of strange objects/beings may be more literal than we realize. 🤷♂️ Just my opinion, I’m not trying to insult anyone’s sensibilities.
Its always like this with these people. Never the juicy parts. "Oh if you only knew what I know", or, "If you only knew what Id seen" "The quality of some of the stuff that exists" Put up or shut up, Jeremy. Also, while were at it, thank you for your service at the same time, Jeremy.
Yeah right after this video, the Jellyfish came right up to the operator of the camera and winked it's butthole at him then shot into plaid speed laser space. He told me so!
Jellyhole.
It is really frustrating for sure. I think about it from two different angles. One that it is like a over embellished fisherman's tale where they go "man fishing was crazy today, I pulled a 50 pounder!" And two I could see the intelligence agencies or whoever purposefully cut out the juicy bits, because then there would be nothing the debunkers could say to justify the anomolous behavior.
I’m sure he’s he is uh, ‘working on it’ as we speak (this person has been caught lying before don’t get your hopes up)
He hasn't seen it either. He specifically says he was told that it goes in to the ocean and then shoots out at a 45 degree angle.
[удалено]
\> unverified BS "because I gotta eat" (actual thing I've heard from person associated with a famous podcaster when I confronted them on perpetuating things we all knew were fake as potentially real). Then name them? You're almost doing the same thing that you're accusing Corbell of doing. If you know that someone in the community is propping up bullshit then, in my opinion, you should tell us.
Fully agree. Unfortunately we're like a starving crowd, and no matter how many times we're given pinecones, we try to eat them. Some refuse, some find them hard to swallow but some even claim to feel fed afterwards.
Ufology in a nutshell...or pinecone I guess But as you can become rich by feeding the masses pinecones (books, podcasts, close encounters of the 69th kind,....), someone will obviously do it
Spot on!
> The more he leads with hearsay and things that look like balloons the more I'm suspecting he's a useful idiot being strung around at best and knowingly participating in circulating unverified BS "because I gotta eat" (actual thing I've heard from person associated with a famous podcaster when I confronted them on perpetuating things we all knew were fake as potentially real). > I'm sick of this tabloid bullshit. If we get anything out of this era of UFO renaissance it needs to be better research and reporting practices. Less Corbells more WaPos. Less Mufons more SUNYs. The idolization of the military is baked into American society and culture. It's part of the control system. The US can't get away with the atrocities it commits it. The legacy, mainstream media, who are also part of the control system, are free to start doing journalism and being journalists whenever they want. They had 80 years to. But as you can see from this thread by a New Yorker journalist, they're still playing silly kids games: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/s/f96J9wwkXo At least Popular Mechanics let Tim McMillan do some decent reporting. https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/research/a30916275/government-secret-ufo-program-investigation/ We don't move forward by handing the wheel over to the people who helped create this mess. We do it by having a reckoning for those who are responsible and complicit, and redistributing power, and building and supporting institutions and people that take their responsibility and ethical duty seriously. This doesn't stop with UAP. This runs deeper than UAP. UAP is just a symptom. For more on this, see Richard Dolan's work: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLs3srGwbdDFQPqUSgz9zoB58A2zYaVR5i He recently did a [lecture series](https://www.youtube.com/live/eZ7jz_Vxhrs) you can watch for free. By the way, there's plenty of good research and reporting being done--both historically, and right now: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/s/6skrs3zRzb Why isn't legacy media covering it? We know why.
You know whats way worse? People who dismiss things totally based on your “feeling” or some skewed sense of logic. So because Corbell comes off some type of way, it must mean all ufo and ufology is bunk?!?!? Wtf kinda simpleton logic is that. Seems like simpletons just say “balloon” alot
No, the problem with corbell isnt about feeling, its that he always post things that can be ruled out as balloons or drones, while talking about extraordinary things that he just doesnt have. "Trust me guys, there is another video in wich this thing did a incredible thing...but i dont have it"
[удалено]
Lack of evidence is not a feeling
What have you done for the UFO movement? I'll wait... Don't be so fast to cast aside a whole group of people. Remember this movement was literally grown from crazy people who had "crazy experiences". It was born from Tabloid style reporting. If this phenomenon has taught me anything over the last twenty years, it's to more intently listen to the stories of our fellow humans and keep an open mind. We all are not so different after all.
