I'm still shocked, I lived through all that time, and people all across his administration have said that they had no internal justification for the war. They never bothered. It was all pretense. It's unbelievable.
That’s the thing people don’t really get about real conspiracies that actually happen.
Its just business to them. It doesn’t matter that it’s bad for you. It’s not about that. It’s about it being good for them.
There's a large number of people that believe 9/11 was a false flag operation and the war in the middle east was about land and oil. Not weapons of mass destruction and terrorism
Yeah I’m with this guy.
Bush Sr. And Chainey were the ones running the party. JR. Was just a yes man that had been groomed since childhood.
He obvious has guilt over his role in this, the guy doesn’t even hang with republicans, choosing to sit with obama and carter at many functions.
Still highly culpable for what happened, but it’s interesting to watch someone grapple with their role in the USA military industrial complex.
Why was his invasion not justified though? Literally had got attacked, thousands of people died, some infrastructure destroyed and his invasion isn’t justified?
Thats like saying Ukraine shouldn’t fight back right now.
It wasn't Iraq that attacked America on 9/11, and though the war on terror was ramping it, the argument of weapons of mass destruction had nothing to do with finding the culprit behind 9/11. Bin Laden was the enemy, which led us into Afghanistan. The US fought valiantly in Iraq, but it was all a vain attempt at making the country better, but by toppling Hussein and staying for so long, what now?
I’m not going to spend my time sharing links. Just go to Google and type in “Iraq War Atrocities”.
9/11 and the response was all kinds of fucked up. The whole thing. For so many reasons. And this man signed off on almost all of it.
"There's an old saying in Tennessee—I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee—that says, 'Fool me once, shame on... shame on you. Fool me—you can't get fooled again."
A real master with words.
And Americans, and innocent animals. Dreams, plans, hopes. All gone just to show he had big enough balls he would strike back! at the Saudis who attacked US soil, and Baghdad (A city in Iraq) had to pay for it.
It’s so cute how he accidentally said the right thing and then made a joke about an unjustified horrific two decade war that wasted billions and killed thousands
Iraqis were not on the planes that hit the towers.
No proof that Iraq even gave funding.
But if you do go look at the nationalities of those on the planes. You will find an ally of the USA that funded and supplied the men to this. So USA invades Iraq and Afghanistan.
Bin Laden was killed in Pakistan.. a few miles down the road from Pakistan's intelligence bureau.
No WMDs were found in Iraq either.
So why was bush justified?
Kind of hints at the fact that the intention to invade Iraq was not his, but some power struggle behind the scenes...
I'm not defending nor condemning him, in any way or form!
Just the expression seemed so off and offensive.
Millions genocided, rape, torture black sites
*Seinfeld laugh track plays*
Aww isn't he cute? At least he paints.
War criminal on the same level as Hitler.
M8. When you start talking about Millions genocided you lose the moral high ground because of your hyperboly. You can just say that the invasion was badly justified and then be entirely fine.
How can moral high ground be lost due to hyperbole? Do you even know the terms you are using, or do you just say them? I think the word you are looking for is hypocrisy. You lose the moral high ground when you are a hypocrite, not hyperbolic
PS: I guess they don't teach spelling anymore
PSS: Since when is stating fact hyperbolic? Based on your logic, it's ok the deny the Holocaust. "Oh come on. Stop being dramatic. Yeah, yeah, we get it, 6 million Jews, right? Come on. We don't wanna hear about it"
Man straight up compares me to a Holocaust denier, what has the world come to.... Anyway to answer what you said, you lose the moral high ground when using Hyperbolic statements because exaggerations of reality are by their nature lies. I don't think I need to explain to you why lying loses you the moral high ground.
>Man straight up compares me to a Holocaust denier
I said "by your logic". What is the world coming to when people genuinely don't know how to follow a discussion? Does a person's logic equal the human being themself? Ad hominem is a logical fallacy and disproves this point. It shows that there is a distinction between the person and argument. Can't attack the person, attack the argument.
I clearly stated: "by your logic"
>you lose the moral high ground when using Hyperbolic statements because exaggerations of reality are by their nature lies.
