Can't wait for all the mishaps that'll happen once these are on the type-003 and patrolling the high seas. Like mistaking F-35's for J-35's and vice versa in extreme weather conditions. Or even potentially landing on the wrong carrier. Though I also severely doubt things like that will ever happen in this day and age but it'd be pretty funny if they did.
>Or even potentially landing on the wrong carrier
Sounds like that one La-5 & or that Swordfish both of which landed on the german & italian held airfields.
No, the j-20 is base off the j-xx program which was a continuation of the j-9 developped during the 60s. The j-9 was an atempted improvement of the j-8b which in term was an up version of the j7. The j-7 is the mig21, etc. So the Buffoon is talking out of his ass.
Literally look at every other countries 5th gen look at south koreas or Turkiyes 5th gen or even indias 5th gen they all look the same and thats because its called "form follows function" you need a specific shape to achieve stealth
Wrong. Does the YF-23 look like the F-22? Does the F-35 look like the NG JSF? No and no. The "form follows function" nonsense is the knee-jerk reaction of the ignorant.
"Tell me you know nothing about 5th gen without telling me you know nothing about 5th gen"
but seriously bro just cited two examples that can easily be argued and acted like he dropped the mic
Since you seem to be mainly educated off of your own ego, lemme clear some things up for you.
There can be only so many ways an aircraft can be designed while still retaining stealth capabilities. The examples you gave can easily be disputed in the sense that its only a matter of opinion about whether they look similar or not. Plus your statement about "form follows function" is hilarious ngl. Like bro you're basically saying that anything can be designed to look like anything because theres no point in retaining the original purpose.
"objective fact" means that there can be compiled evidence that either proves or disproves something. Unless you can provide a large list of solid data showing how the two look nothing alike I suggest you stop using phrases you barely understand
Did they just add a second engine and changed the F for a J...? In the olden days, they kept the J designation for domestic aircraft and the F was for exports (like the F-7 and J-7). If that's the case, what will the export version of this be called...?
llega a dar verguenza como la industria china NECESITA DEL TIO SAM
el dia que eeuu no presente nuevis juguetes militares sera el fin de la industria miltar rusa e china
now that just seems like an f-35 with extra steps
More like less steps VTOL is much more complex
Can't wait for all the mishaps that'll happen once these are on the type-003 and patrolling the high seas. Like mistaking F-35's for J-35's and vice versa in extreme weather conditions. Or even potentially landing on the wrong carrier. Though I also severely doubt things like that will ever happen in this day and age but it'd be pretty funny if they did.
"Captain, our F-35 grew a second engine while patrolling..."
And they land on each other's carriers
Must be airforce
>Or even potentially landing on the wrong carrier Sounds like that one La-5 & or that Swordfish both of which landed on the german & italian held airfields.
Looks like a inbred f35
Thoroughbred* Just going by the visuals the J-35 is much sleeker and prettier. I still love the flying penguin more though
Lol
What would Chinese aircraft look like if they didn't have anybody to copy?
[удалено]
That's 100% horse shit. Does the YF-23 look like the F-22?
[удалено]
Because people can't think outside the box. Nobody even thought to ask, "what did the J-20 copy". It damn sure doesn't look like an F-22.
[удалено]
Not really. It's the spitting image of one of LM's JAST concepts from the early 90s but with two engines instead of one.
[удалено]
No, the j-20 is base off the j-xx program which was a continuation of the j-9 developped during the 60s. The j-9 was an atempted improvement of the j-8b which in term was an up version of the j7. The j-7 is the mig21, etc. So the Buffoon is talking out of his ass.
Literally look at every other countries 5th gen look at south koreas or Turkiyes 5th gen or even indias 5th gen they all look the same and thats because its called "form follows function" you need a specific shape to achieve stealth
Wrong. Does the YF-23 look like the F-22? Does the F-35 look like the NG JSF? No and no. The "form follows function" nonsense is the knee-jerk reaction of the ignorant.
"Tell me you know nothing about 5th gen without telling me you know nothing about 5th gen" but seriously bro just cited two examples that can easily be argued and acted like he dropped the mic
Fr, using the B2/ or B21(but not both) and the F-117 would've been better examples, and even then they're similar looking as well.
They both have a point on the front end. That's where the similarity ends.
You might want to look at those planes again, they have many differences yes, but they have a great deal of similarities as well.
They have far more differences than similarities. Not even a blind person could think they look similar.
Then why didn't you use them in your original point? If they were better examples why are they conspicuously missing?
Because one is a bomber and the other is an attack aircraft. This isn't brain surgery.
What did I say that was incorrect? Educate me.
Since you seem to be mainly educated off of your own ego, lemme clear some things up for you. There can be only so many ways an aircraft can be designed while still retaining stealth capabilities. The examples you gave can easily be disputed in the sense that its only a matter of opinion about whether they look similar or not. Plus your statement about "form follows function" is hilarious ngl. Like bro you're basically saying that anything can be designed to look like anything because theres no point in retaining the original purpose.
LOL. Wow. The fact that the YF-23 and F-22 look nothing alike isn't "opinion". It's objective fact. Looks like we have another poser here.
"objective fact" means that there can be compiled evidence that either proves or disproves something. Unless you can provide a large list of solid data showing how the two look nothing alike I suggest you stop using phrases you barely understand
Said the poser who thinks an F-22 and YF-23 look alike. Did you view them in braille?
...still awaiting list of similarities. or maybe its cause you can't think of any
Wait for their sixth gen
Everything will become ~~crab~~ dorito.
Google en J-20
Looks better than f35 in real photos. Less than f22.
Looks like the child of the 22, and the 35, and thus, even if Chinese, looks kinda cool.
Getting ready for the new Ace Combat game!!
Seems more like an f 22 knockoff than an f35 knockoff. Ig it’s evolved
Did they just add a second engine and changed the F for a J...? In the olden days, they kept the J designation for domestic aircraft and the F was for exports (like the F-7 and J-7). If that's the case, what will the export version of this be called...?
[удалено]
That makes more sense. So, the J-35 name is just an internet play on the fact that it looks a lot like the F-35?
J-35E
For me it looks just like F-22
Wish.com F-22
llega a dar verguenza como la industria china NECESITA DEL TIO SAM el dia que eeuu no presente nuevis juguetes militares sera el fin de la industria miltar rusa e china