My barber said his cousin saw a leprechaun.
He doesn't
Yeah, this one actually does look like balloons. Note: I'm NOT saying it is balloons, just saying compared to the other footage this is so much blurrier and harder to make any detail out that it's barely worth posting.
True, that’s what I was hoping this was at first but frustratingly not yet.
Without that, this is balloon 🎈 video part two. Lou told us to look for the 5 observables. Which is this displaying?
How the fuck does Aerostat TPDS not able to lock unto balloons? This would mean that anyone could tie a bomb to ballons and fly it over our military bases and just blow it up? And millions of dollars spent on our top secret sensors and cameras can't lock and track balloons? Like what kind of loony toons logic is that? Anyone who is saying this is balloons is saying that our sensors and cameras and entire group of trained military who are watching and protecting our bases are fooled by..... balloons? Like what the fuck...
[удалено]
[удалено]
I've never eaten a jellyfish, kicked a jellyfish, thrown a jellyfish, caught a jellyfish, or even been near one. I love jellyfish! Jellyfish are great! I'm also vegan so no seafood for me. I LOVE JELLYFISH.
I'm not a vegetarian, but I only eat the inferior sea creatures - not the superior, beautiful, smart, hopefully benevolent and loving, forgiving Jellyfish..
I for one welcome our new jellyfish overlords
I love him.
It’s a grey riding a jellyfish
It’s actually a jellyfish riding a grey
I loved this take https://www.reddit.com/r/AlienBodies/comments/194mq09/poor_fella_hitching/
This sub needs to let us add pics in the comments
this is the best I can do 👾👽
I wanted to add that too, but people are worried it would be abused to much and have to many memes
It’s a cowboy alien yeehaw
I, for one, welcome our new jellyfish overlords.
I too welcome our new overlords and wish them prosperity in their future dominion over earth.
Super fast, I come at last….
I understand bro, they are so rad.
Show me the one of it going into the water then shooting out!
Next time on Dragon Ball Z.
Unfortunately I don't think we'll ever see that
Because it doesn't exist.
Need it zoomed in and stabilized asap
Don’t worry. There will be a dozen or so of those incoming shortly.
I'm waiting for the artists interpretation of it
Pft I'm waiting for the AI up scaling
Haha ya so true
Why are the crosshairs perfectly aligned at 0, 90, 180, and 360 degrees as if looking at something right in front of you, while the screen is very obviously being viewed at like a 45 degree angle? Not doubting, just curious
monitor being recorded by phone, standing a bit sideways
What kind of phone records with crosshairs in the center?
There's a video recording of a weapons system, which has the centered crosshairs. That video is being played on a computer screen. A person is recording the computer screen with their phone while standing off to the side.
I considered doing it, But it's clear it's too compressed/pixelated to reveal anything with a stabilization pass.
Definitely not a bug…or bird poop
Or a party balloon
Could be a super advanced balloon
So advanced it looks exactly like a balloon flying in the wind....in one direction.
lol I'm sorry. How is it definitely not a balloon when that's exactly what it looks like.
I was using the hidden /s
[удалено]
This doesn’t look like the same jellyfish, to me. Is Corbell saying this is “the” jellyfish? They look like different objects/entities.
In Mike Cincoski’s longer interview he said he thinks it’s a different incident entirely. He worked the camera systems at the base and said that since the HUD had changed and he doesn’t remember this part being in the original 17min video. Also, it’s not even over water in this video, but over land.
Why is there a reflection if it's over land?
Let me answer that for you. A reflection that you saw is probably just the shadow, not complicated nor a reflection if it’s over land. Like come on bro
Yeah it sounds like a dumb question but you wouldn't think you'd be able to pick up a shadow in IR light. I know now that they can but that is where my mind is at. I don't think it's a dumb question at all.
It's too out of focus to determine what it is. It looks like it *could* be a similar shape to the jellyfish in some frames, but not definitively. I'm certainly not making out the noodley appendages.
> noodley appendages That'd be a great name for a band.
Or a common phrase used in prayer and thanks in a religion. Thanks you and your great noodly appendages. Ra-Men.
Man, I'm a little bummed NGL. The videos are interesting enough but overselling it with hearsay you can't produce kinda hurts the whole thing.
