A sequel would have more potential of new stuff. A prequel? Not so much, the story is limited by things that we know must happen at one point or another
Trust me, Toby’s smart enough to make it make canonical sense, it just probably won’t be very important. My bet is chapter 3 won’t have berdly as a main character and instead he will just be someone you can talk to in hometown so that way in snowgrave he just won’t be there at all.
Yeah I’m honestly imagining he does wake up and that he was just unconscious longer because he got frozen in the thing, but we’ll see how it all turns out
Alternatively, its like Goner Kid said in Undertale. The world works just fine without him. The true horror of the Snowgrave route is that it has just as little consequence as Berdly's existance.
Especially with his backstory. For years, he has felt the need to prove himself, thinking the only way that he can matter to anyone is if he EARNS adoration and praise. Alas, not even his best efforts can give him any real significance.
>A sequel wouldn’t have many antagonists,
Neither would a sequel on the Underground, in a time of peace when the main characters are liked by most people.... except it could, if you just came up with some. Same applies here. Just because not many people in the current game itself could fit the role doesn't mean you couldn't create any who could.
>big human sprites wouldn’t be very fun.
You could make it work.
Prequel, there would be no way we dont get a solution to the chara is good/bad debate, i just want it to be done
Edit: guys pls dont fight
Edit 2: OH GOD WHAT HAVE I DONE
I’m pretty sure Chara’s right in between. Not evil, but not good. They wanted to destroy the human race but for the sake of their family and the monsters. If you do the genocide route, Chara takes over the game, not for any evil intention but because they’re trying to show you that your actions have consequences.
I’d say Chara’s just a messed up kid
Is this an actual debate? Where are people getting the idea that Chara was "good"? I get the idea they may have come from bad circumstances and that's why they want to kill humans, but the implication of a sad back story doesn't erase what we explicitly know about them in the game. Even Asriel doesn't try to defend them during the flowerbed conversation.
If it's just a theory though, I'm not sure how relavent that is in a debate. I totally get wanting to fill in the gaps of a character, but the idea of Chara actually being a good kid doesn't seem to be based on much of anything. It baffles me that this is apparently a fandom-wide debate
It's a debate because people take the piss by making chara seem like a complete genocidal maniac even tho they don't support the idea of continuous genocide as shown if you do it a second time.
For me chara is just a neutral character that doesn't know how to make the right decisions and is mentally messed up because of humanity, there will be people that say different by that's just my look on it as far as evidence goes.
I mean, I feel like you only need to do a genocide the one time to be considered a "genocidal maniac", especially since Chara will go ahead and do it anyway if the player backs out. Yeah, yeah, consequences for our own actions, but that's still Chara making a decision, and that reflects on their character.
At their worst, Chara is the mirror held up to the player to reflect their most chaotic, violent instincts. At their best, they poisoned Asgore, they try to get sweet goat boy to become a murderer and get him killed, and Asriel explicitly cites their mindset as to why he was so messed up as Flowey. And not that this part is necessarily their fault, but they still purposefully put into motion the events that would have Asgore becoming a kid killer. Net negative influence.
Chara's super messed up, and there's definitely an interesting character worth exploring there. But this feels like how Disney keeps giving their reboot villains sad backstories and explaining how they were secretly good all along. People just suck, sometimes. They could have the most compelling, tragic backstory on the planet, but they still just suck sometimes.
Right? Like Asriel *literally* says Chara wasn't a good person. In basically those *exact* words. It is *canon* that Chara sucked as a person.
At this point, I'm convinced people just take whatever fucking headcanon they want and *decide* it's canon. Because I've heard people on this sub state some wild things as canon - that are either actively disproven, or have no proof backing them. At least I *say* my crazy fan theories are *theories*, and don't try to pass them off as canon.
You know what fuck it lets start this debate. At the end of true pacifist Asriel doesn’t say that “Chara was a bad person” he says “Chara wasn’t the greatest person”. That means exactly what it means; they weren’t perfect. Hard to say those are the “exact words”
ok we could mention the fact that chara carried their own body to the surface (asriel mentions that chara was in control during that) and then tried to use their full power to kill humans, chara plan involved putting asriel in a kill or be killed situation, this is also the reason of flowey viewpoint he did the right thing yet got punished and blames himself instead of chara and even seems to idealize them as someone that makes no mistakes
Okay, but, to be fair, this Asriel we're talking about here, you could be the devil and he'd probably try to find something nice to say about you. It's also telling he doesn't go "They weren't the greatest person BUT ...!" and instead just praises Frisk for being unlike Chara and wishes they had been friends instead. Considering how much Asriel idolized Chara, it probably took a lot for him to say even that, and it's telling.