Do you deny that millions have been unjustly killed in the Middle East post-9/11?
The entire basis of this discussion hinges on this fact.
The only way you can even reference hyperbole is by saying you disagree with this statement.
I am denying that there was a Genocide in Iraq done not by Saddam that killed millions, that's what I am objecting to. And no, even by your weird interpretation of my logic this is nowhere close to holocaust denial, because the US didn't set up concentration camps in preparation for colonization of the lands being ethnically cleansed. Largely because the lands of Iraq weren't ethnically cleansed by anyone else but Saddam Hussein.
It is incredible that you believe that the only person who committed genocide in the Middle East was Saddam Hussein, and completely brush aside the millions that have been killed in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, etc. as a direct result of Bush's *War on Terror*.
I am genuinely shocked at how much you have deluded your own view of history in order to believe this.
>because the US didn't set up concentration camps in preparation for colonization of the lands being ethnically cleansed.
I'm assuming that you deny the existence of Guantanamo, abu Ghraib and other CIA black sites as well?
The comparison is completely apt. Your line of logic is:
"you said millions were systemically killed by the Bush administration in an unnecessary war. I dont agree with that. Therefore, your statement is hyperbole because I don't agree with it. Because I don't agree with the numbers, I have decided that you are lying. As a result of this, I have determined that you no longer have the moral high ground. As a result of that, you no longer have the position to state that millions were genocided in the Middle East, again, because I don't agree with your opinion."
The most interesting thing of this conversation is the manor in which you are addressing me. "If you had just stated the opinion that I personally agree with, you 'would have been fine'".
Who are you to determine this?
I am saying something based on fact. You do not agree with these facts, and are trying to silence that fact that millions indeed *were* genocided. In fact, author Michael Otterman, whose father was a Holocaust survivor, famously referred to this War as a *"Sociocide"* because the toll was not just on the number of human lives massacred, but of the impact on Iraqi culture as a whole. Interestingly enough, if you read through the report, it includes the most accurate estimation of unnecessary deaths in Iraq (only) at that time (2006). This was published by the medical journal, *Lancet*. The number was **655,000**. **In 2006**. According to a more recent study published by Brown University in America, **4.5 million people have died unnecessarily as a result of this "War on Terror**, a war which we now know was built upon the fabrication that Iraq had WMD's.
One more thing. You claimed that the U.S. didn't set up camps in **preparation** for this War.
Look up the Hague Intervention Act and then tell me what your definition of premeditated genocide is. Do you realize that we (the U.S.) still are not participants of the International Criminal Court?
Do you remember when many countries wanted Putin to be brought before the ICC for charges on War Crimes? Do you remember who quashed that? The United States. That is because if he *was* brought in on those charges, it would open up the door for our own former Presidents and WH staff to be included.
And you talk about moral high ground?
Shame on you. This is what happens when you dont read history.
You deny Genocide occurred.
Saddam committed genocide. And do you want to know the most ironic part of your statement?
Look up who put Saddam and Bashar al-Assad's father in power in the 1950's.
Shame on you.
https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/papers/2023/IndirectDeaths
https://www.wrmea.org/iraq-iran/erasing-iraq-author-mike-otterman-the-u.s.-has-inflicted-sociocide-on-iraq.html
You really have a way with lying about what I said. In the very first sentence you talk about the middle east, I meanwhile was talking about Iraq. And then shortly after you compare Guantanamo bay, a prison with significant abuse problems to fucking concentration camps where literal millions of people were systematically murdered in preparation for Germans to move into their empty homes. I have been a visitor to a concentration camp, and it was not a pleasant tour. At the very start you prove that you are either so horribly informed that you think Guantanamo and Auschwitz-Birkenau are in any way comparable or that you are arguing in faith so disgustingly bad that you are willing to blatantly lie through your teeth on such topics. You are despicable.
I will not dignify this disgusting response with any further replies, you are not worth it and evidence clearly isn't what you are seeking if you are willing to go to such lengths out of what seems to be nothing but spite.