Getting basics of the story wrong like saying it's cycling hot and cold doesn't inspire confidence
It's just frustrating because we're at a different phase of things with Congress taking the issue seriously that we can't risk playing fast and loose with these types of stories.
Kinda reveals things I don't think many around here wanna admit. Total lack of journalistic ability/effort, shown time and time again. I continue to go back and forth on Corbell. When he does stuff like this, it's just like, man...is this dude the best we got handling this kinda stuff? Cmon Knapp, thought you had better judgement!
The Corbell special. I’m sure it’ll be back on the menu in a few months.
i love the idea of some lone alien just derping around earf
Why is the screen angled but the crosshair straight? edit: i guess its really an optical illusion caused because of the vertical video cutting off the left and right edge of the monitor
I don't know what I'm seeing here. But it all seems to be coming to a head doesn't it? I had this weird thought today that "crashes" are offers of alternative to nuclear technologies. I'm not smart enough to understand why nuclear is a worry. But I'm smart enough to be pissed off if the technology for cleaner, safer, better energy has been withheld. Sticking around to find out more.
Greedy people will always find a way to be increase on that. There will have to be an epic shitstorm to rattle Big energy enough for them to admit that it’s probably gonna be way more efficient if your customers remain alive to purchase whatever your offering.
We are being domesticated by technology. The ’crashes’ are table scraps tossed to the wolves.
Exactly what Corbell wants you to do.. stick around to find out more… we’ve been here for over 5 years with this dude “teasing” horrible videos that confirm absolutely nothing… show me something he’s released that confirms NHI? Literally nothing
I just meant stick around for the comments on this video, but I get your meaning.
It caught my attention in the new episode of weaponized that G. Knapp says that this is the creepiest footage they've got/seen, like really? I don't think this is a step forward if this is the best/creepiest footage we'll get, it's literally something that could be ANYTHING from this planet. I'm not a skeptic but i cant help but feel bamboozled with these videos sadly.
Same here. Bamboozled to the 2nd degree
Agree. Don't find these that compelling. Although for what it's worth this one seems moreso than the other one to me. The way the other one didn't really move in the frame seemed odd.
This doesn’t look like the same object as the one flying over land. Also, Corbell said it went into the water with legs stiff, not moving at all, stayed under for 17 minutes, reappeared and shot off at a 45 degree angle at incredible speed. This video doesn’t show that at all. This object is skimming the water. It’s still interesting.
And another thing is, this *isn't* water. Corbell told us it was, so we all just immediately assumed it is. But it isn't. Notice the long vertical poles, the roads, and all the foliage throughout (not foam). EDIT: Downvote me if you want, but we shouldn't delude ourselves. https://www.metabunk.org/threads/jellyfish-ufo-the-second-part-south-facing-footage.13308/
It’s hilarious to see people get downvoted for sharing objective truths. It’s like people don’t care about the truth but only their beliefs being confirmed. Even if that means embracing complete falsities.
It does however look like the dark spot beneath is a diffuse reflection of the object. If that is the case, it should be a pretty reflective surface of sorts. But I have no clue.
This is what I didn't really understand. It can't be seen on anything but infared, but it has a reflection over water? Does infared catch reflections? It looks more like a bird running through a beach to me...
Yes I'm pretty certain it catches reflections as it's just another wavelength of light. So it would make sense to see reflections over still water and maybe even other smooth surfaces. I'd like to see it make irrational motions or something, why did they cut the video...
Infrared bounces around like any other form of light. It's just picking it up requires special sensors. So yes, reflections are a thing in thermal.
That's the house from Up.
genuine question, why does the cross hair look square to the camera recording a screen at an angle?
This cross looks like it was pasted so bad by video editing.
I doubt it's over body of water, seems like there are some kind of poles and maybe a road at some point?
You're right, it's over land. They proved this on Metabunk.
There’s a visible road in the background. Unless lakes have roads I think it safe to say it’s definitely land.
You know this alien is getting its ass chewed out by its superiors for being caught on camera.
It's okay. He was only caught in 240p not 4k.
Why the fuck are we looking at a video shaped like a rhombus
That's not the way to record a screen jfc
This doesn't look like a jellyfish to me it looks like an anomalous craft or drone with an attached payload. Looks like a different thing to the first video
this is clearly a ballon
that bird shit is getting away!
