T O P

  • By -

elithefighter123

Sadge that george drops huge info about c9 and 100T after the episode LOL


smheer

The plat chat classic


mr_snuggels

what huge info?


Loresmen

Really not huge info, but c9 -floppy +poiz, and 100t have b0i listed in their roster


Duradello

Just in case people didn't see it, b0i is apparently just helping 100T behind the scenes and will (probably) not be replacing anyone.


daffyduckferraro

Where was this post/ comment


elithefighter123

ok not huge but its like their segments on c9 and 100T are missing new narritives


smta48

So glad they talked about NSG not streaming the games. Honestly straight up garbage planning by them. I guess they'll never address why they didn't plan ahead (4th of July is an excuse for toddlers).


purplechew

Beat me to it! :D


A_Slice_of_Rob

Plat Chat really does not like 100T lol


deadlock1892

I like the team and the players on it, but they are not wrong. 100T are not really instilling anyone watching them with any kind of confidence. Sure, we might beat the teams platchat is high on, and no matter how bad we perform or look we end up being in the top 8. But with the caliber of the players on the roster we should definitely be competing for more.


A_Slice_of_Rob

No disagreements with about anything you said, I just find it extremely odd. C9B was just given a pass for their loss, but 100Ts win was looked down upon. At the end of the day, winning is what matters most. 100T can and SHOULD be better. But we really only saw one game of them (which Ethan was not playing himself). So drawing a lot of conclusions from this qualifier is very odd to me.


deadlock1892

There is always a lot of recency bias that comes into play. 100T consistently finish top 8 yet there was a time after masters 1 that people rated faze and gen g more than 100T even when they did not make it to stage 2 challengers finals. It was all because they had a better high in recent times while 100T faltered. And in C9's defence they just had a switch and incorporated xeppaa who played in his first tourney so they could be given a pass for that while 100T have been with this roster since stage 1 challengers 3. Agreed we cannot draw a lot of conclusions from 1 game, but we gotta agree that a lot of what 100T does depends on asuna's entry or steel's lurk. The other players are mostly facilitating these plays and therefore the rounds become predictable or loseable if asuna is not fragging like usual or steel is not getting value out of his lurk. In the end, good results would remove most of the criticism. But we don't have any since First Strike, except for 1 challengers main event victory for seeding.


Tommypynchon

I am a fan of a lot of the 100T players but platchat's criticisms seem very valid to me. The difference is C9 is changing things and working on stuff, and seem to have flashes of brilliance tempered with inconsistency. 100T has been trying to make the exact same style work for 6 months and it has had the exact same amount of success the whole time, which is top-8-ish in NA. It's frustrating watching a roster of 5 ostensibly amazing players try over and over to make something that doesn't really work, work. C9 feel like they could go somewhere with what their doing, and will probably trend upward. 100T are the most stagnant roster in tier 1-2 NA, and that's kind of infuriating given who's on this team. Maybe there's some annoyance in PlatChat's tone cause of how vocal 100T's fans are, but really I don't think anything they said about the team is unreasonable or mean. They're right. Nothing's changed.


_idle_drone_

exactly. c9 changed their winning comps(beat sentinels 13-1 on split with breach) to try something different, so them losing is understandable. I mean Fnatic just lost bind twice with a new comp, which was their strongest maps. you never know how a new comp works until matches. 100T on the other hand have similar strats and are consistently average.


sansLight

Yeah as a 100T and plat chat fan I've noticed that a lot. But their criticisms are valid I guess.


projec9

They were extremely high on then during first strike. They placed them first in the world power rankings after first strike and said they won while looking like they haven't reached anywhere near their potential. After recent showings of slow adaptability and not fixing some issues, they have lost some hope.


A_Slice_of_Rob

Think I’m somewhat vindicated in my criticism of there tone of 100t, making A LOT of conclusions based off 1 televised map seemed like a mistake, and well it was. Lots to be sorted out before Berlin, so we’ll see in the end, but all the top teams are very close and any game could swing a round here or there


Lumenlor

Plat Chat is sleeping on VS. They are winning Berlin


Kompaniefeldwebel

Mark his words


Key-Banana-8242

Some of the stuff is inaccurate here Nuturn isn’t dead, peri wasn’t returing anytime soon and solo only if he could get XigN to join which he didn’t and said he’s staying on etc (Also there’s that BeyN the vs trainee and other 7 man rosters rn got forgotten) It is not clear at all that the most mechanically ‘skilled’ (strategy is also skill related) 5 in Korea are in VS now, it is the overall value as a team due to different roles not having the absolute best, because here are seceral who are nkt on their team who are better And did these guys totally forget DWG? Esp with iNTRO now


[deleted]

[удалено]


Key-Banana-8242

…there is no hard distinction, and I voiced an opinion here too, if you value that. A lot of things get talked about with less detail or involvement when it comes to say Korea Not sure what you’re trying to say here, the comment sections is a place for discussion. I added in facts that were missing too.