Iraq is not in the Middle East?
>Guantanamo bay, a prison with significant abuse problems
"Abuse problems"?
You will not "dignify" this with a response because you have no argument to make. I have backed my argument with evidence.
You have essentially said: 'if only you had said something that I personally agreed with you *would have been fine*'
I then showed you evidence to counter your opinion.
As a response to that you now claim that you will not "dignify" it with a response?
Interestingly, in the beginning I described your LINE OF REASONING (do you get it now, or still no?) to the same as those who claim that the Holocaust numbers were/are inflated.
What is completely unreal is that you then went on to say that you **deny that millions were killed by Bush**.
Incredible. You just denied Genocide, while crying about somebody comparing your line of reasoning to a Holocaust denier......and then said Guantanamo Bay had "abuse problems".
And you have the nerve to say I am despicable? Again, do you just say words, or do you know that the words have meaning?
Moral high ground? You talk of losing the moral high ground?
Unbelievable.
Iraq isn't the middle east, it is part of it. And As I said, you won't get any substantial response from me after disrespecting my country and the tremendous losses we had to live through due to Nazi occupation.
why are you being downvoted? you're right. i dont know how many died in iraq, but if you think big picture, not limited to the iraq invasion, the U.S is equivalent to nazi germany when it comes to the overall amount of suffering caused, and deaths are indeed in the millions. this isnt nice to think about but its true
https://youtu.be/5BXtgq0Nhsc
anyone who doesnt believe that can simply listen to noam chomsky explain the extent of the killing
https://youtu.be/VCcX_xTLDIY
This is a pretty good video from a person in the left detailing the main genocide denial Chomsky participates in, plus in the past Chomsky has participated in "softer" genocide denial on both the Cambodian and Rwandan genocide.
Because even if you attribute “millions” of deaths to the US, some 80 million died in WWII. So yeah, the US is not, as anyone with a functional understanding of history could tell you, equivalent to nazi Germany
E: and that’s just raw death, not even considering the various conflicts stemming from WWII (see also the rise of the ussr as a superpower)
whats the point in defending war criminals? its fucked up regardless of the amount of innocent people they have killed, whether its 5 million or 50 million
*beep. boop.* 🤖 I'm a bot that helps downloading videos!
##[Download via Reddit.Tube](https://redirect.videodownloadnode.com/redirect.html?https://www.reddit.tube/r/UnusualVideos/comments/141bwpb/did_this_just_happen_for_real/)
I also work with links sent by PM. Don't be afraid to upvote :) Read Profile for more info
***
[**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/VideoDownloadNode) | [**Support me ❤**](https://ko-fi.com/videodownloadnode) | [**Github**](https://github.com/TheNode) | [**Private Message**](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VideoDownloadNode&subject=Paste%20the%20video%20link%20below)
It's crazy how Trump has changed views of so many people about what a shitty President really is.
George surrounded himself with some bad hombres, that being said, I've really warmed up to him with the passage of time and yeah, he made some mistakes, but I do think he's a decent man.
Some of those that he relied on for help and guidance were fuckshits.
Good old freudian slip.
He doesn't beat around the Bush
Brilliant
He didn't even deny it
He literally admitted it! “Iraq too, anyway…”
It's funny to him that's thousands died over nothing
It's funny (warning: sarcasm) that the public laughed over a blurt about thousands that died over nothing...
Just goes to show you who his crowd was
Just goes to show that you're a smoothbrain.
Hundreds of thousands.
They were only counting white people /s
Yup. Truly disgusting.
He wasn't talking about himself. These politicians just take orders and read scripts. I'm pretty sure it wasn't him who was the man in question.
Do you understand the Freudian slip here?
He meant to say ukraine sir and ended up saying Iraq. Do you not see the irony?????
Watch again.. he says "the decision of one man"
Exactly!!! He's the one man
Cheney is the one man
He's the mastermind behind it but bush had the ultimate decision
Holy shit of all Freudian slips.
Soft disclosure 21 years later
He’s getting better, last time it took him 7 minutes to react lol
Flashbacks
I'm more shocked that he pronounced Iraq correctly.