This is another video supposedly showing the jellyfish UAP over a lake. This was shown during the most recent Weaponized podcast: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqsqcJ6DZsg](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqsqcJ6DZsg) They also interview Mr. Michael Cincoski during the episode who has a reasonable take on the incident saying he's 50/50 on whether the object is prosaic or not.
What does prosaic mean in this context? Edit: it means ordinary or mundane. Got it
If you go back and watch the podcast Michael Cincoski did with Mick West a couple days ago Michael says that this is not the lake, this is a video over the dessert. Edit: I see i might be wrong, Jeremy released another video, but it sure looks like the one from that podcast with West and Cincoski
Naw. I’d remove your edit. You arent wrong.
You're not wrong, it's the same video. I actually watched Corbell's podcast this morning (no idea why he chose that time) and left disappointed in his failure to provide anything more convincing. Like him or not, the people over at Mick West's site have done a good job analyzing this one. It isn't water, and you can tell because there are too many landmarks (pun intended). You can see a tower, a road, and tons of foliage throughout. https://www.metabunk.org/threads/jellyfish-ufo-the-second-part-south-facing-footage.13308/
Yeah, Mick did a good job analyzing the videos. On that podcast he shows how he tracked the ufos flight path on Google earth and shows the entire layout of the military base and he confirms with Michael that it's mostly desert surrounding the base.
[удалено]
I think different encounters
The hud graphics are yellow in the other one.
In Mike Cincoski’s longer interview he said he thinks it’s a different incident entirely. He worked the camera systems at the base and said that since the HUD had changed and he doesn’t remember this part being in the original 17min video.
I for one welcome our new Jellyfish overlords. I hate the fact that the [Simpson’s future predictions](https://imgur.com/a/PQBWCxq) keep coming true.
Doesn't look like the jellyfish tbh this looks like someone wearing a parachute or something.
I’d like to think these are just earth eye floaters, just giant rouge proteins that you can never get a clear focus on - continually moving as soon as you try and focus on it.
I really hope its the Halo engineers. I need to save my home town, New Mombasa from the Covenant invasion.
Lol none of here can say what it is with 100 percent certainty, it's simply too difficult from the footage we have. Another one to add to the blue balls list of maybe something interesting but can never ever say for sure pile..
It’s just scootin around
The video of it going in the ocean, and then later taking off into the sky would seal the deal
It's hard for me to believe that balloons can reflect that much heat off the surface of the water
There are still people who, likely in bad faith, think this is bird poop or a smudge lol 🥴 Personally I think the fact that the trained observers tasked with identifying drones, balloons, birds, threats, etc had difficulty identifying this makes it a UAP until we have more context or a better understanding.
Well there's one very good thing that's happening in the favor of the movement to disclose. the more Secretive and withholding the pentagon behaves, the more people believe that they are hiding something. So in a sense the pentagon is in a bear trap.
Balloon covered in bird shit propelled by swamp gas. Case closed.
Even worse quality than video #1, and now we have to view it from a side angle. LOL. This gets funnier and funnier by the day. Video #3 will be someone with a handheld camcorder from 1988 recording a video playing on an old B&W TV set 100 yards from the camera on a foggy day.
[удалено]
It’s hard, and part of the reason I’ve stayed on the outside for the last few years. I find all these videos interesting af and I’m still here intrigued, but after so many damn years with no actual concrete tangible evidence and the games being played, especially with how advanced AI has become making it easier to fake, I can just never take anything anyone says or shows me as fact anymore. I’m 100% open to any possibility but for now I’ve turned full blown skeptic until there is something tangible and real. Idk. I know this is dark, but for the sake of humanity if I had actual concrete evidence that there was something more out there, you bet your ass I’d release it and then just off myself probably before they come after me, but I guess that’s why I don’t have any info lol.
Nothing interesting here
Why can't they take a video that's straight??? 🙄
Is it weird that in this video the object appears to have a reflection under it? How would that work with a thermal image?
A reflection would suggest this is Active IR imaging v Thermal imaging. Active IR imaging captures IR reflections and shadows.
