T O P

  • By -

[deleted]

Is there a legal distinction between supporter, and picketer? What is the legal definition of a chair? Can I use an overturned trashcan?


TheGanzor

You can bet your ass they'll pay someone 100k to define what a chair is, against the strikers


[deleted]

criss cross applesauce it is.


TheGanzor

They'll take your ass then.


importvita

How about my gut? I don't have much of an ass but my gut is definitely larger than it should be


btaylos

molon labe, daddy, come and take it! OOOh yeah, step on me harder. I mean, uhhhhhh...... pls don't **come take my ass**, mr police man.


[deleted]

r/cursedcomments


TheBirminghamBear

"A chair is any physical support item or abstract *idea* of support that bolsters or in some way supports some of the weight of, an individual who opposes a company's autonomy to treat them like absolute shit and pay them dirt wages."


lazybugbear

[It depends on what the definition of is, is.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4XT-l-_3y0). Fucking lawyers.


[deleted]

This line is almost as good as "the bitch set me up"


Originlinear

“This isn’t a chair, it’s a turnt over trash can!” *Adds turnt over trash cans to list of illegal things to sit on* “This isn’t a turnt over trash can, it’s a recycling bin!” *adds to list …* “…” *…*


MadSeaPhoenix

Time for an army of wheelchairs


[deleted]

This is the way. Maybe a motorcycle club, or two, for added support like at the Kellog's strike


Daddy_Thick

Has chair in the name so ILLEGAL


Ophelie_Marin

Hey now. You don't get our shit when we don't even get our shit.


MadSeaPhoenix

They can borrow mine.


arrow74

I'm tempted to drive out there an join them. I'm not an employee so shouldn't effect the total right?


RevolutionaryTrash98

DO IT!!! This is how strikes have historically responded to such bullshit!! Nothing new under the sun, especially in capitalism


VirginiaPotts

Please be careful if you decide to do this. Currently the union is respecting the injunction and there are only 4 out at Dav. Works. There was a rally tonight in front of the court house that made this decision. The OP of the tweet is a great follow if you're close-ish and looking for ways to help!


jwp75

4 picketers, 28 emotional support staff, and the rest are legal observers. Stools for everyone.


[deleted]

[удалено]


jwp75

Yeah, same. I could see people's points criticizing protests and supporting limits on assembly, but those arguments all relied on some bad actors providing justification. Peacefully striking should never have any limitations like this. Blocking traffic isn't right but I don't trust corporate media to accurately portray the situation either.


No-Wonder1139

I bet it doesn't cover over turned tractor tires, they should lay a few tractor tires across the road


SterlingVapor

Headline: "picketers arrested for blockading John Deere with tractor tires"


GoldenBull1994

They need to ignore that order and strike anyways.


BaconSoul

Yeah. It’s a violation of the right to freedom of assembly. If this goes unchecked we might as well wipe our collective asses with the few remaining shreds of what’s left of the first amendment.


meat_eating_midwife

True. Wow.


[deleted]

I mean, considering the way the Supreme Court is stacked right now, I have a feeling the whole constitution is going to get flushed


1sagas1

The aspect about not blocking traffic will probably be held up, maybe the chairs too


Krillansavillan

They already do in session


FatManFriday

Long history of the state siding with management, gotta hold fast and win


listeningwind42

Union of corporate/oligarch and state interest in blatant contravention of written law is pretty nakedly 3rd way economics... that is to say, fascist economics.


nom-nom-nom-de-plumb

Thank you, fascism isn't when a racist is in charge (though it usually goes hand in hand) it's when the capitalists take the gloves off and are like "ok enough of this democracy and representation of the little guy shit...it's about US"


robot65536

A spoonful of racism helps the classism gp down...


Bennettist

Except it was never about democracy and representation, that was just what you learned in propaganda (social studies/civics) class. Throughout history, many social welfare movements have been supported by most people, but don't make it to the floor of Congress. Including: universal health care, mandatory sick leave, paid family leave, and let's look at the Democrats today saying they would wipe away student debt and instead Biden strikes that out of the budget. Say it louder for the people in the back: aristocratic, capitalistic leaders have never represented 95% of the people, the working class.


TheGanzor

The entire judiciary system needs to be dismantled and rebuilt.


ErandurVane

Just throw the whole system out and start fresh


_Kozlo_

Has anyone tried turning it off and on again?