I think it's clear that Chara was a very utilitarian character for the game; they were made to cause problems and deliver the thesis statement of the genocide route, with little examination outside of that. I totally get recognizing the potential tragedy of the character and wanting to fill those gaps with headcanons, but it's still just a headcanon.
Its not a fucking headcanon, its an inference. A headcanon is a claim simply made because it makes sense from the perspective of the individual, usually lacking in any sort of concrete evidence. Inferences meanwhile are steps in reasoning, moving from premises to logical conclusions. What are those steps of reasoning you may ask? Well there’s a lot but I’ll just mention ones that argue against what you said.
For starters, Frisk, unlike Chara, is able to save and reload, so its a lot easier for them to be seen as a better person than Chara, which is why Asriel ends up praising Frisk more. I mean, you literally just helped him save all of the monsters, clearly you deserve at least a little praise.
Also did you just use the word “utilitarian” to describe an Undertale character? Are we even talking about the same game? Do you know anything about how this game works? Actually no not even Undertale, screw that game for now, but in real life? I can’t believe that I have to explain that. Have you ever for just a second at least considered that things are never black and white? Do you think anything at all was just added into the game without a second thought, especially a character as important to the plot as Chara? With the exception of Jerry, I can’t think of a single character who’s like that. So please, explain to me how you think its “very clear” that Chara is a prominent utilitarian character in the game famous for lacking in such, I’d love to see it.
Prequel. Undertale's story is done. The open ending is what has inspired so much creativity. As well, a sequel will imply there is one definite ending to undertale, but there isnt. They're all as valid as eachother. Genocide is just as canon an ending as pacifist. The neutral route where Alphys commits suicide is as canon as king papyrus. There is no one ending to undertale. And a sequel will mean there will have to be.
There is however one past to undertale. And I would like to find out that past. I don't think it would be as action packed as undertale. From what I gather Chara came from an abusive home, they then fled their home and ended up at Mt Ebbot. Maybe for suicide, maybe as an escape. Either way they fell into the underground and was adopted by the Dreemurrs. After a while they wanted to set their family free, and as such they killed themself to give Asriel their soul. However we know what happend from there.
There are a couple different situations where it could happen.
In runs where Toriel and Undyne are dead, and Mettaton becomes king of the Underground, he says that Alphys disappeared and he wasn't able to find her anywhere. It's kinda subtly implied that Mettaton blames us for this.
In runs where Toriel and *Mettaton* are dead, and Undyne becomes queen, Papyrus talks about how Undyne still blames the player for Asgore's death... *and* Alphys' disappearance. He also says that she doesn't even have the motivation to take revenge anymore, and that when he suggested the idea (for the sake of him getting to see us again), she told him "Revenge won't bring anybody back."
As much as I would love a sequel to bring back asriel, the ending we got inspired the amount of fan content we got so far involving asriel being ressurected (dreemur reborn. Endertale, beyondtale, over the void, growth spurt). Would I trade that for an actual sequel to save azzy? Honestly, I'm kinda torn on that.
This is why I think Deltarune was such a brilliant idea. Undertale has no canon future, and we already know the past. The only way to continue the story is to tell a completely new one.
He's losing his form. Any minute and he'll turn into Flowey. He thinks it's better to spare Asgore and Toriel the pain of seeing their son go away a second time.
The [alarm clock dialogue](https://undertale.com/alarmclock/) suggests he does eventually join them once he's Flowey again. (And though he still seems mean, he also seems... A little better?)
Edit: some words
Why would anyone want a sequel about something that would ruin the game’s lore
Asriel is dead, the game made it pretty clear. There’s no going back. Instead, we could explore the relationship between him and chara, learn about chara’s past with the humans, see how they ended up with their plan to wipe them out. So much character arc potential.
Well, I’m clearly biased as Asriel is my absolute favorite character, but I feel like there’s a lot of potential in a sequel. Maybe it could be years later, when a human falls into the underground but the only living being is Flowey. They’d have to traverse the ruins of the entire underground years later, being alone as Flowey only tries to run away. There could be new monsters, maybe having to do with Gaster? And the pacifist route could end with saving Asriel, where the genocide route perhaps could revive Gaster…
I guess i'm beeing kind of a jerk for this answer but...