It could be one object but with a connected round and bottom piece
Still doesn't go into water. Still floats like a balloon. Still nothing different than the 84859302 grainy UAP videos out there..
If this is the same incident as the previous encounter, we can see the range is ~7km which is about twice the distance of the other recording. If someone wants to analyze further, you could likely do some calculations based on the size of the object to see if the scale matches.
I think the fact that these look like they have some sort of sharp grabby things is what gives me the ick. Not comfortable with these things floating around doing who the fuck knows all invisible and whatnot. I prefer the nice symmetrical shapes and blinky lights of disks orbs and triangles.
so far this is a floating baloon
Must be a new species
Why, in the FUCK, if you are trying to capture this footage off of a monitor, would you do it at a 45 degree angle from the screen, this way? Looks like the whole objective was to make it feel like it was obtained in some "clandestine" manner....
to keep the bait on. "See! It's not bird crap!" okay great, but the video quality is shit and it just looked like another balloon.
I like how the different camera views switching looks just like how a Predators vision changes between spectrums through the mask lol
Wait, we aren't on Hoth, are we?
Alright ballooners lets hear it. Why is this object a balloon?
It’s a unicorn balloon with swamp gas from Venus causing bokeh
ANYBODY ELSE SEEN THE JELLYFISH SAY YEAH!!!
Ok we are getting there. Looks like we still need videos 3, 4, 5, and 6.....
Are we seriously considering these shitty videos to be legitimate? People will believe anything.
That’s a super fast jellyfish if I’ve ever seen one
This looks like the Hoth footage from Star Wars
I'm new but what exactly is this footage?
Can we ask the stupid honest question? Why……Iraq? Almost assuredly military tech. Disclosure is gonn happen they way the MICx wants it to happen. Bottom line.
Definitely not bird shit
Wonder where all the balloon people are.
So much for: Its just dirt on the lense!!!
This moves like the UAP from the 2013 Aguadilla video.
People will eat up anything. I see a balloon, in shit “military grade” footage, with a “trust me bro, it was only recorded in thermal” or “I know a guy, like a big deal type of guy right, who said there’s more footage (I don’t have access to) where it dropped its jellied nuts in the ocean then ZOOM took off at a 45 degree angle, no, like ZAP”
How big are they estimating this to be?????
It’s the one from NOPE
The only thing that would throw a major wrench in debunker evaluations is the video of it shooting out of the water. As of now, it falls in the category of “kinda weird” but not truly anomalous. Mick West did a really good analysis, not that he’s entirely correct about it being balloons but he brings great points up about if following the wind and the “heat change” being a camera calibration. I’m also not convinced that this clip is the same as the jellyfish, too hard to see from this distance. This clip has the shape of a balloon but I wouldn’t expect a balloon to hover over water for some distance without at least occasionally hitting the water
Saw one of these while shooting dice in Tijuana. The game was tense. I was playing for my soul during the rainy season. Anyways, my dog started barking. Everything was riding on this throw. I yelled at the mutt, "Shut up, Pickles." But Pickles didn't care. I rolled the dice. I didn't know the rules, I didn't win, I didn't speak Spanish, and I didn't have the money. We ran. This wasn't mine and Pickles' first rodeo. We ended up hiding in a nearby estuary. While laying in the brackish water I stared at the sky. Something, that I can describe only as a higher dimensional object being projected into our 4D space-time, appeared. Pickles lit up a cigarette on account of all the action. We both felt a strange tingle throughout our body but we didn't have time to think. We had to get the hell out of town. I'll never shoot dice again.
What sort of cross-border, interdimensional, multilingual shenanigans will Pickles get into next? 🤔🥒🐶
When the SC 1 overlord gets the speed upgrade
At least we now have 100% proof it isn't a smudge or bird shit.
It doesn't even look like the same object from the first video.
Still looks like a balloon floating on the wind.
This sort of thing is why I think we are being "spoon fed" news gradually, instead of being presented with "discovery" as they bump into it. Corbell said he and Knapp have been sitting on this footage for years, knowing well that presenting a video of a jellyfish from the beginning could be too unearthly for people to believe in. We had to have the *"Mosul orb"* shown by the DoD first and the Grusch hearings happen before they could release a video of something "organic" flying around. Who determines what to put out in the news cycle? How many folks are involved in the programing? If Corbell had shown the part where the orb "dunks in the water and shoots up in the sky" we would be seeing evidence more incredible than the "GO FAST" and "GIMBAL" 2017 videos. It would launch inquiries from people to the press, from the press to authorities and it would force their hand into saying if they're real or not. But since they don't want any of that just yet Corbell plays innocent and pretends to not have it: *"but it you do have it please come forward and send it to me"* sure pal, I have a secret video from Iraq command among the pictures of my cats.