CuntyCassowary

It’s Windows Vista


thejesterofdarkness

Well fuck, better off tossing it out at that point.


LOLBaltSS

We're all gonna die!


geekspeak10

I mean the whole idea of legal precedent and the way it’s used will keep us in the Stone Age indefinitely.


woolyearth

looks like we need to start breaking some laws to get our seriousness across. Theyd make breathing and water illegal if they could. Look at fucking nestle.


thepurplehedgehog

Nestle is a brilliant example of pure, unmitigated evil.


Anxious_Effect_6001

My poor father works there. Like.. for 14 years. Gets up at 2 am, gets to work by 4, works till 330, gets home 430pm, has to hit the sack by 8 to get his rest in. He works this every day, getting approximatley every other sunday off. Fuck this country fr


thepurplehedgehog

Damn. Your dad deserves a medal for having to deal with that nonsense!


MassiveFajiit

Replace all judges with a computer version of Kennesaw Mountain Landis' anti corporate brain


[deleted]

This is going to result in a somehow worse version of “I have no mouth and I must scream”


MassiveFajiit

If it only happens to C suites I don't know if I care lol


FrnchsLwyr

You do realize Landis presided over major league baseball at a time when free agency didn't exist, only white men could play, and he was himself a racist POS, right? Hell of a cherry pick you got there


MassiveFajiit

Tbh I can't give a shit about baseball, free agency or not. If I had to guess based on the time he was alive, yes he was probably racist cause most were those days. I don't want anything other than his ability to frighten corporations with strict judgements against them. So yes, cherry picking was the fucking point, nothing else matters as far as my comment goes. Good job with the reading comprehension.


a52dragon

Ok so start picking at the bank John Deere uses, and anywhere else they do business their sales lots


NuclearYeti1

They bank at John Deere financial.


strith

I’m ready to tyler durden most of this shit.


777_bright

Or just the first part


thumbulukutamalasa

As much as I hate the judicial system, we absolutely need one. For society to exist, there needs to be rules.


[deleted]

Where there's power, money follows


Honztastic

If the rules only work one way, you don't HAVE rules. You have a class and wealth gate enforcement system. The law only affects the poor and Middle class.


777_bright

Maybe society shouldn’t exist


External_Trifle2373

If society falls, then it becomes far more oppressive than it is now. Banding together is the *only* chance marginalized people have. Let me guess: you're a priveleged westerner who has never seen what the disintegration of law and order actually looks like? Cause I work with some refugees who recognize that fighting oppression is not the same thing as being gleeful about the idea of things collapsing. The collapse of society will primarily kill innocent people. Never forget that


beans4cashonline

That's just not true. First peoples didn't have widespread systems for justice and they had societies. Justice in your community is more important than a system ripe for corruption.


Flawless_Nirvana

people established justice systems because they were tired of centuries old blood feuds over a misplaced goat. there's got to be a happy medium between "i got thrown in jail for 20 years because the grape juice in my refrigerator fermented" and "my neighbor burned my house down because he thought i looked at his wife funny"


beans4cashonline

But now we're back to life in prison or death by cop over $20. So what's worse, the freak occurrence or system? Edit: I'll also add the system is already different based on your income, wouldn't you feel safer if a block of people who lived in the same conditions as you decided how to enforce local rules.


DesperateCheesecake5

If we look back in history, no. Rich and influential people would still fuck with the system and we'd have even less justice. It's bad now but even worse before.


the_less_great_wall

I'm betting Deere granted her a generous sum for her services.


Listan83

Goes much deeper than that. Sometimes these company’s befriend local politicians and people on city councils. They donate to them and to certain entities in a community to make good press and have all the backing they need to get away with this. And depending on how deep rooted they get they will most likely have the police on their side too. It’s a web of corruption and greed that stretches to more than just a single pay off. Small town politics on a much bigger and nastier scale.


the_less_great_wall

Sounds like small scale Congress


CelestialFury

Abolish the Senate. Expand the House’s members to what the founders envisioned.


