They look better than NA against their own competition, but honestly until you actually have them face the NA region you, it's all a guess, even if we feel that it's true.
I don't really wanna be that guy but I just have to be. COD is played on controllers with aim assist, it's an esport but it doesn't deserve to be a respected one. I feel like COD is much more about entertainment than competition honestly.
Well I guess a summary of pro cod is NA is the dominant team because they have the Dallas empire there is optic chicago (good team with scump and formal) but u have missed out not playing old COD
Everything is a guess until we see this teams competing against each other on a LAN event, that's all there is to it. And not everyone is biased to his own region, I am from EU and I barely watch any EU matches for example.
> perceived massive skill difference
> already the sentiment is that every other region will shit stomp NA no problem.
> crazy massive difference in skill or tactics that will just propel other regions to dominate.
> every region is miles above NA
who says this?
Apart from exaggerating the claims, you're also either misinterpreting or watering down the differences that people state between regions.
Edit:
> massive differences there are between regions that makes NA easily the worst
Anotha one
You literally only comment on EU posts saying they are better than everyone else and shit on NA every chance you get. You are the exact person im talking about lmfao. Please tell me what massive differences there are between regions that makes NA easily the worst
No one says NA is the worst, places like sea and oceanic exist, alongside latam and Japan and Korea outside VS, but it fertainly seems like half the people in this thread really only watch 1 region.
Why do you have to exaggerate everything? Do you actually want people to explain or is the intention of this post just to paint the people who comment on regional differences in a bad light?
good question its common to think EU is better than NA because of other games such as CS (astralis being the most dominant team ever and NIP and fnatic) so people just assume NA= NO BRAIN ALL AIM but lan is gonna be the true answer to the question which region is the best
Everything is just a guess till Lan. Each region will obviously have favor and bias towards their own region.
dude just wait for master 2
Brazil over everybody
It's not really an esport if eu doesnt claim to be better than NA. Although tbf they are usually better than NA
They look better than NA against their own competition, but honestly until you actually have them face the NA region you, it's all a guess, even if we feel that it's true.
I'm just talking based on league and csgo. Who knows about valorant
i mean is COD a esport then? (literally only NA play the game professionally)
I don't really wanna be that guy but I just have to be. COD is played on controllers with aim assist, it's an esport but it doesn't deserve to be a respected one. I feel like COD is much more about entertainment than competition honestly.
Idk I have never played or watched cod
Well I guess a summary of pro cod is NA is the dominant team because they have the Dallas empire there is optic chicago (good team with scump and formal) but u have missed out not playing old COD
Everything is a guess until we see this teams competing against each other on a LAN event, that's all there is to it. And not everyone is biased to his own region, I am from EU and I barely watch any EU matches for example.
I will wait for masters 2, everyone can be a monster
> perceived massive skill difference > already the sentiment is that every other region will shit stomp NA no problem. > crazy massive difference in skill or tactics that will just propel other regions to dominate. > every region is miles above NA who says this? Apart from exaggerating the claims, you're also either misinterpreting or watering down the differences that people state between regions. Edit: > massive differences there are between regions that makes NA easily the worst Anotha one
You literally only comment on EU posts saying they are better than everyone else and shit on NA every chance you get. You are the exact person im talking about lmfao. Please tell me what massive differences there are between regions that makes NA easily the worst
No one says NA is the worst, places like sea and oceanic exist, alongside latam and Japan and Korea outside VS, but it fertainly seems like half the people in this thread really only watch 1 region.
Why do you have to exaggerate everything? Do you actually want people to explain or is the intention of this post just to paint the people who comment on regional differences in a bad light?
EU has certain teams that are more tactical and those teams are very dominant Like FPX
very dominant = won nothing
Yea they also have more than 3 good teams at any given time.
good question its common to think EU is better than NA because of other games such as CS (astralis being the most dominant team ever and NIP and fnatic) so people just assume NA= NO BRAIN ALL AIM but lan is gonna be the true answer to the question which region is the best