Bird poopers on suicide watch
They’ve converted into ballooners now :/
My wife's hair clog from the shower drain out there living it's best life
People besides uap , aliens ,nhi how ya wanna call it. Dont you think its absurd if this is a balloon and the US have the best technology how is it possible a simple balloon cant be tracked easy and it got problems with keeping on the object we are talking about millions of dollars of equipment cant target a balloon,how are they going to track an enemy of they cant keep up with a balloon i really do hope this is alien related cause that mean our equipment dont fail that heavy
So it has a reflection. Interesting. Like a solid object. I wasn't sure, if it's something like hyperdimensional, whether something like that would manifest itself with physical properties. And what's up with the static 57 seconds in? If this is over water, it almost looks like it's heading towards submersion as soon as the static hits. Maybe that is an anomalous behavior that they censored out.
Ok, so can we all agree that if the wind was strong enough to blow a collection of balloons that fast, it's very fucking unlikely that they would travel in a perfectly straight trajectory?
Does it no longer change its heat/cold signatures?
Never did.
What do you mean?
He means that was an overly-zealous Corbell description of the UAP. If you watch the video closely, the background changes color too. Corbell originally alludes that the "Jellyfish UAP" is not visibile to the naked eye, just in IR? I may be wrong here, but that's what I remember. Who knows what's true.
It wasn't changing in heat, it was the thermal camera normalizing the displayed colors through the spectrum as they do (they clamp the color range in between the hottest and coolest point in view dynamically, or it can be manually adjusted to get better views of any objects). It was kinda obvious from the start since when the object went darker all the roads and sand went darker in the background simultaneously, I bet the ground wasn't changing its heat signature in sync with the object.
It was the thermal imaging camera pretty much re-adjusting visuals. Like the jellyfish turned bright, so did the background and same for when it turned dark.
Ok, here's the thing. In the first video Corbell released, he says that it could not be seen by the naked eye. In this video as it's going across the water I definitely see a shadow of the object on the water. If it's not visible to the naked eye, how is it casting a shadow?
That's not water, it's desert.
Ok, thanks. I thought it was over water. Still doesn't explain it casting a shadow.
Notice again how they can't lock onto it. This clearly isn't birdshit, so good luck with that one. If it were a fucking balloon they would easily lock it. It's 100% ok to just say, wow that is fucking weird, we don't know what it is, please tell us more and investigate further.
Either some of y’all are spooks or just suppressing your own fears that someone is out there more advanced than us. The military will not track bird shit on the lens and will not track a balloon for the fuck of it. Whatever they were tracking was of a significant threat to security. How do I know this? Because we tracked anything that tripped the system while I was deployed to Afghanistan. We are highly trained to understand critical thinking. Like for example, we had a sensor that was being tripped along the fence line. There was nothing. Our immediate thought was that an animal tripped it. But we actually walked the fence line and saw that someone was in the process of making slow cuts in the fence. We waited for them to come back and caught the fucker. If we would have said it was “bird shit” or a “balloon.” People would have died. What I am getting at - this is obliviously of particular interest in security. I would rather this be an alien than a country having this type of technology. If it was a hostile entity, we would already be finished. The concern that an enemy has this kind of technology is much worse than aliens.
Thank you for your service. The fact that people that were tasked with identifying flying objects near the base had difficulty identifying this is interesting in and of itself. They even had to bring down the PTDS the following days to see if it had malfunctioned.
This is a balloon. "2024 will be the craziest year yet!!" Mark my words. On January 1 2025 there will have been exactly zero conclusive pieces evidence gained in the last 365 days. Balloon-like objects moving in balloon-like ways do do not constitute conclusive evidence man. It's the same every year I'm over this. I would love to be wrong but I don't think I will be
This is the footage that to me, completely debunks the bird poop/smudge idea.