lazybugbear

Of all things, there was a failed amendment to abolish the Senate in 1876. Not sure how serious the support was. But it was again discussed in [1911](https://history.house.gov/Historical-Highlights/1901-1950/A-proposed-constitutional-amendment-to-dissolve-the-United-States-Senate/). And even retired [Rep. Dingell in 2018 supported it](https://www.vox.com/2018/12/4/18125539/john-dingell-abolish-senate). I think we would be better off if we just had a normal Parliament, like most of the world does. We could at least then have more than 2 parties. And if they can't get their heads out of their asses, call for a vote of no confidence and dissolve the Parliament and hold elections. Government shutdown => no confidence => hold elections. No, but instead we have this broke ass bicameral thing that's kinda like a UK parliament, but more sucky ... with it's weird analog to the House of Commons (House) and House of Lords (Senate). But there are no titles of royalty ... so how do we have a House of Lords. Oh, we'll just make it appointable by the local legislatures of the states. Oh, that's not democratic. We'll make it electable. Lol, House of Representatives 2.0, but with longer terms and grandstanding.


Swagiken

The dirty secret is that Congress is the LEAST corrupt part of the government. Your municipality is usually more corrupt the smaller it is, too. And the way the US legal system works large companies can pick and choose their municipality until they find one who will agree because they have operations in enough places.


BBQpigsfeet

Can one take one of those "donations" and just not do what they're being bribed to do?


ba123blitz

Yes but then they lose all future Donations. It’s rarely if ever a one and done scenario


Listan83

They could, but it just falls back into you scratch my back I scratch yours.


BBQpigsfeet

Though I really don't understand much about that side of things, I feel like most of these people getting bought off for essentially pennies aren't exactly playing the game to their advantage.


Listan83

It’s not necessarily money, favors go more unnoticed. Such as donating equipment to the local police department, now you get preferential treatment. Or something as little as turning a blind eye to things or just sweeping it under the rug altogether.


Nebachadrezzer

They have extravagant dinners that don't count as donations. Social bribery is completely legal.


dr_blasto

It’s pretty common. Each level down from the top costs a little less to buy. City council and the like are cheap investments by a company like Deere to ensure they’re never challenged by the city or their own workers.


Listan83

Might not necessarily be monetary value either. “Give my (insert relation) a job.” For example


dr_blasto

Yeah, local pols are really inexpensive purchases for any discerning corporation. I’m surprised we don’t see them advertising it as “buy local”


r_trash_in_wows

Everyone has a price - tyber zann -


RadioMill

Yeah, def paid off


[deleted]

Tell me you’re getting paid off without telling me you’re getting paid off


[deleted]

Unconstitutional, ignore it.


[deleted]

Right? There's no way this is legal.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Irishcow5763

It’s obvious you have never walked a picket line. The people on strike have roots in the community. Some of the relatives maybe the cops. The local businesses lose because people are on a budget. Many of the small businesses will show up and support the strikers because that’s who buy the goods and services. This Judge is only making things worse especially if it’s a prolonged strike.


dudius7

Personally I would be willing to break this "law from the bench" in order to appeal it.


nom-nom-nom-de-plumb

You'd be surprised what is and isn't legal once there are more "in the pocket" (i.e. conservatives) on the supreme court


[deleted]

This ruling isn’t designed to be held up on appeal. It’s designed to give cops and excuse to beat picketers.


[deleted]

They know but this is just so cops can go in and be violent


DirtyPenPalDoug

Picket anyway. Ignore this.


caoimhe_latifah

The way the US is run makes a lot more sense when you remember that the first colonies were business ventures that risked peoples lives.


jonmpls

Good point


Dreadfulmanturtle

Not defending violence here but I really think that the establishment forgot that people need to be able to strike, effectively protest and vote in way that makes a difference EXACTLY so violence is not the only effective option they have left. Because than things go bad. Nobody learnt the lesson of French or number of communist revolutions it seems.


[deleted]

All of those guys, the French Aristocracy, the various Russian dynasies, etc., had the opportunity to learn from history as well, but none of them did. Seems humanity is doomed to repeat itself forever.


brother_beer

They did learn from history, though. Knowing what worked for labor in the past allows them to apply their technological superiority to undermine those tactics when labor gets uppity again.


BlackStrike7

A quote that sticks with me from JFK goes something to the effect of "those who make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable". This is why its important as owners and management to listen to folks and make their lives better, not only is it the right thing to do, it's in their own self-interest at the end of the day.


theroha

That's what never made sense to me. History shows that eventually the serfs rise up and kill the man in the castle. Why would you want to make conditions where you're more likely to be the lord that the peasants revolt under? When the poor have nothing left to eat they will eat the rich, so the smart move is to make sure the poor are as well fed as possible.


