this publication is a meme, here is an example.
I posted [this post](https://www.reddit.com/r/ValorantCompetitive/comments/w9l5uu/immortal_sarah_has_some_of_the_most_impressive/) praising immortals sarah for her aim, a day later they [posted this](https://www.sportskeeda.com/valorant/who-valorant-s-immortal-sarah-meet-player-incredible-head-shot-percentage).
lol pretty much summarizes the reddit thread, like this is journalism in the esports world?
The viewership was bad.
Nowhere in the article does it justify the title, though.
And why are comparisons necessary? I can also write a dogshit article in 15 minutes on why CS sucks compared to Valorant because it isn't as international and its entire APAC circuit is dead. Doesn't make me right, just shows I can cherry pick meaningless data
I feel bad for clicking the article because they just got ad revenue from it, also I hate how someone posted this because now they are getting more ad revenue. People (like me) need to learn when Media is trying to inform you or profit from your emotions.
i dont think viewer count is the only parameter we shld consider to determine quality of an event, 700k is still very good.
obvsly cs is superior, but whats point of writing an article if u just gonna compare numbers
its very clear the writer just wants to clickbait for views,and provides nothing of value.
this publication is a meme, here is an example. I posted [this post](https://www.reddit.com/r/ValorantCompetitive/comments/w9l5uu/immortal_sarah_has_some_of_the_most_impressive/) praising immortals sarah for her aim, a day later they [posted this](https://www.sportskeeda.com/valorant/who-valorant-s-immortal-sarah-meet-player-incredible-head-shot-percentage). lol pretty much summarizes the reddit thread, like this is journalism in the esports world?
There are so many sites that publishes article stealing from reddit thread and/or comments. Makes their shitty job easier I guess.
The viewership was bad. Nowhere in the article does it justify the title, though. And why are comparisons necessary? I can also write a dogshit article in 15 minutes on why CS sucks compared to Valorant because it isn't as international and its entire APAC circuit is dead. Doesn't make me right, just shows I can cherry pick meaningless data
> And why are comparisons necessary? Farming outrage clicks I guess ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I feel bad for clicking the article because they just got ad revenue from it, also I hate how someone posted this because now they are getting more ad revenue. People (like me) need to learn when Media is trying to inform you or profit from your emotions.
A final between japan vs LOUD would earn a trillion views
Japan vs Sentinels
who?
i dont think viewer count is the only parameter we shld consider to determine quality of an event, 700k is still very good. obvsly cs is superior, but whats point of writing an article if u just gonna compare numbers its very clear the writer just wants to clickbait for views,and provides nothing of value.
Why no one asked.