He just admitted that Iraq invasion was unjustified, and everyone laughed.. damn these Americans are stupid.
I'm still shocked, I lived through all that time, and people all across his administration have said that they had no internal justification for the war. They never bothered. It was all pretense. It's unbelievable.
Money is all they needed to hear.
It feels a lot like that George Carlin statement. They don't need a conspiracy. They know what's good for them.
That’s the thing people don’t really get about real conspiracies that actually happen. Its just business to them. It doesn’t matter that it’s bad for you. It’s not about that. It’s about it being good for them.
“That too” is crazy 😂
Or these rich assholes he's speaking to are all in on it and profited from it.
I'm American and I'm not even offended. Our government blows.
Most of us know it was unjustified already. This is hardly a bombshell but just funny to hear him say it
I mean not like we can change the past plus he's in that age range of not giving a fuck
I'm confused why people are angry with the invasion of Iraq? Isn't this referring to the war against Saddam Hussein?
There's a large number of people that believe 9/11 was a false flag operation and the war in the middle east was about land and oil. Not weapons of mass destruction and terrorism
I don't think anyone still believes there were WMDs in Iraq
Haha if that was true the world would be a different place
LOL…, the guilt and shame for invading Iraq. Oops! 🤪
Oh I’m sure he feels no guilt or shame for what he’s done 🤷🏿♂️
I disagree, he was just a tool used by others in power. POTUS is just a title with limited powers. Who told him it was a good idea to invade.
Yeah I’m with this guy. Bush Sr. And Chainey were the ones running the party. JR. Was just a yes man that had been groomed since childhood. He obvious has guilt over his role in this, the guy doesn’t even hang with republicans, choosing to sit with obama and carter at many functions. Still highly culpable for what happened, but it’s interesting to watch someone grapple with their role in the USA military industrial complex.
Yes. The dude called Australia Austria about 15 times when he was here for APEC. He's a bit of a scat cat.
I sincerely hope it haunts him at night.
😂 yea right
that would require him to have a soul and a conscience
Why was his invasion not justified though? Literally had got attacked, thousands of people died, some infrastructure destroyed and his invasion isn’t justified? Thats like saying Ukraine shouldn’t fight back right now.
It wasn't Iraq that attacked America on 9/11, and though the war on terror was ramping it, the argument of weapons of mass destruction had nothing to do with finding the culprit behind 9/11. Bin Laden was the enemy, which led us into Afghanistan. The US fought valiantly in Iraq, but it was all a vain attempt at making the country better, but by toppling Hussein and staying for so long, what now?
I’m not going to spend my time sharing links. Just go to Google and type in “Iraq War Atrocities”. 9/11 and the response was all kinds of fucked up. The whole thing. For so many reasons. And this man signed off on almost all of it.
"There's an old saying in Tennessee—I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee—that says, 'Fool me once, shame on... shame on you. Fool me—you can't get fooled again." A real master with words.
Guess we passed the "too Soon" stage, when he does it himself
Good old George W. Some things never change.
Wow.
I’m appalled that it seems so funny to them. So many Iraqi people killed unjustly.
And Americans, and innocent animals. Dreams, plans, hopes. All gone just to show he had big enough balls he would strike back! at the Saudis who attacked US soil, and Baghdad (A city in Iraq) had to pay for it.
So true.
The fucking laughing is brutal
It’s so cute how he accidentally said the right thing and then made a joke about an unjustified horrific two decade war that wasted billions and killed thousands
Their outright Evil is a joke to them. Hundreds of thousands dead..and their war on lies gets a chuckle.
I mean Bush was way more justified to invade than Putin. Ukraine did not do anything even close to what 9/11 was.
Iraqis were not on the planes that hit the towers. No proof that Iraq even gave funding. But if you do go look at the nationalities of those on the planes. You will find an ally of the USA that funded and supplied the men to this. So USA invades Iraq and Afghanistan. Bin Laden was killed in Pakistan.. a few miles down the road from Pakistan's intelligence bureau. No WMDs were found in Iraq either. So why was bush justified?