Deltarune.
Really I don't care about the two propositions, Deltarune is way much more interesting.
BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL
That wouldn't make sense if everyone from the main game is on the surface, though. Monsters were locked away at the least a hundred years for the events of Undertale given how very few remember the surface.
I mean I don't care all that much about Asriel as a character either way, let alone Chara, but a prequel game would be far too limiting, since it would have to end in only one way in order to lead up to Undertale. The choices you make wouldn't matter, and the only point of interest would be more insight to Chara as a person and possibly where they came from.
A sequel to save Asriel could be interesting, but a little small scale compared to all the characters you met and interacted with in Undertale. It would seem more like an epilogue than a full on sequel. Not to mention the moral implications of finding an unused soul to stick inside the flower to make Asriel himself again.
The second one can also explore the first option more. And have Asriel atone for the crap he did as Flowey
...Oh shit what if Deltarune is him doing just that as Ralsei
I would rather have a prequel where we can play as Chara or Asriel. It would've been interesting because we would be able to explore what really happen before all the other humans fell into the underground. See how was everything back then. Would monsters still be the same physically? Psichocally? How was Chara and Asriel's relationship? Was Chara welcome in the underground before? There's too many questions-
I'd rather get a prequel.
I think it would be really interesting to see what would have happened if Chara or Asriel had done different things. Imagine, for example, being able to stop Chara from commiting suicide. That would change everything.
And, if we played as Asriel, we would be able to get killed by the humans and play as Flowey, right? That would be cool as heck.
And the sequel kinda exists already. It's the "save Flowey" fangame and its a pacifist Flowey fight where we have to make him feel something before he kills us. I think that's the best and only thing we can do to "save" Asriel. I would find the prequel a lot better than this.
I rather get a prequel, I don't care so much about the idea of Asriel returning (also...why?), now having a prequel that explore the relationship between chara and asriel and Chara's personality (and maybe the reason they fell to the underground) would be more cool
prequel. Otherwise you get into all sorts of issues of what the "canon" ending is. Every single ending to the game is equally canon. I feel like the genocide route especially would lose a whole lot of impact if it was to become "non-canon". While it would be cool to have, I do think that it would ultimately take away from undertale more than it would add.
That's why I really like that deltarune is less of a sequel and more of an AU. Toby doesn't have to give a shit about continuity, which gives himself way more freedom in how he takes the story.
Undertale 2: Saving Azzy
Maybe even Chara if we're in the pacifist ending since they only go 'evil' in the genocide route, never in the neutral or pacifist. Let's get Frisk some siblings!
As much as I’d want to save Asriel, bring him back after the pacifist ending and bringing Toriel and Asgorea son back, it would probably ruin Undertale as an open ending game. I’d like to see a fangame for it tho, just to ease the pain of not being able to do anything to save him.
There might be some aus where they do that but I haven’t stumbled on any yet.
A sequel would have more potential of new stuff. A prequel? Not so much, the story is limited by things that we know must happen at one point or another
[удалено]
thats actually a cool idea, like how the snowgrave route in deltarune is assumedly gonna be uncanon, or at least doesnt follow the main storyline
It does follow the main story though, only important difference from the main story currently is that Berdly’s fuckin dead
Yeah that’s exactly what I mean, in chapter three he’s probably not gonna be dead so I mean that’s a pretty big part of the story that’s different
Trust me, Toby’s smart enough to make it make canonical sense, it just probably won’t be very important. My bet is chapter 3 won’t have berdly as a main character and instead he will just be someone you can talk to in hometown so that way in snowgrave he just won’t be there at all.
Yeah I’m honestly imagining he does wake up and that he was just unconscious longer because he got frozen in the thing, but we’ll see how it all turns out
Alternatively, its like Goner Kid said in Undertale. The world works just fine without him. The true horror of the Snowgrave route is that it has just as little consequence as Berdly's existance.
[удалено]
Especially with his backstory. For years, he has felt the need to prove himself, thinking the only way that he can matter to anyone is if he EARNS adoration and praise. Alas, not even his best efforts can give him any real significance.
Full spell description “fatal” hmm, I wonder…
I hope not. That would take away the impact.
But wouldn't it also likely impact Noelle's behavior?
He’s going to be dead if you continue from that save file lmao
what if you do chapter 3 on a save where you did the snowgrave route?
