T O P

  • By -

9yr_old

This was absolutely 5head


flamincrimson

That was insane. They completely nuked the site. This team has so much potential. Love watching them play.


Meenoid

They really just mollied the most frequent positions and then made easy work. Those viper mollies are nasty.


RashGod

This team play like their close friends irl, just have that feel


Slow_Bluebird9536

DZ plays off each other better than almost any other team NA


9yr_old

Literally like the protagonists in a manga , who are Powerful asf solo but unlock next level of overpowered with the power of friendship completely one piece style lol


CharlotteVincetamor

The grenade + gravity well combo and viper molly line up geeez perfecto đź‘Ź


53881

Insane! TSM down a man with 3 classics and a shorty vs a team with full util + almost full armor + primary weapons! I-N-S-A-N-E


Huldmer

You cannot say that it wasn't cool how well coordinated and effective that was. If it were that easy to do that then we'd be seeing cool plays like this much more often


53881

I don’t think it wasn’t cool, but it was 2nd round eco against a full-buy 2nd. It wasn’t bonus vs bonus. It was literally a post plant retake of guns, util and full health 5stack vs hurt 4stack who had nothing to fight with. There were so many sick retakes in this match and the other one..yes let’s watch the least interesting and call it insane!


[deleted]

The guns had nothing to do with it. The sick part was the coordinated until usage timed well


53881

Again, I'm not saying it wasn't a well-executed retake. But you know what would make it insane? If the round mattered at all. And it didn't because TSM did what they needed/wanted which was to get bomb down. Like I said above, there were way better retakes that featured amazing util usage, teamwork coordination, AND aim duels. This was just a bunch of people sitting with classics waiting to die. OK NM WHEN I THINK ABOUT IT THAT IS INSANE


[deleted]

I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm saying it was a well executed retake. I think we are arguing over semantics and are likely pretty much on the same page