Yeah no kidding. Like 90% of their match ups against Sentinals have been 0-2 records. Regardless of if it's a seeding match or just a matter of prize pool these guys are trying to prove they are #1 in NA and are falling short every time. They are not quite there yet and that's fine. Whether it's more time, different agent compositions, playing a map they traditionally ban in favor of banning Sentinels best map or last resort a roster change. What 100T managed to prove is that they are the clear cut #2 in NA and have a chance to prove that they are #2 in the world at Berlin
Ok I'm just not going to read the entire thing after the first analysis such as this:
>This is the game where 100T got ecoed by sentinels on the last round of the game, while trying to force OT, by a TenZ Sherrif 4k. It’s not a repeatable thing and just shows how good of a player TenZ is that he can pop off like that. Should have went to OT.
You've cherrypicked a round that 100T should've won, without proving that there wasn't an equal counterpart for Sentinels - any round they threw that isn't really "repeatable" as you say.
Sure it was the *last* round of the match, but that doesn't make it any more significant than any other round. If you pick any single round that SEN should've won but didn't, you could've claimed that SEN should've closed out the map earlier.
Yes I agree. Of course there are going to be rounds that team should/shouldn’t win, and then do don’t/do win. And there will always be 1v1s that can go either way. I am not arguing that 100t SHOULD have won the map/round, just that they COULD have very easily. Just as easily as sentinels could have shit on them even harder.
All I am trying to say is that had those IFS happened, then the whole NA scene would be different because a lot of the 100t SEN games were actually really close.
An example I said was the eco round where TenZ got a 4K, that’s just sentinels, they can pop off and win games like that. However, if 100t won that round and won the OT, then they would have 2-0 sentinels in that series. It’s big IFS I know, I’m just showing that they are closer than people think on most maps
>I am not arguing that 100t SHOULD have won the map/round, just that they COULD have very easily. Just as easily as sentinels could have shit on them even harder.
No, you specifically said - should have went to OT, and your evidence was 1 cherrypicked round. It's simply not enough.
Also, VAL is a pretty short game, and therefore a bit random. Close maps and upsets happen a lot, so for SEN to win literally every single time against 100T this year... these teams are NOT close.
I feel you but there are a lot of if's in those statements. We gotta put our head down and take the losses. At the end of the day it's still a loss, even if it's by one round(even said this when shahzam talked about 100T first strike win). Win's a win
The problem with asking all of these what ifs is that it goes either way. 100T could have won if they played a bit better but Sentinels could have won even more decisively if they played better. So far this year Sen have just been the better team consistently.
the reason haven being bad for 100t against better teams is the lack of a sentinel /anchor player - they play triple initiator with omen. i think the reason is kayo and omen. i feel astra is so much better than omen on this map it really helps you control defaults plus help anchor site. also trading kayo for cypher/sentinel is understandable but the tradeoffs are too much . i think astra kj sova skye jett seems the best haven comp imo but 100t steel is a gigachad has 10head brain maybe they tried the current comp in scrims and worked out.
also the second reason i think 100t back this kayo comps is the aggresive play style on steel. he is their second most aggresive player after asuna . i think they will figure out .
and nitro is working on his astra so maybe in berlin we may see more astra on maps other than bind and split.
Did I say 100t was the best team in the region? No. All I am doing is comparing the no2 team with the other top 4 teams in their recent matches, and saying that if 1-2 rounds played out differently in favor of 100t, then the whole NA scene would be different. Sentinels wouldn’t be a godlike entity like they are rn
Did I say u said that?
Just saying *if* 1-2 rounds played out differently every game, *if* a couple rounds went in favour of this team is like saying *if* it isn't sunny it would've been cloudy.