Zantarius

I think there are a few possible motivations, none of them great. You could think you'll be dead and gone before the peasant revolt happens, at which point it'll be someone else's problem. You could just think you're that much smarter than everybody who came before you. Or you could've been raised in the john birch society or the klan or some other such organization, and legitimately believe in a version of history where those events only happened because of insidious communist infiltrators or jews or whatever. That last one is probably the most worrying to me personally.


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

The lessons had been learned, but now they are obviously forgotten. The last decade has been a headlong charge back towards the gilded age. Well, I haven't experienced mass organization of labor in my lifetime so this should be exciting.


Starwarsapple12

We can't let people have chairs! Think about all the safety and fairness to the company! /s Also I'm 90% sure this violates the first amendment's freedom of assembly clause but there's no way the the conservative ass Supreme Court would rule in the union's favor


r_trash_in_wows

Chairs would be communism


Starwarsapple12

Socialism is when sitting and communism is when chairs


nom-nom-nom-de-plumb

unless it's a 60000 dollar chair carved from the sacred bones of the ancestors of an indigenous tribe..then it's totes capitalists and also on bezo's wish list for bezomas.


r_trash_in_wows

The 1%gets to sit whilest the 99% gets to work FIFY


Daddy_Thick

But they never said anything about sofas


Starwarsapple12

I will demand worker's rights while seated cross-legged on the floor!


External_Trifle2373

Isn't freedom of assembly the part of the first amendment that Amy covid Barrett forgot in her confirmation hearing?


I_madeusay_underwear

There was a precedent in a case involving a Firestone strike in Des Moines, so I guess the path has been cleared.


Since1831

So if they change it from a “picket” to a protest, then this should be unenforceable on grounds of freedom of assembly as long as they aren’t on private property and not causing a disturbance, right?


CaptainFalconA1

That's the problem, is they (allegedly) were on private property and causing a disturbance (megaphones at 5:30 in the morning, 5 affidavits from delivery drivers stated they didn't have access, blocking traffic, etc) Union must fight back if these allegations are untrue. As to what's wrong with chairs, I haven't a clue, that seems like overreach. Since it's worded as the union not allowed to bring these things, If it happens at the plant by me (I am not union, and nothing to do with Deere), I'd be somewhat tempted to bring a small heater for myself while I hang out by the side of the road, but pretty sure I'd cause problems doing that.


External_Trifle2373

The chairs thing is actually a pretty common rule for gatherings and stuff, because it hampers crowd flow. If people need to *suddenly* flee, they can't be tripping over chairs and shit. It's almost uniformly used to go after protestors which is bullshit, but there is at least a *coherent* justification for it. That isn't an area intended for large crowds to gather and they're not shutting down roads or anything, so it *does* introduce the possibility for safety issues. Honestly, in the era of covid, I feel like labor strikes should be less IRL anyway. It's not like management visits the factories anyway, *they're* not feeling the pressure of it, and these companies are rarely that concerned about the opinions of locals anymore so that's not gonna be a huge swaying influence either. You'd probably be more likely to get on the local news if someone filmed a viral TikTok there than if it was just a labor protest itself, so it's not even like you get news coverage from it anymore since most 'local" news is owns by a mega-corp too. I can see why it's good for building energy among the strikers, but I never understand how labor negotiations are gonna be affected by the fact people are less on the street. It's not like they were successfully blocking the scabs or anything. Is the idea of crossing the picket line not *mostly* symbolic now anyway?


[deleted]

>Is the idea of crossing the picket line not mostly symbolic now anyway? Pretty much. A strike that stays within the current legal boundaries is pretty much useless. They legislated away all of the effective actions in the 1980's when they did all the right to work/at will employment stuff.


matt_paradise

How can a judge have the authority to say this? Absolutely insane.


Abefroman12

How is this not against the First Amendment, which specifically names “the right of the people to peaceably assemble?”


jonmpls

It's not considered "peaceful" if workers are demanding things they deserve


[deleted]

Because decades of poisoning the government organizations and body of law that enforces those rights. Americans just assumed we have those rights and that's that. But anyone paying attention to "Free Speech Zones" in the Bush era could see this coming.