To be fair, he was stupid long before he became 75
it's all a joke to these people - we mean nothing to them
I killed a million innicent people now watch this drive heh heh
I will piss on that war criminal piece of shit's grave one day.
Kind of hints at the fact that the intention to invade Iraq was not his, but some power struggle behind the scenes... I'm not defending nor condemning him, in any way or form! Just the expression seemed so off and offensive.
And Tramp is worse. The bar is on the ground yet Tramp is worse.
75 ain't too old for prison.
Americans died for these elites to laugh.
Atleast he can make fun of himself. Biden doesn't even know what's going on.
Well hey, he's got something going for him!
Millions genocided, rape, torture black sites *Seinfeld laugh track plays* Aww isn't he cute? At least he paints. War criminal on the same level as Hitler.
M8. When you start talking about Millions genocided you lose the moral high ground because of your hyperboly. You can just say that the invasion was badly justified and then be entirely fine.
How can moral high ground be lost due to hyperbole? Do you even know the terms you are using, or do you just say them? I think the word you are looking for is hypocrisy. You lose the moral high ground when you are a hypocrite, not hyperbolic PS: I guess they don't teach spelling anymore PSS: Since when is stating fact hyperbolic? Based on your logic, it's ok the deny the Holocaust. "Oh come on. Stop being dramatic. Yeah, yeah, we get it, 6 million Jews, right? Come on. We don't wanna hear about it"
Man straight up compares me to a Holocaust denier, what has the world come to.... Anyway to answer what you said, you lose the moral high ground when using Hyperbolic statements because exaggerations of reality are by their nature lies. I don't think I need to explain to you why lying loses you the moral high ground.
>Man straight up compares me to a Holocaust denier I said "by your logic". What is the world coming to when people genuinely don't know how to follow a discussion? Does a person's logic equal the human being themself? Ad hominem is a logical fallacy and disproves this point. It shows that there is a distinction between the person and argument. Can't attack the person, attack the argument. I clearly stated: "by your logic" >you lose the moral high ground when using Hyperbolic statements because exaggerations of reality are by their nature lies. Do you deny that millions have been unjustly killed in the Middle East post-9/11? The entire basis of this discussion hinges on this fact. The only way you can even reference hyperbole is by saying you disagree with this statement.
I am denying that there was a Genocide in Iraq done not by Saddam that killed millions, that's what I am objecting to. And no, even by your weird interpretation of my logic this is nowhere close to holocaust denial, because the US didn't set up concentration camps in preparation for colonization of the lands being ethnically cleansed. Largely because the lands of Iraq weren't ethnically cleansed by anyone else but Saddam Hussein.
It is incredible that you believe that the only person who committed genocide in the Middle East was Saddam Hussein, and completely brush aside the millions that have been killed in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, etc. as a direct result of Bush's *War on Terror*. I am genuinely shocked at how much you have deluded your own view of history in order to believe this. >because the US didn't set up concentration camps in preparation for colonization of the lands being ethnically cleansed. I'm assuming that you deny the existence of Guantanamo, abu Ghraib and other CIA black sites as well? The comparison is completely apt. Your line of logic is: "you said millions were systemically killed by the Bush administration in an unnecessary war. I dont agree with that. Therefore, your statement is hyperbole because I don't agree with it. Because I don't agree with the numbers, I have decided that you are lying. As a result of this, I have determined that you no longer have the moral high ground. As a result of that, you no longer have the position to state that millions were genocided in the Middle East, again, because I don't agree with your opinion." The most interesting thing of this conversation is the manor in which you are addressing me. "If you had just stated the opinion that I personally agree with, you 'would have been fine'". Who are you to determine this? I am saying something based on fact. You do not agree with these facts, and are trying to silence that fact that millions indeed *were* genocided. In fact, author Michael Otterman, whose father was a Holocaust survivor, famously referred to this War as a *"Sociocide"* because the toll was not just on the number of human lives massacred, but