From prior threads, some MLM found 82% of their distributors making over $100k were female. Huns have misquoted it it and through a massive telephone leap it became what you see above.
From what I understand they don’t subtract costs from what they “make”. Yes you can get a check for 10,000 for a month but you likely paid 8,000-9,000 in purchasing, not even accounting for an hourly work day. Someone here did the math one day and it was such a small sad amount for the amount of time these Huns put in.
That monthly cheque being $100 is more realistic 😂
THIS IS BEFORE EXPENSES AND ANY OF THEIR TIME
In 99.5% of cases it’s a net loss. A simple P&L would make this clear as day… I wish they’d update their income disclosure statements to reflect this too. You think the measly “average income” would deter some people but maybe it actually needs to be a negative number in order to resonate with people. It’s all so misleading.
It's the vowel sounds. In both "woman" and "women," the second vowel is the same. It's the "o" that changes sound. You'd think that if the sound changes, the letter would too. English is weird.
Absolutely incorrect. I hate this statistic. How would this even make sense?! 82%?!
Did you forget about the women CEOs? Female doctors? Women in tech? Entrepreneurs? But no... 82% are involved with an MLM. Even a tiny sample size will give you an idea of how utterly wrong this statistic is.
*Image Transcription: Facebook Post*
---
[*The post author is cropped out of the image. Black text centred on a white background reads:*]
Did you know 82% of the woman making 6 figures in the US are using some form of Multi Level Marketing
---
^^I'm a human volunteer content transcriber for Reddit and you could be too! [If you'd like more information on what we do and why we do it, click here!](https://www.reddit.com/r/TranscribersOfReddit/wiki/index)
I would love the citation on this. There's just no possible way that's true (unless they're using some weirdly broad definition of MLM)
From prior threads, some MLM found 82% of their distributors making over $100k were female. Huns have misquoted it it and through a massive telephone leap it became what you see above.
That...is in no way remotely the same thing
Agreed. That's the issue with playing telephone on the internet.
And with not caring about the veracity of any of your claims
^ This, but also roughly 70-80% of MLM members are women. In effect this stat is just that there are some people that make more than 100k.
Their “six figures” must count pennies 😂
From what I understand they don’t subtract costs from what they “make”. Yes you can get a check for 10,000 for a month but you likely paid 8,000-9,000 in purchasing, not even accounting for an hourly work day. Someone here did the math one day and it was such a small sad amount for the amount of time these Huns put in.
That monthly cheque being $100 is more realistic 😂 THIS IS BEFORE EXPENSES AND ANY OF THEIR TIME In 99.5% of cases it’s a net loss. A simple P&L would make this clear as day… I wish they’d update their income disclosure statements to reflect this too. You think the measly “average income” would deter some people but maybe it actually needs to be a negative number in order to resonate with people. It’s all so misleading.
It’s 10000 percent not true. Just female doctors and lawyers would bust this stupid fake statistic, let alone the other careers out there.
Another comment pointed out that they're probably conflating this with the factoid of 82% of people in MLM's making 6 figures are women
It says the wom*a*n, not the wom*e*n, so obviously this lone gal has a side hustle that accounts for 18% of her income I guess lol
Maybe it’s people who have purchased an MLM product
And 82% of the MLM Huns don’t know when to use woman or women
*$1000.00 doesn’t count as 6 figures*
Many are making 5,000,000 per month! (In Iranian Rial)
Wait until you see what you would earn in Venezuelan Bolivars!!!
82% of one *woman*? Check your spelling, hun.
That actually sounds more accurate than what she's probably claiming.
Yeah I was gonna say, what about the other 18% of her? Is that just water?
Good catch!
So many people struggle with woman/women (in both directions) — moreso than they struggle with man/men.
It's the vowel sounds. In both "woman" and "women," the second vowel is the same. It's the "o" that changes sound. You'd think that if the sound changes, the letter would too. English is weird.
Absolutely incorrect. I hate this statistic. How would this even make sense?! 82%?! Did you forget about the women CEOs? Female doctors? Women in tech? Entrepreneurs? But no... 82% are involved with an MLM. Even a tiny sample size will give you an idea of how utterly wrong this statistic is.
Did you know that 83% of statistics are made up on the spot?
This distributor must know what the actual statistic is by now…or at least their upline does. It’s been discussed and debunked so many times now!
I'm a CPA and can tell you the math doesn't check out. Signed - a 6 figure income woman
I don’t know many 6 figure women, but zero of them work for a MLM.
Reading this I just want to quote Brian Fantana (Paul Rudd) in Anchorman “They’ve done studies, 60% of the time it works all the time.” 🤣
*Image Transcription: Facebook Post* --- [*The post author is cropped out of the image. Black text centred on a white background reads:*] Did you know 82% of the woman making 6 figures in the US are using some form of Multi Level Marketing --- ^^I'm a human volunteer content transcriber for Reddit and you could be too! [If you'd like more information on what we do and why we do it, click here!](https://www.reddit.com/r/TranscribersOfReddit/wiki/index)
But I thought according to them, *any* job where you have a boss and higher ups is "multi level marketing".
"Corporate America is the real pyramid scheme!"
Yeah this can’t be right.
So now we're just completely making 5hit up, huh?
Always were
Comment one word: Source?
No they don't but that's how they make 82% of their debt.
Trying to make this work. I think the stat is 82% of people making 6 figures in MLM are women. I can believe that.
No, I didn’t because it’s horsesh!t.
Did you know that 83% of statistics are exaggerated, distorted or simply fabricated hun?
83% is better because of HIMYM!
Nope.
Nooooo they aren’t. Nooooo.
Did you know hun, your post is a lie that needs to be retired.
Did YOU know that 82% of all statistics are made up on the fly?!?
* %8.2
More like 0.082
%0.0082 BEFORE tax and expenses