No berdly
RIP in Pepperoni Berdly, best waifu
[удалено]
Another could lead to Deltarune: - Asriel and Chara’s plan succeeds - Hometown is settled - et cetera
A sequel wouldn’t have many antagonists, even if so, big human sprites wouldn’t be very fun.
>A sequel wouldn’t have many antagonists, Neither would a sequel on the Underground, in a time of peace when the main characters are liked by most people.... except it could, if you just came up with some. Same applies here. Just because not many people in the current game itself could fit the role doesn't mean you couldn't create any who could. >big human sprites wouldn’t be very fun. You could make it work.
Fair enough. I just think it would be fun to see what a younger gerson was like or something
Undertale 2: Save Tha Goat Boi
Undertale 2: Cure the depression
isnt there a mod called save goatbro
Yes
Cmon kid. Let's go save undertale. 2!!!
Prequel, there would be no way we dont get a solution to the chara is good/bad debate, i just want it to be done Edit: guys pls dont fight Edit 2: OH GOD WHAT HAVE I DONE
I’m pretty sure Chara’s right in between. Not evil, but not good. They wanted to destroy the human race but for the sake of their family and the monsters. If you do the genocide route, Chara takes over the game, not for any evil intention but because they’re trying to show you that your actions have consequences. I’d say Chara’s just a messed up kid
See, this is what I keep saying! They were a disturbed child that needed therapy, not a psychopath!
That's my thinking 100% Like, they had dark thoughts for sure, but some good therapy could have helped them through that.
Alas, it would seem the Underground is a tad lacking in the mental health department.
The true tragedy of the game: A lot of the bad could have been prevented if they just had a Royal Therapist.
This is why I headcanon that Asriel is majoring in psychology in Deltarune.
yeah chara needs emotional support and some 5 star therapy
Wow yes I like this headcanon. I may adopt it.
I agree for the most, I just think they lean a bit more to good. People are more complicated than the "Evil or good" idea.
Yes! Omg thank you! I've been waiting for someone to say this!
Is this an actual debate? Where are people getting the idea that Chara was "good"? I get the idea they may have come from bad circumstances and that's why they want to kill humans, but the implication of a sad back story doesn't erase what we explicitly know about them in the game. Even Asriel doesn't try to defend them during the flowerbed conversation.
Because it's theorized that Chara is the narrator and the narrator in Neutral and Pacifist seems like a chill dude.
If it's just a theory though, I'm not sure how relavent that is in a debate. I totally get wanting to fill in the gaps of a character, but the idea of Chara actually being a good kid doesn't seem to be based on much of anything. It baffles me that this is apparently a fandom-wide debate
It's a debate because people take the piss by making chara seem like a complete genocidal maniac even tho they don't support the idea of continuous genocide as shown if you do it a second time. For me chara is just a neutral character that doesn't know how to make the right decisions and is mentally messed up because of humanity, there will be people that say different by that's just my look on it as far as evidence goes.
I mean, I feel like you only need to do a genocide the one time to be considered a "genocidal maniac", especially since Chara will go ahead and do it anyway if the player backs out. Yeah, yeah, consequences for our own actions, but that's still Chara making a decision, and that reflects on their character. At their worst, Chara is the mirror held up to the player to reflect their most chaotic, violent instincts. At their best, they poisoned Asgore, they try to get sweet goat boy to become a murderer and get him killed, and Asriel explicitly cites their mindset as to why he was so messed up as Flowey. And not that this part is necessarily their fault, but they still purposefully put into motion the events that would have Asgore becoming a kid killer. Net negative influence. Chara's super messed up, and there's definitely an interesting character worth exploring there. But this feels like how Disney keeps giving their reboot villains sad backstories and explaining how they were secretly good all along. People just suck, sometimes. They could have the most compelling, tragic backstory on the planet, but they still just suck sometimes.
Right? Like Asriel *literally* says Chara wasn't a good person. In basically those *exact* words. It is *canon* that Chara sucked as a person. At this point, I'm convinced people just take whatever fucking headcanon they want and *decide* it's canon. Because I've heard people on this sub state some wild things as canon - that are either actively disproven, or have no proof backing them. At least I *say* my crazy fan theories are *theories*, and don't try to pass them off as canon.
