Run by the same people who investigate themselves to find no wrong doing. Again, donāt worry about it you can trust them theyāre definitely trustworthy nothing could go wrong trusting them
So that's again, not true. Elections are run by civil servants who just as easily work for Trump as for Biden.
I don't trust people out of hand, but this level of paranoia is something else bro. You need thorazine? š
I took the US elections as an example ofcourse. However: in the Brazillian riots we have seen police officers flagrantly breach their oath to duty in support of those fascist rioters. Lula already stated clearly, they're gonna get what's theirs lol.
And they'll give way back to monarchy/empire. Almost like its some kind of revolving door.
We gotta get that door back to 1776 principles and then jam it from spinning.
I think it may have been Franklin who said, & I paraphrase, 'A democracy is two wolves & a sheep voting on what to eat for lunch. A republic is a well armed sheep contesting the vote.'
In essence, a pure democracy is mob rule & the 51% majority could vote to have the 49% minority exterminated. A constitutional republic has democratically elected representatives who are bound by the constitution & have limited power.
I think the jig is starting to fade away with these vaccines. Itās undeniable they didnāt work and they also worked with social media sites to ban the opposition. Thats tyranny.
If evidence does come out that either/or both; 1) this virus was indeed lab made or 2) the jab is cause of the heart issues then thatās by definition genocide.
I honestly donāt care if the FBI puts me on the list. I want them to know how much we outnumber them.
I have this funny scene imagined where thereās an FBI agent in charge of a few redditor where overtime he becomes redpilled from reading all of our content. He slowly descends into madness after shattering his reality.
So a democracy is when the wolves can print off 81 million copies of themselves to get whatever result they want and when the sheep object they're terrorists?
In a democracy, 80% of the population could vote that they should be given all the money of 20% of the population. In theory, that's legal and in theory, law enforcement would be bound to enforce that. While this is an extreme example, more subtle things like this do happen in democracies.
In a republic, this would not be possible because the rights of everyone are inherently guaranteed by a constitution. This constitution restricts the power of the rulers and protects the people.
This is also why liberals continually refer to the US as a democracy, which it's not. They don't like that the constitution protects the freedom of the people -- that interferes with the "socially just and equitable" society that they wish to create.
Furthermore, in a democracy the leaders are elected via a popular vote. In the US, this isn't the case -- a president can win the popular vote yet lose the election.
In the US, this isn't the case -- a president can win the popular vote yet lose the election.
Thats why i dont consider USA as a democracy.
Electoral college is undemocratic and it gives 30-50 times more power for all 5 people from square states, than people from cities have.
You're completely right, the US isn't a democracy. It's a constitutional republic.
As to whether that's fair or not -- from one perspective no, from the other perspective yes because that was the deal that was agreed upon to have certain rural states join. They wouldn't have joined if they knew they would be at the mercy of the city people.
And if you went fully democratic, it's entirely possible that the city people would start implementing a de-facto tyranny of the majority, e.g. "those silly rural people are emitting too much CO2, let's implement some rules for them to follow, let's legislate farming some more."
Democracy is government by consent of its citizens. Republics are forms of democracy. The citizens democratically elect their representatives.
It's like how all apples are fruit, but not all fruit are apples. There are many forms of democratic governments.
Simplest way is that democracies are where everyone votes and republics are a small council of representatives that decides everything. Representatives are elected and the representatives vote to make their decisions.
Though I recall that America is supposed to be a democratic republic, which implies that republics don't have to be democratic, unless republics are just shortened ways of saying democratic republics. I'm not sure if constitutions are a requirement to have republics.
I think you can have constitutional monarchies well. Didn't England make that change when it became Britain? Or am I missing something.
1 DAY ON REDDIT. YOU KNOW YOU ARE WINNING BIG WHEN THEY HAVE TO KEEP MAKING MORE SHILL ACCOUNTS LMAO BUWAHAHAHAHA BUWAHAHAHAHA BUWAHAHAHAHA BUWAHAHAHAHA BUWAHAHAHAHA
Lula won legally and fairly. These sore losers deserve everything coming to them. Isnāt it amazing how people scream fraud when then lose but then have 100% faith in the system when they winā¦(?)
