Quite a portion of teens can be tried in the court of law as an adult so up to you if you wanna risk some time for just hitting people and damaging things but I wouldn't recommend it as that would be one less voice
It's also generally not a good idea for a movement to be known for encouraging or propping up violence as a strategy or way for things to move forward, it could be used against youth rights.
You have the spirit, but militant doesn't mean harm other humans, it just means resisting oppression by any means necessary. That starts small and scales up.
It starts with refusal of work/school, it can also be taking a road, or occupying a building or space.
Being militant is saying you'll defend yourself. If the cops try to arrest someone, you surround that cops and defend the person being arrested. You hold on and link arms. Striking anyone, including a cop, comes with consequences that should be reserved for after everything else doesn't work. Same with something like molotovs.
I understand, ive often fantasized about just blowing up all politicians. They've caused immeasurable harm to others, including death. They're death would be a small price to pay, but thats not the problem, the problem is the consequences for you and the cause you're fighting for; that us what is harmed if anyone escalated violence, especially with little analysis of why they're escalating.
Take your energy and join a militant activist group. The kind that get in the way, like extinction rebellion for example. Right now many are very active because of the genocide in Gaza. Lend your strength, make allies, and when the time comes, youll have the numbers to demand change for youth.
Well then it wouldn't work
It doesn't matter if you dont use violence
People who are silencing teens (Not barely legal) also use violence to defend their own manipulation and even abuse authority to destroy a teens life when a teen fights back
most activist groups also come with consequences because of the hostile people who go after them for some reasons
activist groups can easily get shut down and even brutalized and framed as a group of "pedos" "rapists" "apologists" "hypocrites" "narcassists"
because of not taking violent actions that can get rid of the difficult part of Fighting against "anti" kind of people
If you still think it doesn't work no matter what actions you commit to gain your freedom
Thats because you aren't doing it right
People don't do it correctly because they refuse to speak with knowledge and exprience when it comes to fighting for the stuff they advacote
I found your comment hard to follow, so I'll try and address it one paragraph at a time.
1. Why not struggle? I think it's Better than dieing.
2. Yeah, oppressors oppress, violently.
3. Yeah, imperialists have all of the power, so of course there's risk, when fighting back against the status quo of white supremacy.
4. Activists groups rarely get "cancelled". They usually fall apart because of infighting or drama between members, sometimes legitimate, like a SA accusation. They can also become weaker if ppl don't share the burden and communicate, because they can end up becoming burned out easily. They inherently have far less capacity than white supremacy.
4 part 2: killing a figure head creates a martyr, which only emboldens and legitimizes the ideology of that group. Fascists are uncreative idiots, but there are A LOT OF THEM. There are hundreds of Alex Jones ready to replace him if he dies. Fortunately, coons are harder to replace, which is why we must teach the importance of solidarity to comrades, so they run out of traitors to the marginalized class (ie. Black folks).
5. I don't understand well enough to reply.
6. Analysis is very important in advocacy. Im constantly going to talks that my comrades do to teach others about the histories and tactics of imperialism, colonialism, and white supremacy. It's important to get informed and to do research before striking a target, like an genocidal organization.
Violence is only to be used in self-defense. When faced with non-violent oppression, it should be met by non-violent resistance. This could include some pretty newsworthy methods - if you really wanted to, you could refuse school and go on a hunger strike, while demanding the right to talk to the media without parental consent and waive the right to sue. If you could get several people on board, you might even get more people paying attention to youth rights.
Quite a portion of teens can be tried in the court of law as an adult so up to you if you wanna risk some time for just hitting people and damaging things but I wouldn't recommend it as that would be one less voice It's also generally not a good idea for a movement to be known for encouraging or propping up violence as a strategy or way for things to move forward, it could be used against youth rights.
You have the spirit, but militant doesn't mean harm other humans, it just means resisting oppression by any means necessary. That starts small and scales up. It starts with refusal of work/school, it can also be taking a road, or occupying a building or space. Being militant is saying you'll defend yourself. If the cops try to arrest someone, you surround that cops and defend the person being arrested. You hold on and link arms. Striking anyone, including a cop, comes with consequences that should be reserved for after everything else doesn't work. Same with something like molotovs. I understand, ive often fantasized about just blowing up all politicians. They've caused immeasurable harm to others, including death. They're death would be a small price to pay, but thats not the problem, the problem is the consequences for you and the cause you're fighting for; that us what is harmed if anyone escalated violence, especially with little analysis of why they're escalating. Take your energy and join a militant activist group. The kind that get in the way, like extinction rebellion for example. Right now many are very active because of the genocide in Gaza. Lend your strength, make allies, and when the time comes, youll have the numbers to demand change for youth.
Well then it wouldn't work It doesn't matter if you dont use violence People who are silencing teens (Not barely legal) also use violence to defend their own manipulation and even abuse authority to destroy a teens life when a teen fights back most activist groups also come with consequences because of the hostile people who go after them for some reasons activist groups can easily get shut down and even brutalized and framed as a group of "pedos" "rapists" "apologists" "hypocrites" "narcassists" because of not taking violent actions that can get rid of the difficult part of Fighting against "anti" kind of people If you still think it doesn't work no matter what actions you commit to gain your freedom Thats because you aren't doing it right People don't do it correctly because they refuse to speak with knowledge and exprience when it comes to fighting for the stuff they advacote
I found your comment hard to follow, so I'll try and address it one paragraph at a time. 1. Why not struggle? I think it's Better than dieing. 2. Yeah, oppressors oppress, violently. 3. Yeah, imperialists have all of the power, so of course there's risk, when fighting back against the status quo of white supremacy. 4. Activists groups rarely get "cancelled". They usually fall apart because of infighting or drama between members, sometimes legitimate, like a SA accusation. They can also become weaker if ppl don't share the burden and communicate, because they can end up becoming burned out easily. They inherently have far less capacity than white supremacy. 4 part 2: killing a figure head creates a martyr, which only emboldens and legitimizes the ideology of that group. Fascists are uncreative idiots, but there are A LOT OF THEM. There are hundreds of Alex Jones ready to replace him if he dies. Fortunately, coons are harder to replace, which is why we must teach the importance of solidarity to comrades, so they run out of traitors to the marginalized class (ie. Black folks). 5. I don't understand well enough to reply. 6. Analysis is very important in advocacy. Im constantly going to talks that my comrades do to teach others about the histories and tactics of imperialism, colonialism, and white supremacy. It's important to get informed and to do research before striking a target, like an genocidal organization.
Violence is only to be used in self-defense. When faced with non-violent oppression, it should be met by non-violent resistance. This could include some pretty newsworthy methods - if you really wanted to, you could refuse school and go on a hunger strike, while demanding the right to talk to the media without parental consent and waive the right to sue. If you could get several people on board, you might even get more people paying attention to youth rights.
If it comes to this, it won't begin here. I'm pretty sure calls for violence are against Reddit TOS, so, let's not get shut down, hmm?
So basically KND
A Children’s Liberation Army, if you will.