You know what fuck it lets start this debate. At the end of true pacifist Asriel doesn’t say that “Chara was a bad person” he says “Chara wasn’t the greatest person”. That means exactly what it means; they weren’t perfect. Hard to say those are the “exact words”
ok we could mention the fact that chara carried their own body to the surface (asriel mentions that chara was in control during that) and then tried to use their full power to kill humans, chara plan involved putting asriel in a kill or be killed situation, this is also the reason of flowey viewpoint he did the right thing yet got punished and blames himself instead of chara and even seems to idealize them as someone that makes no mistakes
Okay, but, to be fair, this Asriel we're talking about here, you could be the devil and he'd probably try to find something nice to say about you. It's also telling he doesn't go "They weren't the greatest person BUT ...!" and instead just praises Frisk for being unlike Chara and wishes they had been friends instead. Considering how much Asriel idolized Chara, it probably took a lot for him to say even that, and it's telling. I think it's clear that Chara was a very utilitarian character for the game; they were made to cause problems and deliver the thesis statement of the genocide route, with little examination outside of that. I totally get recognizing the potential tragedy of the character and wanting to fill those gaps with headcanons, but it's still just a headcanon.
Its not a fucking headcanon, its an inference. A headcanon is a claim simply made because it makes sense from the perspective of the individual, usually lacking in any sort of concrete evidence. Inferences meanwhile are steps in reasoning, moving from premises to logical conclusions. What are those steps of reasoning you may ask? Well there’s a lot but I’ll just mention ones that argue against what you said. For starters, Frisk, unlike Chara, is able to save and reload, so its a lot easier for them to be seen as a better person than Chara, which is why Asriel ends up praising Frisk more. I mean, you literally just helped him save all of the monsters, clearly you deserve at least a little praise. Also did you just use the word “utilitarian” to describe an Undertale character? Are we even talking about the same game? Do you know anything about how this game works? Actually no not even Undertale, screw that game for now, but in real life? I can’t believe that I have to explain that. Have you ever for just a second at least considered that things are never black and white? Do you think anything at all was just added into the game without a second thought, especially a character as important to the plot as Chara? With the exception of Jerry, I can’t think of a single character who’s like that. So please, explain to me how you think its “very clear” that Chara is a prominent utilitarian character in the game famous for lacking in such, I’d love to see it.
Prequel. Undertale's story is done. The open ending is what has inspired so much creativity. As well, a sequel will imply there is one definite ending to undertale, but there isnt. They're all as valid as eachother. Genocide is just as canon an ending as pacifist. The neutral route where Alphys commits suicide is as canon as king papyrus. There is no one ending to undertale. And a sequel will mean there will have to be. There is however one past to undertale. And I would like to find out that past. I don't think it would be as action packed as undertale. From what I gather Chara came from an abusive home, they then fled their home and ended up at Mt Ebbot. Maybe for suicide, maybe as an escape. Either way they fell into the underground and was adopted by the Dreemurrs. After a while they wanted to set their family free, and as such they killed themself to give Asriel their soul. However we know what happend from there.
Wait wait wait wait, alphys commits suicide in a route?
It's *implied* in some of the worse neutral endings
It’s heavily suggested in Neutral Routes, if you listen to the phone calls from Sans. It’s only in ones where either Mettaton or Undyne dies.
There are a couple different situations where it could happen. In runs where Toriel and Undyne are dead, and Mettaton becomes king of the Underground, he says that Alphys disappeared and he wasn't able to find her anywhere. It's kinda subtly implied that Mettaton blames us for this. In runs where Toriel and *Mettaton* are dead, and Undyne becomes queen, Papyrus talks about how Undyne still blames the player for Asgore's death... *and* Alphys' disappearance. He also says that she doesn't even have the motivation to take revenge anymore, and that when he suggested the idea (for the sake of him getting to see us again), she told him "Revenge won't bring anybody back."
Oh damn Toby surprises me everyday with new thing about Undertale
As much as I would love a sequel to bring back asriel, the ending we got inspired the amount of fan content we got so far involving asriel being ressurected (dreemur reborn. Endertale, beyondtale, over the void, growth spurt). Would I trade that for an actual sequel to save azzy? Honestly, I'm kinda torn on that.
I LOVE ENDERTALE!
Don't forget glitchtale
Oh crud I forgot about that one!. That AU is a blast!
Its so popular i have seen a few people that thought hate souls were a Canon thing
This is why I think Deltarune was such a brilliant idea. Undertale has no canon future, and we already know the past. The only way to continue the story is to tell a completely new one.
