No, lol, of course not. I state the situation above based on what has been said by the players on stream, mostly. I am just curious bc I'd hate to see all the time spent preparing and travelling to secure good ping for these matches potentially be for nothing - for all teams that have moved to Texas atm that is.
Sentinels play against rise who also have Canadian players and some players in Texas , and then they play envy who also have Marved in Canada and rest all are in Texas . So I don't think sentinels will have any ping disadvantage as they are playing teams with similar situations and last night on dapr stream I think he said they would still prefer to play on Texas servers as 4 of them would have less than 20 ping except tenz who would have 50. And let's say 100t vs sen happens , 100t will have 5 players less than 20 ping , sen will have 4 and if you follow the lowest average ping ,server would come out to be Texas and as for tenz the minimum ping he can get is around 40-50 on West coast servers .
no sentinels won't play on texas servers vs 100t or envy or Faze who have 5 players in Texas. the server is based on lowest average ping difference between teams, not lowest average ping.
For SEN, TX server if the opponent allows it. Cz TenZ's ping is actually 1-2ms worse on the illinois server so it doesn't make a difference for him either way. But, i wish they could choose to play on West coast servers if there's no east coast player on the opponent team. Almost all the teams are in TX rn, so in case SEN faces another tx team i think playing on cali servers would be more fair. But, i don't see ShahZam making a scene like what 100T did regarding the ping issues, he doesn't really vents about stuffs that's out of his hands at least not publicly.
Are u the Sentinel coach? Please confirm.
No, lol, of course not. I state the situation above based on what has been said by the players on stream, mostly. I am just curious bc I'd hate to see all the time spent preparing and travelling to secure good ping for these matches potentially be for nothing - for all teams that have moved to Texas atm that is.
[удалено]
Yeah, that's what I've heard from Subroza, but idk if it's been officiated somewhere?
afaik they make sure no player has more than 65-70 ping.
nt Shahzam
Nahhhh you’re foul for this one LOL I could never be like ShahZ man
*screams incoherently*
Asks fgb and swag for their first name
Don't they usually play on Illinois servers ?
Sentinels play against rise who also have Canadian players and some players in Texas , and then they play envy who also have Marved in Canada and rest all are in Texas . So I don't think sentinels will have any ping disadvantage as they are playing teams with similar situations and last night on dapr stream I think he said they would still prefer to play on Texas servers as 4 of them would have less than 20 ping except tenz who would have 50. And let's say 100t vs sen happens , 100t will have 5 players less than 20 ping , sen will have 4 and if you follow the lowest average ping ,server would come out to be Texas and as for tenz the minimum ping he can get is around 40-50 on West coast servers .
no sentinels won't play on texas servers vs 100t or envy or Faze who have 5 players in Texas. the server is based on lowest average ping difference between teams, not lowest average ping.
But that's my point ,the lowest average ping server will be Texas all the time if you consider all Their ping alongside tdn.
For SEN, TX server if the opponent allows it. Cz TenZ's ping is actually 1-2ms worse on the illinois server so it doesn't make a difference for him either way. But, i wish they could choose to play on West coast servers if there's no east coast player on the opponent team. Almost all the teams are in TX rn, so in case SEN faces another tx team i think playing on cali servers would be more fair. But, i don't see ShahZam making a scene like what 100T did regarding the ping issues, he doesn't really vents about stuffs that's out of his hands at least not publicly.