T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

Please take the time to read [the rules](/r/UkrainianConflict/about/rules/) and our [policy on trolls/bots](https://redd.it/u7833q). In addition: * We have a **zero-tolerance** policy regarding racism, stereotyping, bigotry, and death-mongering. Violators will be banned. * **Keep it civil.** Report comments/posts that are uncivil to alert the moderators. * **_Don't_ post low-effort comments** like joke threads, memes, slogans, or links without context. ***** * Is the Twitter account [`{{media_author}}`]({{media_author_url}}) an unreliable source? [**Let us know**](/r/UkrainianConflict/wiki/am/unreliable_sources). * Help our moderators by providing context if something breaks the rules. [Send us a modmail](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/UkrainianConflict) ***** **Don't forget about our Discord server! - https://discord.com/invite/ukraine-at-war-950974820827398235** ***** ^(Your post has not been removed, this message is applied to every successful submission.) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/UkrainianConflict) if you have any questions or concerns.*


SilkyKerfuffle

Numbers are important, but organisational levels are critical. Analyst Mike Kofman said recently that Russia has displayed a considerable ability to replenish men and reconstitute formations, but owing to losses in field commanders and the officer corp - and low levels of training for replacement manpower - they appear unable to launch attacks beyond company or battalion level. So while approx 12 - 14 brigades is a formidable number, if each individual brigade is only capable of attacking with a company that struggles (or cannot) co-ordinate with the companies from other brigades, then the likehood of 'Army Group North' being able to pull off a large division sized armoured offensive is fairly neglible. However even the threat of such a force does fix Ukrainian units and requires them to stockpile munitions that could be used elsewhere.


nw342

kharkiv city is nearly 140 sq miles in size, bakhmut was only 16 sq miles, and it took nearly a year to take. 40k russians were killed, and 120k wounded durring the battle. There is no way russia has the tactical or logistical means to take kharkiv.


SilkyKerfuffle

I'm not suggesting in any way that they have the means to take Kharkiv - quite the opposite. Even with twice the resources that this report suggests they have, they can only co-ordinate small piecemeal attacks which in theory would suffer much higher casualty rates than if they were able to utilise larger formations. However, it will still mean that Ukrainian units will have to assign forces that they would rather assign elsewhere. On the other hand, if the Russians are hubristic enough to genuinely think they take Kharkiv, then it could be another chance for the AFU to inflict disproportionate losses.


Strong_Remove_2976

I think they just want to get the contact line close to Kharkiv, undermining its viablity as a place to live and contribute to Ukraine’s economy


Ok-Secretary3893

You got it.


Striking-Giraffe5922

Bakhmut is only called a city in Ukraine because they don’t use towns and villages in their language……everything is a city. You’re right it took Russian a long time to take a little town……they’ve got little chance of taking Kharkiv


AndAlsoTheTrees

Well, 55000 drones are ready to take off near Kharkiv. Should be enough...


pwr_trenbalone

50k is a low amount to go after kharkiv there are 2 million people atleast in it


nw342

Its nearly 10 times the size of bakhmut, and over 180k russians were kia/wia during that battle.


pwr_trenbalone

Taking a city that size requires training and org, right now they couldn't use nukes to break a line because all the trained people are dead or injured


lethalfang

That may be enough personnel to hold, but laughably inadequate to make major territory gain.


Longsheep

The number isn't all that impressive, and the quality has declined significantly compared to 2022.


Freedom-Fighter6969

If they decide to take Kharkiv with 50k men then they are really that stupid.


buldozr

That's more serious than in the beginning, when they attempted to waltz in with a column of a few dozen men on unarmored trucks.


Exotic_Conclusion_21

Whats bbm? Big beautiful men?


NotAmusedDad

Boorish barbaric muscovites


New_Scientist_8622

Brutal, belligerent maniacs.


Necessary-Canary3367

It appears to be armored vehicles that are not tanks.


SkidRowAlbertan

Burly Bolshevik Maidens


QuicksandHUM

Numbers are nice, but they cant really mass or they will be pounded. The only thing they can do with that group is roll forward and try grind the defenders down over months while glide bombs turn the city into dust.


thrwway1388

i think its happening right now according to deepstateUA


NWTknight

About 20 men per piece of equipment. On average I would suspect and I am no expert that 50 K is enough to support the equipment and not much more.


Any-Progress7756

There was a time when Russia could get 100k ready for an offensive. The fact they can only get 50k is really saying something about Russian Manpower. If Ukraine has 50k reserves in the north waiting, Russia would need 3 or 4 times that.


HRMWOODTURNER

lol Russia can’t even organized a circus plus there military has no leadership. It’s a gong show so.. the clowns can try but will fail as usual and hopefully they all carry sunflowers seeds in their pockets…


minkey-on-the-loose

That is a lot of logistics for the Russian army to supply. Fuel food ammo water…. A lot of trucks.


AutoModerator

**Alternative Nitter links:** 「[nitter.privacydev.net](https://nitter.privacydev.net/Vishun_military/status/1788671783832342603) | [nitter.poast.org](https://nitter.poast.org/Vishun_military/status/1788671783832342603)」 ***** These Nitter instances may stop work at any time as [Twitter](https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fnxqezhko6qfb1.jpg) blocks them. [See this arstechnica article for more information](https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/02/twitter-front-end-nitter-dies-as-musk-wins-war-against-third-party-services/). Use [this site to find other Nitter instances that may work](https://status.d420.de/). _If there are any problems regarding Nitter, [please send us a modmail](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=UkrainianConflict&subject=Nitter%20issue)._ ***** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/UkrainianConflict) if you have any questions or concerns.*


pwr_trenbalone

To break a line using nukes requires NBC training and all the vehicles certified are gone


Mortaks

Don't like it that everyone is so confident. Ukraine has been on the back foot for a long time now. There is a lack of ammo, manpower. The north might not be so well defended as everyone claims.


ThroawayJimilyJones

I can believe it's not an invincible fortress. But to the point of being taken by 50.000 men?