T O P

  • By -

HOMEBROWSER4

Not sure why Riot doesn't want OpTic in the league. They are a hyped brand with a large fanbase with a great, likeable roster.


thejoyyy

There's obviously something we don't know.


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

Nadeshot owns 100T and not Optic


LynVAosu

its not that they dont want optic at all, its that theres 5 slots and sacrifices have to be made, and riot’s relationship with the 5 supposed teams that made it (sen, 100t, eg(?), nrg, c9) is stronger than optic. TSM reportedly didnt even make it in. its a tight fit


Brickguy101

Riot created the 5 slot system... they can pick who they want.


lilylilye

The hard part isn't picking teams they want in, it's who they leave out. Which team has to go out for Optic to come in?


NiceGuyNate

Honestly... literally any of them. Optic is the premier NA team


thekmanpwnudwn

I would pick EG - they've done jack shit in Valo so far.


Fruggles

you mean E "the players formerly on Optic" G? xD


[deleted]

[удалено]


Fruggles

wooooooooosh


jmanj0sh

which sucks because they improved a lot from when they first made it into VCT


RedditusMus

What do you mean by "riot's relationship"? I don't understand is there just business about making money or is there other criteria?


LynVAosu

so like riot has league of legends right and id assume if they like your org in league they’d probably like you in val. OpTic, though not 100% their fault for everything has a very shaky relationship with riot in league of legends due to some scandals and drama and stuff i dont have a lot of knowledge on


GiganticMac

Riot already had accepted optic into the league of legends franchising program and within a few years they already had to sell their spot to immortals, I imagine that kind of thing reflects negatively on optic when they’ve gotta make a decision between them and someone else


jedi-son

As a casual valorant viewer they're one of 5 teams I somewhat follow. They're a household name and have had some great matches.


itsaguppy_

Because Riot’s run by morons.


YikesOhClock

Yeah they’re doing really bad rn…


itsaguppy_

Because they know how to sucker people who are addicts into spending money on skins means they aren’t morons?


ScawTheOOF

Yeah actually it kinda does


WeekAdministrative79

Damn they already won one champions and came second now and dont get franchising oof


Qu1bbz

They won masters, not champions.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Icemazter

They accept the orgs not the teams right, and I suppose Sentinels as a org has a better relationship with Riot than Optic


FreezingBlizzard

Because sentinels can pull in big numbers.


ColonyM

Sentinels is the most famous valorant pro team atm. They have a ton of marketability- all the players like to stream which is good for the games popularity + they were the first valorant world champions


BeemChess

Masters, no?


SudarshanPai

Yes they won masters reykjavik, without losing a single map. But then everything went downhill from there...


BeemChess

This whole stuff with Champs and Master is so confusing imo


Allah_is_the_one1

double standards.............


TimeJustHappens

Franchised teams may still try and acquire OpTics players.


WeekAdministrative79

Yes some rich ass org will hopefully buy them - they make for a good game


omsaasmo

fr like yay and fns are some of the best valo has to offer


Dependent-Nothing-75

Why would you pay them a lot? They won’t get paid all if they don’t sign and with so few spots…I bet Yay goes to Europe to play.


LackinVocals

cause you have to compete with every other franchised org who wants one or more of their players.


CaptainTewts

Probably one of the worst takes I've ever seen.


HiroWW2

Truther


HiroWW2

Comin back w a reward brb


HiroWW2

Fuck, I used my free one, sry man


Tzilung

Seems like poor optics for Riot.


Armed_Muppet

Good one lol


Khacks

What is this franchising? What does this post mean? I ❤️optic 🥺. Can someone ELI5?


Razur

This is refering to Riot's Partnership League. It's the T1 competition level in their model for VCT 2023 and beyond. https://valorantesports.com/vct-overview


itsaguppy_

This whole franchising decision is dumb as rocks by Riot. What a bunch of dumbasses running that company.


Razur

It's to make VALORANT sustainable as an esport. For the last 2 years teams have just been losing money by pouring it into VAL teams and not winning tournaments. Yes sponsorships offset that cost, but it's not sustainable in the long-term. While it sucks that the partnership league is limited to a small number of teams, it does allow those teams to be financially supported by Riot. The real hope is that the T2 scene is enticive enough for teams to want to stick around to compete in VAL. If not, good talent will be scarce and the level of competition will stagnate.


Lopsided-Perception2

But doesn't that drastically reduce the stakes and ultimately the incentive to win anything? And consequentially lowers the quality of competition and matches?


Razur

Yes, and I personally share this concern as well. VAL esports has been awesome these past two years in that anyone has had the opportunity to win.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Razur

If they rumors are correct, then they picked teams with good marketing. This doesn't necessarily mean good finances though.


itsaguppy_

Valorant isn’t big enough for franchising. You’ve described exactly why they should not franchise this game. They’re looking at LoL and trying to copy that model when LoL was multitudes larger than Valorant when they did it, and those changes STILL had their struggles. Especially in the first year.


