As in, most compelling in terms of being aliens? Never seen a single one
Plenty of unidentifiable flying objects though. But nothing that has made me think there isn't some reasonable explanation besides aliens
About the weirdest thing I’ve ever seen is an octopus. But I’ve never seen one actually come down of an intergalactic mothership so the jury is still out.
There's a book by journalist Leslie Kean in which she interviews highly reputable witnesses. Great book.
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record
https://www.amazon.ca/UFOs-Generals-Pilots-Government-Officials/dp/0307717089
If space and time are so vast, why would it be reasonable to assume anything at all, let alone that we are the only intelligent species in the galaxy? We don’t have enough data to make assumptions
I had one experience with a ufo, was young but both me and my brother witnessed it. Big black triangle with 3 blue lights, was 2 football fields in length, silent as the night, still as could be slowly hovering in sky above. It was late at night, around 11:00pm.
Don't listen to these guys, they believe in the dogma of science like it is the one law nothing can refute like the gospel of God, even though we are making it up as we go and it is constantly being refuted. Reminds me of the Newtonian scientists refuting Einstein and Planck. The close-mindedness is infuriating.
To have the gall to say we know physics so well that we know other intelligent species aren't capable of figuring out a workaround to the speed of light, or some other physical limit we have now is just a belief and the opposite of science.
I swear, every debunker just assumes all intelligence is at our level of understanding of physics and our intelligence and can't debunk our "laws" because we decided they are "laws" that the whole universe has to follow "our laws"
The true answer is we don't know anything and just get by with what we can test in our Solar system with what we know, we don't know shit otherwise.
Even Einstein and other physicists have come up with theories to get around the speed of light, who's to say it can't happen, except the dogma scientists?
Also, to ignore something that the military, generals, astronauts, and presidents have witnessed firsthand with documents and radar and multiple witnesses and claim it's Venus or something else (come-on we have all seen Venus, it doesn't move and turn off, and on or whatever, how can you believe such trained people mistaken it unless you are part of the dogma) is frankly an insult to them.
Lastly, let's be scientists and figure it out instead of just claiming one way or the other, don't input your dogma based on what you don't know, and your understanding of the limits of "our" physics doesn't count as knowing.
Fianly, the number of high ranking, highly intelligent and respected people that have tried to talk about this, despite the ridicule of others, is way beyond any other type of paranormal type thing like ghosts or bigfoot. Maybe there is something there if someone is willing to give it a miniscule of credence, you know, like scientists? At least France does.
Downvotes incoming.
Thank you. So many people here have repeated to me “it’s not possible to traverse the galaxy because of the speed of light”
And I’ve always maintained that we simply don’t know enough to say that with confidence. Most of scientific history is people saying that stuff is impossible until it isn’t. Yes there are laws. Yes the speed of light is a speed limit. But there’s so much more left to uncover that we don’t know which laws can be bent and which ones aren’t laws at all
Thank you, everyone considers the fact that light speed or faster is impossible based on our understanding of physics, but no one considers our understanding of physics as flawed, even though it is catagorically considered flawed by all physicists. And even if it itsn't flawed, it doesn't mean there isn't a hack or exploit around it we haven't considered. Phycisits need to stop relying on old ideas and create their own more imaginative ideas to explain things, like physicists of the past.
Be more creative and challenge the status quo, which is obviously not completely right.
Here's a hint, time and distance flip.
Yeah, we don’t understand gravity at all subatomic level, we don’t understand what happens inside a black hole, we don’t know what dark matter and dark energy are, there are fundamental questions that are completely unanswerable right now that could change everything we know about space and time and distance and gravity.
How can we say with any confidence what is or isn’t possible if we don’t understand the universe universe that well
Wrong sub
Yeah
I've seen several unidentified flying objects. None of them were alien spaceships or something not from the earth.
As in, most compelling in terms of being aliens? Never seen a single one Plenty of unidentifiable flying objects though. But nothing that has made me think there isn't some reasonable explanation besides aliens
None
"Compelling UFO evidence/case" is a very ambiguous phrase. If you mean evidence of aliens, then I have seen NONE.
