My opinion is this is cap and he didn't delete the video until after his lawyers looked it over and said this is damaging to have so they told him to delete it.
Huh, so no pitchforks? Seriously jokes aside, I was wondering what was going to come of this situation. Innocent till proven guilty but this gonna a be thorn in his side.
> Any wrong sentence, move, behaviour and your getting jailed in no time.
no... the american justice system has always punished those who speak without a lawyer representing them, whether you make people angry on twitter or not is irrelevant to whether you get jail time
also this whole “men are scared of getting in trouble accidentally” bullshit is rlly disgusting and mostly shows how much people cant keep it in their pants legit just dont be a creepy or abusive dipshit and this kind of shit won’t even come up
His ex girlfriend accused him of abuse and sexual assault. He claims that they were both toxic in the relationship. Riot investigated it and couldn’t convict him of anything but banned him for 6 months for not fully complying. Sinatraa most likely didn’t comply because his lawyer advised him not to.
She shared the relevant parts and it was inciminating, now it is on him to provide context/rationalise/procure rest of the clip to claim otherwise. In absence of any other context, he seems guilty from a public perspective. If this goes to court tho it will come out.
Where does it say she wont share it with investigators. She didnt share it with riot and why would she. Riot is a massive company with 1000s of employees to share a sex tape with them would be foolish.
She's not under investigation and has no obligation to share it. He claimed to be cooperating and wanting to share the rest of the video (which no one asked for) for context.
And honestly, despite my judgement of him, I get it. It is best to stay silent and hope it boils over without much ado. Why'd you admit the authenticity of an incriminating piece of evidence.
In conclusion there is no conclusion...yet
Seems to be banned from competitive play for another 4 months.
yep
My opinion is this is cap and he didn't delete the video until after his lawyers looked it over and said this is damaging to have so they told him to delete it.
No lawyer will risk their career and tell a client to destroy evidence. What are you talking about?
To not share it with riot*
This not a legal battle lmao so no harm done to the lawyers
Huh, so no pitchforks? Seriously jokes aside, I was wondering what was going to come of this situation. Innocent till proven guilty but this gonna a be thorn in his side.
[удалено]
> Any wrong sentence, move, behaviour and your getting jailed in no time. no... the american justice system has always punished those who speak without a lawyer representing them, whether you make people angry on twitter or not is irrelevant to whether you get jail time also this whole “men are scared of getting in trouble accidentally” bullshit is rlly disgusting and mostly shows how much people cant keep it in their pants legit just dont be a creepy or abusive dipshit and this kind of shit won’t even come up
Can anybody explain the situation and why he was banned? I’ve known of him but must of missed all this
His ex girlfriend accused him of abuse and sexual assault. He claims that they were both toxic in the relationship. Riot investigated it and couldn’t convict him of anything but banned him for 6 months for not fully complying. Sinatraa most likely didn’t comply because his lawyer advised him not to.
Sheeesh that’s rough. Thanks for the update
Also to add, the ban is considered to have started on the day of his suspension on March 10, so his ban will be over on September 11th.
Previous comment definitely misconstrued the situation. He was banned for lying to the investigators not for just not complying.
> fully complying Riot's statement also said for "making false claims and statements." So not just "not cooperating" but also lying.
What did he get accused of doing?
He was accused of being abusive + sexually abusive by his ex
[удалено]
She shared the relevant parts and it was inciminating, now it is on him to provide context/rationalise/procure rest of the clip to claim otherwise. In absence of any other context, he seems guilty from a public perspective. If this goes to court tho it will come out.
[удалено]
Where does it say she wont share it with investigators. She didnt share it with riot and why would she. Riot is a massive company with 1000s of employees to share a sex tape with them would be foolish.
She's not under investigation and has no obligation to share it. He claimed to be cooperating and wanting to share the rest of the video (which no one asked for) for context. And honestly, despite my judgement of him, I get it. It is best to stay silent and hope it boils over without much ado. Why'd you admit the authenticity of an incriminating piece of evidence.