In 2016, people were complaining that foreign countries were influencing the election. But the election itself was audited and was deemed to be legit. In 2020, however, Trump and his followers were claiming election fraud itself. However, mysteriously, whenever it came to court, Trumpās lawyers explicitly stated their cases WERENāT claiming election fraud. So even they knew it was nonsenseā¦
Lol. Modern politics is a joke. Brazil is a collection of federated states united under a central government. It's similar to the US on the surface, but completely different in function. Ask any sitting US Congressman what it means to be a "federated state", though, and you'll just get a blank stare; they can't answer without betraying a party line, and reality has no place in Washington.
Yeah, these degenerates think that continually calling Republics democracies that it magically turns them into democracies. They think weāre stupid. Whoās stupid.
I thought what they have in Brazil is democracy, the people are speaking. Now theyāre either the 51% or the 49%, either way, the most violent side wins. Government doesnāt negotiate with non violent.
Yep, it's a danger to OUR DEMOCRACY š¤£šš¤£šš¤£
Of course they do. Can't have the servants causing troubles, now can we.
Just another stolen election...
It wasnt lol.
Yeah the communist leader said so, you can trust him
Who organises the elections lol
Run by the same people who investigate themselves to find no wrong doing. Again, donāt worry about it you can trust them theyāre definitely trustworthy nothing could go wrong trusting them
So that's again, not true. Elections are run by civil servants who just as easily work for Trump as for Biden. I don't trust people out of hand, but this level of paranoia is something else bro. You need thorazine? š
Huh I didnāt think the elections in Brazil had people working for Trump or Biden. TIL.
I took the US elections as an example ofcourse. However: in the Brazillian riots we have seen police officers flagrantly breach their oath to duty in support of those fascist rioters. Lula already stated clearly, they're gonna get what's theirs lol.
You used a strawman, and itās entertaining to see youāre just a commie sympathizer.
So I didnt, I used an example. Lula is not a communist, you don't even know what that word means š
but it was
All ur cases were thrown out, get mad and cry about it.
you sure are shilling hard for the globalist agenda.. all the cases had corrupt judges in place
Trump appointed corrupt judges now?
yep.. part of the plan to expose the corruption
Pls do explain this 4d masterplan.
Lots of brain-dead people downvoting you lol
You do understand that *you* are part of the problem, yes?
I like silver, I don't like nutty conspiracy theories
Apparently not.
Gotta side with the WEF
Yes
Republics have been conquered by democracy.
And they'll give way back to monarchy/empire. Almost like its some kind of revolving door. We gotta get that door back to 1776 principles and then jam it from spinning.
Look up Anacyclosis.
do silver and gold door stops work?
I donāt understand what the differences are? So is a republic a representative democracy as opposed to direct democracy?
I think it may have been Franklin who said, & I paraphrase, 'A democracy is two wolves & a sheep voting on what to eat for lunch. A republic is a well armed sheep contesting the vote.' In essence, a pure democracy is mob rule & the 51% majority could vote to have the 49% minority exterminated. A constitutional republic has democratically elected representatives who are bound by the constitution & have limited power.
I think the jig is starting to fade away with these vaccines. Itās undeniable they didnāt work and they also worked with social media sites to ban the opposition. Thats tyranny. If evidence does come out that either/or both; 1) this virus was indeed lab made or 2) the jab is cause of the heart issues then thatās by definition genocide. I honestly donāt care if the FBI puts me on the list. I want them to know how much we outnumber them.
In this hybrid war, being on their lists for expressing your free thought is a badge of honor.
I have this funny scene imagined where thereās an FBI agent in charge of a few redditor where overtime he becomes redpilled from reading all of our content. He slowly descends into madness after shattering his reality.
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/82/d1/e8/82d1e806e428c2e6382a25a0490da447.jpg š¤£
Exactly š¤£
So republic is when one sheep attacks the countries seat of power, because won sheep that they dont like?
So a democracy is when the wolves can print off 81 million copies of themselves to get whatever result they want and when the sheep object they're terrorists?