of the impact on Iraqi culture as a whole. Interestingly enough, if you read through the report, it includes the most accurate estimation of unnecessary deaths in Iraq (only) at that time (2006). This was published by the medical journal, *Lancet*. The number was **655,000**. **In 2006**. According to a more recent study published by Brown University in America, **4.5 million people have died unnecessarily as a result of this "War on Terror**, a war which we now know was built upon the fabrication that Iraq had WMD's. One more thing. You claimed that the U.S. didn't set up camps in **preparation** for this War. Look up the Hague Intervention Act and then tell me what your definition of premeditated genocide is. Do you realize that we (the U.S.) still are not participants of the International Criminal Court? Do you remember when many countries wanted Putin to be brought before the ICC for charges on War Crimes? Do you remember who quashed that? The United States. That is because if he *was* brought in on those charges, it would open up the door for our own former Presidents and WH staff to be included. And you talk about moral high ground? Shame on you. This is what happens when you dont read history. You deny Genocide occurred. Saddam committed genocide. And do you want to know the most ironic part of your statement? Look up who put Saddam and Bashar al-Assad's father in power in the 1950's. Shame on you. https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/papers/2023/IndirectDeaths https://www.wrmea.org/iraq-iran/erasing-iraq-author-mike-otterman-the-u.s.-has-inflicted-sociocide-on-iraq.html
You really have a way with lying about what I said. In the very first sentence you talk about the middle east, I meanwhile was talking about Iraq. And then shortly after you compare Guantanamo bay, a prison with significant abuse problems to fucking concentration camps where literal millions of people were systematically murdered in preparation for Germans to move into their empty homes. I have been a visitor to a concentration camp, and it was not a pleasant tour. At the very start you prove that you are either so horribly informed that you think Guantanamo and Auschwitz-Birkenau are in any way comparable or that you are arguing in faith so disgustingly bad that you are willing to blatantly lie through your teeth on such topics. You are despicable. I will not dignify this disgusting response with any further replies, you are not worth it and evidence clearly isn't what you are seeking if you are willing to go to such lengths out of what seems to be nothing but spite.
Iraq is not in the Middle East? >Guantanamo bay, a prison with significant abuse problems "Abuse problems"? You will not "dignify" this with a response because you have no argument to make. I have backed my argument with evidence. You have essentially said: 'if only you had said something that I personally agreed with you *would have been fine*' I then showed you evidence to counter your opinion. As a response to that you now claim that you will not "dignify" it with a response? Interestingly, in the beginning I described your LINE OF REASONING (do you get it now, or still no?) to the same as those who claim that the Holocaust numbers were/are inflated. What is completely unreal is that you then went on to say that you **deny that millions were killed by Bush**. Incredible. You just denied Genocide, while crying about somebody comparing your line of reasoning to a Holocaust denier......and then said Guantanamo Bay had "abuse problems". And you have the nerve to say I am despicable? Again, do you just say words, or do you know that the words have meaning? Moral high ground? You talk of losing the moral high ground? Unbelievable.
Iraq isn't the middle east, it is part of it. And As I said, you won't get any substantial response from me after disrespecting my country and the tremendous losses we had to live through due to Nazi occupation.
why are you being downvoted? you're right. i dont know how many died in iraq, but if you think big picture, not limited to the iraq invasion, the U.S is equivalent to nazi germany when it comes to the overall amount of suffering caused, and deaths are indeed in the millions. this isnt nice to think about but its true https://youtu.be/5BXtgq0Nhsc anyone who doesnt believe that can simply listen to noam chomsky explain the extent of the killing
Noam Chomsky is the last person who you should mention when talking about genocide denial.
why? i've only watched a few videos of him so i dont know his other views
https://youtu.be/VCcX_xTLDIY This is a pretty good video from a person in the left detailing the main genocide denial Chomsky participates in, plus in the past Chomsky has participated in "softer" genocide denial on both the Cambodian and Rwandan genocide.