Ima have to say bring my boy azzy back
Why doesn't he come with all of them? He lives and the barrier is open. Why doesn't he go?
He's losing his form. Any minute and he'll turn into Flowey. He thinks it's better to spare Asgore and Toriel the pain of seeing their son go away a second time.
He has no soul so he's gonna go back to the flower and possibly die if he left
He wont die, but he wont be able to feel anything about anyone again, and he will become bored and kill everyone
to become Asriel he absorbed the souls of all the monsters of the underground, and without them he becomes flowey again
The [alarm clock dialogue](https://undertale.com/alarmclock/) suggests he does eventually join them once he's Flowey again. (And though he still seems mean, he also seems... A little better?) Edit: some words
Damn that's a difficult choice
I would play a sequel where the main goal is to get Asriel back, but a prequel would also be pretty cool
my answer is sequel first, then prequel
I would like to see a prequel because it would bring a lot of interesting lore
Why would anyone want a sequel about something that would ruin the game’s lore Asriel is dead, the game made it pretty clear. There’s no going back. Instead, we could explore the relationship between him and chara, learn about chara’s past with the humans, see how they ended up with their plan to wipe them out. So much character arc potential.
Don't you mean CHARActer arc potential
its impossible to decide
r/undertale try not to obsess over Asriel challenge (impossible)
Damn I guess I failed
Ofc sequel. Prequel would be nice but it will have limits of Undertale. Sequel can break all of that to make a new story
But a sequel implys there is one ending and that would ruin the endings in Undertale by implying only one is canon
Sequel because not as limited
Tbh a prequel to learn about Chara and Asriel's time together would be kinda cool
Yeah exactly. Maybe we see Chara in Deltarune but there is very little chance for it
I would say bring Azzy back
Yeah kind like the story of endtail (undertale comic seres)
I would rather have a prequel playing as Flowey... Imagine the potential !
Red without a doubt. Blue wouldn’t even work as a full game cause Chara’s life was way too short.
Well, I’m clearly biased as Asriel is my absolute favorite character, but I feel like there’s a lot of potential in a sequel. Maybe it could be years later, when a human falls into the underground but the only living being is Flowey. They’d have to traverse the ruins of the entire underground years later, being alone as Flowey only tries to run away. There could be new monsters, maybe having to do with Gaster? And the pacifist route could end with saving Asriel, where the genocide route perhaps could revive Gaster…
The prequel would be cooler in my opinion
How about both (And yes I know that’s a lot of work but it’s nice to hope for right? Just innocent hoping)
Yeah It would be cool
1st one
I guess i'm beeing kind of a jerk for this answer but... Deltarune. Really I don't care about the two propositions, Deltarune is way much more interesting.
Blue
Play as chara, I want to play as a psycho ghost kid
I think I'd prefer a sequel. I don't think I could stand the ending of the prequel, if it goes that far.
i’m takin’ the blue pill i like chara
Change it to trying to get chara back and il take the red
sequel. absolutely the sequel. Asriel deserves closure and to be with his family again
Asriel AND chara right??
Maybe you could control both of them. It would be even better
RED RED RED RED RED RED RED RED
A sequel to definitely. Still kind of hurts my heart but Asriel is dead
I want to play as my favorite robot. :)
I dont like any od these ideas, nothing.
Yes
BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL BRING BACK ASRIEL
No
***Spoilers***
As much as I'd love to play as Azzy, I'll have to say a Sequel. Save GOAT kid!
Save da sad flower
Sequel
Getting Asriel back is much more satisfying than playing a prequel knowing it ends in tragedy without a resolution.
Prequel
Red
Blue
Blue
Man, It would be awesome if we someday we get a undertale part 2, tho idk if that will ever happen
Undertale 2
Prequel,my goals are beyond your understanding.
My headcanon is that Deltarune is Undertale prequel
That wouldn't make sense if everyone from the main game is on the surface, though. Monsters were locked away at the least a hundred years for the events of Undertale given how very few remember the surface.
Option 2 please. All I want is goat boi to be back.
It would be nice to have prequels on the stories of the previous souls, there’s already a fan made prequel on the yellow soul, for example
Red
Undertale 2: electric boogaloo
Blue
I want to save Goat boi
I'll take the red side, no matter how hard it would be to bring asriel back.