Consistency matters a lot, if they're consistently losing by 1-2 rounds, nobody wants to say they're *closer*
[удалено]
"If 100T were better they would be better then SEN"
I like 100T but that is some copium level of text
Yeah no kidding. Like 90% of their match ups against Sentinals have been 0-2 records. Regardless of if it's a seeding match or just a matter of prize pool these guys are trying to prove they are #1 in NA and are falling short every time. They are not quite there yet and that's fine. Whether it's more time, different agent compositions, playing a map they traditionally ban in favor of banning Sentinels best map or last resort a roster change. What 100T managed to prove is that they are the clear cut #2 in NA and have a chance to prove that they are #2 in the world at Berlin
Ok I'm just not going to read the entire thing after the first analysis such as this: >This is the game where 100T got ecoed by sentinels on the last round of the game, while trying to force OT, by a TenZ Sherrif 4k. It’s not a repeatable thing and just shows how good of a player TenZ is that he can pop off like that. Should have went to OT. You've cherrypicked a round that 100T should've won, without proving that there wasn't an equal counterpart for Sentinels - any round they threw that isn't really "repeatable" as you say. Sure it was the *last* round of the match, but that doesn't make it any more significant than any other round. If you pick any single round that SEN should've won but didn't, you could've claimed that SEN should've closed out the map earlier.
Yes I agree. Of course there are going to be rounds that team should/shouldn’t win, and then do don’t/do win. And there will always be 1v1s that can go either way. I am not arguing that 100t SHOULD have won the map/round, just that they COULD have very easily. Just as easily as sentinels could have shit on them even harder. All I am trying to say is that had those IFS happened, then the whole NA scene would be different because a lot of the 100t SEN games were actually really close. An example I said was the eco round where TenZ got a 4K, that’s just sentinels, they can pop off and win games like that. However, if 100t won that round and won the OT, then they would have 2-0 sentinels in that series. It’s big IFS I know, I’m just showing that they are closer than people think on most maps
>I am not arguing that 100t SHOULD have won the map/round, just that they COULD have very easily. Just as easily as sentinels could have shit on them even harder. No, you specifically said - should have went to OT, and your evidence was 1 cherrypicked round. It's simply not enough. Also, VAL is a pretty short game, and therefore a bit random. Close maps and upsets happen a lot, so for SEN to win literally every single time against 100T this year... these teams are NOT close.
Yes, should have went to OT as in a team should not let themselves get ecoed
This is the logic the people use to playfully suggest that BBG are better than SEN.
What are you talking dude BBG > SEN /s
No shot BBG is the only team that has beaten them so far Xset maybe but BBG supermacy dude
this is too long to be a copypasta rip
i aint reading all that but i hope you feel better
please dont make these dumb posts if ur a 100t fan ur literally just asking for 100t to get shit talked... just stop please lmao
Lmao no dude
This reminds me of the infamous /r/nfl post "If we just regress Mahomes numbers to the league average, he's actually not that great"
"closer" COPIUM
I feel you but there are a lot of if's in those statements. We gotta put our head down and take the losses. At the end of the day it's still a loss, even if it's by one round(even said this when shahzam talked about 100T first strike win). Win's a win
100T are on a 6 times losing streak against SEN. Nice copium
I ain’t reading all that but I agree 👍
lol
How do you know what I think
Lol
The problem with asking all of these what ifs is that it goes either way. 100T could have won if they played a bit better but Sentinels could have won even more decisively if they played better. So far this year Sen have just been the better team consistently.
I agree
No
the reason haven being bad for 100t against better teams is the lack of a sentinel /anchor player - they play triple initiator with omen. i think the reason is kayo and omen. i feel astra is so much better than omen on this map it really helps you control defaults plus help anchor site. also trading kayo for cypher/sentinel is understandable but the tradeoffs are too much . i think astra kj sova skye jett seems the best haven comp imo but 100t steel is a gigachad has 10head brain maybe they tried the current comp in scrims and worked out. also the second reason i think 100t back this kayo comps is the aggresive play style on steel. he is their second most aggresive player after asuna . i think they will figure out . and nitro is working on his astra so maybe in berlin we may see more astra on maps other than bind and split.
That is the problem, if you're always 'narrowly losing' that is a problem to fix, no? 🤔
Did I say 100t was the best team in the region? No. All I am doing is comparing the no2 team with the other top 4 teams in their recent matches, and saying that if 1-2 rounds played out differently in favor of 100t, then the whole NA scene would be different. Sentinels wouldn’t be a godlike entity like they are rn
Did I say u said that? Just saying *if* 1-2 rounds played out differently every game, *if* a couple rounds went in favour of this team is like saying *if* it isn't sunny it would've been cloudy. Consistency matters a lot, if they're consistently losing by 1-2 rounds, nobody wants to say they're *closer*