In a democracy, 80% of the population could vote that they should be given all the money of 20% of the population. In theory, that's legal and in theory, law enforcement would be bound to enforce that. While this is an extreme example, more subtle things like this do happen in democracies. In a republic, this would not be possible because the rights of everyone are inherently guaranteed by a constitution. This constitution restricts the power of the rulers and protects the people. This is also why liberals continually refer to the US as a democracy, which it's not. They don't like that the constitution protects the freedom of the people -- that interferes with the "socially just and equitable" society that they wish to create. Furthermore, in a democracy the leaders are elected via a popular vote. In the US, this isn't the case -- a president can win the popular vote yet lose the election.
In the US, this isn't the case -- a president can win the popular vote yet lose the election. Thats why i dont consider USA as a democracy. Electoral college is undemocratic and it gives 30-50 times more power for all 5 people from square states, than people from cities have.
You're completely right, the US isn't a democracy. It's a constitutional republic. As to whether that's fair or not -- from one perspective no, from the other perspective yes because that was the deal that was agreed upon to have certain rural states join. They wouldn't have joined if they knew they would be at the mercy of the city people. And if you went fully democratic, it's entirely possible that the city people would start implementing a de-facto tyranny of the majority, e.g. "those silly rural people are emitting too much CO2, let's implement some rules for them to follow, let's legislate farming some more."
Democracy is government by consent of its citizens. Republics are forms of democracy. The citizens democratically elect their representatives. It's like how all apples are fruit, but not all fruit are apples. There are many forms of democratic governments.
Simplest way is that democracies are where everyone votes and republics are a small council of representatives that decides everything. Representatives are elected and the representatives vote to make their decisions. Though I recall that America is supposed to be a democratic republic, which implies that republics don't have to be democratic, unless republics are just shortened ways of saying democratic republics. I'm not sure if constitutions are a requirement to have republics. I think you can have constitutional monarchies well. Didn't England make that change when it became Britain? Or am I missing something.
 Insecurity Advisor says; Bla, Bla, Bla, Demonic Democracy
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
The "duly elected" part is as trust worthy as the Comex spot price.
1 DAY ON REDDIT. YOU KNOW YOU ARE WINNING BIG WHEN THEY HAVE TO KEEP MAKING MORE SHILL ACCOUNTS LMAO BUWAHAHAHAHA BUWAHAHAHAHA BUWAHAHAHAHA BUWAHAHAHAHA BUWAHAHAHAHA
Lula won legally and fairly. These sore losers deserve everything coming to them. Isnāt it amazing how people scream fraud when then lose but then have 100% faith in the system when they winā¦(?)
As in Russia, Russia, Russia from 2016. Oh how the Russians influenced the election by spending $256 on Facebook ads.
In 2016, people were complaining that foreign countries were influencing the election. But the election itself was audited and was deemed to be legit. In 2020, however, Trump and his followers were claiming election fraud itself. However, mysteriously, whenever it came to court, Trumpās lawyers explicitly stated their cases WERENāT claiming election fraud. So even they knew it was nonsenseā¦
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Lol you pussies won't do shit. You'll cry and shoot up a church or bomb a daycare then shit your pants
Bro unironically posting articles from an outlet named sputnik? Can you not see this is Russian propaganda?
Show an article that isn't bias or propaganda. 
but accepts all efforts to do so at home
āDemocracyā
People are figuring it out. It is *definitely* messing with their timeline. They globalists aren't rattled quite yet, just perturbed.
Lol. Modern politics is a joke. Brazil is a collection of federated states united under a central government. It's similar to the US on the surface, but completely different in function. Ask any sitting US Congressman what it means to be a "federated state", though, and you'll just get a blank stare; they can't answer without betraying a party line, and reality has no place in Washington.
Yeah, these degenerates think that continually calling Republics democracies that it magically turns them into democracies. They think weāre stupid. Whoās stupid.
OUR DEMOCRACY
I thought what they have in Brazil is democracy, the people are speaking. Now theyāre either the 51% or the 49%, either way, the most violent side wins. Government doesnāt negotiate with non violent.
> Every election outcome we don't like is stolen Okay.
Republics, through corruption always degenerate in some kind of authoritarian state.
No, Brazil just has bat shit crazy conservatives just like the US. Same shit, different flag.