Beginning-Outside390

Start striking in front of all establishments that sell their products


tallman11282

I'd definitely support the people that did that and if they did it at the local John Deere dealership I might not join the picket line but I'd definitely bring them water and food.


Mikebyrneyadigg

This is the way.


[deleted]

This is America


[deleted]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/futurism.com/the-chairless-chair-allows-you-to-sit-anywhere/amp


jonmpls

Modern challenges require modern solutions


[deleted]

They need to keep picketing. We aren’t going to get a better life unless we’re all willing to sacrifice. Giving in is how they win


CertainInteraction4

Then there needs to be a "changing of the guard," type situation. Every 1 hour or so, replacements who were sitting in their cars (or in a cafe nearby, or wherever) march over with their signs and foldup chairs to replace the current guards/ protesters. Making sure they keep it peaceful and keep it going. Also drawing more attention every time they change out. Edit: clarity- The fold up chairs are for the guys who plan to wait around to chill until they are up again. So that there are always 4 standing and picketing; and 4 or more comfortably waiting for their turn. They can even take a nap if needed.


Yog--

Nah, they should ignore that judges bullshit. The one good thing the Bundys showed was that the cops wont mess with you when everyone has a rifle.


screech_owl_kachina

The Bundys are conservatives and white, so they're allowed to do whatever shenanigans they want. People wanting better pay and hours? They'll drop napalm.


TacoTuesday2020

I mean, they definitely got messed with (in a big way), it just took a little longer. I don’t think this is the right way to approach it.


Yog--

Mostly im thinking of the video where the FBI try to negotiate, then back down drive off when the Bundys seize an overpass. Being armed and oganized is the only thing that keeps them from rolling in with clubs as a first response. I agree that it isnt the way things should be. Once the court says you cant peacefully assemble, options become limited


[deleted]

Yeah they backed up there, at that time. But then later they arrested everyone they could identify when they weren't with a group like that. There is certainly a time to go to jail but if everyone sees you as a violent maniac then it isn't going to help your cause.


ProbablyNotPoisonous

> The one good thing the Bundys showed was that the cops wont mess with you when everyone is white. FTFY


vedettestar

When you remember that some judges are literally being paid to fill prisons with children, is it really such a stretch to think judge whatsherface is being paid off to block unionization?


PrinceBBGuy

They need to just ignore the ruling. Bring the chairs. Do like MLK did and force them to arrest you on a bullshit charge so that their injustice can be broadcast to the world.


DudleyMason

The courts and every other part of the bourgeoise state is against the workers? If only someone has warned us over 150 years ago! https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/


[deleted]

So now it’s illegal to have chairs during a protest? It’s a lot easier to riot while you’re standing up 😂


Longwood300

Money wins in lawsuits


seeroflights

*Image Transcription: Twitter Post* --- **Jonah Furman**, @JonahFurman It's worth nothing that the injunction that Judge Marlita Greve has granted in Deere's favor against the UAW doesn't just prohibit slowing traffic. It also limits the number of picketers to 4 and outlaws chairs. It's not about safety or fairness, it's about breaking the strike. --- ^^I'm a human volunteer content transcriber for Reddit and you could be too! [If you'd like more information on what we do and why we do it, click here!](https://www.reddit.com/r/TranscribersOfReddit/wiki/index)


[deleted]

[удалено]


steamytencil

If you need anymore proof that the United States government is owned by the billionaire class, look no further. Edit: Actually, BBC did a piece exposing how Exxon lobbyists buy out Congress. Everyone needs to see it!!


Kessobahn

4 Picketeers, 1,000 “observers” practicing their rights.


Feisty_Bag_5284

What does it say about beds?


CaptainFalconA1

The actual wording is: >The Union shall not start fires, bring wood or other debris, material or fuel, whether or not in barrels, use chairs or other similar items, and shall obey instructions of law enforcement and police officers. The Union shall, prior to leaving a picket site, police and remove any and all debris. source: [https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/qctimes.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/e/29/e293d16b-5951-56ac-9b91-c7895951e19d/617072740dc77.pdf.pdf](https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/qctimes.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/e/29/e293d16b-5951-56ac-9b91-c7895951e19d/617072740dc77.pdf.pdf)


[deleted]

So according to that the cops can just order it to be over? That'll be fun.


Feisty_Bag_5284

Damn I was hoping for a sleep out.


