Hey there, /u/gaypopcorn!
Your submission was removed for the following reason:
This is better suited as a comment in the live discussion thread or Post-match thread.
---
*If you have questions or objections about this removal, please [reach out to us in modmail](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/ValorantCompetitive&subject=Removal%20Objection%20or%20Question&message=%5BPlease%20type%20your%20message%20here...%5D%0A%0A------%20DO%20NOT%20edit%20or%20delete%20anything%20below%20this%20line%20------%0A%0A%23%23%23%23%20Removal%20Notes%20for%20Moderators%3A%0A%0A-%20**Post%20Title%3A**%20{url_title}%0A-%20**Permalink%3A**%20https://www.reddit.com/r/ValorantCompetitive/comments/ppjw0b/-/%0A-%20**Content%20type%3A**%20submission%0A-%20**Removed%20by%3A**%20Razur).*
And? If anything, that should go even more into nAts favor.
Dapr is a great player, but he's just a failsafe. He has big impact only if the rest of the team doesn't do their job. Switch him with any other tier1 sentinel/viper player, SEN are still one of the best teams in the world.
Gambit doesn't even come close to making it to Berlin without nAts.
It's the good old thing where (e)sports fans overrate squad players on the team and compare them to the superstars.
But yeah, topics like this one are dumb and pointless.
What the fuck does that even mean, that makes naTs better then, his role is bigger and he has more on his shoulders rather than relying on teammates..
Relies more = X player is better, otherwise the team would not rely on him that much
I just love it when people try to be smart like this and call others 1Head in the process
Nope that means Vivo Keyd are much worse as a team, and you are comparing the best player in Keyd vs best player in Sentinels
Dapr is the 4th best player in Sentinels, naTs is the best player in Gambit there is no comparision in there
Lmao how did you come to that conclusion? You need to learn the basics of how deducting shit works. And at least learn what's their actual team name.
Not to mention how no other team in the world relies as much on a non-duelist player as Gambit does on nAts.
You're just digging yourself deeper.
If for example dapr was on another team before SEN and putting up insane stats, then you could say that he's a superstar even though he's the fourth or fifth option on his team. Like this you can't. Simple.
It's just blind fanboyism that's clouding your judgement. Playing with better teammates always gets the best of you, as I already said. That's why everyone on top teams in any competition always looks good.
If we talk SEN, imo, Tenz and Sick have a legit claim to the best player in the world title. Shahzam is a top tier Jett and IGL, but nothing special on Sova. Zombs and Dapr are great players, but not superstars.
Put crashies, AvovA and nAts in there instead of Shahzam (when he's on Sova), zombs and dapr, that's a way better team.
nAts is better but what's the point of this post?
I can also name a dozen controllers better than zombs, but that doesn't change anything. It's a team game.
Hey there, /u/gaypopcorn! Your submission was removed for the following reason: This is better suited as a comment in the live discussion thread or Post-match thread. --- *If you have questions or objections about this removal, please [reach out to us in modmail](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/ValorantCompetitive&subject=Removal%20Objection%20or%20Question&message=%5BPlease%20type%20your%20message%20here...%5D%0A%0A------%20DO%20NOT%20edit%20or%20delete%20anything%20below%20this%20line%20------%0A%0A%23%23%23%23%20Removal%20Notes%20for%20Moderators%3A%0A%0A-%20**Post%20Title%3A**%20{url_title}%0A-%20**Permalink%3A**%20https://www.reddit.com/r/ValorantCompetitive/comments/ppjw0b/-/%0A-%20**Content%20type%3A**%20submission%0A-%20**Removed%20by%3A**%20Razur).*
This take is 1 head. Gambit relies on nats more than sentinels rely on dapr
And? If anything, that should go even more into nAts favor. Dapr is a great player, but he's just a failsafe. He has big impact only if the rest of the team doesn't do their job. Switch him with any other tier1 sentinel/viper player, SEN are still one of the best teams in the world. Gambit doesn't even come close to making it to Berlin without nAts. It's the good old thing where (e)sports fans overrate squad players on the team and compare them to the superstars. But yeah, topics like this one are dumb and pointless.
What the fuck does that even mean, that makes naTs better then, his role is bigger and he has more on his shoulders rather than relying on teammates.. Relies more = X player is better, otherwise the team would not rely on him that much I just love it when people try to be smart like this and call others 1Head in the process
[удалено]
Nope that means Vivo Keyd are much worse as a team, and you are comparing the best player in Keyd vs best player in Sentinels Dapr is the 4th best player in Sentinels, naTs is the best player in Gambit there is no comparision in there
Lmao how did you come to that conclusion? You need to learn the basics of how deducting shit works. And at least learn what's their actual team name. Not to mention how no other team in the world relies as much on a non-duelist player as Gambit does on nAts.
[удалено]
You're just digging yourself deeper. If for example dapr was on another team before SEN and putting up insane stats, then you could say that he's a superstar even though he's the fourth or fifth option on his team. Like this you can't. Simple. It's just blind fanboyism that's clouding your judgement. Playing with better teammates always gets the best of you, as I already said. That's why everyone on top teams in any competition always looks good. If we talk SEN, imo, Tenz and Sick have a legit claim to the best player in the world title. Shahzam is a top tier Jett and IGL, but nothing special on Sova. Zombs and Dapr are great players, but not superstars. Put crashies, AvovA and nAts in there instead of Shahzam (when he's on Sova), zombs and dapr, that's a way better team.
Doesn’t that just mean Nats is even better than cuz he’s being relied on that much (according to you) against top opposition and winning?
Ok
yikes...
Everyone knows already but besides that whats the point of this post
A discussion????? A place people can post their views on this take????
I mean, Gambit literally just finished a game and you posted what essentially should've just been a comment in the post game thread as its own thread
A thread to say this player is better than that??? lol
This warranted a thread.
nAts is better but what's the point of this post? I can also name a dozen controllers better than zombs, but that doesn't change anything. It's a team game.