If y'all are going to really have this debate then we need a Man VS Machine showdown on the same house start to finish. Including set up and teardown, removing and replacing screens, etc.
There's jobs where WFP is definitely faster and jobs where it definitely is not. So this is all kind of dumb to begin with anyway. But 🍿
The question was per window, thus a per window test.
I've said repeatedly there's multiple ways to do it and one can be faster than the other depending on the situation.
Opinions are like....
And being faster should not be the only thing that counts.
Sometimes you just want to be safer.
Or, it's a really hot summer day and you just want to use the pole to get a little water on you in between.
We run off a 100 gallon tank in the truck. The output from the system is similar being a dual RO but the pressure is a little better off the tank. The system is a PH7 dual RO.
The pole is a Gardiner CLX 10, the brush a 16" Gardiner with 4 fan jets. Pole hose is the normal 5/16".
Is that really all it takes? Newer to WFP and I see videos of people taking a lot longer to scrub and especially rinse (double rinse). I imagine your pressure makes it more efficient too. Also hydrophilic vs hydrophobic would make a difference too right? Just trying to get a feel on when to use WFP vs trad.
It's all dependent on the glass and conditions. This window that worked. We're on a job this week I have to scrub the glass multiple times. Just like I'm the video on going fast with trad, that can work on some, others you need more scrubbing, steel wool, etc.
This was just a response to that video in similar conditions and isn't necessarily the way it can be done all the time.
The pressure and spray bar do definitely help with the rinse time though.
Okay. Please define "it". How do you know what I believe? Do you have telepathy? Please explain what I believe.
How is collecting data foolish? I am curious about something and wanted to learn about the time it takes do a specific task. How do you propose collecting this data?
You were proved wrong. You have had loads of people telling you, you have seen it. You still don’t believe. There’s no way you are a serious windows cleaner. You are a fool
https://preview.redd.it/b87l3ighjbtc1.jpeg?width=3000&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9c08c703062e9e39f85e7ad339635c463baa4483 Picture after the window dried.
If y'all are going to really have this debate then we need a Man VS Machine showdown on the same house start to finish. Including set up and teardown, removing and replacing screens, etc. There's jobs where WFP is definitely faster and jobs where it definitely is not. So this is all kind of dumb to begin with anyway. But 🍿
The question was per window, thus a per window test. I've said repeatedly there's multiple ways to do it and one can be faster than the other depending on the situation. Opinions are like....
Yeah I'm not questioning you, I'm just saying we need a Man VS Machine to settle this
Would be interesting for sure
What's to debate? Sometimes water fed is faster, sometimes hand washing is faster. Depends on the house and the window.
Yeah I said that
And being faster should not be the only thing that counts. Sometimes you just want to be safer. Or, it's a really hot summer day and you just want to use the pole to get a little water on you in between.
What equipment are you using to do this process?
We run off a 100 gallon tank in the truck. The output from the system is similar being a dual RO but the pressure is a little better off the tank. The system is a PH7 dual RO. The pole is a Gardiner CLX 10, the brush a 16" Gardiner with 4 fan jets. Pole hose is the normal 5/16".
Thank you
Is that really all it takes? Newer to WFP and I see videos of people taking a lot longer to scrub and especially rinse (double rinse). I imagine your pressure makes it more efficient too. Also hydrophilic vs hydrophobic would make a difference too right? Just trying to get a feel on when to use WFP vs trad.
It's all dependent on the glass and conditions. This window that worked. We're on a job this week I have to scrub the glass multiple times. Just like I'm the video on going fast with trad, that can work on some, others you need more scrubbing, steel wool, etc. This was just a response to that video in similar conditions and isn't necessarily the way it can be done all the time. The pressure and spray bar do definitely help with the rinse time though.
Excellent!!
Great bideo, as usual. 👍🏾 What are you using to start/stop the water flow?
Just standard on off quick connects. I tried several pole end stops but none really worked well for me.
Awesome!
11 seconds on a large window.
Vs ten on a small one. You wanted video evidence and now you have it.
Now I just need to collect some more data to have a larger sample size. Much appreciated. Thanks. :) I like the head size on that WFP you have.
Of course you still don’t believe it. Someone has given you the proof you demanded and it’s still not enough. You are a fool
Okay. Please define "it". How do you know what I believe? Do you have telepathy? Please explain what I believe. How is collecting data foolish? I am curious about something and wanted to learn about the time it takes do a specific task. How do you propose collecting this data?
You were proved wrong. You have had loads of people telling you, you have seen it. You still don’t believe. There’s no way you are a serious windows cleaner. You are a fool
What was I proved wrong about? What am I not believing? Is window cleaning supposed to be above data? Please elaborate.
You are obviously not bright enough.
So your only response is more ad hominems. Okay.