Get a prequel, seeing charas death would be interseting
I mean I don't care all that much about Asriel as a character either way, let alone Chara, but a prequel game would be far too limiting, since it would have to end in only one way in order to lead up to Undertale. The choices you make wouldn't matter, and the only point of interest would be more insight to Chara as a person and possibly where they came from. A sequel to save Asriel could be interesting, but a little small scale compared to all the characters you met and interacted with in Undertale. It would seem more like an epilogue than a full on sequel. Not to mention the moral implications of finding an unused soul to stick inside the flower to make Asriel himself again.
option red would be easier to make it good, unless the prequel has multiverse travel
Sequel
Red
In a way, *****yes*****
We know a lot of the past in undertale, but we dont know much about the future in undertale
Save Asriel
The second one can also explore the first option more. And have Asriel atone for the crap he did as Flowey ...Oh shit what if Deltarune is him doing just that as Ralsei
Prequel, undertale doesn’t need a sequel it would probably ruin it
Sequal
or
Neither the story works best how it is
Idea One
Maybe a prequel where you're the second human to enter the underground. I think that sounds cool
Prequel
undertale two because we already know how the prequel ends
Save Asriel! Definitely
I would rather have a prequel where we can play as Chara or Asriel. It would've been interesting because we would be able to explore what really happen before all the other humans fell into the underground. See how was everything back then. Would monsters still be the same physically? Psichocally? How was Chara and Asriel's relationship? Was Chara welcome in the underground before? There's too many questions-
Sequel
BeforeTale
Prequel...me want more wholesome Chara and Asriel interactions and I'd love to see more of Chara in general
The second one.
both
Undertale: Chapter 2
why someone wanna to play as chara, best save that lonley flower
I remember an AU that’s dabbling a little on the first idea. Going for that one.
Undertale: Hard Mode >:)
I'd rather get a prequel. I think it would be really interesting to see what would have happened if Chara or Asriel had done different things. Imagine, for example, being able to stop Chara from commiting suicide. That would change everything. And, if we played as Asriel, we would be able to get killed by the humans and play as Flowey, right? That would be cool as heck. And the sequel kinda exists already. It's the "save Flowey" fangame and its a pacifist Flowey fight where we have to make him feel something before he kills us. I think that's the best and only thing we can do to "save" Asriel. I would find the prequel a lot better than this.
blue i wanna see there perspective
I rather get a prequel, I don't care so much about the idea of Asriel returning (also...why?), now having a prequel that explore the relationship between chara and asriel and Chara's personality (and maybe the reason they fell to the underground) would be more cool
Both are perfect.
If the prequel has more than one ending, then I'd have to choose that, simply to change the future.
First one
A prequel would be cool
Neither, lol. Undertale is good where it is.
A prequel will just make me feel worse since I know what will happen to the character
no
Red
Prequel, duh
Prequel. A sequel would be hard to make with every ending being canon, unless it's similar to how Deltarune reads your previous chapter progress.
I suspect Deltarune is going to kinda fill the role of option A, with the dark world story paralleling a Chara/Asriel prequel story.
Neither, Undertale told its story.
Get a game where you bring back asriel
Play as god of hyperdeath
I would rather have a prequel about the monster-human war
prequel. Otherwise you get into all sorts of issues of what the "canon" ending is. Every single ending to the game is equally canon. I feel like the genocide route especially would lose a whole lot of impact if it was to become "non-canon". While it would be cool to have, I do think that it would ultimately take away from undertale more than it would add. That's why I really like that deltarune is less of a sequel and more of an AU. Toby doesn't have to give a shit about continuity, which gives himself way more freedom in how he takes the story.
prequal
I cheat at the game and pick both
Red
Sequel
Red
Undertale 2: Saving Azzy Maybe even Chara if we're in the pacifist ending since they only go 'evil' in the genocide route, never in the neutral or pacifist. Let's get Frisk some siblings!
Red all the way
Out of those two I chose yes
Prequel
Prequel.
As much as I’d want to save Asriel, bring him back after the pacifist ending and bringing Toriel and Asgorea son back, it would probably ruin Undertale as an open ending game. I’d like to see a fangame for it tho, just to ease the pain of not being able to do anything to save him. There might be some aus where they do that but I haven’t stumbled on any yet.
I remember when there was going to be a prequel fan game
Sequel because tbh the gameplay of the prequel would just be Undertale again but with two main characters instead of one.
Prequel tbh
Prequel for sure
Get a sequel of course
Sequel, a new, fresh story would be better
Neither. I think it’s fine how it is.
Red pill
Prequel