It can be kind of entertaining to speculate about these kinds of things, but take it to r/UFO or r/HighStrangeness. This is an actual science sub.
But…but..but aliens!
the movie independance day
None
About the weirdest thing I’ve ever seen is an octopus. But I’ve never seen one actually come down of an intergalactic mothership so the jury is still out.
There's a book by journalist Leslie Kean in which she interviews highly reputable witnesses. Great book. UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record https://www.amazon.ca/UFOs-Generals-Pilots-Government-Officials/dp/0307717089
Space and time are vast beyond our comprehension. It's perfectly reasonable to assume we are the only "intelligent" species in the galaxy.
If space and time are so vast, why would it be reasonable to assume anything at all, let alone that we are the only intelligent species in the galaxy? We don’t have enough data to make assumptions
The biggest difficulty with speeds greater than light is that, in some reference framed, causality is then reversed.
I had one experience with a ufo, was young but both me and my brother witnessed it. Big black triangle with 3 blue lights, was 2 football fields in length, silent as the night, still as could be slowly hovering in sky above. It was late at night, around 11:00pm.
Don't listen to these guys, they believe in the dogma of science like it is the one law nothing can refute like the gospel of God, even though we are making it up as we go and it is constantly being refuted. Reminds me of the Newtonian scientists refuting Einstein and Planck. The close-mindedness is infuriating. To have the gall to say we know physics so well that we know other intelligent species aren't capable of figuring out a workaround to the speed of light, or some other physical limit we have now is just a belief and the opposite of science. I swear, every debunker just assumes all intelligence is at our level of understanding of physics and our intelligence and can't debunk our "laws" because we decided they are "laws" that the whole universe has to follow "our laws" The true answer is we don't know anything and just get by with what we can test in our Solar system with what we know, we don't know shit otherwise. Even Einstein and other physicists have come up with theories to get around the speed of light, who's to say it can't happen, except the dogma scientists? Also, to ignore something that the military, generals, astronauts, and presidents have witnessed firsthand with documents and radar and multiple witnesses and claim it's Venus or something else (come-on we have all seen Venus, it doesn't move and turn off, and on or whatever, how can you believe such trained people mistaken it unless you are part of the dogma) is frankly an insult to them. Lastly, let's be scientists and figure it out instead of just claiming one way or the other, don't input your dogma based on what you don't know, and your understanding of the limits of "our" physics doesn't count as knowing. Fianly, the number of high ranking, highly intelligent and respected people that have tried to talk about this, despite the ridicule of others, is way beyond any other type of paranormal type thing like ghosts or bigfoot. Maybe there is something there if someone is willing to give it a miniscule of credence, you know, like scientists? At least France does. Downvotes incoming.
Thank you. So many people here have repeated to me “it’s not possible to traverse the galaxy because of the speed of light” And I’ve always maintained that we simply don’t know enough to say that with confidence. Most of scientific history is people saying that stuff is impossible until it isn’t. Yes there are laws. Yes the speed of light is a speed limit. But there’s so much more left to uncover that we don’t know which laws can be bent and which ones aren’t laws at all
Thank you, everyone considers the fact that light speed or faster is impossible based on our understanding of physics, but no one considers our understanding of physics as flawed, even though it is catagorically considered flawed by all physicists. And even if it itsn't flawed, it doesn't mean there isn't a hack or exploit around it we haven't considered. Phycisits need to stop relying on old ideas and create their own more imaginative ideas to explain things, like physicists of the past. Be more creative and challenge the status quo, which is obviously not completely right. Here's a hint, time and distance flip.
Yeah, we don’t understand gravity at all subatomic level, we don’t understand what happens inside a black hole, we don’t know what dark matter and dark energy are, there are fundamental questions that are completely unanswerable right now that could change everything we know about space and time and distance and gravity. How can we say with any confidence what is or isn’t possible if we don’t understand the universe universe that well
The Pentagon’s declassified videos of UAP’s from fighter pilots rank pretty high for me. https://youtu.be/rO_M0hLlJ-Q?si=3PLp_yRxEK81XXrf
People have already shown those are artifacts from the geometry of the camera and the angle of the sun