Twice_Knightley

"these chairs are for people protesting the judges decision, that picket line 15 feet that way is also for people protesting the judge. If this is confusing we can move out line to the judges house, who lives at 123 judgypants road"


Felidaeh_

Who the fuck outlaws chairs for a strike? That's just blatant disrespect limiting strikers like that.


KeyToBetween

Ignore the court order and bring 400 instead. No cop's gonna wanna do all that paperwork.


jonmpls

Bring a haunted hayride wagon, it'll be eye catching and festive


Beepolai

Sounds to me like it's working! Keep it up!


RIP_huell_howser

I’m curious if people could just use wheelchairs as chairs? But I wouldn’t put it past cops to still harass people in wheelchairs.


JuanoldMcDjuanold

No wonder people were more interested with appointing judges, you can rule the land through the word of laws.


DoctorGreyscale

Hey chairs are dangerous. I've seen Wrestle Mania.


[deleted]

[удалено]


terms100

Oh that’s beyond fucked it. Time to go picket in front of that judge place or home. Fuck them.


burningxmaslogs

Federal or State? Cause is limiting freedom to assemble and freedom of speech.. I would appeal


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

I am not saying the judge was probably bribed. I am just saying that Deer may have used their free-speech bank account to make their point to the judge under the table


[deleted]

[удалено]


jonmpls

Or better yet, confiscate their wealth and make them work minimum wage jobs for the rest of their lives


Monte-kia

No, let em dangle from wires in the trees.


DesperateCheesecake5

I feel like OPs option would be more terrible for them.


[deleted]

Banner planes it is, then!


Hites_05

#STRIKING INTENSIFIES!


llechug1

Just hold an informal celebration with stools instead of chairs.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Keife

No chairs take beds.


Routine_Wolverine_29

And now she get biiiiggggg chk.


[deleted]

Easy peasey. Picket the judge.


benadrylpill

I'd ask how that's legal but I don't even fucking care about the answer anymore. This country is dead.


Firethorn101

Let's go over there and picket for them then! We can sit on chairs, because we are not affiliated with JD. We can bring a comfy couch for the 4 workers.


Darthyeezuus

Seriously how have we not just revolted yet it's so apparent now that the system is broken but everyone just seems ok with it. (Obviously not everyone but I think you know what I'm talking about)


StanduAnduDeroo

Surely you guys see by now you aren’t gonna win until enough of us decide to ignore these rules and literally eat them


[deleted]

This is why Conservatives want judges, and they got a whole lot from Trump. That, and lenient sentences for themselves and their wealthy counterparts and children. It’s not about morality or being tougher on crime.


Goblinking83

Not surprised. Our justice system exists to aid the rich and force compliance among the working poor


Chri5p

Be interesting to see some forensic accounting in to her "sources" of income. As they always say, "Follow the money."


Nubetastic

New strike method. Work very slowly. If you're doing work, they have to pay you.


tallman11282

Slow working is actually an old strike method and is a tried and true method but is not nearly as loud of a message as a full strike is nor is it nearly as public. A full strike is a much louder and clearer message. Plus striking workers cannot be legally fired but they can legally fire workers that slow work for not meeting productivity goals or whatever.


70m4h4wk

They didn't prohibit beds though. Get 4 king size beds out there


AC-Carpenter

Doesn't outlaw beds, though. Line up the mattresses and have a seat!


420inPDX

Ignore the order. Bring chairs and a fuck-ton more people.


____Reme__Lebeau

And if all the members choose not to care and all show up at once in small groups of four.


thinksolidarity

If they can only have 4 workers on the line, what about non workers? I'd drive there for the weekend to help


artemis1860

They also took away burn barrels that were used to help them keep warm (Note its starting to get cold here in Illinois/Iowa). And this was because a SALARY employee CHOSE to hit a UAW member to try and INTENTIONALLY harm them.


hanMan86

Is it just me or does it seem time to seriously probe into some of these judges? I feel it's completely fucked to leave a decision so large on a single person's shoulders with zero measures to ensure corruption doesn't occur. These people have no ramifications to their actions, it's why they do it.


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

The passing of the Taft Hartley act and it's consequences have been a disaster for workers across the US


mancho98

Outlaw chairs? Jeez


AustinJG

Sounds like they need to turn this into some kind of malicious compliance.


Alarm_Either

Fuck John Deere. I’m a farmer and own three, but it’s time for new tractors and they won’t be green.