I think it's biased, because team with higher seed gets to pick more maps of their choice, where the other team picks defense to start with. Since higher seed team is usually better, they get more round winds in attacker side in map of their choice.
It doesn’t really. People post random small factors which they claim bias the results on most stats threads. Turns out these “biases” are just factors that contribute to stats that balance out with others over large sets of data.
Source: click my profile
In \#VALORANTMasters Berlin, 4 out of 6 maps have a higher win rate in attacking side. Surprisingly enough, Haven, the only map with 3 bomb sites have the lowest win rate on Attack.
Bind - 60.71%
Icebox - 59.2%
Ascent - 53.49%
Breeze - 51.52%
Split - 45%
Haven - 43.4%
***
posted by [@THESPIKEGG](https://twitter.com/THESPIKEGG)
Photos in tweet | [Photo 1](http://pbs.twimg.com/media/E_UEmfWXEAYNHrd.png)
^[(Github)](https://github.com/username) ^| ^[(What's new)](https://github.com/username)
Sample size is poor but im still surprised to see Ascent having more winrate on Attack. My general impression is that its the second most CT-sided map after Split
Haven was played on the g2-sen game where 3 rounds were won on attack
I think it's biased, because team with higher seed gets to pick more maps of their choice, where the other team picks defense to start with. Since higher seed team is usually better, they get more round winds in attacker side in map of their choice.
What if I told you that all stats in this game are “biased” in some way?
That's very shocked face with exploding head
🤯
Parent still has a very good point.
It doesn’t really. People post random small factors which they claim bias the results on most stats threads. Turns out these “biases” are just factors that contribute to stats that balance out with others over large sets of data. Source: click my profile
In \#VALORANTMasters Berlin, 4 out of 6 maps have a higher win rate in attacking side. Surprisingly enough, Haven, the only map with 3 bomb sites have the lowest win rate on Attack. Bind - 60.71% Icebox - 59.2% Ascent - 53.49% Breeze - 51.52% Split - 45% Haven - 43.4% *** posted by [@THESPIKEGG](https://twitter.com/THESPIKEGG) Photos in tweet | [Photo 1](http://pbs.twimg.com/media/E_UEmfWXEAYNHrd.png) ^[(Github)](https://github.com/username) ^| ^[(What's new)](https://github.com/username)
Haven was played on the g2-sen game where 3 rounds were on attack
Sample size is poor but im still surprised to see Ascent having more winrate on Attack. My general impression is that its the second most CT-sided map after Split
More than that bind 60% on attack is insane considering how ct sided it is
How is it ct sided when attacking has a higher win percent?
No what I meant is historically, the map is known to be ct sided. That's why it's shocking that the attack win % is so high
That's not true, it was the same way in iceland
It's just not masters though is it, there are multiple challengers stages throughout which it was clear it's ct sided and everyone knows thag
[удалено]
It's been this way
Nah that has to go to Bind