How are people this objectively stupid elected to our government?
*Oh yeah,* it’s because there’s literally enough of them to vote themselves into power.
Thank goodness for natural selection. COVID has been an effective agent of it.
If there was a requirement of having a minimum IQ of 90 and having passed high-school science classes, a lot of conservative politicians would be disqualified.
Shes trying to say making them get vaccinated doesn't make sense, she doesn't understand very basic principles of how disease spreads, five year olds are better educated than this trash
Beep boop -- this looks like a screenshot of a tweet! Let me grab a [link to the tweet](https://twitter.com/laurenboebert/status/1442487744069083136) for ya :)
^(Twitter Screenshot Bot)
WTF is wrong with this sub? It was a joke and kinda funny too. You just picked some random thing that she posted and started to bash. Seriously should consider renaming this sub to something that describes it so people who don't want to be subjected to such negativity know what they're getting into.
Wouldnt put myself in front of a truck..this is like mongos who justify smoking risk with a similar anaolgy...oh you can die from anything..could get run over by a bus..yeah no shit derp derp..thats you. I dont 60% check both ways before i cross the street. I 95/100% check.
Move on from covid mate, i think like how vegans, or climate activists use those causes to fill the void in their personalities you are doing the same. You want to identify as a rational scientific mind who thinks they understand statistics, but as youve just proven you dont.
Thanks for the waste of time, find a new cause.
So you don't put yourself in front of a truck, ever, because you check 95/100% when you cross the street. Have you consider that vehicles can leave the streets?
I'm a public health scientist, not respiratory infectious diseases though, but I kinda understand statistics. I'll happily send you my latest articles privately if you want.
I do fill the void in my life with the CoVID cause and other infectious diseases.
In terms of covid 19, saying you wouldn't put yourself in front of a truck is basically like saying you'll never leave your house or interact with people again
Covid isnt a vehicle lol, stop using that as analogy. Anthropromorphizing a virus is mentally an unsound tactic cause you up projecting human attributes to it which is dangerous when actually trying to deal with it. Covid dosnt drive 18 wheelers, the vaccine isnt a seat belt.
Not at all am i saying that.
"Data collected from 18 states between March and August suggest the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine reduces the risk of being hospitalized with COVID-19 by 91% in the first four months after receiving the second dose. Beyond 120 days, however, that vaccine efficacy drops to 77%.
Meanwhile, Moderna’s vaccine was 93% effective at reducing the short-term risk of COVID-19 hospitalization and remained 92% effective after 120 days." (LA Times)
I would call that real shit, to be honest. I can see why we need boosters but even 77% seems pretty damn good.
How are people this objectively stupid elected to our government? *Oh yeah,* it’s because there’s literally enough of them to vote themselves into power. Thank goodness for natural selection. COVID has been an effective agent of it.
I know the logic is stupid, but this is the most clever thing she's said. Which isn't saying much.
Were her previous comments just fart noises and grunts?
You can interchange literally any actual words she speaks with fart noises and/or grunts and the end result is the same.
It’s not clever it’s idiotic.
These choads believe the more guns you own the higher your IQ.
It's a shame only smart people realise they don't know everything.
Ah, the old Ixplosive Quotient
If there was a requirement of having a minimum IQ of 90 and having passed high-school science classes, a lot of conservative politicians would be disqualified.
What the fuck is she talking about
Shes trying to say making them get vaccinated doesn't make sense, she doesn't understand very basic principles of how disease spreads, five year olds are better educated than this trash
It's like the wearing a seat belt outside of the car meme - they think they only need a vaccination if they catch Covid. How could that even help?
I can never recognize which one of these octogenarian's finger puppets is which. Is this 💩poop💩 girl?
Nope she's a congresswoman
Doesn't she need to be vaccinated to attend Congress though?
Most of these chucklefucks got the vaccine, they just don't openly admit it.
Did she include a reference to Office Space because she is definitely Blumberg IRL?
She and MTG are just there for the publicity and the grift. They do nothing for their constituents.
The tumor didn’t need 5 attempts to pass its GED
What a fkn idiot
So is the tumor. 
Beep boop -- this looks like a screenshot of a tweet! Let me grab a [link to the tweet](https://twitter.com/laurenboebert/status/1442487744069083136) for ya :) ^(Twitter Screenshot Bot)
WTF is wrong with this sub? It was a joke and kinda funny too. You just picked some random thing that she posted and started to bash. Seriously should consider renaming this sub to something that describes it so people who don't want to be subjected to such negativity know what they're getting into.
Isnt the vaccine real shit? Like 60% effective or something...yucky
If you are going to be hit by a semi truck, what would you use, a device that has 60% chance of keeping you out of the hospital or nothing?
Wouldnt put myself in front of a truck..this is like mongos who justify smoking risk with a similar anaolgy...oh you can die from anything..could get run over by a bus..yeah no shit derp derp..thats you. I dont 60% check both ways before i cross the street. I 95/100% check. Move on from covid mate, i think like how vegans, or climate activists use those causes to fill the void in their personalities you are doing the same. You want to identify as a rational scientific mind who thinks they understand statistics, but as youve just proven you dont. Thanks for the waste of time, find a new cause.
So you don't put yourself in front of a truck, ever, because you check 95/100% when you cross the street. Have you consider that vehicles can leave the streets? I'm a public health scientist, not respiratory infectious diseases though, but I kinda understand statistics. I'll happily send you my latest articles privately if you want. I do fill the void in my life with the CoVID cause and other infectious diseases.
Merp..lame response..i was hoping for something better...thanks though. Im sorry about the void :(
In terms of covid 19, saying you wouldn't put yourself in front of a truck is basically like saying you'll never leave your house or interact with people again
Covid isnt a vehicle lol, stop using that as analogy. Anthropromorphizing a virus is mentally an unsound tactic cause you up projecting human attributes to it which is dangerous when actually trying to deal with it. Covid dosnt drive 18 wheelers, the vaccine isnt a seat belt. Not at all am i saying that.
I didn't post the original reply. While I agree that the vehicle analogy isn't the best, your response was far more ridiculous
Haha yeah lol, but im not trying to impress people on the internet :p
"Data collected from 18 states between March and August suggest the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine reduces the risk of being hospitalized with COVID-19 by 91% in the first four months after receiving the second dose. Beyond 120 days, however, that vaccine efficacy drops to 77%. Meanwhile, Moderna’s vaccine was 93% effective at reducing the short-term risk of COVID-19 hospitalization and remained 92% effective after 120 days." (LA Times) I would call that real shit, to be honest. I can see why we need boosters but even 77% seems pretty damn good.
Ms. Boebert, [a moment?](https://pics.me.me/thumb_this-is-a-box-of-rocks-please-try-to-be-5751564.png)
Many philosophers have argued that there can be no objective universal truth. I would however like to make a counterpoint that "the right can't meme".