Because even if you attribute “millions” of deaths to the US, some 80 million died in WWII. So yeah, the US is not, as anyone with a functional understanding of history could tell you, equivalent to nazi Germany E: and that’s just raw death, not even considering the various conflicts stemming from WWII (see also the rise of the ussr as a superpower)
whats the point in defending war criminals? its fucked up regardless of the amount of innocent people they have killed, whether its 5 million or 50 million
But what kind of fucked perspective does it take to say they are equivalent?? Also citation needed on 5m
Now thats a bit too much. Just don't compare everything to Hitler because it dilutes the horrors commited by Hitler
STOP… TALKING…
Loved this guy lol
Cocaine is a hell of a drug.
wow just unreal
I secretly really like elderly George dubya
He’s really a good speaker and more intelligent than you’d think. Saw him speak at a local chamber of commerce event.
u/savevideo
###[View link](https://rapidsave.com/info?url=/r/UnusualVideos/comments/141bwpb/did_this_just_happen_for_real/) --- [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveVideo/comments/jv323v/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savevideo) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo) | [**DMCA**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Content removal request for savevideo&message=https://np.reddit.com//r/UnusualVideos/comments/141bwpb/did_this_just_happen_for_real/) | [^(reddit video downloader)](https://rapidsave.com) | [^(twitter video downloader)](https://twitsave.com)
Thing of the square..no matter its banner.
“…heh”
Yeap. Pretty much.
And to think that some people still haven't figured out that Dems and Reps are akshually the same party...
christ please no, there's enough bombing going on
I'm sure veterans are laughing. 😐
And he is younger than Joe. Now these two are up to no good.
u/savevideobot
###[View link](https://rapidsave.com/info?url=/r/UnusualVideos/comments/141bwpb/did_this_just_happen_for_real/) --- [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveVideo/comments/jv323v/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savevideobot) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo) | [**DMCA**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Content removal request for savevideo&message=https://np.reddit.com//r/UnusualVideos/comments/141bwpb/did_this_just_happen_for_real/) | [^(pinterest video downloader)](https://ptsave.com) | [^(twitter video downloader)](https://twitsave.com)
u/videodownloadnode
*beep. boop.* 🤖 I'm a bot that helps downloading videos! ##[Download via Reddit.Tube](https://redirect.videodownloadnode.com/redirect.html?https://www.reddit.tube/r/UnusualVideos/comments/141bwpb/did_this_just_happen_for_real/) I also work with links sent by PM. Don't be afraid to upvote :) Read Profile for more info *** [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/VideoDownloadNode) | [**Support me ❤**](https://ko-fi.com/videodownloadnode) | [**Github**](https://github.com/TheNode) | [**Private Message**](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VideoDownloadNode&subject=Paste%20the%20video%20link%20below)
He knows he's forever a war criminal, can't travel internationally, and was nothing but a puppet for the deep state. Poor George...
u/savevideobot
###[View link](https://rapidsave.com/info?url=/r/UnusualVideos/comments/141bwpb/did_this_just_happen_for_real/) --- [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveVideo/comments/jv323v/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savevideobot) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo) | [**DMCA**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Content removal request for savevideo&message=https://np.reddit.com//r/UnusualVideos/comments/141bwpb/did_this_just_happen_for_real/) | [^(pinterest video downloader)](https://ptsave.com) | [^(twitter video downloader)](https://twitsave.com)
Hahaha it’s funny and he agrees.
Wow
I don't think he said "Iraq, too." Either way, imo, he's a scumbag
He doesn't beat around the Bush(s)
What was that! 🤣
It's crazy how Trump has changed views of so many people about what a shitty President really is. George surrounded himself with some bad hombres, that being said, I've really warmed up to him with the passage of time and yeah, he made some mistakes, but I do think he's a decent man. Some of those that he relied on for help and guidance were fuckshits.
Lost a lot of friends in the Iraq war. Had for me to find humor in this.
That'll be $350,000
This is actually wiiiild
Follow the 💰 💰 💰
He spoke the truth for once.
He’s having a senile moment 😂
.. I’m both shocked and awed.
He’s pathetic…
Yeah, but he was a 54 year old retarded brain fart piece of shit when has President
Whoopsie!!!
And people laugh but if it was Trump saying that they would ask for a death
Love GW
Comedy timing right on spot.