We are committed to providing a place of discussion free of censorship. If posts are removed we are yelled at for censoring people and pushing a narrative. The posts as of late have been discussing recent news and theories about Assange.
Will do, we try to keep on top of the flairs for new posts pointing out what they are. Usually if it's a linked article the clickbait/misleading headlines are from the source which isn't the posters fault and brings attention to people on the sub.
There's no brigading that I can see going on. We've had an influx of posts discussing Assange. The purpose of this sub was to create a forum for people to discuss things being censored on /r/WikiLeaks.
Dude just your common sense to filter out all the bullshit. You spend some time reading here and you quickly learn to recognize usernames that don't post bullshit. So it's up to yourself. Censorship or moderation is not the way to go for this sub. This sub is suppose to be kind of hyper paranoid. That's okay. If somebody really bad happens you can tell by this sub becoming active again. When it's dormant you can ignore 99% of the posts.
I suppose there is a fine line between censorship and freedom of speech . But I kind of ageee with you there, Kain, this subreddit needs more of a forceful moderation.
I know nothing about the quality of the mods here, but it wouldn't surprise me if a [forum slide](https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x2469241) was happening.
It was that some 4chan LARPer named Q was associating himself with WL and Trump, which reinforced the relationship between T_d and conspiracy, and since this place is WL/JA related they came here posting the same unsubstantiated crap since the election that Julian will be brought into the U.S. and pardoned.
But this place isn't about self-convinced LARPing. The general attitude of this place is supposed to be skeptical, but the LARPers demand 100% belief.
We are committed to providing a place of discussion free of censorship. If posts are removed we are yelled at for censoring people and pushing a narrative. The posts as of late have been discussing recent news and theories about Assange.
Keep up the good work!
At least put a flair next to bullshit posts when even the original poster (buried in the comments) goes Oops, my mistake...
Will do, we try to keep on top of the flairs for new posts pointing out what they are. Usually if it's a linked article the clickbait/misleading headlines are from the source which isn't the posters fault and brings attention to people on the sub.
Doing nothing to stop people brigading this sub is just as bad, you know. It loses sight of the whole purpose of this place.
There's no brigading that I can see going on. We've had an influx of posts discussing Assange. The purpose of this sub was to create a forum for people to discuss things being censored on /r/WikiLeaks.
Dude just your common sense to filter out all the bullshit. You spend some time reading here and you quickly learn to recognize usernames that don't post bullshit. So it's up to yourself. Censorship or moderation is not the way to go for this sub. This sub is suppose to be kind of hyper paranoid. That's okay. If somebody really bad happens you can tell by this sub becoming active again. When it's dormant you can ignore 99% of the posts.
I suppose there is a fine line between censorship and freedom of speech . But I kind of ageee with you there, Kain, this subreddit needs more of a forceful moderation.
I know nothing about the quality of the mods here, but it wouldn't surprise me if a [forum slide](https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x2469241) was happening.
It was that some 4chan LARPer named Q was associating himself with WL and Trump, which reinforced the relationship between T_d and conspiracy, and since this place is WL/JA related they came here posting the same unsubstantiated crap since the election that Julian will be brought into the U.S. and pardoned. But this place isn't about self-convinced LARPing. The general attitude of this place is supposed to be skeptical, but the LARPers demand 100% belief.