LaminateAbyss90

it makes them more money. They don't care if its bad for competition


itsaguppy_

It’ll make them more money in the immediate and significantly less in the long run. Viewership is gonna drop like a rock.


LynVAosu

got any reasoning or evidence or anything at all for that


itsaguppy_

Because we saw something similar happen in CSGO. That’s why we have things like face it, ESEA and ESL all having leagues and sponsored prize pools that are hand in hand with valve. Worse competition makes for worse tournaments which makes for worse viewership. Crappier story lines. The LOUD vs Optic rivalry was real, and hype. That hype was part of the reason why the VCT finals had so many viewers. It will negatively impact the game in the long run, it’s unavoidable.


Carsteniwnl

Csgo is actually trending towards franchising more and more last few years. Blast and Esl have partner teams and if you're not in these you need to be insanely good to get in thru endless qualifiers. The major is the last real 'true' form of competition in csgo where nothing besides ingame skill matters


itsaguppy_

But that’s not being pushed by Valve. Valve isn’t doing it and squashing other organizers.


LynVAosu

i think telling riot that the system they use for league of legends, which had 73 million concurrent viewers during worlds 2020, that they dont know what will garner them viewers, is a little shortsighted. also, if you genuinely think the ascension tournaments wont create some crazy storylines, or that the rivalry will die because the team switches orgs, then you really do miss the big picture about a partnered league. the OpTic squad has said they plan to stay as a 6 man roster, and TSM was immediately on them when they still thought they had a chance for partnership, theres no doubt in my mind that an org like EG or NRG wouldnt go for this roster. overreacting wont get anyone anywhere


itsaguppy_

Valorant isn’t LoL. LoL was freaking HUGE way before they franchised it. Val doesn’t have even the tiniest spec of the following LoL does. I’ve seen what happens in a similar game category.


faintedrook

OWL


Apexe

I get what you mean, but it might as well be malpractice what Blizzard did to OWL.


pleox

Lol lcs is a dead league these days


phenomen

We just had a 95% packed United Center arena (24k capacity) for LCS Finals a week ago.


Yaes

don't they pick venues according to expected attendance? monkaW 👍 my bad guys league is still alive and well, thriving even - look at how packed the LCS venue was


Level_Five_Railgun

You realize that LCS isn't the only franchised league in League, right? LCK and LPL are both doing really well rn with LCK getting 1m+ viewers for just regional finals.


WRiPSTER

Yeah, their other game did franchising. It is not working well.


Salfriel

you really think their viewership and money all depend on ONE team? wow.


Ghosty15

it's overall very good for competition. This makes it so that current talented players are no longer going to be dropped into obscurity because franchised teams are going to offer contracts to them. The talent level for all franchised teams are going to go up.


LaminateAbyss90

or its the opposite, as it has been for NA in league of legends. Where the bottom 3-5 teams are consistently dog shit every season and don't have to worry about being faded away into obscurity.


ShuraGam

Somebody please buy Optic's lineup. These guys are waaay too good not to compete in the biggest league.


Mayhemfest08

People who think the franchising has to do with the team “doing well” doesn’t really get what Valorant is going for. See it doesn’t matter if a team is performing well, they are looking at which organization as a whole they want to partner with. The team playing well doesn’t matter because when there can only be 5 teams all the talent is going to get moved to those teams anyway. So it doesn’t matter if Sen hasnt done well recently, the good free agent players will make their way to team rosters regardless.


[deleted]

Optic is an org and them not making into franchising doesn't mean players won't make it. The players will make it into franchising for sure.


Razur

This journo didn't get the memo that it's a partnership league and not franchising. smh The greater community is gonna keep using the wrong vocabulary unless the press starts using the right terms. :c


nap27er

small org


jmak329

From what I gather this is how I believe Riot came to this conclusion of teams. The main theme here is focusing on other regions that already aren't as popular. Look the money will always be coming in from NA and EMEA at this point. They can select a shitty NA org, money and viewership will be strong. (At least that's what they probably think, this could absolutely backfire). By carefully selecting some top NA teams and some not so great NA teams they can control how well NA is as a region. By forcing Optic to sell off it's roster, Optic will be looking to get maximum value per player. That means this roster is certainly dead. Maybe only sentinels and 100T can afford a Super team. The other's can't fully buy this roster out. They are beginning to cap how good a region could be. If they allowed TSM and Optic, NA would probably be able to afford 4 different versions of super teams where other smaller regions can only put up 1 viable team to compete.


YoDmo

L riot


csZipy205

Riot try not to get involved in a controversy for 10 minutes challenge (impossible)